MARC in 2011 Alan Hopkinson

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standards showcase: MODS, METS, MARCXML ALA Annual 2006 Rebecca Guenther and Jackie Radebaugh Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of.
Advertisements

The US RDA Test: Status & Next Steps For the Authority Control Interest Group, American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, January 9, 2011 Presented.
MARC 101 for Non-Catalogers Colorado Horizon Users Group Meeting Philip S. Miller Library Castle Rock, CO May 29, 2007.
Lis512 lecture 4 the MARC format structure, leader, directory.
Resource Description and Access (RDA): a new standard for the digital world Ann Huthwaite Library Resource Services Manager, QUT.
The Mysterious MARC Record
Representation of the UNIMARC bibliographic data format in Resource Description Framework Gordon Dunsire, Mirna Willer, Predrag Perožić Presented at DC-2013,
An Introduction to MODS: The Metadata Object Description Schema Tech Talk By Daniel Gelaw Alemneh October 17, 2007 October 17, 2007.
RDA: a new international standard for resource discovery and access Gordon Dunsire Based on a presentation created by the Joint Steering Committee for.
MODS What is MODS: When is MODS use:
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen OLAC 2006 Conference October 27, 2006
RDA: Resource Description and Access A New Cataloging Standard for a Digital Future Jennifer Bowen Cornell University May 16, 2006
MODS What is MODS: o Stands for Metadata Object Descriptive Schema o MODS is an XML descriptive metadata standard.  Uses the XML schema language of the.
RDA – The SLQ experience Karen Stone 12 May 2014.
Introduction to MARC Cataloguing Part 2 Presenters: Irma Sauvola: Part 1 Dan Smith: Part 2.
Fixed Fields Information Session 29 February 2012 Andrew Gloe Map Acquisitions & Cataloguing Team Australian Collections Management & Preservation Branch.
Metadata: Its Functions in Knowledge Representation for Digital Collections 1 Summary.
Guest Lecture LIS 656, Spring 2011 Kathryn Lybarger.
The European Manuscript & Hand Press Book Heritage The role of the Consortium of European Research Libraries (CERL) Manuscript Collection in the National.
DIGITIZATION OF RARE LIBRARY MATERIALS Metadata Format Access to Digital Documents © Adolf Knoll, National Library of the Czech Republic.
XML & Library Applications ELAG 2001 Poul Henrik Jørgensen, Danish Bibliographic Centre,
CATALOGING NON- TRADITIONAL (MOSTLY ONLINE) MATERIALS The Whys and Hows.
UNIMARC : what next? Alan Hopkinson Chairman Permanent UNIMARC Committee.
Structure AACR2 Part I - Description Part II - Headings, Uniform titles, References RDA Attributes (of entities) Relationships (between entities)
MARC and XML ELAG April 2002, Rome Mette Båstrup
Updated :02 Hong Kong University of Science & Technology Library XML Name Access Control Repository at the Hong Kong University of Science.
Maria Inês Cordeiro Director, UNIMARC Core Activity RESULTS OF THE 2008 WORLDWIDE SURVEY OF THE USE OF UNIMARC (with additions) Maria Inês Cordeiro, 13.
The Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) NISO Metadata Workshop May 20, 2004 Rebecca Guenther Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library.
Richard Siegersma General Manager Thorpe-Bowker Australian ISBN agency since 1997.
ODINCINDIO Marine Information Management Training Course February 2006 Cataloguing: Introduction Murari P Tapaswi National Institute of Oceanography,
Update on RDA & cataloguing standards developments Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee.
RDA : Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
JENN RILEY METADATA LIBRARIAN IU DIGITAL LIBRARY PROGRAM Introduction to Metadata.
Resource Description and Access Since We Last Met… Marjorie E. Bloss RDA Project Manager 1.
1 August 1, 2011 ALCTS Continuing Education Committee Webinar Aiming for a Robust Metadata Infrastructure for the Future: RDA Component Beacher Wiggins,
Developing Databases and Selecting an Appropriate Library System.
Implementation scenarios, encoding structures and display Rob Walls Director Database Services Libraries Australia.
RDA Toolkit is an integrated, browser-based, online product that allow user to interact with a collection of cataloging-related documents and resources.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
24-25th November,Tallinn Digital Memory Bibliographic control of Lithuanian e-cultural Genutė Jokubaitytė M. Mažvydas National Library of Lithuania.
Evolving MARC 21 for the future Rebecca Guenther CCS Forum, ALA Annual July 10, 2009.
Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee for the Development.
Setting a new standard Resource Description and Access Deirdre Kiorgaard 18 September 2006.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
Cataloguing Code and Cataloguing Process. What is a Catalog(ue)?  A list of library materials contained in a collection, a library, or a group of libraries.
RDA and Special Libraries Chris Todd, Janess Stewart & Jenny McDonald.
Authority Control Interest Group RDA and MARC ALA Mid-Winter Denver 23 January 2009 John Espley VTLS Inc.
Description of Bibliographic Items. Review Encoding = Markup. The library cataloging “markup” language is MARC. Unlike HTML, MARC tags have meaning (i.e.,
Resource Description and Access (RDA) information session Deirdre Kiorgaard Australian Committee on Cataloguing Representative to the Joint Steering Committee.
Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records The Changing Face of Cataloging William E. Moen Texas Center for Digital Knowledge School of Library.
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
Metadata and Meta tag. What is metadata? What does metadata do? Metadata schemes What is meta tag? Meta tag example Table of Content.
RDA Implementation. Implementation factors Publication of RDA International evaluation Changes in MARC Implementation in library systems.
UNIMARC in Russia RUSMARC as national implementation of UNIMARC 3rd UNIMARC Users Group Meeting, Lyon, France, March 31, 2010 Olga Zhlobinskaya National.
Sally McCallum Library of Congress
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: The Tools of our Trade: AACR2/RDA and MARC.
Current initiatives in developing library linked data Gordon Dunsire Presented at the Cataloguing and Indexing Group Scotland seminar “Linked data and.
Session 2 Tools and Decisions. 2-2 Session 2 1. What tools are available to help you catalog IR’s? 2. What decisions need to be made?
Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.
A RCHIVAL COLLECTIONS IN A D IGITAL W ORLD Cheryl Walters Nov. 6, 2008.
An information retrieval system may include 3 categories of information:  Factual  Bibliographical  Institutional  Exchange and sharing of these categories.
1 Metadata: examples Alan Hopkinson ILRS Middlesex University.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: Metadata – what, why and how Ann Chapman.
MARC Tags to BIBFRAME Vocabulary: a new view of metadata Sally McCallum Library of Congress ALA - January 2014.
Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Information Technology Michael Middleton 1 CRICOS No J Bibliographic description.
Some basic concepts Week 1 Lecture notes INF 384C: Organizing Information Spring 2016 Karen Wickett UT School of Information.
Chinese MARC (Taiwan) and its bibliographic database Ching-Chen Anthony Mao (Fu Jen Catholic University) Ching-fen Frances Hsu (National Central Library)
1 Metadata: an overview Alan Hopkinson ILRS Middlesex University.
Introduction to Metadata
Presentation transcript:

MARC in 2011 Alan Hopkinson

Early MARC MARC developed by Library of Congress 1966; MARC II and UK MARC developed in 1968 (UK MARC has more subfields) MARC II > LC MARC > US MARC > MARC21 IFLA developed UNIMARC IN 1973 Many features were improvement on MARC MARC developed by Library of Congress 1966; MARC II and UK MARC developed in 1968 (UK MARC has more subfields) MARC II > LC MARC > US MARC > MARC21 IFLA developed UNIMARC IN 1973 Many features were improvement on MARC Record structure (ISO 2709) remained static Record structure (ISO 2709) remained static

UNIMARC: origins Joint project: Library of Congress, British Lib., National Library of Canada to develop an interpretative manual to improve consistency of UNIMARC as international exchange format Joint project: Library of Congress, British Lib., National Library of Canada to develop an interpretative manual to improve consistency of UNIMARC as international exchange format Conversions developed between US MARC and UNIMARC and UK MARC and UNIMARC UNIMARC adopted by countries as a national exchange format: e.g. China, France, Italy, Japan, Portugal, South Africa, USSR, Yugoslavia Conversions developed between US MARC and UNIMARC and UK MARC and UNIMARC UNIMARC adopted by countries as a national exchange format: e.g. China, France, Italy, Japan, Portugal, South Africa, USSR, Yugoslavia

MARC or UNIMARC? In 1997 LC changed policy: In 1997 LC changed policy: – renamed US MARC > MARC21 UNIMARC would not be used as international exchange format Australia (1991), New Zealand and UK (2004) national libraries change from national format (e.g.UK MARC) to US MARC / MARC21 Australia (1991), New Zealand and UK (2004) national libraries change from national format (e.g.UK MARC) to US MARC / MARC21

Changes UNIMARC continued to be used in most countries UNIMARC continued to be used in most countries – France, Italy, Portugal, Slovenia and neighbours (COBISS’s COMARC), Russia (RUSMARC), Greece, China, Japan, Taiwan South Africa, Czech Republic and Slovak Republic moved to MARC21 South Africa, Czech Republic and Slovak Republic moved to MARC21

MARC and cataloguing codes Bibliographic exchange formats depend on cataloguing codes for their data element definition UNIMARC hospitable to ISBD related formats MARC21 hospitable to AACR > RDA (Resource Discovery and Access) UNIMARC in process of implementing RDA

Other definitions used in UNIMARC Standard numbers, ISBN, ISMN, ISSN Authority records (UNIMARC/A) Classification schemes National practices (UNIMARC)

UNIMARC features – More logical structure (zoned) 0xx Standard Numbers 1xx Coded data 2xx ISBD data 3xx Notes 4xx Linking data 5xx Title Access points 6xx Subject data 7xx Name access points 8xx National usage

Granularity of subfields UNIMARC 700 $aHopkinson$bAlan MARC $aHopkinson, Alan

Title field MARC21 v. UNIMARC $aThe printer's manual$h[microform] /$cby Caleb Stower ; with a new introduction by John Bidwell. The printer's companion / by Edward Grattan ; with a new introduction by Clinton Sisson $aThe printer's manual$bmicroform$fby Caleb Stower$gwith a new introduction by John Bidwell$cThe printer's companion$fby Edward Grattan$gwith a new introduction by Clinton Sisson

Coded data UNIMARC: Many different fields 100General Processing Data 101Language of the Item 102Country of Publication or Production 105Coded Data Field: Textual materials, Monographic 106Coded Data Field: Textual materials – Physical Attributes 110Coded Data Field: Continuing Resources 115Coded Data Field: Visual Projections, Videorecordings and Motion Pictures 116Coded Data Field: Graphics 117Coded Data Field: Three-dimensional artifacts and realia

Coded data: MARC Fixed-Length Data Elements - Additional Material Characteristics Physical Description Fixed Field Fixed-Length Data Elements Character Position BK CF MP MU CR VM MX Date entered on file ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 06 Type of date/Publication status ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

UNIMARC governance IFLA Core activity led by National Library of Portugal Permanent UNIMARC Committee: 9 members from different countries plus UK plus LC/OCLC Anyone can make suggestions via members Meets formally once per year

UNIMARC Guidelines 1.Guidelines for Using UNIMARC for Component Parts (May 1999)Guidelines for Using UNIMARC for Component Parts 2.Guidelines for Using UNIMARC for Microforms (May 1999)Guidelines for Using UNIMARC for Microforms 3.Guidelines for Using UNIMARC for Older Monographic Publications (Antiquarian) (April 1998)Guidelines for Using UNIMARC for Older Monographic Publications 4.UNIMARC Minimal Level Record (Feb. 1999)UNIMARC Minimal Level Record 5.Multi-level Description: Encoding Options for UNIMARC (Feb. 1999)Multi-level Description: Encoding Options for UNIMARC 6.Electronic Resources (Aug. 2000)Electronic Resources 7.Music (July 2005)Music 8.Serials and Other Continuing Resources (October 2006)Serials and Other Continuing Resources

Use of MARC in internet age Key library management systems implement UNIMARC (ISO 2709) Import bibliographic records via Z39.50 Bibliographic records sent in file from bookseller corresponding to book invoice Records created by cataloguers where not available externally

Exchange format record structure ISO 2709 adopted as international standard in 1973 (based on magnetic tape structure) MarcXML / MarcXchange, XML not ISO cam a DLC s1993 caua j eng : $15.95

MarcXchange ISO 25577: MarcXchange DIS_25577__E_.pdf Contains UNIMARC examples

New XML formats MODS: Metadata Object Description Schema – Rich but not too rich metadata format – DL projects, archiving websites, OAI METS: schema for containing digital data objects with their metadata See standards showcase, ALA mets-ala/mods-mets-ala.html

Future of MARC formats XML is more exchangeable on the WWW Despite XML alternatives, records are transferred via traditional ISO 2709 between suppliers and library management systems – Commercial reasons (easier to control) – Inertia (why change a system if it works) – Inflexibility of ISO 2709 helps

Future of UNIMARC Similar reasons as general reasons for MARC Extensive use in various countries Support from IFLA Sources of records are being extended

Thank you!