Video Cases Online: Cognitive Studies of Pre- Service Teacher Learning Sharon J. Derry University of Wisconsin-Madison Cindy Hmelo-Silver Rutgers University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E ducational T echnology I ntegration & Implementation P rinciples to guide teachers in their instructional decision making Sara Dexter University of Virginia.
Advertisements

Project-Based vs. Text-Based
How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School John D. Bransford, Ann L. Brown, and Rodney R. Cocking, editors.
Designing and Developing Online Courses. Course Life Cycle Design Develop Implement Evaluate Revise.
The 21st Century Context for
When Students Can’t Read…
Economic Education and How People Learn Scott Simkins, Interim Director Academy for Teaching and Learning (ATL) North Carolina A&T State University Acknowledgements:
The Teacher Work Sample
Fostering Learners’ Collaborative Problem Solving with RiverWeb Roger Azevedo University of Maryland Mary Ellen Verona Maryland Virtual High School Jennifer.
1 Your Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) Associate Professor Sarah Thomason & Karen Brunner, Asst. VP for Institutional Effectiveness & Research August 29,
Teacher Librarians. Contact Information Mary Cameron Iowa Department of Education (515)
TANYA NOLAN MED, RT(R), RDMS Balancing Literacy. Learning Objectives Evaluate the differences between content and processes. Evaluate what is involved.
Classroom Birdfeeder Project Overview Teacher Planning Work Samples & Reflections Teaching Resources Assessment & Standards Classroom Teacher Guide Pre-service.
Math-Science Subgroup Report Recommendations. APEC Context Members are keenly interested in collaborating to learn from each other how to provide 21 st.
What should learners understand? Defining Understanding Goals for Disciplined Inquiry.
Constructivist learning and multimedia Ian Hart, Gray Williams, Denis Meyer CAUT Ecology & French Biodiversity.
Distributed Intelligence, Lifelong Learning, & Innovative Media: Foundations for Graduate Education Sharon Derry, University of Wisconsin-Madison Gerhard.
Texas A&M University College of Education eEducation Group.
Metacognition Helping students to self-regulate. Definitions  Metacognition - literally “beyond knowing”, knowing what one knows and doesn’t know - promoting.
Cognitive Science Overview Design Activity Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory Cognitive Flexibility Theory.
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
Constructivism and Instructional Design Are they compatible? Summary and Presentation by Anna Ignatjeva.
ScienceQuest: Integrating Science and Technology in Elementary and Secondary Classrooms Dr. Sheila Offman Gersh City College of New York
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
Instructional design principles and models Mart Laanpere, M.Sc. in educational technology Tallinn University of Educational and Social Sciences
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Learning and Teaching Technology Integration Dr. Brush Research Group
Teaching with Multimedia and Hypermedia
Contributions of Contextual Teaching to Improved Student Learning Richard L. Lynch, PI University of Georgia (706)
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Planning Focus Workshop Facilitated by: Sandy Sanford.
Online Resources for Pre- Service Teachers Laura J. Pyzdrowski West Virginia University Anthony S. Pyzdrowski California University Of Pennsylvania
1 Meeting the Challenge of Community: Online Social Networking to Facilitate Online Distance Learning.
© Copyright 2005 by Peter Chan Dr. Peter Chan Asst Professor of Instructional Technology, Brigham Young University Hawaii Visiting Professor, Chinese University.
Literacy of Assessment Karen Yager Knox Grammar School & University of NSW
1 Design Principles for Language Education Short cut to theory Gert Rijlaarsdam & Anne Toorenaar University of Amsterdam,
Cognitive Apprenticeship “Mastering knowledge” CLICK TO START.
Chapter 8 Assessing Active Science Learning
CFN 204 · Diane Foley · Network Leader CMP3 Professional Development Presented by: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach CFN204 1.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING BICYCLE Assessing Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Future Elementary Teachers CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS PCK of future elementary teachers.
Attitudinal Factors Influencing Pre- service Teachers’ Pedagogical Philosophies in an Innovative Learning Sciences Course and Curriculum: A Structural.
Differentiation PLC.
IRIS CENTER Learning Outcomes for IRIS Online Modules Used in College Courses Project # H325F OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Washington, DC July.
Working Memory and Learning Underlying Website Structure
Shaping a Writing Community with an Interactive Website for First-year Writing Courses.
"Insert Session Title Here" November 13-14, 2015 Educational App Integration: Creating Tablet-Enhanced Instruction.
NETS-T.  Name  The course(s) that you coordinate for EED  Your comfort level with NETS 1.Not familiar with the NETS 2.Familiar but not comfortable.
Standards-Based Instruction Implementation: Badge 4-Analyzing Standards.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Use of Technology in Course and Clinical Experiences The University of Toledo UToledo. UTeach.UTouch the Future (UT 3 ) Program Add Corporate Logo Here.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
Videocases for Science Teaching Analysis (ViSTA) Dr. George O’Brien, Instructor, SCE 4310 PLANTS MODULE Fall, 2012.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
Introduction to Supporting Science. What Does Science Involve? Identifying a question to investigate Forming hypotheses Collecting data Interpreting data.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Design Evaluation Overview Introduction Model for Interface Design Evaluation Types of Evaluation –Conceptual Design –Usability –Learning Outcome.
Fdtl5 FDTL5 project V-ResORT : A Virtual Resource for Online Research Training.
Collaborative Learning Community: Student Reflective Assessment: Part 1 Team Orange Tarica Miller Christina Mullikin,Michael Paekukui.
edTPA: Task 1 Support Module
The Effects of a Web 2.0 Tool on Elementary Math Achievement
Learning type: Acquisition
Stephanie L. Craig, M.Ed. University of Kansas
Video Enhanced Observation in teacher development
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Purdue Electronic Portfolio
Professional Learning for the e-Learning Context
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
A Research Companion to Principles and Standards
Presentation transcript:

Video Cases Online: Cognitive Studies of Pre- Service Teacher Learning Sharon J. Derry University of Wisconsin-Madison Cindy Hmelo-Silver Rutgers University Funding Provided by The National Science Foundation

Unsolved Problem: Spontaneous Transfer to Practice Can conceptual systems we “market” in university professional programs be truly useful in students’ future professional lives? A search for practical instructional approaches that can be implemented on a large scale.

Context of Work: Learning Sciences Courses for Preservice Teachers at Rutgers & UW-Madison Goal: Help teachers acquire useful knowledge of learning science concepts.

Ideas are powerful things, requiring not a studious contemplation but an action, even if it is only an inner action. Midge Decter, American writer Knowledge in Action

Needed for Transfer: Meshed Cognitive Representations Produce representations that mesh: Perceptual visions of (teaching) practice Conceptual understanding learning science Plans for (teaching) practice Mindsets for reflective practice Courses that systematically intertwine: Video case study Conceptual processing (e.g. readings) Lesson design activities

STELLAR (Socio-technical Environment for Learning & Learning Activity Research) System for Building High-Mesh Online Courses Configurable Tools: Learning Activity Constructor Interactive Group Whiteboard Individual Student Notebooks Asynchronous and Synchronous Discussions Research Library Multimedia Hypertext Upload video and digital resources Integrate with course text Interface for Viewing Video

An Example STELLAR Activity: A Lesson Design Problem for Math Educators Designer Constructs Steps in Activity Designer Configures Tools for Learning Designer Creates Instructions & Activities for Each Step: This is Problem at Step 1

Group Whiteboard Tool Voting Utility Feedback Configurable Spaces and Prompts

Video Case Interface Links to Hypertext (differs for each mini- case) Active Mini- case

A Hypertext Page on Transfer Access to mini- cases on Transfer CFT-Based Navigation Tool

Ratings of STELLAR Activity Fall 2002 (5 = high) Activity ComponentsUWRutgers Overall Activity Individual prep Sharing design ideas Group design online Individual reflection Overall group interaction

Ratings of Online Tools and Features (5 = high) Tool FeatureUWRutgers Video cases CFT hypertext Links from cases to CFT hypertext Individual notebook Group whiteboard

Types of Data Group instructional plans developed on line Online discourse related to group work Individual reflections & analyses of group work Pre and post-course analyses of teaching/learning video cases Self reports of beliefs and attitudes related to teaching & learning Evaluative ratings of system activities and tools

Psychometrically Validated Assessments: Examples Concepts-in-Use Rubrics Used to score pre- and post video analyses and other student products to determine the level of sophistication in students use of target concepts. Example target concepts: understanding, transfer, metacognition, Bridging Instruction Rubric A complex rubric used to evaluate instructional designs and design discourse

About Rubrics Features to guide coding Calibrated to the STEP scoring scale Can be used across multiple types of student products and documents Are psychometrically sound (validity and reliability studies)

1. Generally considers, mentions, or refers to understanding but does not explicitly or implicitly refer to any of the specific features listed below 2. Understanding is actively constructed knowledge 3. Understanding builds on prior knowledge 4. Understanding in context is an active process of comprehension that involves constructing a situation model. 5. Understanding supports the making of inferences and/or application in new contexts 6. There are different depths or forms of understanding 7. Understanding involves grasping the underlying principle, theme or big idea. 8. Understanding is socially negotiated and distributed in “communities of practice” (broadly defined to include classrooms and groups) Features Coders Consider in Judging Student Ability to Use the Concept Understanding to Inform Teaching

Results from Fall 2002 (0 = no knowledge; 3 = expert) RutgersUW-Madison N3360 Level & Course Ed Psy prerequisite for entering TE Learning Sci required in final year of TE Pre-course concept “use score” Mean = 0.42 SD = 0.35 Mean = 0.65 SD = 0.46 Post-course concept “use score” Mean = 1.56 SD =.63 Mean = 2.09 SD =.63

STELLAR vs. Traditional Course: Understanding Score Spring 2004 (Rutgers) NMeanStd. Dev PreSTEP Comparison PostSTEP Comparison ANCOVA F(1, 67)= 69.62, p<.001

Delayed Performance (%) Under Different Activity Designs Task Contrast Video Cases then Text a Text then Contrast Video Cases b Text-Notes (no Video) c Term Recall12.3 (2.3)39.2 (2.3)24.0 (2.4) Gist Recall7.4 (1.2)15.4 (1.2)14.0 (1.2) Transfer24.3 (1.6)32.4 (1.6)32.5 (1.7) Recognition73.9 (4.2)86.6 (4.2)84.3 (4.4) a n = 52 b n = 51 c n = 50

What Predicted Understanding Score? 1. Pretest 2. Site (Rutgers vs. UW) 3. Success with collaborative tool (whiteboard) 4. Success with video-text links 5. Website “hits” R Square =.38

What Predicted Perceptions of Learning? 1. Success with individual work activity steps 2. Success with Knowledge Web exploration R Square =.42 Comment: Course components promoting individual study and exploration in accordance with personal interests enhanced perceptions of learning but did not improve performance on targeted learning goal.

Regression Analysis For MSLQ Variables Predicting Academic Success in a STEP Course

Conclusions STELLAR designs produce significant increases in teacher-learners’ abilities to teach for understanding and are more effective than traditional approaches. STELLAR collaborative tools are effective. There are order effects in contrasting cases instructional activities that inform design and support a schema-elaboration view of learning over several other theories. Targeted course outcomes are strongly related to effort, perceived task value, and successful use of tools that scaffold collaboration and site exploration.

A Former Student, A Reflective Practitioner

The Concepts of Professional Vision