Slews: Fast and Slow. Fast Slew Status  XMMSL1: catalogue of slew sources released May 2006 Revs 314-978, 5180 detections, 2692 Revs 314-978, 5180 detections,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
John Cunniffe Dunsink Observatory Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies Evert Meurs (Dunsink Observatory) Aaron Golden (NUI Galway) Aus VO 18/11/03 Efficient.
Advertisements

XMM-Newton 1 Matthias Ehle - SCI-OAX EPIC BGWG Meeting#6 November 5 th, 2007 BGWG Report from the June XMM-Newton User Group Meeting Matthias Ehle.
Overview Review of the Goddard method Update on instrument/detector evolution (a purely phenomenological approach) Characterization of the soft proton.
XMM EPIC MOS Jenny Carter 4 th EPIC BG WG Meeting Mallorca, 25/10/06 BGWG blank sky data analysis Jenny Carter, University of Leicester.
Epic-Cal 4 Feb 2003 Flux check Richard Saxton XMM-SOC/SSC Flux Comparisons.
Clusters as calibration tools S. Molendi (IASF-MI)
A Large Catalogue of Ultraluminous X-ray Source Candidates in Nearby Galaxies Madrid: 2010 DOM WALTON IoA, Cambridge, UK In collaboration with Jeanette.
15 years of science with Chandra– Boston 20141/16 Faint z>4 AGNs in GOODS-S looking for contributors to reionization Giallongo, Grazian, Fiore et al. (Candels.
Basic Principles of X-ray Source Detection Or Who Stole All Our Photons?.....
S.Mereghetti - Simbol-X: The hard X-ray Universe in focus - Bologna -15/5/20071 Studying the Galactic Ridge Emission with SIMBOL-X Sandro Mereghetti IASF.
The MOS Background (and XMM-ESAS)‏ K.D. Kuntz The Henry A. Rowland Dept of P&A Johns Hopkins University And occasionally GSFC With PN additions from S.L.Snowden.
ESTREMO meeting, IASF-BO 05/05/2006 M. Cocchi, J.J.M. In ‘t Zand X-ray Bursters with ESTREMO Looking for burst lines: investigating the NS EOS Superbursts.
Jonathan Gimeno Boal, UCM MODEL PSF EFFECTS OF PILE-UP Jonathan Gimeno Boal, UCM Tutor: Martin Stuhlinger.
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay ESAC 04/10/05 Implementation of the MOS spatial/temporal DRM: Does it work ? Zeta Puppis: Checking the line.
XMM EPIC MOS Steve Sembay EPIC Calibration Meeting Saclay 24/09/03 Epoch dependant MOS QE and RMF and Cross-calibration with the PN.
Probing the X-ray Universe: Analysis of faint sources with XMM-Newton G. Hasinger, X. Barcons, J. Bergeron, H. Brunner, A. C. Fabian, A. Finoguenov, H.
Marcus Kirsch Science Operations & Data Systems Division Research & Scientific Support Department Page 1 XMM-Newton MOS Timing Mode calibration Marcus.
Growth of Structure Measurement from a Large Cluster Survey using Chandra and XMM-Newton John R. Peterson (Purdue), J. Garrett Jernigan (SSL, Berkeley),
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC Calibration Meeting Leicester University 05/11/03 Update on refinement of the PSF - Spectral and spatial.
MOS 3x3 mode slow slew survey Richard Saxton October 2006.
The EPIC-pn spectral response Frank Haberl EPIC Cal meeting, Tübingen, February 2003 Status of the pn spectral response in SAS5.4.1 Latest developments.
UKIDSS SciVer Products E. A. Gonzalez-Solares (IoA, Cambridge) (+CASU) UKIDSS SV.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read for the BGWG CAL/OPS/BG Meeting Palermo, Sicily 11-13/04/07 EPIC Background Working Group Summary: Meeting.
The XMM-Newton Slew Survey Richard Saxton, M. Pilar Esquej Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri Andrew Read.
Early Results from SWIFT's BAT AGN Survey: XMM Follow-up Observations for 22 BAT AGNs Lisa Winter Lisa Winter (Grad Student at UMD) Richard Mushotzky (GSFC),
Source detection at Saclay Look for a fast method to find sources over the whole sky Provide list of positions, allowing to run maximum likelihood locally.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC CAL/OPS Meeting Mallorca, Spain 26-27/10/06 EPIC BGWG XMM-Newton EPIC BackGround Working Group founded.
The XMM-Newton Slew Survey: XMMSL1 Richard Saxton 1, M. Pilar Esquej 1,3, Andy Read 2, Michael Freyberg 3, Bruno Altieri 1, Diego Bermejo 1,4 1 ESAC 2.
The XMM slew survey: status and future Richard Saxton, Andrew Read, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC Calibration Meeting Saclay 24/09/03-25/09/03 Analysis of the X-ray PSF PSFs in the CCF MCG C273.
Bkg modeling for hot medium z Clusters Bkg modeling for hot medium z Clusters Alberto Leccardi Silvano Molendi.
XMM EPIC MOS Andy Read EPIC CAL/OPS Meeting MPE, Germany 04-05/05/06 EPIC BGWG XMM-Newton EPIC BackGround Working Group founded (~1.
XMM-Newton 1 D Lumb -- SCI-ST. EPIC TTD Nov01 EPIC Background Template Files Why we need them - previous attempts insufficient Adding together high galactic.
The XMM-Newton hard band wide angle Survey Nicoletta Carangelo and Silvano Molendi (IASF-MI(CNR)) Epic Consortium Meeting Palazzo Steri, Palermo,
Review of 2XMMp data products Anja Schröder, Univ of Leicester, UK John Pye, Univ of Leicester, UK.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy Lecture 19 EPIC background Event lists and selection The RGA Calibration quantities Exposure calculations.
RAS National Astronomy Meeting April 2006, University of Leicester, UK The XMM-Newton Slew Survey The excellent sensitivity of the XMM-Newton.
SPIE, San Diego, CA - 1 August 2005 Bruno Altieri, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 The XMM-Newton Slew Survey: processing challenges.
A multi-colour survey of NGC253 with XMM-Newton Robin Barnard, Lindsey Shaw Greening & Ulrich Kolb The Open University.
SAG+SASWG Meeting Potsdam /15 PN Tasks – Status Report (update since Leicester) Hermann Brunner - MPE  epframes:  The dark quadrant problem.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed with INTEGRAL and XMM- Newton Sinead McGlynn School of Physics University College Dublin.
A look at XMM slew data Richard Saxton, Andrew Read, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Puri Munuera.
The X-ray Universe September 2005, El Escorial, Madrid, Spain The XMM-Newton Slew Survey XMM-Newton Slew 1 (XMMSL1) Fig 1. Slew observation.
X-ray astronomy 7-11 September 2009, Bologna, Italy XMM-Newton slew survey hard band sources XMM-Newton slew survey hard band sources R.D. Saxton a, A.M.
Initial Results from the Chandra Shallow X-ray Survey in the NDWFS in Boötes S. Murray, C. Jones, W. Forman, A. Kenter, A. Vikhlinin, P. Green, D. Fabricant,
Fermi LAT Monash University Nov 21, 2009 R.DuboisFermi LAT Science Analysis Tutorial1 Issues in a Nutshell LS5039 Low stats: 4k photons in 1 yr Strong.
PSF in-flight calibration - PN IFC/CNRRingberg, April 2-4, 2002 PSF in-flight calibration for PN camera Simona Ghizzardi Silvano Molendi.
M. Pilar Esquej, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 Status of the XMM-Newton Slew Survey P. Esquej, R. Saxton, B. Altieri, A. Read, M. Freyberg,
SPI Data Analysis A. Strong MPE Moriond, Les Arcs 2002.
Swift as a Rapid Wide Field Follow-up Instrument John Nousek & Jamie Kennea Penn State University Phil Evans University of Leicester International Workshop.
XMM slew survey Richard Saxton 1, Andy Read 2, Pili Esquej 3, Michael Freyberg 3, Bruno Altieri 1 1. ESAC 2. University of Leicester 3. MPE XMM slew survey.
1 John Nousek & David Burrows (Penn State University) Alberto Moretti (Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera) X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Performance after Five.
25s detection of the Sy1 galaxy NGC3516 The Palermo BAT survey project Application to a sample of SDSS LINERs V. La Parola, A.Segreto, G. Cusumano, V.
M. Pilar Esquej, XMM-Newton European Space Astronomy Centre Page 1 Status of the XMM-Newton Slew Survey P. Esquej, R. Saxton, B. Altieri, A. Read, M. Freyberg,
Gamma-Ray Bursts with the ANTARES neutrino telescope S. Escoffier CNRS/CPPM, Marseille.
Update on the XMM Slew Survey Richard Saxton 1, M. Pilar Esquej 1 Andy Read 2, Michael Freyberg 3, Bruno Altieri 1, 1 ESAC 2 University of Leicester, U.K.
The Slow Slew Survey Richard Saxton / Pedro Rodriguez November 2006.
Absolute flux G source region – circle radius 2.7 arcmin Best fit po x phabs model:  = 1.86 ± 0.04 Nh = 1.91 ± 0.04 x cm -2 Flux (2-10 keV)
The XMM-Newton Slew Survey: XMMLS1 Richard Saxton 1, M. Pilar Esquej 1,3, Andy Read 2, Michael Freyberg 3, Bruno Altieri 1, Diego Bermejo 1,4 1 ESAC 2.
Extragalactic Survey with MAXI and First MAXI/GSC Catalog Extragalactic Survey with MAXI and First MAXI/GSC Catalog Yoshihiro Ueda Kazuo Hiroi, Naoki Isobe,
Swift-BAT as a Triggering Facility Amy Lien Scott Barthelmy, Hans Krimm NASA Goddard Space Flight Center The 4 th AMON workshop, Penn State University,
The XMM-Newton Slew Survey Richard Saxton, Andy Read, M. Pilar Esquej, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Diego Bermejo, Veronica Lazaro.
The X-ray Universe September 2005, El Escorial, Madrid, Spain Extended Sources in the XMM-Newton slew survey V. Lazaro a, R. Saxton a, A.M.Read.
The XMM-Newton Slew Survey
TDE in the XMM-Newton slew survey
XMM-Newton slew sources A quick analysis
EPIC Calibration & Operations Meeting
The spectral properties of Galactic X-ray sources at faint fluxes
TRAINEE PRESENTATION The North and South Ecliptic Pole fields population Project supervisors: R. Saxton N. Loiseau Trainee student: Jaime Abella Payá.
Temporal &Spatial Dependency of the MOS RMF
Presentation transcript:

Slews: Fast and Slow

Fast Slew Status  XMMSL1: catalogue of slew sources released May 2006 Revs , 5180 detections, 2692 Revs , 5180 detections, 2692 clean sources, 259 hard (2-10 keV) clean sources, 259 hard (2-10 keV) sources, 6200 square degrees, sources, 6200 square degrees, attitude error=8” (1 sigma) attitude error=8” (1 sigma) Read et al, 2006, PASJ - Scientific highlights Esquej et al, 2007, A&A – High variability galaxies Saxton et al, 2007, A&A (in prep) – Full description

SOFT keV HARD 2-12 keV

Fast Slew: work in progress  XMMSL1/delta-1 to be released May/June Revs , 110 slews, 3800 deg^2, 3850 detections. Revs , 110 slews, 3800 deg^2, 3850 detections. Still needs to be cleaned. Still needs to be cleaned. Total of 10,000 deg^2; about 4000 clean sources. Total of 10,000 deg^2; about 4000 clean sources.

Exposure Map XMMSL1 + Delta-1

Fast Slew: work in progress  XMMSL1/delta-1 to be released May/June Revs , 110 slews, 3800 deg^2, 3850 detections. Revs , 110 slews, 3800 deg^2, 3850 detections. Still needs to be cleaned. Still needs to be cleaned. Total of 10,000 deg^2; about 4000 clean sources. Total of 10,000 deg^2; about 4000 clean sources.  6000 deg^2 of useful slews still to process, further deltas planned to be released every few months. further deltas planned to be released every few months.

Fast Slew: fast turn-around Variability analysis o Retrieve SDF from XSA – days after observation o Initial processing to event file – 1 day o Split into discrete images – 1 day o Source search – 1 day o Calculate RASS upper limits, cross-correlate with NED, SIMBAD – 1 day Can find high variability slew sources days after slew in time for follow-up

XMMSL1 J Rev 25 c/s; >200 x brighter than RASS upper limit SWIFT Fits to Nh=3.2E20, BBOD=66 eV Also seen in Rev 4.0 c/s Probably a Nova on edge of LMC – typical T=20-80 eV Piled-up, no offset map but can do rough spectral work with slew data

XMMSL1 J SWIFT SWIFT UVOT B and UVW2

Slow Slew Available as link from SOC external web

Slow Slew Test  Scan over the Galactic plane at 30 degs/hour  Orbit legs covering 45 x ~0.5 degs with 15 arcmin overlap between legs ~200 deg^2  Open loop slew for 1.5 hours, followed by closed- loop slew of 17 mins to set position to start of next leg.  Operationally went very well  Drift was very small, typical offset was 2 arc mins. will increase if slew rate decreases

Properties Mean background (c/arcmin 2 ) from slew legs 5,7: INST INST PN PN M M M M But extraction region bigger for MOS because of extension in slew direction (1.5x depending on final frame time) Flux Limits INST INST PN 5x x x PN 5x x x PN+MOS1/2 4x x x PN+MOS1/2 4x x x PN: Exposure time ~6x normal slew, limits MOS ~3x lower eff. Area (depending on spectrum, etc.) but 2-3x lower backgnd. MOS 3x3 Pattern 0 = Singles + 2/3 doubles + 4/9 (trips+quads) + Part of Patt 31 Q.E. to be calibrated…. Q.E. to be calibrated…. 3x deeper than XMMSL1

Any advance possible? Slew speed down to 20 deg/hr certainly possible. Even 10 deg/hr may be achievable without losing too much positional accuracy. In which case: Flux Limits at 10 deg/hr INST INST PN+MOS1/2 2.5x x x PN+MOS1/2 2.5x x x Remains to be tested Remains to be tested

Slow Slew Summary  PN – to run in FF mode, Medium filter  MOS – intended to run in 3x3 pixel free running mode with ~400ms frame time.  Work to do with s/w (nearly complete), calibration and CCFs – particularly MOS QE / pattern fractions  For efficiency need to have legs of at least 1 hour as turn-around time is 17 mins.  Great for mapping large extended sources  Probe flux levels intermediate between XMMSL1 and dedicated short pointings,  Position error is ~4 arcsecs – similar to pointed obs for low count sources

Simulations/Spurious fraction  Find dependence of spurious sources on number of photons in image  Randomise the position of every photon in all slew images and run the standard source search  Tabulate number of false sources Real sources and fluctuations for different selections