GLOBAL EFFECT ON INTERNATIONAL PRICES OF EU- MEDITERRANEAN PARTNER COUNTRIES BILATERAL AGRICULTURAL LIBERALIZATION Rafael de Arce (UAM University) Ramón.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Subsidies and the Environment An Overview of the State of Knowledge Gareth Porter OECD Workshop on Environmentally Harmful Subsidies November 7-8, 2002.
Advertisements

Indias Trade Policy Choices MANAGING DIVERSE CHALLENGES SANDRA POLASKI A. GANESH-KUMAR SCOTT MCDONALD MANOJ PANDA SHERMAN ROBINSON February 2008.
Winners and Losers: Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries FINDINGS FROM A GLOBAL GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL Director, Trade, Equity and Development.
Antonia Diakantoni Hubert Escaith WTO
Research Proposal PIDE and Iran. Prudent economic management is essential for putting the economies on the path of sustainable economic growth. Over the.
Vietnamese agriculture and global integration David Vanzetti and Pham Lan Huong Australian National University and independent consultant National CGE.
Intra-Industry Trade, Imperfect Competition, Trade Integration and Invasive Species Risk Anh T. Tu and John Beghin Iowa State University.
Chapter 4: Essential Microeconomic Tools Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein.
EC 936 ECONOMIC POLICY MODELLING LECTURE 8: CGE MODELS OF CLIMATE CHANGE.
Economic Implications of the AUS-FTA for U.S. Dairy Markets and Policy Presentation by Joseph Balagtas at the Silverado Symposium on Agricultural Policy.
Sample exam paper Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
1 [Giovanni Anania, IAAE Congress, Durban, August 2003] The Fischler reform of the CAP and the WTO negotiations Giovanni Anania Department of Economics.
SIMULATION MODELS 1 st Week INTRODUCTION Master économie Internationale et Développement Université Paris Dauphine Dr. Rafael de Arce Professeur Univ.
AGRO II MODEL AUTOMATIC TOOL FOR LIBERALISATION SCENARIOS SIMULATION Marseille, 4-6 December, 2003.
Leontief and Ghosh Models Modèles de Simulation Université Paris IX Dauphine Prof. Rafael de Arce Master Économie et Affaires Internationales.
Dr. Rafael de Arce and Dr. Ramón Mahía Professors in Econometrics UAM
Thom Achterbosch LEI EU - India regional trade agreement – a quantitative assessment.
Quantifying the impacts of agricultural trade liberalisation Lecture 23 Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement Lecture 20. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
AGRICULTURAL POLICY REFORM IN THE WTO The Road Ahead.
ESTIMATION OF A TARIFF ONLY LEVEL TO REPLACE THE CURRENT EUROPEAN PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR THE BANANA MARKET ASOCIACIÓN GRUPO DE ESTUDIOS EUROPEOS Y MEDITERRÁNEOS,
Quantifying the impacts of agricultural trade liberalisation Lecture 27 Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Master Économie et Affaires Internationales Cours “Modèles de Simulation” Paris Dauphine –October 2009 Prof. Ramón Mahía Applied Economics Department
Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT ÉCONOMIQUES.
The U.S. and World Sugar Industries under the EU and DOHA Trade Liberalization Won W. Koo   Chamber of Commerce Distinguished Professor and Director  
Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT ÉCONOMIQUES.
Trade Facilitation: Benefits to Business Dr. Carol Cosgrove-Sacks Director, Trade United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) CTIED, 26 May 2005.
Interlinkages between Trade and Sustainable Development: Launch of Bridges Russian Edition The International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
Directorate for Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries 1 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT.
Domestic Support and the WTO: Comparison of Support Among OECD Countries C. Edwin Young Mary Burfisher Frederick Nelson Lorraine Mitchell Economic Research.
ECIPE PRESENTATION » Natalia Macyra Trade Policy Analyst, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) Implications of the Transatlantic.
The WTO negotiations: Will developing countries benefit from a new agreement?
Negotiations on Agriculture State of Play by Surabhi Mittal WTO &The Doha Round : The Way Forward 6-7 April, 2006.
Bi-lateral FTAs, RTAs and Unilateral Liberalization: The South Asian Trade Highways Presented at the ARTNeT-PEP Policy Forum on “Trade, Investment and.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE IN TURKEY: Developments in the Framework of EU Accession Erol H. ÇAKMAK Department of Economics Middle East Technical University (METU),
2 LIBERALIZATION, PRODUCTIVITY AND AGGREGATE EXPENDITURE: FUNDAMENTAL DETERMINANTS OF REAL EQUILIBRIUM EXCHANGE RATE Juan Benítez Gabriela Mordecki XI.
HOW SINKS IN WOOD PRODUCTS AFFECT THE COST OF KYOTO PROTOCOL AND WORLD TRADE OF WOOD PRODUCTS: results from a global economywide model Johanna Pohjola.
RENEWABLE ENERGIES AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE MEDITERRANEAN: THE CASE OF MOROCCO (Simulation ) PROJECT: FEM34-02 Co-directors: Prof. A.
The Chinese Agricultural Sector after Admittance to the WTO Won W. Koo Director and Professor Center for Agricultural Policy and Trade Studies North Dakota.
TARIFF AND NON-TARIFF MEASURES AFFECTING MARKET ACCESS FOR FRESH AND PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES John Wainio and Barry Krissoff Economic Research Service,
Directorate for Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries 1 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT.
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis: a User’s Guide – Economic tools Nairobi, 6-8 th December 2006.
Agriculture Negotiations: Moving Forward Ashok Gulati IFPRI Director in Asia WTO and The Doha Round: The Way forward ICRIER-SRTT Conference 6-7 April,
IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE MULTILATERAL AGRICULTURAL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS ON CEMAC COUNTRIES By: Ernest BAMOU & Jean Pierre TCHANOU UNCTAD workshop on Trade.
AG -1 © WTO – OMC 2012 The WTO Agreement on Agriculture Serafino Marchese, Chief, Training and Capacity Building Section WTO Institute for Training and.
1 Implications of a Doha Agreement for Agricultural Markets in Sudan Imad Eldin Elfadil Abdel Karim University of Khartoum - Sudan David Abler Penn State.
Impact on EU agriculture of Falconer’s draft modalities DG for Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
Impact of the CAP Reforms on U.S. – EU Cereal Trade Sachin Chintawar, Lynn Kennedy, John V. Westra.
Gaelle Gouarin OECD Trade and Agriculture Food chain network meeting Mobilizing the food chain for health OECD, PARIS, October Impacts on the.
Development of the World Trading System
New Orleans June 1 – 3, Comparing market access formulas for U.S. and EU What hurts and who benefits? Christine Wieck and Tom Wahl Impact Center.
Leontief Prices Model Modèles de Simulation Université Paris IX Dauphine, October 17th 28th 2005 Master Économie et Affaires Internationales.
Moldova Trade Study: IS THE DCFTA GOOD FOR MOLDOVA? Note 2 Valeriu Prohnitchi Adrian Lupusor Chisinau, Moldova February, 29 th 2016.
1 The Impacts of the FTAA and China’s WTO Accession on the International Trade of Soybeans and Soybean Products Presentation: Conference on Free Trade.
Eric Wailes and Alvaro Durand-Morat University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture Impacts of WTO Policy on U.S. Rice Policy.
Non-Agriculture Market Access(NAMA)  It is widely acknowledged that trade could be an engine of economic growth as well as an effective driver of development.
Estimating the causal effect of trade protection on productivity in Uruguay Data and methodology issues Carlos Casacuberta Dayna Zaclicever November, 2008.
Non-agricultural market access negotiations Marc Bacchetta ERSD WTO.
The economic implications of Brexit for Scotland
Impact of the CAP Reforms on U.S. – EU Cereal Trade
Trade performance of the EU economies: Inter-country input-output tables (IOTs) as a necessary tool Conference of European Statistics Stakeholders, Budapest.
The Effect of China’s Preferential Trade Agreements on Energy Trade
The Potential Impact of the Doha Round on Grains
IMPACTS OF EU INTEGRATION ON TURKISH AGRICULTURE
Modeling full global trade policy reform and Doha scenarios
Sven Blank (University of Tübingen)
The 2008 Market Access Proposals and Developing Countries
Impact Assessment of Thailand FTA
Poverty and Social Impact Analysis: a User’s Guide – Economic tools
Presentation transcript:

GLOBAL EFFECT ON INTERNATIONAL PRICES OF EU- MEDITERRANEAN PARTNER COUNTRIES BILATERAL AGRICULTURAL LIBERALIZATION Rafael de Arce (UAM University) Ramón Mahía (UAM University) ERC / METU International Conference in Economics, Ankara 6 th September 2003

PRESENTATION -General framework of analysis: International Trade Evolution Impact on international trade conditions after liberalization processes Agricultural Trade Liberalization Process UE- MPC’s Countries -Two footnotes: Econometrical exercise Preliminary results of FEMISE project

PRESENTATION FEMISE Project Framework Agri-Trade Liberalisation UE - MPC’s Change in trade prices Change in trade flows Chain effects in the whole MPC’s economies (Dynamic TIO analysis)

CASE OF STUDY (Some details) -Interest on NET price changes after EU-MPC's agricultural liberalisation Agri-Trade Liberalisation UE - MPC’s Domestic Support Reduction in EU Import Tariff Cuts in MPC´s Trade prices DOWN Trade prices UP NET EFFECT?

CASE OF STUDY (Some details) -Interest on NET price changes after EU-MPC's agricultural liberalisation -Selection of countries and products (Comext, FADN, FAO, OECD databases )

MODELLING THE EFFECT OF REDUCTION IN EU AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT I: Description -The model: Pit: International price logarithm of product “i” at time "t" PSE it: Producer Support Estimate of product “i” at time "t" EUP it: EU export price of product “i” at time "t" HPP it: Hodrick-Prescott filter series

MODELLING THE EFFECT OF REDUCTION IN EU AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT I: Description -Relevant Comments: Equation working at 2 digits level of product PSE instead of TSE (CSE and GSSE rejected) Hodrick-Prescott filter series as a innovation to consider volatility in raw materials prices Export EU Price as exogenous (Poonyth, 2000), (Frandsen, 2003) Simple Partial Equilibrium Model

MODELLING THE EFFECT OF REDUCTION IN EU AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT II: Results -Relevant Comments: Good Adjustment Variables significance Affordable mulcolinearity problems -General Empirical results: Negative relationship Prices - PSE proved Large connection between Prices and PSE in two cases: Cereals and Sugar

MODELLING THE EFFECT OF REDUCTION IN EU AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT II: Results Coefficients and adjustment details (i)

MODELLING THE EFFECT OF REDUCTION IN EU AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT II: Results Coefficients and adjustment details (ii)

MODELLING THE EFFECT OF REDUCTION IN EU AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT III: Simulation -Scenarios: EU : 55% reduction in the Aggregate Measurement of Support (AMS) starting from the level of commitments made in the last round of negotiations. USA: reduction of trade-distorting support to 5 percent of a country’s total value of agriculture production (the 5 percent rule) over a 5-year period

MODELLING THE EFFECT OF REDUCTION IN EU AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT III: Simulation -Simulation Results:

MODELLING THE EFFECT OF REDUCTION IN EU AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT III: Simulation -Simulation Results: Similar results in both scenarios Big impact on cereal prices Relevant changes in other agricultural goods prices but not unusual changes if we look at a secular price series for agricultural goods

EU-MPC'S TRADE PRICES AFTER SUPPRESION OF AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT AND TARIFFS -Main questions Can the EU maintain agricultural production without the domestic support implemented through the CAP? How much market share would the EU have with different prices?

EU-MPC'S TRADE PRICES AFTER SUPPRESION OF AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT AND TARIFFS -Can the EU maintain agricultural production without the domestic support implemented through the CAP? Exploitations bigger than 40 ESU receive 50% of domestic support / 59% of subventions are received by just 22% of agricultural exploitations.

EU-MPC'S TRADE PRICES AFTER SUPPRESION OF AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT AND TARIFFS -How much market share would the EU have with different prices? ?

COMPUTATION OF CHANGE IN BILATERAL PRICES AFTER A TARIFF ELIMINATION IN MPC’s -Measure of trade protection just using MFN ad-valorem tariff weighted averages: Non-tariff measures considered Average data considered Tariff peaks, tariff dispersion and tariff escalation ignored -High level of protection -Low movement in international trade prices -Final Net effect similar to the one linked with support reduction.

SUMMARY -Valuable tool for primary simulation of domestic support reduction -Empirical results shows a low effect of support reduction in agricultural world prices or production capacity in both scenarios (UE / USA)

SUMMARY -If trade liberalisation seems to be irrelevant for trade prices and production level, What´s the use of it? Rise in import capacity volume for MPC’s countries without increase in import yield Production system efficiency improved