LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera1 Jet/Calorimeter Cluster Energy Corrections – Status Goal: To improve the individual jet energy determination based.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

US CMS H1/H2 Issues1 H C A L Dan is interested in the calibration of the HCAL for jets. He defines “R” as the measured energy of a pion, probably in ADC.

Advertisements

LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements Sufficient data for Energy Flow algorithm development Provide data for calorimeter tracking algorithms  Help setting.

PFA-Enhanced Dual Readout Crystal Calorimetry Stephen Magill - ANL Hans Wenzel - FNAL Outline : Motivation Detector Parameters Use of a PFA in Dual Readout.

Particle Flow Template Modular Particle Flow for the ILC Purity/Efficiency-based PFA PFA Module Reconstruction Jet Reconstruction Stephen Magill Argonne.

P. Gay Energy flow session1 Analytic Energy Flow F. Chandez P. Gay S. Monteil CALICE Coll.

Energy Flow in CMS ;-P 1 Colin Bernet & Patrick Janot, for the CMS PF group. PF discussion, Feb 15, 2011.

Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS

Calorimeter1 Understanding the Performance of CMS Calorimeter Seema Sharma,TIFR (On behalf of CMS HCAL)

Testbeam Requirements for LC Calorimetry S. R. Magill for the Calorimetry Working Group Physics/Detector Goals for LC Calorimetry E-flow implications for.

Single Particle Energy Resolution Vishnu V. Zutshi.

1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.

L. Perera LPC physics meeting 11/17/ Search for H/A →  Lalith Perera Rutgers University for Rutgers CMS Group Amit Lath, Keith Rose, Sunil Somalvar,

PFA on SiDaug05_np Lei Xia ANL-HEP. PFA outline Calibration of calorimeter –Done –Not tuned for clustering algorithm Clustering algorithm –Done: hit density.

 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.

 Performance Goals -> Motivation  Analog/Digital Comparisons  E-flow Algorithm Development  Readout R&D  Summary Optimization of the Hadron Calorimeter.

Clustering: Algorithm development and analysis R. Cassell, G. Bower.

Individual Particle Reconstruction Norman Graf SLAC April 28, 2005.

1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.

PFA Development – Definitions and Preparation 0) Generate some events w/G4 in proper format 1)Check Sampling Fractions ECAL, HCAL separately How? Photons,

Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.

Energy Flow Studies Steve Kuhlmann Argonne National Laboratory for Steve Magill, Brian Musgrave, Norman Graf, U.S. LC Calorimeter Group.

Scintillator (semi)DHCAL? Vishnu Zutshi for. Introduction Can a scintillator (semi)digital calorimeter work? Cell sizes are necessarily 6-12 cm 2 Can.

1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.

Application of Neural Networks for Energy Reconstruction J. Damgov and L. Litov University of Sofia.

Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL – ANL Approach Steve Magill ANL 1 st step - Track extrapolation thru Cal – substitute for Cal.

Study of a Compensating Calorimeter for a e + e - Linear Collider at Very High Energy 30 Aprile 2007 Vito Di Benedetto.

Progress with the Development of Energy Flow Algorithms at Argonne José Repond for Steve Kuhlmann and Steve Magill Argonne National Laboratory Linear Collider.

Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.

Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.

Jet Energy Scale at CMS Anwar A Bhatti June 8, 2006 XII International Conference on Calorimetry Chicago IL, USA.

Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.

PFA Template Concept Performance Mip Track and Interaction Point ID Cluster Pointing Algorithm Single Particle Tests of PFA Algorithms S. Magill ANL.

16-Nov-2002Konstantin Beloous1 Digital Hadron Calorimeter Energy Resolution.

Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.

Two Density-based Clustering Algorithms L. Xia (ANL) V. Zutshi (NIU)

1 Calorimetry Simulations Norman A. Graf for the SLAC Group January 10, 2003.

UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation Jae Yu * UTA DoE Site Visit Nov. 13, 2003 (*On behalf of the UTA team; A. Brandt, K. De, S. Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee,

Results from particle beam tests of the ATLAS liquid argon endcap calorimeters Beam test setup Signal reconstruction Response to electrons  Electromagnetic.

PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.

Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.

13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),

CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.

1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.

US CMS UC Riverside, 18-May-2001, S.Kunori1 Status of JetsMET Shuichi Kunori U. of Maryland 18-May-2001 PRS: Physics Reconstruction and Selection.

1 1 - To test the performance 2 - To optimise the detector 3 – To use the relevant variable Software and jet energy measurement On the importance to understand.

Individual Particle Reconstruction The PFA Approach to Detector Development for the ILC Steve Magill (ANL) Norman Graf, Ron Cassell (SLAC)

Minbias Miss ET Study1 H C A L 100 Minbias - Hit Flags All “hits” are ~ 1000 in HCAL and ~ 7000 in ECAL for 1 crossing. Appears to be ECAL “noise”. Set.

Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.

7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.

Dijet Mass and Calibration1 H C A L Z(700) Data and Calibration Dan Green Fermilab June, 2001.

Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.

Energy Reconstruction in the CALICE Fe-AHCal in Analog and Digital Mode Fe-AHCal testbeam CERN 2007 Coralie Neubüser CALICE Collaboration meeting Argonne,

DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE

ECAL Interaction layer PFA Template Track/CalCluster Association Track extrapolation Mip finding Shower interaction point Shower cluster pointing Shower.

1 Jet Reconstruction and Energy Scale Determination in ATLAS Ariel Schwartzman 3 rd Top Workshop: from the Tevatron to ATLAS Grenoble, 23-Oct-2008.

Status of Reconstruction Studies for a Realistic Detector Ron Cassell SiD Workshop Nov. 15, 2010.

papas: CMS single particle tuning

Jet Energy Scale and Calibration Framework

Predrag Krstonosic - ILC Valencia

Dual Readout Clustering and Jet Finding

CALICE scintillator HCAL

Track Extrapolation/Shower Reconstruction in a Digital HCAL

Status of ECAL Optimization Study

Individual Particle Reconstruction

EM Linearity using calibration constants from Geant4

Plans for checking hadronic energy

Argonne National Laboratory

Michele Faucci Giannelli

Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation

LC Calorimeter Testbeam Requirements

Presentation transcript:

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera1 Jet/Calorimeter Cluster Energy Corrections – Status Goal: To improve the individual jet energy determination based on measured cluster structure. Response of the ECAL is different for EM particles (photons/ electrons) and hadrons. Energy determination will improve if we can separate EM particles and hadrons and apply separate corrections.

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera2 Classification –EM particles: Energy in ECAL should be okay as it is calibrated for electrons. –Non-interaction hadrons: All energy (except MIP), in HCAL and it is calibrated for hadrons (charged pions). –Interacting hadrons: deposit some energy in ECAL- needs to be corrected. Challenge: Overlapping particles (many particles going through the same cell)

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera3 Procedure Cluster cells in the ECAL and HCAL Match ECAL and HCAL clusters and find the fraction of ECAL energy ( f ) in the matched clusters : f= E/(E+H) Classification: 0.95 < f < 1 EM particle 0.1 < f < 0.95 Interacting hadron 0 < f < 0.1 non-interacting (MIP) hadrion energy in ECAL+ HCAL and ECAL energy > MIP interacting hadron also works

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera4 Analysis Using a 120 GeV Z´  q q (u,d,s) MC sample ( no noise or pile-up) Analysis done in ExRootAnalys Currently considering ECAL /HCAL barrel A simple algorithm to cluster ECAL and HCAL cells separately in eta-phi: –Seed cell E T >0.5 GeV –Add neighboring (3x3) cells (dR< 0.03 for ECAL, dR<0.15 for HCAL) –Mark out used cells Match ECAL and HCAL clusters (dR <0.15)

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera5 EB cluster HB cluster + pion + proton + photon Jet

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera6 number of GenJets pT >10GEV GenJet  Number of RecJets RecJet 

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera7 jet energy in charged hadrons (  K p) 12 Energy in all charged hadrons within a cone of 0.5 around GEnJet axis (as a fraction of GenJet energy) At the IP After propagating them to HCAL in 4T.

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera8 RecJet GenJet comparison RecJet has 60% of the energyDijet mass form RecJet is 70% of from GenJet

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera9 ECAL/HCAL Cluster matching ( R<0.15 ) within a jet outside the jets

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera10 Energy distribution in clusters 35% of jet energy is in uniquely matched clusters One ECAL cluster matching one HCAL cluster Easier to do energy correction 30 of jet energy is in clusters which have multiple matches Energy correction is not straightforward

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera11 Cluster Energy Correction estimate the energy correction from a simple fit to test beam data (for now) Use ECAL+HCAL energy of unique match clusters as particle energy

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera12 energy correction Jet energy Correction: 4.5 % increase in jet energy

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera13 Improvement in DiJet mass Mean of dijet mass increased by 4.5% Width of the dijet mass decreased by 6.5% Small but in the right direction !

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera14 ECAL thresholds are too high (ECAL noise 40 MeV) Significance of the improvement of resolution is less when ECAL thresholds are lowerd (100 MeV)

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera15 dR pion photons within Jet dR pi/photon dR pion Jet axis dR pi/photon

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera16 Dijet mass from genJets Z’ mass 3

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera17 DiJet mass after propagating Particles to ECAL pT of pions within Jet

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera18 After rescaling pion energies by distribution in page 11 Dijet mass from RecJets

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera19 Charged hadrons photons Neutral Hadrons (n, K_L) Contribution to Jet Energy

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera20     Pion and ECAL cluster matching photon and ECAL cluster matching

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera21 There seems to be a non linearity in ECAL at low energies ECAL cluster energy/photon energy Photon energy GeV

LPC Jet/Met meeting 1/12/2006L. Perera22 Most of photons in the jet are in this region Cause under investigation: seems to be in digitization