GOAL OF THIS WORK ■ To investigate larval transport in “idealized” simulations ● To describe long term & short term dispersal kernels ● Four scenarios.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LARGE EDDY SIMULATION Chin-Hoh Moeng NCAR.
Advertisements

WHERE IS F3 IN MODELING LARVAL DISPERSAL? Satoshi Mitarai, David Siegel University of California, Santa Barbara, CA Kraig Winters Scripps Institution of.
Günther Zängl, DWD1 Improvements for idealized simulations with the COSMO model Günther Zängl Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany.
Computer Aided Thermal Fluid Analysis Lecture 10
Chesapeake Bay Lagrangian Floats Analysis. Motivation Lagrangian float has its advantage in describing waters from different origins. We follow definition.
Predictability of Japan / East Sea (JES) System to Uncertain Initial / Lateral Boundary Conditions and Surface Winds LCDR. Chin-Lung Fang LCDR. Chin-Lung.
IDEALZED KERNEL SIMULATIONS REPORT #3 SATOSHI MITARAI UCSB F3 MEETING, 12/3/04.
Indirect Determination of Surface Heat Fluxes in the Northern Adriatic Sea via the Heat Budget R. P. Signell, A. Russo, J. W. Book, S. Carniel, J. Chiggiato,
High-Resolution Baroclinic Ocean Simulations for the East Florida Shelf: Frontal Eddies to Reef Scale Processes Jerome Fiechter and Christopher N.K. Mooers.
Fluid Kinematics Fluid Dynamics . Fluid Flow Concepts and Reynolds Transport Theorem ä Descriptions of: ä fluid motion ä fluid flows ä temporal and spatial.
ROLE OF HEADLANDS IN LARVAL DISPERSAL Tim Chaffey, Satoshi Mitarai Preliminary results and research plan.
Quantitative Description of Particle Dispersal over Irregular Coastlines Tim Chaffey, Satoshi Mitarai, Dave Siegel.
Earth Systems Science Chapter 5 OCEAN CIRCULATION I: SURFACE Winds, surface currents Flow within gyres: convergence, divergence, upwelling, downwelling,
A Lagrangian approach to droplet condensation in turbulent clouds Rutger IJzermans, Michael W. Reeks School of Mechanical & Systems Engineering Newcastle.
Connectivity in SoCal Bight UCLA-UCSB Telecon 1/14/08.
MODELING OF LARVAL DISPERSAL IN CALIFORNIA CURRENT Satoshi Mitarai 06/26/05.
SPACE / TIME SCALS OF LARVAL SETTLEMENT AND ITS MODELING Satoshi Mitarai Oct. 18, 2005.
Temperature Profiles of Settling Larvae+ Satoshi Mitarai 06/26/06.
Larval Connectivity Talk Goals 1.) INTRODUCE A NEW FLOW DATASET 2.) COMPARE WITH OLD 3.) STATISTICS... SOME WAYS OF VISUALIZING THE DATA.
Flow, Fish & Fishing A Biocomplexity Project
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
DOES LARVAL BEHAVIOR MATTER? No because cross-shore transport does not change within above 50 m or so Yes because larvae will be on different flow layers.
Scaling of Larval Transport in the Coastal Ocean Satoshi Mitarai, Dave Siegel, Kraig Winters Postdoctoral Researcher University of California, Santa Barbara.
Flow, Fish and Fishing: Building Spatial Fishing Scenarios Dave Siegel, James Watson, Chris Costello, Crow White, Satoshi Mitarai, Dan Kaffine, Will White,
SIMULATION SETUP Modeled after conditions found in the central coast of California (CalCOFI line 70) during a typical July Domain is unstructured in alongshore.
Inherent Uncertainties in Nearshore Fisheries: The Biocomplexity of Flow, Fish and Fishing Dave Siegel 1, Satoshi Mitarai 1, Crow White 1, Heather Berkley.
Scaling of larval dispersal in the coastal ocean Satoshi Mitarai Postdoctoral Researcher University of California, Santa Barbara.
Inherent Uncertainties in Nearshore Fisheries: The Biocomplexity of Flow, Fish and Fishing Dave Siegel 1, Satoshi Mitarai 1, Crow White 1, Heather Berkley.
Quantifying Connectivity in the Coastal Ocean With Application to the Southern California Bight Satoshi Mitarai, Dave Siegel, James Watson (UCSB) Charles.
ROLE OF HEADLAND IN LARVAL DISPERSAL Satoshi Mitarai Preliminary results and research plan (Maybe for the next F3 meeting)
ROLE OF IRREGULAR COASTLINES IN LARVAL DISPERSAL Tim Chaffey, Satoshi Mitarai, Dave Siegel Results and research plan.
Scaling and Modeling of Larval Settlement Satoshi Mitarai Oct. 19, 2005.
Juan Carlos Ortiz Royero Ph.D.
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1–2: General actions – Actions on structures exposed to fire Part of the One Stop Shop program Annex D (informative)
Hans Burchard Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde Coastal Ocean Dynamics First course: Hydrodynamics.
Wind Driven Circulation I: Planetary boundary Layer near the sea surface.
Introduction to Monte Carlo Methods D.J.C. Mackay.
Monin-Obukhoff Similarity Theory
“IDEALIZED” WEST COAST SIMULATIONS Numerical domain Boundary conditions Forcings Wind stress: modeled as a Gaussian random process - Statistics (i.e.,
The Influence of Diel Vertical Migration on Krill Recruitment to Monterey Bay Sarah Carr Summer Internship Project Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute.
Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) Fluid dynamics The fluid is represented by a particle system Some particle properties are determined by taking an.
Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
Chapter 15FLUIDS 15.1 Fluid and the World Around Us 1.A fluid is a substance that cannot support a shearing stress. 2.Both gases and liquids are fluids.
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
Application of ROMS for the Spencer Gulf and on the adjacent shelf of South Australia Carlos Teixeira & SARDI Oceanography Group Aquatic Sciences 2009.
“Very high resolution global ocean and Arctic ocean-ice models being developed for climate study” by Albert Semtner Extremely high resolution is required.
Lecture 6: Open Boundaries Solid wall Open boundary Let us first consider the ocean is incompressible, which satisfies (6.1) H  Integrating (6.1) from.
Investigation of Mixed Layer Depth in the Southern Ocean by using a 1-D mixed layer model Chin-Ying Chien & Kevin Speer Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute,
Ekman pumping Integrating the continuity equation through the layer:. Assume and let, we have is transport into or out of the bottom of the Ekman layer.
Ocean Surface Current Observations in PWS Carter Ohlmann Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
Class 8. Oceans Figure: Ocean Depth (mean = 3.7 km)
Kinetic Theory of Gases 4 Main Postulates. Kinetic Theory Postulate 1 – Gases consist of tiny particles (atoms or molecules) whose size is negligible.
“One does not meet oneself until one catches the reflection from an eye other than human.” - Loren Eiseley -
Wind-SST Coupling in the Coastal Upwelling --- An Empirical Numerical Simulation X. Jin, C. Dong, and J. C. McWilliams (IGPP/UCLA) D. B. Chelton (COAS/OSU)
Forces and accelerations in a fluid: (a) acceleration, (b) advection, (c) pressure gradient force, (d) gravity, and (e) acceleration associated with viscosity.
Yamada Science & Art Corporation NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF AEROSOL TRANSPORT Ted Yamada ( YSA Corporation ) Aerosol transportGas transport.
Status of component 4, “urbanLS”… testing the four optional configurations (forward/backward, 0 th /1 st order) John Wilson, 22 August/06 Context Random.
Tropical dynamics and Tropical cyclones
Introduction to the Turbulence Models
Development of the two-equation second-order turbulence-convection model (dry version): analytical formulation, single-column numerical results, and.
The β-spiral Determining absolute velocity from density field
FLUID DYNAMICS Made By: Prajapati Dharmesh Jyantibhai ( )
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures –
Models of atmospheric chemistry
Fluid Kinematics Fluid Dynamics.
TALLEY Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved
Wind Stress and Ekman Mass Transport along CalCOFI lines: 67,70 and 77 by Lora Egley
A Lagrangian Dynamic Model of Sea Ice for Data Assimilation
FLUID MECHANICS - Review
Presentation transcript:

GOAL OF THIS WORK ■ To investigate larval transport in “idealized” simulations ● To describe long term & short term dispersal kernels ● Four scenarios considered ▷ Strong or weak upwelling ▷ Northern or southern California ■ To develop modeling to establish short time kernels from available data sets

IDEALIZED SIMULATIONS ■ Idealized is state that shows 1) statistical stationarity 2) statistical homogeneity in alongshore 3) physically reasonable coastal current ■ Make particle tracking easier ■ No such simulation in literature ● Need to construct our own

OBJECTIVE OF THIS TALK ■ To show progress in simulation construction ● Focus on summer northern California ● Hard to satisfy three “idealized” conditions ● Still some problems in simulations

ROADMAP ■ Four things to be modeled 1) Numerical domain 2) Boundary conditions 3) Initial conditions 4) Forcings ■ Show obtained simulation fields & trajectories ■ Research plan to obtain kernel

1) NUMERICAL DOMAIN ■ 64 x 64 x 32 grid points 512 km x 512 kmDepth: 20 m m

2) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS Periodic Free-slip wall Nudging & sponge layer Wind stress Open B.C.'s

2) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ■ O pen B.C.'s ● Outflow: radiation ▷ Extrapolates boundary values from interior values ● Inflow: nudging ▷ Forces boundary values to reference values ● Sponge & nudging layer ▷ Remove numerical difficulty

3) INITIAL CONDITIONS ■ Determined using CALCOFI Atlas ● Velocity: geostrophic velocity ▷ No motion at 500db (500m) ● Temperature ▷ Consistent with given density field ● Sea level ▷ Dynamic height with zero mean

4) FORCINGS ■ Two external forces: wind stress & pressure gradient ■ Wind stress: Modeled with Gaussian random process whose statistics taken from NBDC archive ○ Cross-shore: 0-m/s mean, 1.2-m/s std, 1-hour corr. ○ Alongshore: -5.6-m/s mean, 4.6-m/s std, 2-hour corr.

4) FORCINGS ■ Pressure gradient: imposed as external force ● Periodic domain cannot develop pressure difference at north/south boundaries ● Computed from dynamic height difference between Pt. Arena & Pt. Conception

COMPUTATION ■ Two year simulation with 30-minute time stepping ● Using ICESS cluster ▷ Took 6 hours using 2 CPU's ▷ Eventually using 12 CPU's ■ Lagrangian particles: ● Released after fields are fully developed ● Released every day at fixed location

RESULTS: TEMPERATURE

RESULTS: ALONGSHORE VELOCITY

RESULTS: SEA LEVEL

RESULTS: KINETIC ENERGY

RESULTS: PARTICLE TRAJECTORIES

PLAN TO OBTAIN KERNEL ■ Describe kernel in idealized simulations ● Track “settlers” & sort them by PLD ▷ Issue: what is “settlement”? ● Question: how do they look? ▷ Long term? Short term? ■ Model short term kernel ● From available data set

PLAN TO OBTAIN KERNEL ■ Detect particle correlation time & length ● Say, particles released within 20 hours at same source go to same destination ● Say, particles released at sources separated 2 km or less at same time go to same destination ■ Release many particles separated by 2 km every 20 hours ■ Observe when kernel becomes Gaussian ● Possibly a month, or possibly over years

SUMMARY ■ “Idealized” simulations are under development ● Little too excited ● But, shows reasonable turbulence structures ● Will be done shortly ■ Dispersal kernel will be provided soon (hopefully) ■ Adding complexity ● Inhomegeneity, behavior, etc