CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 1 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 an institutional repository for Cambridge University Peter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

Consortium within a consortium: the basis for the York service model Elizabeth Heaps (University Librarian) Elizabeth Harbord (Head of Collection Management)
Creating Institutional Repositories Stephen Pinfield.
FAIR – Focus on Access to Institutional Resources William J Nixon DAEDALUS Project, University of Glasgow e-libraries for e-learning.
Edinburgh 23 October DSpace: A Platform for Research Repositories Peter Morgan Project Director, Cambridge University Library.
Electronic Theses The RGU Project Background to the Project Aims and Objectives Dr. Susan Copeland.
Supporting education and research Repositories in Context Digital repositories as components of an integrated infrastructure for education Leona Carpenter.
The Future of Scholarship in the Digital Age: The Role of Institutional Repositories Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
DSpace: the MIT Libraries Institutional Repository MacKenzie Smith, MIT EDUCAUSE 2003, November 5 th Copyright MacKenzie Smith, This work is the.
JISC Collections 04 September 2014 | Presentation to PRATT-SILS MA Summer School | Slide 1 JISC Collections.
E-Theses & Supplementary Digital Data. E-Theses and Supplementary Digital Data Really useful stuff to know Paper manuscript PhD Theses Digital PhD E-Theses.
Administration & Workflow
Building institutional support: how we & others have done it …good? Rea Devakos University of Toronto Libraries E :
DAEDALUS: Facing the Challenges of eTheses at Glasgow William J Nixon Project Manager: Service Development (DAEDALUS) ETD Berlin, May 2003.
Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.
MIT’s DSpace A good fit for ETDs Margret Branschofsky Keith Glavash MIT LIBRARIES.
MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology MIT Libraries.
Faculty Self-Archiving: The Gap between Opportunity and Practice Denise Troll Covey Carnegie Mellon University Libraries DLF Forum – November 2007.
1 Planning And Electronic Records Issues For Electronically Enhanced Courses Jeremy Rowe Nancy Tribbensee
The KnowledgeBank: Powered by DSpace Laura Tull Systems Librarian Ohio State University Libraries WiLSWorld July 27, 2004.
December 9, 2004International Conference on Developing Digital Institutional Repositories ©MIT1 Managing Digital Research Data With DSpace MacKenzie Smith.
Building Publishing Services in the Academic Library Brian Rosenblum University of Kansas Colorado Academic Library Summit Denver, Colorado June 1, 2007.
NHPRC ELECTRONIC RECORDS RESEARCH FELLOWSHIP SYMPOSIUM Nov. 19, 2004 Rebecca Schulte University of Kansas Project Title: Testing Boundaries—An Exploration.
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER University Library The Library’s Digital Repository or Whatever happened to MIDESS? Michael Emly Jonathan Ainsworth.
Archiving Data. Essential stuff to know Why deposit? Digital repositories ADS Guidelines Deposit evaluation & requirements Deposit checklist & template.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Service update Elin Stangeland Repository Manager.
I:\Share\Bestuursinligting\OUDITfinaal\Portfolio\Statistics\BI UPSpace An institutional repository for the University of.
I:\Share\Bestuursinligting\OUDITfinaal\Portfolio\Statistics\BI UPSpace An institutional repository for the University of Pretoria.
Open Exeter Project Team
Release 4 of the COUNTER Code of Practice for e- Resources and new usage- based measures of impact Peter Shepherd COUNTER May 2014.
Supporting further and higher education Digital Preservation: Legal Issues Chinese National Academy of Sciences July04 Neil Beagrie, BL/JISC Partnership.
E-journal Publishing Strategies at Pitt Timothy S. Deliyannides Director, Office of Scholarly Communication and Publishing and Head, Information Technology.
I:\Share\Bestuursinligting\OUDITfinaal\Portfolio\Statistics\BI UPSpace An institutional research repository for the University of Pretoria.
Management, marketing and population of repositories Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.
Open Access: An Introduction Edward Shreeves Director, Collections and Content Development University of Iowa Libraries
Update on the VERSIONS Project for SHERPA-LEAP SHERPA Liaison Meeting UCL, 29 March 2006.
Introducing New Services with DSpace Open Repositories Conference 2007 Susan Wells Parham Kent Woynowski Julie Griffin.
Libra: Thesis and Dissertation Submission. What is Libra? UVA’s institutional repository, providing online archiving and access for the scholarly output.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Uganda Science Digital Library (USDL) Digitizing and publishing documents Bergen – Makerere visit February 2005.
THE ROAD TO OPEN ACCESS A guide to the implementation of the Berlin Declaration Frederick J. Friend OSI Open Access Advocate JISC Consultant Honorary Director.
Creating an IR: Planning and Policies Stacy Nowicki, Kalamazoo College Christopher Raab, Franklin & Marshall College NITLE DSpace Virtual User Community.
BMC Open Access Colloquium, 8 February Morgan: "Open Access Repositories"
Digital Preservation: Current Thinking Anne Gilliland-Swetland Department of Information Studies.
Presentation to Legal and Policy Issues Cluster JISC DRP Programme Meeting 28 March 2006.
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 Resource Issues.
Getting Your Publications to the Masses: Using W&L’s Institutional Repository to Enhance Scholarly Communication Elizabeth Anne Teaff, MLIS August 31,
HEFCE/Higher Education Academy/JISC cc-by-sa (uk2.5) Image source – flickr (cc-by) OER and the Open Agenda Malcolm Read, Executive Secretary, JISC.
Uganda Scholarly Digital Library (USDL) Makerere University’s Institutional Repository By Margaret Nakiganda URL:
ScholarSpace & Open UH Mānoa March 2013 Beth Tillinghast Web Support Librarian ScholarSpace & eVols Project Manager UHM Library.
CSUN eCommons Submitting Learning Objects to CSUN eCommons: A Preliminary Guide February 7, 2008.
Institutional Repositories: the DSpace Experience Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
April 14, 2005MIT Libraries Visiting Committee Libraries Strategic Plan Theme III Work to shape the future MacKenzie Smith Associate Director for Technology.
Preservation metadata and the Cedars project Michael Day UKOLN: UK Office for Library and Information Networking University of Bath
Institutional Repositories July 2007 Intellectual property management : the DISA experience Dr D Peters DISA: Digital Innovation South Africa.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
DAEDALUS - An ePrints Case Study William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
ARIADNE is funded by the European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme Archiving and Repositories Holly Wright.
A Project of the University Libraries Ball State University Libraries A destination for research, learning, and friends.
Making the Case for Curation: The Practical Experiment of DSpace Managing Digital Assets February 5-6, 2005 Charleston, SC Ann J. Wolpert, Director of.
EXPLORER project Elizabeth Lunt Project Manager De Montfort University.
Repositories 101 Morag Greig and William Nixon, University of Glasgow.
Digital Commons digitalcommons.unl.edu. Digital Commons is: an “institutional repository” (IR) a resource for scholarly communication an opportunity for.
Open Access Initiatives Memorial University Libraries Lisa Goddard Scholarly Communications Librarian April 2011.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Outline of Talk What is eResearch and why does it matter? The South African SARIS project Challenging the current scholarly communication system eResearch,
Wanted: The Right Content and The Content Rights Putting Knowledge to Work: Building an Institutional Repository for Your Campus California Polytechnic.
Open Exeter Project Team
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III
Presentation transcript:

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 1 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 an institutional repository for Cambridge University Peter Morgan Project Director Cambridge University Library

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 2 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Outline  Cambridge University and its Library  –project background –acquiring content –sample communities –what's next? –questions raised

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 3 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Cambridge University and its Library

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 4 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Cambridge University Library © Cambridge University Library

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 5 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Cambridge University Library 1934 © Cambridge University Library "Under D-construction" (acknowledgement: University of Cambridge Newsletter)

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 6 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Cambridge University - profile  800th anniversary in 2004  ~16,500 students (11,500 u/g, 5,000 p/g)  ~3,000 staff  collegiate university – 31 colleges  23 faculties in 6 schools  separate library and computing service

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 7 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Cambridge University - libraries  tripartite library system (~100 libraries) –Cambridge University Library –departmental libraries –college libraries  Cambridge University Library –legal deposit library –5 buildings (main library + law, medicine, physical sciences, biological sciences) –8 million items

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 8 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Cambridge University Library - the policy context  digital preservation research and practice –CEDARS (CURL Exemplars in Digital ARchiveS)  scholarly communication –SPARC Europe –advocacy for self-archiving of research papers  library collections (born-digital, digitized)  local archiving –e-theses –University Archives  legal deposit of UK digital publications

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 9 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 "Digital information will never survive by accident" (Neil Beagrie, British Library)

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 10 HKUST, 9-10 December project background

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 11 HKUST, 9-10 December project outline  3-year project (to Dec 2005) funded by Cambridge-MIT Institute  collaboration between Cambridge (Library + Computing Service) and MIT Libraries  project vision and goals –establish institutional repository –develop functionality of DSpace platform (digital preservation, learning management systems) –create a business plan –collaborate with others

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 12 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Getting started  project plan –timetable, staffing, equipment, office overheads)  project team  technology base –hardware –software installation & customizatoin

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 13 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Policy formulation  aims and objectives  initial service definition  management structure  Library - Computing Service integration  advisory structure  communication process  operational policy

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 14 HKUST, 9-10 December acquiring content

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 15 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Potential material  scholarly papers (advocacy campaign)  library collections (born-digital or digitized)  learning materials (interactive, multimedia)  research materials (texts, images, films, etc.)  e-theses  datasets  administrative records  e-journals & e-books  websites

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 16 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Attracting users and content  Top-down –heads of Schools (deans), senior administrators  Bottom-up –individual creators/owners of material  Formal –letters, press releases, articles, presentations  Informal –visits, word of mouth, surveys of websites

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 17 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Acquisition of content  'early adopters' –voluntary –formal and informal recruitment –political importance –enthusiasm –variety of subjects (science, humanities, arts) –variety of file formats –variety of types (research collections, teaching material, texts, theses, records, scientific data) –safety net for materials under threat

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 18 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Assumptions  submitters provide their own metadata  University Library reserves right to validate, correct, or reject metadata  copyright remains with the original owner  repository is licensed to make copies for dissemination and preservation  default is always to "open access", but restricted /closed access may be agreed

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 19 HKUST, 9-10 December sample communities

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 20 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Early Adopter communities COMMUNITYITEMSTOTAL SIZE  Applied Economics162 items (papers) 94 MB  Cambridge Rock Art D/b153 items (images) 8,553 MB  Cambridge Univ Library705 items (images) 81 MB  CARET 7 items (video) 13,778 MB  Chemistry1,925 items (mixed) 51 MB  items (mixed) 82 MB  Fitzwilliam Museum1 item (paper) 1 MB  Philosophy5 items (interviews) 13 MB  Social Anthropology303 items (films) 28,692 MB

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 21 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 22 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 23 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 24 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 25 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 26 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 27 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 28 HKUST, 9-10 December what's next?

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 29 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Business plan - outline  project funding ends Dec 2005  business plan will support sustainable service  consultants commissioned  business plan must be relevant to Cambridge  methodology potentially useful elsewhere

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 30 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Business plan - fundamentals  the elements of our business plan include –vision and goals –service definition –market research –organizational structure –operations plan –cost model –revenue model –communications & PR –evaluation and ongoing market review

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 31 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Business plan components - market research  survey goals –confirm service definition –test attitudes and understanding –acquire demographic data –size market –gauge marketing channels  survey design and distribution issues –pilot version –target audience –distribution methods –online v. hardcopy –timing –250 responses (>70 interested in using

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 32 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Cost & revenue models  Cost models: –cost categories (especiallY staffing, hardware) –derived from service definition –range of options (minimal service  full range of features and services)  Revenue models –must reflect market research –identify local constraints (financial, political, etc.) –think creatively - question conventional wisdom

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 33 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Evaluation  within the institution –to monitor health of system –to demonstrate usage / justify initial investment –to support case for further investment and development –to establish benchmarks for future assessment –to demonstrate success (what IS "success"?)  beyond the institution –to compare progress with like and unlike communities –to identify community trends (successes, problems, gaps) –to support case for collaboration at regional, national, international levels –to establish benchmarks for future assessment

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 34 HKUST, 9-10 December questions for consideration

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 35 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Policy considerations (1)  is Open Source affordable?  submission criteria –what should be submitted? –who decides (who determines 'value')?  voluntary or mandatory?  who handles the submission?  acceptable file formats?  levels of access (open, restricted)?  metadata standards (quality assurance)?

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 36 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Policy considerations (2)  IPR issues (management of rights & obligations)?  institutional and/or subject repositories?  institutional repository = single or multiple systems?  single or multiple installations within institution?  short-term v. long-term ‘ownership’?  responsibility for externally-owned items?  who runs the repository (library? IT?)  who pays?

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 37 HKUST, 9-10 December 2004 Peter Morgan