How to Trace the Growth in Learners’ Active Vocabulary? -- a corpus based study Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska TEFL Unit University of Łódź.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research background Research project on the development of L2 proficiency in French, English and Dutch in different educational contexts. Theoretical,
Advertisements

Corrective Feedback – pronunciation errors How effective it is in learning L2 oral communication Nguyễn Thị Tố Hạnh.
Tracking L2 Lexical and Syntactic Development Xiaofei Lu CALPER 2010 Summer Workshop July 14, 2010.
CRELLA University of Bedfordshire May 2012 Parvaneh Tavakoli Effects of Task Design on Native and Non-native Task Performance.
Metaphorical Uses of Language in Native and Non-native Student Writing: A corpus-based study By: Claudia Marcela Chapetón Castro M.A. in Applied Linguistics.
Vocabulary Assessment Norbert Schmitt University of Nottingham
The many faces of distribution: tracing the development of linguistic structures in learner writing Maisa Martin University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Enhancing English Vocabulary Learning and Teaching at Primary Level
Improving lexical richness by text analysis software Arthur McNeill The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Session 2 Vocabulary size and vocabulary profiles of studentsVocabulary size and vocabulary profiles of students Often used in proficiency or entrance.
Guiraud’s Index Michael Daller BAAL 2010 Aberdeen.
1 Measuring maturity Richard Hudson Institute of Education, London July 2009.
Good teaching, good teachers and comparative analysis Fernando Reimers.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Some research into vocabulary teaching and learning Referring to pp of: Read, J. (2004). Research in teaching vocabulary. Annual Review of Applied.
1 Vocab Assessment & Corpora and Concordancing Major vocabulary assessment tools Major corpora and concordancers.
Corpus Linguistics What can a corpus tell us ? Levels of information range from simple word lists to catalogues of complex grammatical structures and.
Session 2 Vocabulary size and vocabulary profiles of studentsVocabulary size and vocabulary profiles of students An indicator of proficiency levelAn indicator.
Sifter for classifying books dense (or not) in family history information & for selecting 3-page sequences for evaluation Deryle Lonsdale 1 Oct
Assessing Vocabulary Development in Upper Elementary Writing
Masaryk University, Brno Friday 13 th September Katie Mansfield
Investigating the ‘parallelness’ of speaking narrative tasks Chihiro INOUE PhD student at Lancaster University TBLT
Featured Colloquium Tasks across modalities Convenors: Folkert Kuiken & Ineke Vedder University of Amsterdam TBLT 2009, Lancaster, September 14, 2009.
The development of academic literacy in bilingual settings: a corpus-based research on the rise of subordination in CLIL Francisco Lorenzo Jyväskylä, 2012.
PAUL ALEXANDRU CHIRITA STEFANIA COSTACHE SIEGFRIED HANDSCHUH WOLFGANG NEJDL 1* L3S RESEARCH CENTER 2* NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND PROCEEDINGS OF THE.
ENG 626 CORPUS APPROACHES TO LANGUAGE STUDIES exploring frequencies in texts Bambang Kaswanti Purwo
Averil Coxhead Hüsem Korkmaz MA TEFL. was developed from a corpus of 5 million words with the needs of ESL/EFL learners in mind, contains the most widely.
What is the CELDT? California English Language Development Test PURPOSE:  to identify students who are English Learners  to monitor progress in learning.
CCR Anchor Standard 10 – Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently 10/18/2015MSDE2.
Vocabulary Acquisition Learning and teaching vocabulary.
Proposal Presentation: The Relationship among English Proficiency, Vocabulary Knowledge and the Lexical Richness in Writing of Taiwanese Senior High School.
S.3 English Speaking Camp 18th - 20th July, 2001.
Working with learners who are reading at starting points a focus on vocabulary Sue Dymock & Sue Douglas.
Word usage of L2 learners in performing narrative tasks: An analysis of task types and learner proficiencies 2007 TBLT Conference, Honolulu Hung-Tzu Huang.
Barbara A. Pijan = Dec Vocabulary for IELP Tutors Dec-2011 Vocabulary Skills for IELP Tutors.
VOCABULARY LEARNING THROUGH READING Warren Matsuoka & David Hirsh University of Sydney Australia INSERT YOUR ORGANIZATION’S LOGO HERE The results suggest.
Why do students and teachers like vocabulary tests? Is the popularity justified? Arthur McNeill
An assessment of L2 vocabulary following an intensive course István Thékes University of Szeged Doctoral School of Educational Science.
Lina Bikelienė Vilnius University 3 September, 2010 Connector usage in advanced Lithuanian learners’ English writing.
Assessing Vocabulary and Writing
Introducing Assessment Tools. What is an assessment tool? The instrument/s and procedures used to gather and interpret evidence of competence: –Instrument.
Five Energizing Activities to Boost Vocabulary Production and Retention.
Development of L2 Pragmatic Competence: The Data-Driven Teaching of German Modal Particles Based on a Learner Corpus Nina Vyatkina Penn State University.
学习者书面语中的程序化词汇研究 Procedural vocabulary and EFL writing quality 梁茂成
1 Ch 1. VOCABULARY SIZE, TEXT COVERAGE & WORD LISTS Nation& Waring.
Putting it All Together Xiaofei Lu APLNG 596D July 17, 2009.
Q_Lex: A test of word recognition for Japanese learners: practical assessment, and lexicon structure David Coulson A presentation.
Session 2 Vocabulary size and vocabulary profiles of studentsVocabulary size and vocabulary profiles of students Often used in proficiency or entrance.
Reading Online Course Hu zhanqi. Learner Profile – Context: Non-English major students in Chinese university who master the general knowledge of English.
Use of Concordancers A corpus (plural corpora) – a large collection of texts, written or spoken, stored on a computer. A concordancer – a computer programme.
Diane Schmitt Nottingham Trent University
Automatic Writing Evaluation
Sun Feng Wang Junju Integrating Reading and Writing in ESP Teaching to Develop Students’ Lexis Sun Feng Wang Junju.
Nation on testing.
Chapter 07 – Rate, Ratio & Variation Q1
Vocabulary acquisition in language classrooms
Academic Teaching Excellence English as the medium of instruction
Ma Rui Tianjin Normal University
Anik Wulyani, PhD candidate

Copyright © American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Development in L1 Written Vocabulary between 6 and 14
How many lexical items do students need to know?
Text Inspector for materials & test developers
בניית שאלון לתלמיד PROFILES דבורה קצביץ.
How dimension change affects surface area and volume.
VOCABULARY ASSESSMENT
Advanced Higher Units.
Applied Linguistics.
Presentation transcript:

How to Trace the Growth in Learners’ Active Vocabulary? -- a corpus based study Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska TEFL Unit University of Łódź

Dimensions of learners’ vocabulary knowledge zpassive knowledge zactive knowledge in an elicitation task zactive knowledge in a free production task

Test measuring receptive vocabulary size zVocabulary Levels Test (Nation 1983, 1990) zEurocentres Vocabulary Size Test (Meara & Jones 1990)

Test measuring productive vocabulary size zVocabulary Levels Test (active version) (Laufer and Nation 1995)

Some measures of lexical richness zLexical Density zLexical Originality zLexical Variation zLexical Sophistication zOthers less frequently employed tests: semantic variation, lexical quality, T-unit length, error free T-unit length (Laufer and Nation 1995, Meunier 1998)

Reasearch aims zto compare the validity of two measures of lexical richness: ylexical variation ylexical sophistication zto trace and analyse the growth of receptive and productive vocabulary in advanced learners of English at two different proficiency levels

Tools zVocabulary Levels Test (receptive version) zWordsmith zVocabProfile

Vocabulary Levels Test zoriginal zprivate__________complete zroyal__________first zslow__________not public zsorry ztotal

Lexical variation measure zType/Token Ratios yType/Token Ratio yStandardised Type/Token Ratio (300 words) yStandardised Type/Token Ratio (150 words) yStandardised Type/Token Ratio (450 words) -- YEAR IV only

Lexical sophistication measure zLexical s ophistication: Lexical Frequency Profile y1000 y2000 yUWL (Xue & Nation 1984) ynot in the lists (> 2000)

Receptive vocabulary size YEAR I & YEAR IV zYEAR I 100 students range word families mean = 8236,1 SD = 936,136 zYEAR II 67 students range word families mean = 9218,21 SD = 665,933

Comparison of receptive vocab. YEAR I & YEAR IV

zmean Year I < mean Year IV zt = -7,41823 zP-value = 1,15253E-7

Essay statistics YEAR I & YEAR IV zYEAR I 100 essays range tokens mean = 486,75 SD = 64,8036 zYEAR II 67 essays range tokens mean = 714,343 SD = 124,573

Comparison of Type/Token Ratios YEAR I & YEAR IV

Lexical Frequency Profile YEAR I

Lexical Frequency Profile YEAR IV

Comparison of LFP levels YEAR I & YEAR IV

Comparison of Type/Token Ratios and receptive vocabulary size

Comparison of LFP levels and receptive vocabulary size