Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
Advertisements

June 6, 2013 SURFACE RECLAMATION OF THE CAPTAIN JACK MILL SUPERFUND SITE Nick Anton, CDM Smith Todd Bragdon, CDM Smith Mary Boardman, CDPHE Joy Jenkins,
Former NAS Moffett Field
Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement.
Cytec Statement of Basis and Permit Modification July 16, 2012 Public Hearing Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
1 BoRit Asbestos & The Superfund Process Stacie Peterson, Remedial Project Manager (RPM)
J-Field Edgewood Aberdeen Proving Ground. Description From 1940 to 1970s, the Army disposed of chemical agents, high explosives and chemical wastes. APG.
BoRit Superfund Site Timeline
Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site Proposed Plan for Site Cleanup.
INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF CERCLA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS USDA FOREST SERVICE Grants and Agreements Workshop February 28, 2002 Great Falls,
Part III Solid Waste Engineering
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
What is NPDES? “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System”
RAF PORTREATH A.K.A Chemical Defence Establishment Nancekuke
Radium contamination in Denver, Colorado Colin Hall.
DOE 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010 Loren W. Setlow, CPG Office of Radiation and.
Federal Mogul Department for Environmental Protection Kentucky Division of Waste Management February 10, 2015 Presented by Chris Jung To Protect and Enhance.
Location In the mountain of Colorado consist of numerous sites in Denver area which contaminate with radioactive soils and Debris. There are about 65.
Fate and Transport of Chemicals A Presentation by Terrie Boguski Technical Outreach Services for Communities (TOSC) Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Hazardous.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
Remediation Plan for Arkansas River Flood Plain OU11 of the California Gulch National Priority Site.
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
Delivering Excellence in Remediation of Contaminated Sites.
McCoy Field Proposed Keith Middle School Site EPA Proposes Approval of McCoy Field Cleanup Plan.
U.S. Environmental History 1965 Solid Waste Disposal Act (WSDA) 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) – Identification of wastes (characteristics.
Scott Surovchak Rocky Flats Site Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Cleanup and Remedy Implementation at the Rocky.
Contaminated Land Management Framework in Malaysia
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
RBES Guiding Principles The Department will comply with the requirements of the nation’s environmental laws and regulations. However, the requirement to.
TURNING BROWNFIELDS. Definition US EPA 1997 abandoned, idled or under-used industrial and commercial facilities where expansion or redevelopment is complicated.
Module 1: Introduction to the Superfund Program. 2 Module Objectives q Explain the legislative history of Superfund q Describe the relationship between.
Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda April 25, 2013, MassDEP, One Winter Street Boston.
Spectron Superfund Site Proposed Plan Contaminated Shallow Soils U.S. EPA Region III June 26, 2003 Philadelphia, PA Robert J. Sanchez US EPA - Remedial.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
Indiana Petroleum & Environmental Contractors Association August 26, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
1 Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Site LTS&M Planning LTS&M Conference Grand Junction, CO November 16, 2010 Donald Metzler U.S.
State and Tribal Government Working Group November 12, 2008 FERNALD NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES SETTLEMENT.
1 A Consultancy on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation ~ Experience on aftermath of Fukushima Daiichi NPS accident.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
By Mitch Cooper & Haley Herbert January 1987 Vertac site manufactured herbicides 1978 National Dioxin Survey 1983 Site placed on the National.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Coeur d’Alene Basin TLG Repository PFT meeting December 9, 2003.
Tulsa Fuel & Manufacturing Superfund Site Remedial Design and Cleanup Plans September 2014.
David K. Paylor Virginia State Board of Health March 17, 2016.
1. 2 Presentation Highlights BGOU overview Scope of the Remedial Investigation Investigation results Schedule 2.
Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Draft Feasibility Study/Remedial Action Plan Draft Feasibility Study/Remedial Action Plan Schlage Lock and.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
Omaha Riverfront Redevelopment Project Brownfields 2004 C. Dale Jacobson, P.E., DEE.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Environmental Cleanup Program Status
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Upland Landfill Waste Discharge Application 7295 Gold River Highway
Uranium in Colorado: Past, Present, and Potential Future
EPA Options for the Federal Regulation of Coal Combustion Waste Lisa Evans Earthjustice October 22, 2010.
Colorado: Current Waste Disposal Approaches and Challenges
TENORM in Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: Assessing the Risk
Hazardous Waste Any waste that is a risk to the health of humans or other living things Solids, liquids, and gases Often contain toxic, corrosive, or.
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL SITE PUBLIC MEETING December 6, 2016
AFPC Policy Protect its personnel, contractors,3rd parties and the environment against the hazards of exposure to ionizing radiation due to AFPC activities.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Purpose To address the hazards to human health and the environment presented.
Presentation transcript:

Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN

Meeting Agenda Introductions (6:30-6:35) Site Background (6:35-6:40) Review of Site Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (6:40-6:50) Remedial Alternatives and Preferred Alternative (6:50-7:05) Public Comment (7:05-7:55) Meeting Closure (7:55-8:00)

Presentation and Comments Meeting Transcript/Record Formal Comment Follow Presentation Written Comment – Forms Available Oral Comment – Please Note on Sign-In Sheet

Site Background Research Complex On Site Mining and Minerals Industry Investigations Settling Pond Between Buildings and Creek for Wastewater 17 Research Buildings CSMRI Ceased Operations at Site in 1987

Environmental Impacts Drums Tailings Ponds Industrial Sewer System Buildings/Building Components Soils Sample Storage Areas

Environmental Activities 1992 Water Main Break EPA Response Pond Excavation Soil Stockpile Building Drain Decontamination Selected Building Demolition Drums and Gas Cylinder Disposal

Environmental Activities Soil Stockpile Evaluation and Disposal Additional Drum Removal Building Evaluation and Demolition Additional Subsurface Investigation Concrete and Asphalt Evaluation and Disposal

Remedial Investigation Work Plans Characterization Survey Work Plan Site Safety and Health Plan Sampling and Analysis Plan Quality Assurance Plan Background Evaluation National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) Multi-Agency Radiation Surveys and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM)

Remedial Investigation Surface Soils Gamma Survey Surface Features Survey Topographic Survey Sampling and Laboratory Analysis Sub-Surface Soils Test Pits Soil Borings

Investigation Results Areas with Elevated Metals Concentrations (Cadmium, Lead, Mercury, Arsenic) Some Areas With Elevated Gamma Activity (Radium, Thorium, Uranium)

Investigation Results Upper Foot of Soils Most Affected Limited Deeper Areas Near Former Buildings Also Affected Groundwater Sampling (Four Quarters – Six Wells) Two Wells – Uranium Temporarily Above Drinking Water Limit One Well – TCE Temporarily Above Drinking Water Limit

Site Risks/Hazards Site As-Is Lifetime Risk for Onsite Full-Time Resident Between Four per 1000 and Eight per 10,000 Minimal Risks to Neighbors Some Long-Term Risk to Environment Metals and Radionuclides to Groundwater

Remedial Action Objectives Eliminate Human Exposure Pathways Develop Soil Cleanup Levels to Limit Exposures Minimize Radon Gas Risk Minimize Possible Lead Exposures to Children Prevent Off-Site Migration of Materials

Remedial Action Objectives Limit Ground Water and Surface Water Concentrations to Safe Drinking Water Act Standards Reduce Radiation Exposures to Levels As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) Comply With Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs)

Remedial Alternatives – One NO FURTHER ACTION Institutional Controls Relocate Water Main Maintain Security Fencing/Signage Erosion Control Prohibition of Construction/Use Monitoring

Remedial Alternatives - Two Engineered Cap – Entire Site Clay Cap Prevents Surface Release/Exposure Prevents Surface Water Infiltration Alternative Slurry Wall Prevents Ground Water Infiltration Long-Term Institutional Controls Monitoring

Remedial Alternatives - Three Engineered Cap w Partial Removal Soils Over Elevated Radium, Thorium, Uranium Removed From Site Alternatives Remove to 15 pCi/g or 5 pCi/g Remaining Materials Consolidated and Capped Long-Term Institutional Controls Long-Term Monitoring

Remedial Alternatives - Four On-Site Solidification With Cap/Cell Consolidation of Affected Soils Solidification With Concrete and Fly Ash Alternative Includes Engineered Disposal Cell 0.9 Acre Cap/Cell Long-Term Institutional Controls Long-Term Monitoring

Remedial Alternatives - Five Off-Site Disposal Excavation and Removal of All Affected Material Local Solid Waste Landfill Specialized Landfill Alternate for Radium/Thorium/Uranium Affected Soils Unrestricted Future Use

Evaluation of Alternatives Protection of Human Health and Environment Compliance With Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment

Evaluation of Alternatives Short-Term Effectiveness Implementability Cost State Acceptance Community Acceptance

Preferred Alternative Excavation and Off-Site Disposal (Alternative Five) Substantial Long-Term Risk Reduction Removal of Source Material Returns Ground Water to Background Values Reasonable Timeframe Cost Advantages Complies With ARARs

Community Involvement Web Site Document Repositories CSM Arthur Lakes Library Golden Public Library CSM Environmental Health & Safety Department

COMMENTS ON DRAFT RI/FS Comments Due February 20, 2004 Comment Form US Mail – Attn: Linn Havelick, CSM, 1500 Illinois Street, Golden, CO Oral Comments Recorded