TPAC1.1 progress Jamie C 25 th June 2008. Status FDR changes –Single variant  implemented across all bulk pixels –Pixel layout changes as recommended.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fuding Ge: Die Area Estimation 1 Resistor Area Where R is the desired resistance R s is the applicable sheet resistance W R is the width of the resistor.
Advertisements

Logical Functions Circuits using NMOS and PMOS enhancement mode FETs.
ECE 5220 RFIC Technology & Design – Prof. Kwang-Jin Koh ECE 5220 RFIC HW -2 (Due: 03/05/2012, Hand in by the end of class time, 10:45AM) 1 Homework will.
Jaap Velthuis, University of Bristol SPiDeR SPiDeR (Silicon Pixel Detector Research) at EUDET Telescope Sensor overview with lab results –TPAC –FORTIS.
EE580 – Solar Cells Todd J. Kaiser
TPAC1.2 FDR JC/Feb 27 th. TPAC1.2 FDR Overview The TPAC design will be re-submitted with two mask changes to fix to key bugs in the design: 1.Non-unique.
Copyright 2001, Regents of University of California Lecture 18: 04/0703 A.R. Neureuther Version Date 04/03/03 EECS 42 Intro. electronics for CS Spring.
11/5/2004EE 42 fall 2004 lecture 281 Lecture #28 PMOS LAST TIME: NMOS Electrical Model – NMOS physical structure: W and L and d ox, TODAY: PMOS –Physical.
Tera-Pixel APS for CALICE Progress meeting, 12 th July 2006 Jamie Crooks, Microelectronics/RAL.
Lecture #24 Gates to circuits
Outline Noise Margins Transient Analysis Delay Estimation
DC and transient responses Lezione 3
TPAC1.1 Testing JC/Jan 16 th. Comparator Investigations Two (related) symptoms were observed – Non-gaussian threshold scans, with steep sides and flat.
CMOS VLSI Design4: DC and Transient ResponseSlide 1 EE466: VLSI Design Lecture 05: DC and transient response – CMOS Inverters.
VLSI Digital System Design
S. RossEECS 40 Spring 2003 Lecture 24 Today we will Review charging of output capacitance (origin of gate delay) Calculate output capacitance Discuss fan-out.
ASIC1 progress Jamie Crooks, Feb 08. Bonding Problems: Resolved Smaller bonding wedge + revised programShorts to seal ring discovered under bonds.
NA62 front end Layout in DM option Jan Kaplon/Pierre Jarron.
Chapter 16 CMOS Amplifiers
LEARN THE QUICK AND EASY WAY! VISUAL QUICKSTART GUIDE HTML and CSS 8th Edition Chapter 12: Building Responsive Webpages.
The following slide has the same photo at three resolutions. Each version has been resized in Powerpoint to occupy the entire width of the screen. Remember.
1 Delay Estimation Most digital designs have multiple data paths some of which are not critical. The critical path is defined as the path the offers the.
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
ATLAS Tracker Upgrade Stave Collaboration Workshop Oxford 6-9 February 2012 ABC 130 Hybrid.
Analog Layout.
Microwave Amplifier Design Blog by Ben (Uram) Han and Nemuel Magno Group 14 ENEL 434 – Electronics 2 Assignment
Introduction to VLSI Design – Lec01. Chapter 1 Introduction to VLSI Design Lecture # 2 A Circuit Design Example.
Development of Advanced MAPS for Scientific Applications
TPAC progress Jamie C 29 th July TPAC1.1 Status Submitted 17 th –Some minor DRC errors found at foundry –Corrected/waived Re-Submitted 23 rd July.
Medipix sensors included in MP wafers 2 To achieve good spatial resolution through efficient charge collection: Produced by Micron Semiconductor on n-in-p.
Wire Bonding and Analogue Readout ● Cold bump bonding is not easy ● Pixel chip is not reusable ● FE-I3 is not available at the moment ● FE-I4 is coming.
Penn ESE370 Fall Townley & DeHon ESE370: Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems Day 13: October 5, 2011 Layout and.
1 Fundamentals of Microelectronics  CH1 Why Microelectronics?  CH2 Basic Physics of Semiconductors  CH3 Diode Circuits  CH4 Physics of Bipolar Transistors.
ECE 342 – Jose Schutt-Aine 1 ECE 242 Solid-State Devices & Circuits 15. Current Sources Jose E. Schutt-Aine Electrical & Computer Engineering University.
Radiation Hardness Test Chip Matthias Harter, Peter Fischer Uni Mannheim.
MAPS for a “Tera-Pixel” ECAL at the International Linear Collider J.P. Crooks Y. Mikami, O. Miller, V. Rajovic, N.K. Watson, J.A. Wilson University of.
TPAC1.1 Progress JC: Dec 8 th. Laser No further investigation of odd scans on V1.1 De-ionizing filter needs replacing – On order… Bulb needs replacing.
Electrical and Electronics Engineering Institute College of Engineering University of the Philippines, Diliman IML Probationary Members’ Final Project.
NUMERICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Assessing Technology tradeoffs for 65nm logic circuits D Pramanik, M Cote, K Beaudette Numerical Technologies Inc Valery Axelrad.
1 Fundamentals of Microelectronics  CH1 Why Microelectronics?  CH2 Basic Physics of Semiconductors  CH3 Diode Circuits  CH4 Physics of Bipolar Transistors.
Chapter 6 Voltage Regulators - Part 2-.
J. Crooks STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Jan, 2001CMS Tracker Electronics1 Hybrid stability studies Multi – chip hybrid stability problem when more then ~ 2 chips powered up -> common mode oscillation.
Operational Amplifiers (Op-Amps)
CMOS Devices PN junctions and diodes NMOS and PMOS transistors Resistors Capacitors Bipolar transistors.
AIDA design review Davide Braga Steve Thomas ASIC Design Group 11 February 2009.
11-1 Integrated Microsystems Lab. EE372 VLSI SYSTEM DESIGNE. Yoon Latch-up & Power Consumption Latch-up Problem Latch-up condition  1   2 >1 GND Vdd.
Circuits Series vs Parallel. Electric Circuit Path of current flow As electrons move through a circuit, they transfer potential energy from the source.
EE210 Digital Electronics Class Lecture 10 April 08, 2009
Tera-Pixel APS for CALICE Progress 30 th November 2006.
Test structures for the evaluation of TowerJazz 180 nm CMOS Imaging Sensor technology  ALICE ITS microelectronics team - CERN.
-1-CERN (11/24/2010)P. Valerio Noise performances of MAPS and Hybrid Detector technology Pierpaolo Valerio.
Tera-Pixel APS for CALICE Progress meeting, 6 th June 2006 Jamie Crooks, Microelectronics/RAL.
Glencoe Physics Chapter 23 ”Circuits and Circuit Elements"
17 nov FEC4_P2 status P.Pangaud ; S.Godiot ; R.Fei ; JP.Luo Remember : P2 from P1 Optimization of Rad-Hard block and SEU tolerance blocs Optimization.
Ideas on MAPS design for ATLAS ITk. HV-MAPS challenges Fast signal Good signal over noise ratio (S/N). Radiation tolerance (various fluences) Resolution.
Digital Block Design & Layout Logic gate (3INPUT NAND GATE) 구자연.
Barrel EM Calorimeter Preamp / Shaper Update Mitch Newcomer, Andrew Townley Prepared for Munich Liquid Argon Week 2011.
SPiDeR  Status of SPIDER Status/Funding Sensor overview with first results –TPAC –FORTIS –CHERWELL Beam test 09 Future.
Version 0.1 TPAC Irradiation board Upgrade 2/06/2010.
Charge collection studies with irradiated CMOS detectors
TPAC1.1 progress Jamie C 4th June 2008.
Design and fabrication of Endcap prototype sensors (petalet)
Introduction to Layout Inverter Layout Example Layout Design Rules
Where are we? Lots of Layout issues Line of diffusion style
The current through the resistors is 300mA.
(a) the equivalent resistance, (b) V0,
The following slide has the same photo at three resolutions
TPAC status JC/Jan2010.
Example Example 1: An electric lamp is rated 110 W, 200 V. When the lamp is operated at its rated power and voltage, calculate a) the current flowing through.
Presentation transcript:

TPAC1.1 progress Jamie C 25 th June 2008

Status FDR changes –Single variant  implemented across all bulk pixels –Pixel layout changes as recommended –New resistor layout(s) –New test pixels - as 3x3 blocks of old/new shaper design –Larger bond pads –Assorted test devices to occupy spare pad sites –Changes for Hi-Res processing LVS & DRC –Top (without pads) ok, including 18 test pixels To do –Add test devices to top level schematic/layout –LVS including pad cells –Antenna checks –Auto-fill where necessary –DRC the DPW rules –Tape out/in & repeat all checks

Resistors (again) Now have a better understanding –Previous suspicions were unfounded… –In the calculation of resistance, the drawn width is adjusted by a -∆W term which is large relative to our W: ~O(30%) –Some earlier versions of the tools incorrectly omitted this term, leading to incorrect resistance calculations and my subsequent misunderstanding Potential issue with resistor matching –Various contributing factors in processing –Foundry will send me some more data on variation of this ∆W term –Mismatch models probably don’t account for variation of this term –Recommended minimum width makes this ∆W insignificant: ~O(3%) but is impractical in the pixel. –Most likely cause of lower-than-expected gain in shapers, although the drawn geometry was actually ok Recommended action –Target 4Mohm (as original design) but use the larger available space to increase resistor width to improve potential issues with ∆W. –Can achieve 4.2Mohm with wider resistor, giving ∆W= ~O(21%) –Test structure resistors of the old and new resistor that can be easily measured on each device for monitoring variance

Parasitics in the pixel Reduced to < original design –13.7fF Guard ring  diode node separation increased where possible

Pixel <M2

Pixel <M4

Test Pixels

Changes for Hi-Res Epi Placed a NWELL guard ring around the bulk pixels –2.1um wide constant track around bulk pixels & logic –Connected to old VRST pads for external drive (jumper/dac on PCB) –Additional guard ring around test pixels Placed DPW everywhere except pixels

Guard ring: Example

Test structures Transistors –Nmos (lv/hv) for characterisation, noise measurement, based on unit cell based on input transistor in preShape pixel design –Pmos (lv/hv) for characterisation, noise measurement –Additional long device (TBC) Diodes –1000 diodes for leakage current measurements Capacitors –O(1pF) made from the 1x1um pixel cells in parallel –O(0.5pF) made from parallel units of 2 series capacitors Nwell-Nwell isolation Resistors –Original 4MΩ –New wider 4.2MΩ –2* 4MΩ resistors with larger widths to monitor matching/variance for future projects Foundry will place an extra strip of their standard PCM structures –One with, one without DPW –Will be tested as part of their standard procedure  immediate and directly comparable data for identical structures with/without DPW PADS