Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EUROCON 2005 The International Conference on "Computer as a tool November 21-24, 2005 Sava Center, Belgrade, Serbia & Montenegro PSPICE Simulation of Two-Mass.
Advertisements

Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
Low temperature dissipative behavior in uncoated fused silica slabs Flavio Travasso Dip. Fisica – Università di Perugia and INFN Perugia Virgo - Perugia.
Students Vincent Duplantier Florian Feyt Hoai Dang Leu Teachers Jacques Bernard Mary Ann Flannery.
Wavelength – λ – distance between successive points on a wave (crest to crest)
Green Team Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson September 14, 2005 UTC ENGR 329 Speed System.
自動控制與實驗 Bode Plots. Advantage of Working with Frequency Response in terms of Bode Plots zBode plots of systems in series (or tandem) simply add which.
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
E. Brost 18/6/09 CHESS & LEPP Good Vibrations Vibration studies at CHESS Elizabeth Brost Mentor: Peter Revesz, Don Hartill CLASSE Physics REU June 18,
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Flow Rate Control System
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Column Flooding Michael Hickey Jason Hixson Don Scott UTC ENCH /15/05.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Router Level Flow Control in Data Networks Stephan Bohacek University of Southern California.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Applications of Logarithms Decibels – Power Gain Decibels – Voltage Gain Frequency and Gain Bode Plot Bode Plot - 2.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
Compliance in Robot Legs Jonathan Hurst. Outline Introduction  What is the long-term goal of this work?  What is the intent of this presentation?
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
S1-1 SECTION 1 REVIEW OF FUNDAMENTALS. S1-2 n This section will introduce the basics of Dynamic Analysis by considering a Single Degree of Freedom (SDOF)
PUMP TESTING BY KAUSTUBH V GITAPATHI DIRECTOR VI AUTOMATION (P) LTD, PUNE.
CHEMICAL REACTION ENGINEERING LABORATORY Characterization of Flow Patterns in Stirred Tank Reactors (STR) Aravind R. Rammohan Chemical Reaction Engineering.
Dynamic Performance Analysis of a Full Toroidal IVT - a theoretical approach International CVT and Hybrid Transmission Congress CVT2004 R. Fuchs,
Experimental determination of motor model parameters ETEC6419.
Introduction What is a sonic orifice? How does it work? What are its uses? How is it applicable to lasers?
St Columba’s High School Electricity and Electronics Op-amps.
Centrifugal Pump Performance Experiment Presented by: Steven King ME 498 Senior lab November 16, 2004.
Distributed Laboratories: Control System Experiments with LabVIEW and the LEGO NXT Platform Greg Droge, Dr. Bonnie Heck Ferri, Jill Auerbach.
Types of Traveling Waves
Why does a violin sound different from a horn? Several kinds of audible information Pitch Timbre Attack Decay Vibrato.
Outline Background Explosion Phenomena Experiments Correlation Conclusion/Summary Questions.
MECH 391 Instrumentation Lab 9 Vibration Analysis of an Aluminum Cantilever Beam Performed: 03/15/04 Sinan Ozcan : I believe I performed 100% of this lab.
Using Torque-Ripple-Induced Vibration to Determine the Initial Rotor Position of a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine Phil Beccue, Steve Pekarek Purdue.
Modern Control System EKT 308
Analysis of Rocket Flights E80 Spring 2008 Section 2, Team 2 Student 1, Student 2, Student 3, and Student 4.
Modern Control System EKT 308 Root Locus and PID controllers.
Feasibility of Detecting Leptoquarks With the CDF Detector Althea Moorhead Mentor: Darin Acosta.
Frequency Response Analysis
LATHE VIBRATIONS ANALYSIS ON SURFACE ROUHHNESS OF MACHINED DETAILS LATHE VIBRATIONS ANALYSIS ON SURFACE ROUHHNESS OF MACHINED DETAILS * Gennady Aryassov,
Root Locus Method. Root Locus Method Root Locus Method.
Rotordynamic Forces Acting on a Centrifugal Open Impeller in Whirling Motion by Using Active Magnetic Bearing July 7, 2011 Eucass 2011 in St Petersburg.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: An Approximate Formula to Calculate the Restoring and Damping Forces of an Air.
Lesson 15: Bode Plots of Transfer Functions
CP4 – WAVES (p ) 1 2 Refraction Wave Equations: Light Key Terms
The Doppler Effect Tyler Cash.
Lesson 18: Integral Process Characteristics
Aim: Standing Wave Lab Draw the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Harmonic for a Standing Wave! I will randomly call people up to the board to draw their waves!
BY KAUSTUBH V GITAPATHI DIRECTOR VI AUTOMATION (P) LTD, PUNE
Updated Velocity Data for undamped panel 2
High-Capacity Solar Pumping in Refugee Camps
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Frequency Response Techniques
Project 1: Brake System Modelling & Control
First-Order System Chapter 5
Mohammed Al-Nasheri Madi Al-Hajri Fahad Al-Jubreen Omar Hassan
Monterey Buoy LT Karen Wingeart.
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
General Force Response
Frequency Response Techniques
Presentation transcript:

Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk

Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

FLOW SYSTEM Flow Background Storage Tank Pump Flow Meter

Flow Background zInput = % motor speed zOutput = mass flow rate (lbs/min) zSSOC yOperating Range 10% - 90%

Previous Work zModeling Step Input zFOPDT Model zTransfer Function Parameters ytau=0.4secK=0.66 (lbs/min)/% yto=0.3sec where G=(Ke^(to*s))/(tau*s+1)

Previous Work zModeling Sine Input zFOPDT Model zTransfer Function Parameters ytau=0.4secK=0.7 (lbs/min)/% yto=0.3sec zBode Plots

Bode Plots zTwo Types zPhase Angle vs Frequency zAR vs Frequency

Bode Results zApparent Order is 1.8 zKcu = 2.6 (lbs/min)/% zFu = 0.8 Hz

Modeling zRoot Locus

Theoretical Results zK cd =.22 zK qd =3.4 zK cu =5.2

Experimental Results zK cd =<.1 zK qd =1.6 zK cu =2.3

4.0 1

Verification z1st peak = 4.0 z2nd peak = 1.0 z1/4 =.25 decay z Frequency z 1/( )=.83hz

53.5

Calculations z1st peak= =5 z2nd peak= =35 zDecay=(3.5/5)=.70 z Frequency z 1/( ) =.77hz

Experimental Results zK cd =<.1 zK qd =1.6 zK cu =2.3

Discussion Theory Experimental K cd =.22 K cd <.1 K qd =3.4 K qd =1.6 K cu =5.2 K cu =2.3

Conclusions zCritical damped K c value.1 zQuarter decay K c value 1.6 zUltimate Kc value 2.3

Q UESTIONS ?