Retention Interview Project 2008 University of Michigan Retention Interview Project Copyright ©2008 The Regents of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Advertisements

1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year Focusing on Two-Year Colleges Randy L. Swing, Ph.D. Kathleen M. Morley, Ph.D. Policy Center on the.
Mid Year Performance Review Process
Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Management Supporting Student Success and Retention.
1. Retention Toolkit: Resources for Retaining Valued Staff VOICES Conference Workshop Ann Arbor, Michigan June 26,
HOUSTON EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW (HEAR) PROCESS INFORMATION SESSION NON-SUPERVISOR For more information, visit
1. 2  Identify recruitment and retention challenges  Discuss current trends and challenges  Define the clinical question  Discuss the perceived benefits.
 BUDGET PROCESS UPDATE  ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT  PUB UPDATE  OTHER (if time allows) ALL-CAMPUS MEETING - May 12.
Performance Appraisal System Update
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
Action Implementation and Monitoring A risk in PHN practice is that so much attention can be devoted to development of objectives and planning to address.
Staff Compensation Program Update
Tech-Talks AQIP: Improving the Diversity of the Faculty September 29, – 5pm.
Retention Interview Process Training July 2008 Retention Interview Process Training 1.
7/16/ Roadmap to the Future: Product Strategy for UM Enterprise Systems Michigan Administrative Information Services (MAIS) HRMS Unit Liaison Meeting.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
Update on Job Reclassification System Redesign Project Civil Service Senate Patti Dion, Employee Relations Director Sheila Reger, OHR Consulting Team Manager.
Unit 4: Managing people and change
Variety is the spice of life March 17,  Pair & Share the 3 – P’s (professional, personal, peculiar)  Who are we?  What are our roles at WCU and.
Field Engineer Development Program
“Advancing Knowledge. Improving Life.” Strategic Planning Workshop Dean Stanley Lemeshow Strategic Planning Process Dean Stanley Lemeshow October 2007.
1 Attract, Develop and Engage the Workforce of the 21 st Century New Job Classification System (JCCS) Manager Preparation Session February 2011.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Performance Institute - July 20, 2001 Dagne Fulcher, IT Workforce Improvement U.S. Department of the Treasury Recruiting & Retaining Top IT Talent for.
January Procurement Operations Division Code 210 MD-715 Project Management Person Responsible: Valorie Burr, Procurement Officer Project Facilitator:
RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION One thing that makes our lives easier as leaders is who we hire and how we do it!
Presentation Contents What do we mean by Personal Development? What is the process for doing this activity? How does PD relate to PAR? What are the steps.
Bush School Diversity Report January 29, A General Comparison of Student Data.
Human Capital Office Cultivating Talent, Diversity and Service Servicewide New Employee Ambassador Program NTEU Briefing.
Maricopa Priorities Status Update Fall Maricopa Priorities Basics What it isWhat it’s not A regular, cyclical, bottom-up process to: ▫Evaluate everything.
Workforce Development Framework for NS Public Health To meet the needs for population health, there are some key HR issues that need to be addressed through.
A project of the President’s Emerging Leaders Program in collaboration with the Administrative Services Task Force.
2005 Performance Development System Survey Human Resources Staff Meeting March 20, 2006.
HERI FACULTY SURVEY Surveys mailed through campus mail to all Full-Time faculty during the Spring 2005 semester A follow-up second mailing for non- respondents.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
 Population: 45,578  Median Household Income: $54,871  Persons below poverty level: 8.3%  Housing Units: 27,925  Homeownership rate: 78.8%  Persons.
Educator Effectiveness Update January Agenda 1.Overview of CDE’s Educator Effectiveness Work 2.Focusing Funding Streams to Support Educator Effectiveness.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Casualty Actuarial Society ERM for the CAS. Centennial Goal The CAS will be recognized globally as a leading resource in educating casualty actuaries.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
The Kaleidoscope Group Proprietary and Confidential Diversity & Inclusion Audit Summary NLU Diversity & Inclusion Council January 18, 2007.
Succession Planning Program Design. Meeting Purpose 2 Introduce the Leadership Academy class to the succession planning process Describe succession planning.
Presentation to Faculty Senate February 8, Four Imperatives that Make Diversity UC’s Compelling Interest  Learning Imperative*  Economic Imperative*
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
New Employee Induction Program
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #4: RESOURCES & SUPPORT SYSTEMS
AN UPDATE ON THE EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF HEADS OF DEPARTMENT IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Public Service and.
THE NEED FOR HEALTH PROMOTION Topic One, Part Two.
Copyright © 2012 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved
Human Resource Management Chapter 12. Definition of Human Resources Management The process of attracting, developing and maintaining a quality workforce.
October 1, 2015 v.1 Organizational Readiness Phase Two Presentation to the Chief Human Resources Officers October 1, 2015 Talent Management Consortium.
High Potential Leader Program Brevard Public School District Nancy Rehbine Zentis, Ph.D.
Navigating the Performance Review Process
Succession Planning: Concept and Practice in Nepalese context
Human Aspects of Organizing Reading: pp. 173 – 183.
RECRUITMENT & SELECTION
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
Focused Midterm Report
Infusing Cultural Competency into the Hiring Process
The Council for Diversity and Interculturalism
IT Governance Planning Overview
How does the Branding fit into ECC Excels???
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
EVALUATING THE CITY MANAGER
Apprenticeship and the DSP: Growing Opportunity for Frontline Workers
Presentation transcript:

Retention Interview Project 2008 University of Michigan Retention Interview Project Copyright ©2008 The Regents of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan All Rights Reserved 1

Background Summary The Retention Interview Project was a recommendation from the Faculty and Staff Recruitment Sub-committee Report dated February 15, 2007 and the 2007 Diversity Blueprints Final Report dated March 15, Both of these reports indicated a concern for faculty and staff at risk of leaving the University for other opportunities. The reports further emphasized the importance of identifying career issues and concerns in advance so that negative issues are addressed and positive factors are reaffirmed and replicated. The 2008 University of Michigan Human Capital Report indicates an increasing number of staff becoming eligible to retire through 2014 and some departments are expected to experience a higher than average turnover rate over the next several years. University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 2

Purpose The purpose of the Retention Interview Project is to address the need to maintain a highly qualified and diverse workforce through focused retention discussions and action plans. This will be accomplished by implementing a Retention Interview Process that provide ways to identify staff that may represent a retention risk and discussion guidelines and tools. University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 3

Scope At this time, the scope for the Retention Interview Process is limited to Staff employees. Pilots will be run on the UM Ann Arbor campus, UM Health Systems, and Dearborn campus. All information and results from the pilots will be shared with the Diversity Blueprints Faculty and Staff Sub- committee for their consideration for use with faculty employees. University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 4

Synopsis of Retention Issues and Challenges From the 2007 Faculty and Staff Recruitment and Retention Sub-Committee Diversity Blueprints Task Force; 2007 Diversity Council Subcommittee Recommendations; 2008 AAP Report; Employee Satisfaction and Engagement Surveys; and 2008 Human Capital Report: “Retention too little, too late after years of hard work and feelings of disrespect; because this is a Research I institution, the work of staff members can sometimes seem less significant, thus less appreciated”. “Cascade effect: when one person leaves, others may follow”. “Diversity in small numbers and feeling of isolation. Lack of community”. “Need a process where staff employees can provide feedback about their work experience, climate, and any issues/concerns regarding their career”. “People tend to seek other opportunities during the first 5 years of service which requires some type of positive career intervention during that period”. “Retirement estimates through 2014 are increasing for the majority of staff career families which requires replacement strategies”. “African American and Hispanic managers are among the highest staff employees eligible for retirement through 2014”. University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 5

What is the Retention Interview Project? The Retention Interview Project is a web-based process to identify and respond to employees that may be contemplating leaving the Institution for other opportunities. The process includes diagnostic tools and templates to prioritize retention issues and allow supervisors to focus on employees that represent the greatest retention risk. The process also includes discussion guidelines that lay the foundation for a positive two-way conversation to determine if career expectations are being met. Finally, the process includes an action plan so that the positive aspects of working at the University are reinforced and career aspirations are realized. University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 6

Who is involved in the process? Supervisor, employee, HR What are their roles? Supervisor/Manager Identify staff that may represent a retention risk Conduct retention interview Facilitate the development of a Job Satisfaction and Growth Plan Employee Take responsibility for their career Complete a personal assessment of their career goals and aspirations Take ownership of their Job Satisfaction and Growth Plan HR Counsel supervisors, managers and staff on the process University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 7

Web-Based Tool Kit A.Understand Retention Risks and How to Minimize Them 1.How do I know if I have or may experience a Retention Issue? B.Identify Staff that may be a Retention Risk 1.Retention Risk Matrix 4 Panel Chart and Instructions C.Prepare for and Conduct Retention Interviews 1.A Sample Interview with a Staff Member 2.Supervisor Pre-Interview Worksheet 3.Supervisor Interview Notes Form 4.Career Reflection Questions for Staff Employees D.Take Action 1.Job Satisfaction and Growth Plan University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 8

9 How do I know if I have a Retention problem? You may experience a retention problem if you answer yes to any of the following questions: Large population of retirement eligible staff…20-50% of your staff are eligible to retire over the next 5 years Higher than normal turnover rate...over 10% Difficulty attracting and maintaining diversity in your department…inability to develop a pool of qualified diversity candidates for both entry level and managerial positions and over 10% turnover of diversity candidates Lose more new hires than other staff…unusually high turnover rate of staff with 1-5 years experience High percentage of employees transferring to other departments…10-20% annual turnover of staff leaving for other opportunities in other departments New supervisor or manager……0-1 years experience in the department as a supervisor or manager

RETENTION RISK 4 PANEL MATRIX CHART Purpose and Instructions PURPOSE: The purpose of the Retention Risk 4 Panel Matrix chart is to help supervisors and managers identify staff that may be at risk of leaving the University for other opportunities. It is designed to allow identification of employees that may be at risk of leaving staff based the impact to the department if they were to leave, and their likelihood of departure. If used properly, the chart will give you a list of staff to focus on for retention interviews. It is expected that not all staff will require a retention interview. The chart SHOULD NOT be used to identify performance issues or isolate staff within the department. INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THE CHART: The Retention Risk 4 Panel Matrix chart is a diagnostic tool. It is simple and easy to use and will not take a lot of time and research to complete the chart. It is recommended that the chart be done on a semi- annual or annual basis and can be easily incorporated into your existing performance management or career development discussion cycles. Follow these steps to complete the chart: Prepare a list of your employees. Plot them into the “Retention Risk 4 Panel Matrix chart” boxes using the definitions below the chart. List those staff in box 4. They represent the most retention risk. The staff in boxes 2 and 3 may also represent a retention risk but not as great. They should be noted. University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 10

RETENTION RISK 4 PANEL MATRIX CHART-continued After completing the chart, follow these steps to complete the Retention Interview process: 1.Schedule a retention interview (30-45 minutes) with those staff in box 4 and possibly boxes 2 and 3. 2.Prior to the interview, familiarize yourself with the employee’s history and career. 3.Complete the “Supervisor Pre-interview Worksheet” to prepare for the interview. 4.Ask staff to complete the “Career Reflection Questions” to prepare for the interview. 5.Complete the Job Satisfaction and Growth Plan together with the employee. 6.Monitor the Job Satisfaction and Growth Plan with the employee until completion. University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 11

Job Satisfaction and Growth Plan Date: _________________________________________________________________________ Staff Member Name: ____________________________________________________________ Job Career Family: ______________________________________________________________ Job Satisfaction and Growth Plan Actions: 1.____________________________________________________________________________ 2.____________________________________________________________________________ 3.____________________________________________________________________________ Staff Signature Responsible for the Plan: ____________________________________________ Supervisor Signature Supporting the Plan: ___________________________________________ Expected Completion Date: _______________________________________________________ Suggested actions to take: Assignments to enhance or stretch in current role Development of professional expertise Promotional opportunities Developmental opportunities Opportunities to mentor others/transfer knowledge More formal/informal feedback Work Life Balance Initiatives Review the Career Path Navigator ( University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 12

Retention Interview Process Pilot Update October 28, 2008 Status Total number of employees in pilot groups: 340 Last pilot will end January 2009 Pilot Information Business and Finance (4 Pilots) MAIS; Financial CPU (47 employees) – Launched September 16, 2008 HR Contact: Amy Grier Facilities and Operations; Facilities Maintenance, Plant Buildings and Grounds, Electrical Engineering ( employees) – Launched September 17, 2008 HR Contact: Stacy Johnson Human Resources; HRRIS (5 employees) – Launched July 24, 2008 HR Contact: Sue MacDavitt Finance Operations; Accounting (7 employees) – Launched November 19, 2008 HR Contact: Steve Reck University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 13

Retention Interview Process Pilot Update - continued October 28, 2008 University Development Office (2 Pilots) Talent Management (7 employees) – Launched August 27, 2008 Finance and Administration (8 employees) – Launched August 27, 2008 HR Contacts: Chrissi Rawak and Robin Sober University Health System (3 Pilots) Cardiovascular (60 employees) – Launched July 28, 2008 HR Contact: Greg Joyce UMHS Payroll (6 employees) – Launched September 29, 2008 HR Contact: Kelly Department of Social Work (50 employees) – Launched October 7, 2008 HR Contact: Anita Clos or University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 14

Retention Interview Process Pilot Update - continued October 28, 2008 Dearborn Campus (3 Pilots) – (45-50 employees) College of Arts, Science, Letters – Launched August 27, 2008 Institutional Advancement – Launched August 27, 2008 Enrollment Management and Student Life – Launched August 27, 2008 HR Contacts: Jeff Evans and Ginny Zarras or University of Michigan Retention Interview Project 2008 All Rights Reserved 15