Charmed mesons J. Brodzicka (KEK) for Belle Charm07, Ithaca US.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Charm and  Decays Results from Babar and Belle Jens Sören Lange (University of Giessen) 43 th Rencontres de Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions La.
Advertisements

1 Charged Z’s at Ruslan Chistov (ITEP, Moscow) Representing the Belle Collaboration Quarkonium Working Group Workshop (Nara, NWU, December 2-5/2008) ●
Open Charm Spectroscopy Klaus Peters GSI/GU Frankfurt Nov 19, 2009 Mainz Charm Production at B-Factories D-Meson Spectrum D s -Meson Spectrum Spectroscopy.
Ruslan Chistov (ITEP, Moscow) Charm Baryon Spectroscopy at Belle Charm Charm Baryon Spectroscopy at Belle (1)Introduction to charmed baryons at.
EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
Sep. 29, 2006 Henry Band - U. of Wisconsin 1 Hadronic Charm Decays From B Factories Henry Band University of Wisconsin 11th International Conference on.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Evidence for Narrow D s  0 and D s   0 states Jianchun Wang 05/09/03 Directly involved: Dave Cinabro Selina Li Sheldon Stone Jon Urheim Jianchun Wang.
New Particles at BELLE Beauty 2005 Assisi Spectroscopy and new Particles F. Mandl There is an impressive list of new particles in the charm sector discovered.
I. Shipsey Heavy Quark Physics ICHEP06 7/27/06 1 The Y(5S) at CLEO Introduction Bs Reconstruction at the Y(5S) CLEO PRL 96, (2006) B Reconstruction.
First Observation of B°  D*°         Decays Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang Syracuse University CLEO Plenary 05/11/01.
12/14/021 Measurements of the Branching Fractions and Helicity Amplitudes in B  D*  Decays Authors: Guangpei Chen, Roy A. Briere Intended for: PRD (RC)
B decays to charm hadrons at Belle M.-C. Chang Fu Jen Catholic University (On behalf of Belle Collaboration) European Physical Society HEP2007 International.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
Discovery of D sJ (2463) + (part II) JC Wang CLEO Meeting 06/20/03 Authors Dave Cinabro Selina Li Sheldon Stone Jon Urheim Jianchun Wang Committees Roy.
D sJ mesons Jolanta Brodzicka (KEK) for Belle QWG5, DESY October 2007.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
Page 1 B 0   Ks + quasi 2 body modes Koji Hara (Nagoya University) CKM2006 WG4    from charmless B decays.
Analysis work by: Rachid Ayad Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/ds4pi.ps Status of B  D  (4  )   analysis Jianchun.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
Resonances in decay for 400fb -1 DC Meeting April 10th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D.
Belle B->VV, XXXX Recontres de Moriond - Mar. 11
 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.
Charmed Meson Spectroscopy Robert K. Kutschke Fermilab HQL04 June 4, 2004.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
cc spectroscopy at elle S.L.Olsen Hawaii QWG 2004 Worksop IHEP Beijing _.
New Observations on Light Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII Yanping HUANG For BESIII Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) ICHEP2010, Paris,
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
 3 measurements by Belle Pavel Krokovny KEK Introduction Introduction Apparatus Apparatus Method Method Results Results Summary Summary.
Observation in BaBar of a narrow resonance in the D + s  0 system at 2317 MeV Roger Barlow Manchester University For the B A B AR Collaboration.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
Andrzej Bożek (IFJ PAN, Kraków) B hadron decays to open charm production in B-factories BEACH B hadron decays to open charm at B-factories A.Bożek.
Branching Ratios and Angular Distribution of B  D*  Decays István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (CLEO Collaboration) July 17, 2003 EPS Int.
Radiative penguins at hadron machines Kevin Stenson University of Colorado.
New hadrons BaBar Maurizio Lo Vetere University of Genova & INFN Representing the Collaboration Particles and Nuclei International Conference.
B  K   p  and photon spectrum at Belle Heyoung Yang Seoul National University for Belle Collaboration ICHEP2004.
P.Pakhlov ITEP, Moscow (for Belle collaboration) e+e- collision from  to  Novosibirsk, BINP, 2006.
On quasi-two-body components of (for 250fb -1 ) (for 250fb -1 ) J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Krakow DC Meeting May 16, 2005 B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D 0 D 0.
Recent BESII Results of Charmonium Decays Gang LI CCAST&IHEP, Beijing for Ψ(2S) Group Topical Seminar on Frontier of Particle Physics 2005: Heavy Flavor.
Scalar and pseudoscalar mesons at BESII Xiaoyan SHEN (Representing BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China Charm06, June 5-7, 2006,
Resonances in decay Resonances in decay (for 400fb -1 ) (for 400fb -1 )BAM February 27th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
New Resonances at Belle Jolanta Brodzicka INP Kraków, for the Belle Collaboration ICFP 2005 October 4 th, 2005 Taiwan Outline  ‘ old’ X(3872) properties.
Φ→Ψ, BINP, Novosibirsk.2011P. Pakhlov Phys. Lett. B702, 139 (2011) Charged charmonium-like states as rescattering effects in B  D sJ D (*) P. Pakhlov.
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
F. Martínez-Vidal IFIC – Universitat de València-CSIC (on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration)  from B ±  D (*)0 [K S     ]K (*)±  in BaBar Outline.
Observation of a near-threshold enhancement in  mass spectrum from J/    彭 海 平 中国科学技术大学 广西桂林( 29/10/2006 )
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Andrzej Bożek (IFJ PAN, Kraków) B hadron decays to open charm production in B-factories BEACH B hadron decays to open charm production in B-factories.
1 Hadron Spectroscopy at BABAR BY Usha Mallik (University of Iowa) Representing The BaBar Collaboration The International Light-Cone Workshop July 7, 2005.
E. Robutti Enrico Robutti I.N.F.N. Genova HEP 2003 Europhysics Conference July 17-23, Aachen, Germany Recent BABAR results in Charmonium and Charm Spectroscopy.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
1 Inclusive B → X c l Decays Moments of hadronic mass and lepton energy PR D69,111103, PR D69, Fits to energy dependence of moments based on HQE.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)
QCHS 2010 Lei Zhang1 Lei Zhang (on behalf of BESIII Collaboration) Physics School of Nanjing University Recent.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
V.Tisserand, LAPP-Annecy (IN 2 P 3 /France), on behalf of the B A B AR collaboration. Aachen (Germany), July 17 th -23 rd Charmed B hadrons with.
Observation of the DsJ(2463)Dspo & Confirmation of the DsJ(2317)Dspo
Charm spectroscopy 1 A. Drutskoy University of Cincinnati
Study of New Hadron Spectroscopy at BESIII
DsJ* ‘s & charmed strange baryons at Belle
University of Minnesota on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration
Hidden charm spectroscopy from B-factories
Charmed Baryon Spectroscopy and Decays using the Belle Detector
CONVENTIONAL CHARMONIA
Hot Topic from Belle : Recent results on quarkonia
New States Containing Charm at BABAR
New Spectroscopy with Charm quarks at B factories.
Presentation transcript:

Charmed mesons J. Brodzicka (KEK) for Belle Charm07, Ithaca US

Outline Introduction to cs multipletsIntroduction to cs multiplets Observation of D s1 (2536) → D + π - K +Observation of D s1 (2536) → D + π - K + Partial Wave Analysis of D s1 (2536) → D* + K 0 sPartial Wave Analysis of D s1 (2536) → D* + K 0 s Observation of new D sJ (2700) → D 0 K + in B + → D 0 D 0 K +Observation of new D sJ (2700) → D 0 K + in B + → D 0 D 0 K + SummarySummary J. Brodzicka for Charm07

D s1 (2536) D sJ (2573) D*K D K cs multiplets HQS based potential model predictionsHQS based potential model predictions two doublets for orbitally excited L=1 cs states: (Godfrey-Isgur ‘85)two doublets for orbitally excited L=1 cs states: (Godfrey-Isgur ‘85) 0 +, 1 + (j q =1/2) and 1 +, 2 + (j q =3/2) 0 +, 1 + (j q =1/2) and 1 +, 2 + (j q =3/2) M(j q =1/2), M(j q =3/2) > M D +M K M(j q =1/2), M(j q =3/2) > M D +M K Γ(j q =1/2) >> Γ(j q =3/2) Γ(j q =1/2) >> Γ(j q =3/2) J. Brodzicka for Charm D* s0 (2317) 1+1+ D s1 (2460) L = 0 j q = 1/ Ds* Ds* Ds Ds spin-orbittensor s-o spin-spin j q = 3/2 j q = 1/2 L = 1 L = 2 ….. JPJP j q = s q + L, J = j q + s Q mix 0+0+ ? ? 1+1+ Experiment: j q =1/2 doublet j q =1/2 doublet 0 + : D * s0 (2317) → D s π : D s1 (2460) → D * s π 0 j q =3/2 doublet j q =3/2 doublet 1 + : D s1 (2536) → D * K (Argus ‘89) 2 + : D sJ (2573) → DK (CLEO ‘94) jq=1/2 states: very narrow, masses below D ( * ) K → don’t match the potential model predictions BaBar CLEO ‘03 Belle

Known decay modes of D s1 (2536) : D* + K s, D* 0 K +, D s π + π -Known decay modes of D s1 (2536) : D* + K s, D* 0 K +, D s π + π - Study of e + e - → D s1 (2536)X, D s1 (2536) → D + π - K +, D* + K sStudy of e + e - → D s1 (2536)X, D s1 (2536) → D + π - K +, D* + K s 462 fb -1 data sample used (normalization mode)462 fb -1 data sample used (normalization mode) x P =p Ds1 /p max >0.8 in e + e - cmsx P =p Ds1 /p max >0.8 in e + e - cms Two-body mass spectra consistent with Phase SpaceTwo-body mass spectra consistent with Phase Space Observation of D s1 (2536) → D + π - K + J. Brodzicka for Charm07 BELLE-CONF-0706 angular distribution studied for this D s1 (2536) → D* + K s sample

Mixing of jq=1/2 and jq=3/2 states HQET prediction for P-wave cs states:HQET prediction for P-wave cs states: 1 + (j q =3/2) → D*K pure D-wave: D s1 (2536) → D*K 1 + (j q =3/2) → D*K pure D-wave: D s1 (2536) → D*K 1 + (j q =1/2) → D*K pure S-wave: but D s1 (2460) → D*K forbidden 1 + (j q =1/2) → D*K pure S-wave: but D s1 (2460) → D*K forbidden If HQET not exact: mixing of S-D waves possibleIf HQET not exact: mixing of S-D waves possible (In D s1 (2536) → D*K D wave suppressed (In D s1 (2536) → D*K D wave suppressed → small S-wave component can contribute much to the width) Exp. knowledge on the mixing:Exp. knowledge on the mixing: from BF’s ratio of D s1 (2460) radiative decays: D* s γ/D s γ=0.31 ± 0.14 from BF’s ratio of D s1 (2460) radiative decays: D* s γ/D s γ=0.31 ± 0.14 switch from |j q > to | 2S+1 L J > basis switch from |j q > to | 2S+1 L J > basis tan 2 (θ+θ 0 )=0.8 ± 0.4 where tan 2 θ 0 =2 (no-mixing case) tan 2 (θ+θ 0 )=0.8 ± 0.4 where tan 2 θ 0 =2 (no-mixing case) J. Brodzicka for Charm07 θθ0θ0

Angular distribution dependsAngular distribution depends on α, β, γ angles defined as: on α, β, γ angles defined as: ρ: helicity density matrix;ρ: helicity density matrix; ρ 00 : probability of D s1 ’s helicity=0 ρ 11 = ρ -1-1 =(1-ρ 00 )/2 ρ 00 : probability of D s1 ’s helicity=0 ρ 11 = ρ -1-1 =(1-ρ 00 )/2 √R Λ exp(iξ)=A 10 /A 00 A 10, A 00 : ampl. of D*‘s helicity= ±1, 0√R Λ exp(iξ)=A 10 /A 00 A 10, A 00 : ampl. of D*‘s helicity= ±1, 0 ( A 10 = (S+D/√2)/√3 A 00 = (S-√2D)/√3 ) ( A 10 = (S+D/√2)/√3 A 00 = (S-√2D)/√3 ) D/S =√Γ D /Γ S exp(iη) D, S: partial-wave ampl. in D s1 decay D/S =√Γ D /Γ S exp(iη) D, S: partial-wave ampl. in D s1 decay If no angle integrated → ξ-dependent term survivesIf no angle integrated → ξ-dependent term survives Partial Wave Analysis of D s1 (2536) → D* + K 0 s J. Brodzicka for Charm07 BELLE-CONF-0706

Fit to angular distribution of D s1 (2536) → D* + K 0 s 3D maximum-likelihood fit with PDF: Background PDF: from M(D* + K s ) sidebands, normalized f bck : background fraction in M(D* + K s ) signal region: ~9% ε(α,β,γ)/ → efficiency correction Fit result projections (bckgd subtracted and efficiency corrected) : From χ 2 of the fit: goodness-of-fit probability: 60% J. Brodzicka for Charm07

Results of D s1 (2536) → D* + K 0 s PWA Results of D s1 (2536) → D* + K 0 s PWA Fit results (include systematic errors):Fit results (include systematic errors): Γ S /Γ TOT = 0.72 ± 0.05 (η=43.9 ± 1.7°)Γ S /Γ TOT = 0.72 ± 0.05 (η=43.9 ± 1.7°) S-wave dominates, contradicts HQET S-wave dominates, contradicts HQET D s1 (2460) - D s1 (2536) mixing D s1 (2460) - D s1 (2536) mixing D s1 ’s helicity=0 preferred, agrees with HQETD s1 ’s helicity=0 preferred, agrees with HQET (aligned production of j q =3/2 states is predicted) (aligned production of j q =3/2 states is predicted) First full analysis for P-wave charmed mesonsFirst full analysis for P-wave charmed mesons (CLEO integrated over β in PWA of D 1 (2420) →D* π ) (CLEO integrated over β in PWA of D 1 (2420) →D* π ) J. Brodzicka for Charm07

 (4160)  (3770) New D sJ meson in B + → D 0 D 0 K + b → ccs tree process; cs → D 0 K + and cc → D 0 D 0 states can contributeb → ccs tree process; cs → D 0 K + and cc → D 0 D 0 states can contribute B + → D 0 D 0 K + signal identified using:B + → D 0 D 0 K + signal identified using: ΔE=E B -E beam, E beam =√s/2 : cms energy difference ΔE=E B -E beam, E beam =√s/2 : cms energy difference M bc = √E 2 beam -p 2 B : beam-constrained mass M bc = √E 2 beam -p 2 B : beam-constrained mass S=399±40 for 449M BB pairs usedS=399±40 for 449M BB pairs used BF(B + → D 0 D 0 K + )=(22.2± ) x 10 -4BF(B + → D 0 D 0 K + )=(22.2± ) x Dalitz plot and mass projections Dalitz plot and mass projections different from 3-body Ph. Space different from 3-body Ph. Space points: events from 1.5σ ΔE-Mbc signal box ■ :background from sidebands points: events from 1.5σ ΔE-Mbc signal box ■ :background from sidebands ΔEΔEΔEΔE M bc J. Brodzicka for Charm07 hep-ex/ (submitted to PRL) new D sJ

2D ΔE-M bc fits in invariant mass bins → B signal extracted2D ΔE-M bc fits in invariant mass bins → B signal extracted Obtained background-free mass spectra used to estimate the resonance contributions:Obtained background-free mass spectra used to estimate the resonance contributions: fitted B signal yield M(D 0 K + ) for M(D 0 D 0 )>3.85 GeV fitted with: Breit-Wigner ψ(4160) reflection + Ph. Space (shapes from MC) + ψ(4160) reflection + Ph. Space (shapes from MC) + exponential function (to describe the threshold enhancement (? ) ) Resonance contributions D sJ (2700) J. Brodzicka for Charm07 ψ(4160) in ½ helicity distr. ψ(3770) Non-coherent approach; possible interference effects included in syst. errors

D sJ (2700) → D 0 K + in B + → D 0 D 0 K + Helicity angle distribution of D sJ (2700):Helicity angle distribution of D sJ (2700): background free and efficiency corrected background free and efficiency corrected (reflections from threshold and ψ(4160) subtracted) (reflections from threshold and ψ(4160) subtracted) J=1 preferred; 1 → decay implies P=-1J=1 preferred; 1 → decay implies P=-1 Contributions to the observed mass spectraContributions to the observed mass spectra Most observed features well describedMost observed features well described ■ D sJ (2700) ■ ψ(3770) ■ ψ(4160) ■ 3body ■ threshold component (MC predicted shapes) (MC predicted shapes) fitted B signal yield J. Brodzicka for Charm07 J=0  2 /ndf=112/5 J=1  2 /ndf= 11/5 J=2  2 /ndf=146/5

D sJ (2700) interpretation D sJ (2700) → D 0 K state can be:D sJ (2700) → D 0 K state can be: radial excitation 2 3 S 1radial excitation 2 3 S 1 (predicted by potential models at M~2720GeV) (predicted by potential models at M~2720GeV) chiral doubler state 1 - to 1 + D s1 (2536) (predicted from chiral symmetry considerationschiral doubler state 1 - to 1 + D s1 (2536) (predicted from chiral symmetry considerations at M=2721±10 MeV) at M=2721±10 MeV) BaBaR sees structure at M(DK)~2.69GeV producedBaBaR sees structure at M(DK)~2.69GeV produced in e + e - continuum. Is that due to D sJ (2700)? in e + e - continuum. Is that due to D sJ (2700)? D sJ (2860) observed by BaBar not seen in our data.D sJ (2860) observed by BaBar not seen in our data. Its production in B decays suppressed by its high spin? Its production in B decays suppressed by its high spin? BaBar Coll. PRL 97, (2006) BaBar Coll. PRL 97, (2006) J. Brodzicka for Charm07 Godfrey, Isgur PRD 32, 189 (1985) Close, Swanson PLB 647, 159 (2007) Nowak, Rho, Zahed Acta Phys. Polon. B 35, 2377 (2004)

Summary New info to cs multiplets:New info to cs multiplets: new decay mode: D s1 (2536) → D + π - K + observednew decay mode: D s1 (2536) → D + π - K + observed from PWA of D s1 (2536) → D *+ Ksfrom PWA of D s1 (2536) → D *+ Ks (first full analysis for P-wave charmed mesons): (first full analysis for P-wave charmed mesons): S-wave dominates: Γ S /Γ TOT = 0.72 ± 0.05S-wave dominates: Γ S /Γ TOT = 0.72 ± 0.05 D s1 (2536) and D s1 (2460) mixD s1 (2536) and D s1 (2460) mix longitudinal polarization: ρ 00 = 0.490±0.013longitudinal polarization: ρ 00 = 0.490±0.013 → Falk-Peskin HQET parameter: w 3/2 = ± → Falk-Peskin HQET parameter: w 3/2 = ± new D sJ (2700) meson observed:new D sJ (2700) meson observed: M=2708± MeV Γ=108± MeV J P =1 - M=2708± MeV Γ=108± MeV J P =1 - It opens a box of higher radial/orbital excitations of cs states It opens a box of higher radial/orbital excitations of cs states J. Brodzicka for Charm07

Backup J. Brodzicka for Charm07 J. Brodzicka for Charm07

D s1 recoil mass study D s1 (2536) recoil mass: M rec spectrum indicates 2-body reactions: e + e - → D s1 (2536)X, where X=D s, D* s, higher D** s ’s M rec resolution: ~70MeV at 2GeV, 1/M rec dependence 3D fits to angular distribution in bins of M rec (R Λ and ξ fixed) Polarization at low M rec : show structures expected for: e + e - → D s1 (2536)D s, D s1 (2536)D* s J. Brodzicka for Charm07

HQET Falk-Peskin parameter w3/2 (prob. of light quark’s helicities) ρ00=2/3(1- w3/2) w3/2 = ± (w3/2 from D2*(2460) → Dπ by ARGUS) Parameters: ρ00, RΛ, cos ξ