-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Advertisements

The Performance of Feedback Control Systems
Chapter 10 Stability Analysis and Controller Tuning
Chapter 10: Frequency Response Techniques 1 ©2000, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Nise/Control Systems Engineering, 3/e Chapter 10 Frequency Response Techniques.
Nyquist Plot – First Order Lag
4. System Response This module is concern with the response of LTI system. L.T. is used to investigate the response of first and second order systems.
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Green Team Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson September 14, 2005 UTC ENGR 329 Speed System.
Voltage Control System: Proportional Integral (PI) Controllers Team Purple: John Pangle Jessica Raymond Justin Whitt ENGR 329 November 30, 2005.
Flow Rate Control System “Step Response Modeling” February 15, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Control System Design Based on Frequency Response Analysis
Flow Control System Steady State Operation & Step Response February 1 st, 2006 U.T.C. ENGR 329.
FLOW RATE CONTROL SYSTEM
LEVEL-1 Frequency Response –Experiments –Modeling Jim Henry.
Marshal Stout Michael Brooks Nathan Wilson ENGR 329 Team Green February 11, 2009.
Pressure System Amanda Newman Andy Patel Bryan Cuervo September 28 th 2005 ENGR. 329 UTC Engineering.
Flow Rate Control System
Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions.
Team Green Speed Control - Steady State Performance and Step Response John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles ENGR 329 UTC 2/1/06.
Red Team Amanda Newman Ankit Patel Bryan Cuervo UTC ENGR 329 Sept. 14, 2005.
Red Team -Pressure- Steady State Operating And Step Response Dennis To Cory Richardson Jamison Linden 6/26/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
-Pressure System- Frequency Response Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/27/2015, UTC, ENGR-329.
Transient & Steady State Response Analysis
Pressure Control System: Root Locus Plotting Team Green: X Y Z.
Flow Rate Control System “Frequency Response” By: Taylor Murphy March 1, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
Team Green John Barker John Beverly Keith Skiles UTC ENGR Steady State and Step Response Performance Speed Control System.
Root Locus Plotting Red Squad Flow System Ben Gordon, Ben Klingler, Dianah Dugan October 31, 2007 University of Tennessee Chattanooga ENGR 329.
Green Team Speed System Proportional Only Controller Design and Experimental Dustin Fraley DeAndre Strong Stephanie Wilson.
Lecture 9: Compensator Design in Frequency Domain.
B Note from Dr. Henry These slides are suggested to be ADDED to your previous presentation that included system description, diagrams, SSOC, operating.
Flow Rate Control System Proportional Only Controller April 2, 2006 U.T.C. Engineering 329.
What does Kc do?. What is Kc? Kc is the Controller Gain of a control system. It can be adjusted to obtain a variety of system responses.
Yellow Team Spray-Booth Pressure Station Steady, Step Behavior and Step Modeling Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L.
Feedback Control Systems (FCS) Dr. Imtiaz Hussain URL :
Lecture 22 Second order system natural response Review Mathematical form of solutions Qualitative interpretation Second order system step response Related.
DNT Control Principle Root Locus Techniques DNT Control Principle.
Unit 5: Feedback and control theory An Introduction to Mechanical Engineering: Part Two Feedback and control theory Learning summary By the end of this.
Chapter 13 1 Frequency Response Analysis Sinusoidal Forcing of a First-Order Process For a first-order transfer function with gain K and time constant,
Properties of Root Locus Lesson Objectives : After finish this lesson, students will be able to  be aware of the control system problem  be aware of.
Proportional control Consider forward path gain A Feedback and Control If the size of the loop gain is large, that is if |A  >> 1, then or.
1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse (see
Chapter 5 Transient and Steady State Response “I will study and get ready and someday my chance will come” Abraham Lincoln.
April Second Order Systems m Spring force ky F(t) (proportional to velocity) (proportional to displacement)
1 Lecture D32 : Damped Free Vibration Spring-Dashpot-Mass System Spring Force k > 0 Dashpot c > 0 Newton’s Second Law (Define) Natural Frequency and Period.
Chapter 4 Dynamic Systems: Higher Order Processes Prof. Shi-Shang Jang National Tsing-Hua University Chemical Engineering Dept. Hsin Chu, Taiwan April,
o Problem Reconsider Problem
سیستمهای کنترل خطی پاییز 1389 بسم ا... الرحمن الرحيم دکتر حسين بلندي - دکتر سید مجید اسما عیل زاده.
Chapter 8 Vibration A. Free vibration  = 0 k m x
G(s) Input (sinusoid) Time Output Ti me InputOutput A linear, time-invariant single input and single output (SISO) system. The input to this system is.
1 Time Response. CHAPTER Poles and Zeros and System Response. Figure 3.1: (a) System showing input and output; (b) Pole-zero plot of the system;
Lecture 13: Second-Order Systems Time Response Lecture 12: First-order systems Lecture 13: Second-order systems Lecture 14: Non-canonical systems ME 431,
Lecture 3: Common Dynamic Systems 1. Identify common dynamic elements:  First order  Integrating (Non self-regulatory)  Second order  Dead time Predict.
Date of download: 6/22/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Modeling and Multivariable Control Design Methodologies for Hexapod-Based Satellite.
Signals and Systems, 2/E by Simon Haykin and Barry Van Veen Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons. Inc. All rights reserved. Figure 9.1 (p. 664) Two different.
Plot Diagram.
Automatic Control Theory CSE 322
Time Response Analysis
Figure A circuit used to illustrate the step response of a parallel RLC circuit.
Unit-Ramp Response System & Control Engineering Lab.
Frequency Response Analysis
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 11/2/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
UNIT-II TIME RESPONSE ANALYSIS
1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse
Jamie West Jay Baker Joel Wood 10/10/11 UTC ENGR 3280L
Lecture 22 Second order system natural response
Unit-Impulse Response
CBE / MET Feb 12.
1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse
Frequency Response Analysis
Exercise 1 For the unit step response shown in the following figure, find the transfer function of the system. Also find rise time and settling time. Solution.
Presentation transcript:

-Pressure System- Root Locus Cory Richardson Dennis To Jamison Linden 6/14/2015, UTC, ENGR-329

Contents  Background Description, SSOC, Input/Output  Transfer Function  Step Response/Frequency Response  Root Locus  Modeling  Results  Conclusions

Background - System Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the Dunlap Plant Spray-Paint Booths

Background - Block Diagram Figure 2. Block diagram of paint booth system

Background - SSOC Operating Range for Output Operating Range for Input

Transfer Function Transfer Function m(s) Input c(s) Output

Background – Step Response

Background – Step Response Results ExperimentModel Gain cm- H2O/% Dead Time0.5 s0.48 s Time Constant1.7 s1.75 s

Frequency Response - Example c (1.45) T (25.3) m (15) t (-1.8)

Frequency Response – Bode Plots f u =0.85 Hz

Frequency Response – Bode Plots K= 0.35 cm-H 2 O/% 2 nd Orderfu=0.85 AR=.024

Modeling Approach – Bode Plots

Results Comparison  Experimental Results: K = 0.1 – 0.35(cm-H 2 0/%) t 0 = 0.6 s  = 1.7 s 2 nd Order system Ultimate Frequency = 0.85 Hz Ultimate Controller Gain = 42 – 204 (%/cm-H 2 O)

Results Comparison  Model Results: K = 0.1 – 0.35 (cm-H 2 O/%) t 0 = 0.85 s  = 1.7 s

System  2 nd order system  f u = 0.85 Hz  From the model: K = 0.1 – 0.35 (cm-H 2 O/%) t 0 = 0.85 s  = 1.7 s  K cu = 18.2 – 55.6 (%/cm-H 2 O)

Feedback Control

 Locations

Kc Locations 45-60%

Kc Locations 60-75%

Kc Locations 75-90%

Root Locus Results (45-60%)  Ultimate K cu =55  1/500 th Decay K c =11  1/10 th Decay K c =27  Quarter Decay K c =36  Critically Damping K c = 4.4  Underdamped 4.4< K c < 55  Overdamped 0 < K c < 4.4 *all units are %/cm H 2 O

Root Locus Results (60-75%)  Ultimate K cu =28  1/500 th Decay K c =5.9  1/10 th Decay K c =16  Quarter Decay K c =18  Critically Damping K c = 2.2  Underdamped 2.2< K c < 28  Overdamped 0 < K c < 2.2 *all units are %/cm H 2 O

Root Locus Results (75-90%)  Ultimate K cu =14  1/500 th Decay K c =2.8  1/10 th Decay K c =7.9  Quarter Decay K c =8.6  Critically Damping K c = 1.0  Underdamped 1.0< K c < 14  Overdamped 0 < K c < 1.0 *all units are %/cm H 2 O

Conclusions For 45-60% K c needed Overdamped 0 < K c < 4.4 Critically Damped K c = 4.4 Underdamped 4.4< K c < 55 Quarter Decay K c = 36 *all units are % / cm H 2 O

Conclusions For 60-75% K c needed Overdamped 0 < K c < 2.2 Critically Damped K c = 2.2 Underdamped 2.2< K c < 28 Quarter Decay K c = 18 *all units are % / cm H 2 O

Conclusions For 75-90% K c needed Overdamped 0 < K c < 1.0 Critically Damped K c = 1.0 Underdamped 1.0< K c < 14 Quarter Decay K c = 8.6 *all units are % / cm H 2 O

Conclusions Offset=