Teachers for a New Era Teacher & Pupil Assessment Phase II: Numeracy and Literacy in Grades 2-8 Scott W. Brown, Ph.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Executive Officer Team Attainment in Perth and Kinross Schools September 2013.
Advertisements

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
PROJECT NEXUS A Title III National Professional Development Program Funded by The Office of English Language Acquisition of the U. S. Department of Education.
An Informational Overview: Dual Language Two-Way Immersion Magnet School of Choice.
October 9 th, 2013 Curriculum Presentation: State Assessments Grades 3-8.
Latino Students in the Worcester Public Schools March 30, 2010 Miren Uriarte Mauricio Gaston Institute for Latino Community Development and Public Policy.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Teachers for a New Era Pupil Assessment Phase I: Lessons Learned From a Town- Gown Partnership Jason Irizzarry, Ed.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University.
E DUCATIONAL E XPANSIONS E DUCATIONAL E XPANSIONS (EE ) Research Projects T EACHERS FOR A N EW E RA.
BEST Survey Results: Feeding Information Back to Institutions of Higher Education Scott W. Brown, Ph.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University of Connecticut.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
International Workshop on Graduate Programs for Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers at Tokyo University of Science Tad Watanabe Kennesaw State University.
Examining Teacher Quality and Teacher Preparation for English Language Learners: the Use of Multiple Data Sources Maria Coady, Alice Jo, Ramandeep Brar.
The Impact of a Faculty Learning Community Approach on Pre-Service Teachers’ English Learner Pedagogy Michael P. Alfano, John Zack, Mary E. Yakimowski,
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Joint Advisory Board/Working Group Meeting November 18, 2010 School of Education.
Building Capacity in Chinese and Arabic Pam Delfosse World Languages Education Consultant Claire Kotenbeutel Critical Language Fellows Project Consultant.
Maximizing Reading Gains to Meet AYP Targets: Decision Support Analytics for School Board Providence School District, RI April 2014.
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Using a 21st Century Classroom Grant to Transform Language Arts Classrooms Alice A. Christie, Ph.D. Jan Wolfgramm, M.Ed.
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
Next-Generation Standards and Accountability Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
SCHOOL REPORT CARD ASSESSMENT TRENDS REPORT
1 Up-date on Assessment in Connecticut Dr. Barbara Q. Beaudin, Associate Commissioner Division of Assessment and Accountability Chief, Bureau of Student.
Secondary Teacher Education and Professional Training (STEP T) for English Language Learners (ELLs) National Professional Development Program 2007:
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Review of Evidence Grade 6 Baseline Summary Data Reading and Writing Assessments October 12, 2011 Curriculum and Assessment Department.
Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.
PARCC AND MCAS FAQ FOR ADMINISTRATORS AND EDUCATORS Will Massachusetts use PARCC or MCAS in spring 2016? To evaluate PARCC’s quality, rigor,
Major Aspect of Comparison Formal EducationALS  Elementary Program (grade 1 to 6)  Secondary Program (1 st yr to 4 th yr)  Basic Literacy Program.
Teachers for a New Era: Evidence Study at California State University, Northridge Beverly Cabello Evidence Co-Leader, Teachers for a New Era James David.
Quality George Noell, Ph.D. Louisiana State University and A&M College/Louisiana Department of Education Kristin Gansle Louisiana State University and.
CLASSROOM TEACHERS IMPROVING CONTENT KNOWLEDGE & DELIVERY IN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOLS PowerPoint produced by the Pennsylvania Department of Education September,
ARTS EDUCATION in GEORGIA. Georgia Council for the Arts MISSION The mission of Georgia Council for the Arts is to cultivate the growth of vibrant, thriving.
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
Delaware’s Teacher Effectiveness Model Deb Hansen, Delaware Department of Education October 2012.
Quality George Noell, Ph.D. Louisiana State University and A&M College/ Louisiana Department of Education And Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Teacher Education in California SUSAN TOMA-BERGE, ED. D. COORDINATOR, UCI MULTIPLE SUBJECT CREDENTIAL PROGRAM.
Review of Evidence Grade 8 Baseline Summary Data Reading and Writing Assessments October 20, 2011 Curriculum and Assessment Department.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Principals’ Ad Hoc Meeting Julie Baker, Ph.D., Chief Academic Officer December 5, 2012 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL.
Teaching and Assessing for Learning – The schools’ curriculum, instructional design, and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and.
Quick Look at Minnesota’s Assessment Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Spring 2015 Verona PARCC Results: Year One Wednesday, March 16 7:00-8:00 p.m. VHS Learning Commons.
What is the 90/90/90 Research?  The Original Research  169 schools in high-poverty, high minority system  21 schools broke the mold – 90%
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
The College of Education and Human Services Educating professionals who impact the lives of adults and children.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Incoming 6 th grade Registration Information Night Welcome Class of 2023.
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
Gifted & Talented Students – Federal Update CEC Special Education Legislative Summit - July 11, 2016 Jane Clarenbach Director, Public Education.
The New Junior Cycle – An Introduction. Starting in September, your son/daughter will do the current Junior Certificate exam in all subjects except English,
100+ years of teacher education
Lindsay K. Lightner and Judith A. Morrison Washington State University
Literacy Plan Hanahan High School.
Close Reading and Instructional Rounds
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
LITERACY IN HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES, SCIENCE, AND TECHNICAL SUBJECTS
Impact Analyses for VAM Scores
Study Questions To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic standards and.
Student Mobility and Achievement Growth In State Assessment Mohamed Dirir Connecticut Department of Education Paper presented at National Conference.
ESOL Minor New Program Proposal Faculty Senate Meeting
1/13/2019 New Directions in Pupil Learning Assessment: Emerging Models from the Teachers for a New Era Initiative California State University, Northridge.
DESIGNING CURRICULUM TO MEET INTERNATIONAL TESTING STANDARDS
Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Release of Preliminary Value-Added Data Webinar
Local Control and Accountability Plan Annual Update for
Presentation transcript:

Teachers for a New Era Teacher & Pupil Assessment Phase II: Numeracy and Literacy in Grades 2-8 Scott W. Brown, Ph.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University of Connecticut

Teacher & Pupil Assessment Phase II: Numeracy and Literacy Planning October – April 2006 Larger scale –Multiple years (3 years) –Multiple sites Elementary and Middle schools in Connecticut –Grades Partnership Grants –School districts –Connecticut State Department of Education

Research Questions RQ 1 –Is there a difference in pupil achievement among teachers with specific characteristics Degree program – 4yr v 5yr –BA/BS v. MA Experience: Years teaching Alternate certification Late deciders

Research Questions RQ 2 –What is the impact of multiple Neag Teachers on pupil learning? By grade levels By area –Literacy and Numeracy RQ 3 –What are the impacts of Neag v. non Neag Teachers on special populations? Special education pupils Minority pupils English language learners

Measures - Pupils Connecticut Mastery Tests Self efficacy –Academic tasks –Reading –Numeracy Pupil products / artifacts

Measures – Teachers Program –Neag / Other / ARC Course preparation –# of courses in literacy Math Science Special ed ELL Multicultural issues Experience –Years teaching –Years teaching this specific grade

Measures – Teachers con’t Demographics Education Self efficacy –Teaching Reading Math Special populations –Classroom management

Analysis Plan Predicting pupil performance Value Added Models Growth Curve Analyses Measuring group differences - pupils - teachers

Implications Teacher preparation NCATE requirements of pupil impact Curriculum modifications for Pupils Preservice teachers Inservice teachers Data fields for a state-wide database system Model development Supported by evidence Replicable