First Choice Graduate Programs Initiating a First Choice Program Consultation and Review.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

INSTITUTIONAL READINESS What does it mean to be ready to do a major course redesign? Is your institution ready?

Advertisements

Promotion and Tenure Workshop for MUSM Faculty A Faculty Development Opportunity Mercer University School of Medicine 2012.

WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.

International Students: Best Practices for Recruitment, Admission, and Retention ACCU Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. February 2013.

Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.

PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,

Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 Part II OSU Outcomes Assessment for ABET EC200.

GriffithHonoursCollege Dr Jeanne McConachie, Manager.

Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.

1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.

Senior Appointments Committee J. M. Friedman, MD, PhD.

1 Strategic Planning: An Update March 13, Outline What we have done so far? Where do we stand now? Next steps?

Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.

Assessment Plans Discussion CLAS Unit Heads Maria Cimitile, Associate Dean, CLAS Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer January 11, 2006.

Be a Part of Something Great! Learning Communities at Wayne State.

College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.

DRAFTFall ’08 / Spring ’09 Undergoing significant revision and expansion. Strategic Plan Draft October 1, 2008 Fall ’08/Spring ’09 Undergoing significant.

Robert M. Augustine, Dean of the Graduate School Eastern Illinois University

Implementing the new Australian Medical Council standards: The focus on Indigenous health Professor Michael Field Chair, Medical School Accreditation Committee,

Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

First Choice Graduate Programs First Choice Programs Consultation and Review Processes.

Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

Supporting Talent Development at Western Dr. Peggy Roffey Director, Learning and Development The University of Western Ontario March 21, 2006.

EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J February 2011An overview Academic Promotion to Level B.

Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.

Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.

GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)

WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SUSTAINABLE CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT.

WELCOME Strategic Directions Finale May 1, SETTING THE STAGE Planning for BC’s Future 2015—2018.

Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.

F Y October 29, How do we look? ? ACPE Accreditation.

Strategic Academic Visioning and Empowerment (SAVE) Final Report to UWF BOT December 2011.

AVID Coordinator and Teacher: Jenny Zornes Room: C109 Phone: Conference Time: 8:36-9:24 AVID Stands for Advancement.

UCF University-wide System for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Dr. Julia Pet-Armacost Assistant VP, Information, Planning, and Assessment University.

1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.

EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.

Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.

Curtin University is a trademark of Curtin University of Technology CRICOS Provider Code 00301J 2012An overview Academic Promotion to Level B.

Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.

Learning Goals at St. John Fisher College Peter J. Gray, Ph.D. Director of Academic Assessment United States Naval Academy May 2004.

International Partnerships. Perspective: The challenge for the 21 st century is for institutions to learn how to relate to and work with other institutions—in.

Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

Mission Mission The Raj Soin College of Business provides leadership and innovation to: Develop successful and ethical leaders capable of making valued.

Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.

Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.

P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.

Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage

CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.

Principles of Good Governance

Student Learning Outcomes Documentation

Outstanding Professor Award Committee Presents:

CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness

Quality Assurance of Higher Education Programs:

Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University

Center For Faculty Excellence: Leadership and Faculty Development

Tippie RISE Colleen Opal Assistant Director, Experiential Learning

Enhancing Academic partnerships DSA Faculty Fellows

Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan

Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan

Assessment Presentation

Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks

Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation

PROGRAM DETAILS This innovative program is designed to ease transfer from RBC to W&M for high-ability, Virginia residents who are Pell-eligible. The Promise.

S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.

Presentation transcript:

First Choice Graduate Programs Initiating a First Choice Program Consultation and Review

Graduate Mission Superior Graduate Study Options Quality of Enrollment Advanced Scholarship through Assessment Rigorous Courses & Options Student Scholarship Faculty Scholarship

Criterion 1: Sustained Achievements Attracting Quality Candidates Enrollment Management  Recruitment Plan  Selection Criteria  Acceptance Rate Assistantship/Scholarship Management  Annual Awards  Competitive Awards Matriculation Management Graduate Placement

Criterion 2 Sustained Achievements Fostering Scholarship Assessment Results Center for Academic Support & Achievement  Written & Oral Communication  Depth of Knowledge (Technology & Ethics)  Critical Thinking & Problem Solving  Research & Scholarship Assessment Results Graduate School

Criterion 3 Rigorous Courses and Options Sustained Mission Planning Sustained Curricular Leadership  Administration Contributions to Quality  Faculty Contributions to Quality External Review Contributions to Quality Capstone Contributions to Quality Student Contributions to Quality Alumni Contributions to Quality External Partnership Contributions To Quality

Criterion 4 Sustained Student Research/Creative Activities Sustained Student Research  Productivity  Engagement Commitment to Research & Travel Grants Showcasing Scholarship Award Participation

Criterion 5 Sustained Faculty Scholarship Coordinator Leadership Faculty Scholarship

What is a Consultation? Informal Summary Documenting Criteria Informal Presentation to Review Board Only Guidance for a Decision about a Full Review Identification of Criteria that Appear to be Met Identification of Criteria that Appear not to be Met

How Does it Start? Chair Collaborates with Coordinator: Makes decision to apply Chair & Coordinator Select Program Team, Team Leader, Team Consultants (if desired) Chair or Coordinator Request a Consultation Date

Guidelines for the Consultation Report Not Required in Advance Informal without Format Expectations

Outcome Following a Consultation Dean Provides a Formal Summary of Strengths/Weaknesses via the CGS Board’s Review in 30 Days Meeting with Dean to Review Report Program Communicates Decision for Pursuing Full Review

What is a Full Review? Comprehensive Evaluation of a Program Formal Report with Format Expectations Report Required 30 Days in Advance Presentation to Entire CGS CGS Provides Feedback to Review Board Board Makes Recommendation to Dean Formal Report and Decision

What is Included in a Full Review Report? Program Mission Program Degree Requirements Program Admission Requirements Other Essential Elements Documentation of How Criteria Met/Sustained Highlights of Exemplary Achievements

How is a Full Review Conducted? Documents Reviewed by CGS & CGS Board Formal Presentation to CGS by Program Team Program Team Discussion with CGS CGS Board Discussion with CGS Recommendation by CGS Board to Dean Decision by Dean

What is the Outcome of a Full Review Program Achieves or Does Not Achieve the First Choice Designation Review Board Provides Dean with Summary Report Dean Completes Formal Report for Program If Achieved, Resources Follow If Not Achieved, Meetings Held to Review Needs

AQIGP: Academic Quality Improvement for Graduate Programs Selection Process Consultation Process Report

Suspending Enrollments Enrollment Limitations Assessment Limitations Curriculum Limitations Student Research/Creative Activity Limitations Faculty Scholarship Limitations

Discussion Q & A