Title 4 Compliance Options ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul. Band aide Approach  Buy Credits –Have been abundant because of aggressive compliance – could be running.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting More for Four Principles for Comprehensive Emissions Trading Jan Mazurek, Director Center for Innovation and the Environment 2002 Environmental.
Advertisements

Joe Chaisson April 21, Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Power Plants and Geologic Carbon Sequestration Joe Chaisson.
Mathieu Lucquiaud, Hannah Chalmers, Jon Gibbins
Clean Air Act (Title 4) Acid Rain ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul.
A novel IGCC system with steam injected H2/O2 cycle and CO2 recovery P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Low Quality Fuel but High.
Steve Moorman Mgr Business Development, Advanced Technologies Babcock & Wilcox CO2 Emission Reduction from Coal Fired Plants FutureGen 2.0 CO2 Capture.
CAIR & MATS 2012 Southern Sectional AWMA Annual Meeting & Technical Conference September 12, 2012 Chris Goodman, P.E. Environmental Strategy.
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
Cogeneration Facility The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Cogeneration Systems Energy Services Department Phil Barner- Cogeneration Systems.
Helping PUCs analyze options to reduce GHG regulatory risk in coal dependent states Dalia Patiño-Echeverri Nicholas School of the Environment - Duke University.
Previous MACT Sub Categories EPA has recognized differences in other industry rules by using sub-categorization: – Differences in processes – Differences.
The Massachusetts Approach to Power Plant Clean-up Policy Making and Standards Setting to Reach Clean Air Sonia Hamel Massachusetts Executive Office of.
The Regulatory Tsunami
Indiana’s Clean Energy Credit Program (Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Set-aside) Roger Letterman Sr. Environmental Manager Office of Air Quality.
Recent EPA Regulation Development Presented by Bill Luthans to the 56 th Meeting of the Joint Advisory Committee Meeting for the Improvement of Air Quality.
Coal-Fired Power Plants
Jeopardy Final JeopardyFinal Jeopardy 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt 300 pt 400 pt 500 pt 100 pt 200 pt.
Electricity Generation From Lignite Mark K
EPA Regulations On Electric Utility Generating Units (EGU)
10 th June 2008 Petcoke at Drax Power Station By Ian Wright Houston.
Chapter 8 Cont’d Lecture 14 Acid Rain. Smog
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 19. Acid Rain Name derives from a chemical reaction between SO 2 (sulfur dioxide) NO 2 (nitrogen dioxide) and H 2 O (water)
Fossil Fuels: Their advantages, disadvantages and future
POWER GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES
Mercury in the Great Lakes Region Sponsored by the Commission for Environmental Cooperation’s Environment, Economy and Trade and Pollutants and Health.
GAS POWER PLANT. Producing electrisity using gas Gas mixture ignited in a gas turbine Combined Cycle Gas Turbine Thermal power plant Fuel: coal, oil or.
The good, the bad, and the ugly.. Coal Basics Most abundant of fossil fuels World’s largest energy source Type of rock composed of organic matter having.
Danielle Vaguine Fariha Zaman Harrison Smith. What is Coal? Coal is a fossil fuel formed from the decomposition of organic materials that have been subjected.
Steam Power Station Presented By Ashvin G. Patel Asst. Prof. (E.E.)
Air Pollution Control Board October 1, 2008 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management We Protect.
1 Regulatory Concepts Related to the Control of NOx and SOx From Fossil- fired Electric Generating Units Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee Meeting.
Climate Change: An Opportunity for a Bi-Lateral Approach Driving Technology Innovation Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Canada Institute.
Elemental Mercury Capture by Activated Carbon in a Flow Reactor Shannon D. Serre Brian K. Gullett U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Risk Management.
Mirant Mid-Atlantic MWAQC Technical Advisory Committee Briefing January 21, 2005.
Star Symposium 2013 The Changing Reality of Energy Development Jeffery LaFleur, Vice President Generation Assets APCO/KYPCO October 22, 2013.
ACC Open Meeting – November 18, 2010 Four Corners Power Plant 1.
Electric Generation Reliability Remarks Before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission 2011 Summer Reliability Assessment Meeting June.
Can CCS Help Protect the Climate?. Key Points Climate Protection requires a budget limit on cumulative GHG emissions. Efficiency, Renewable Electric,
Progress Energy and the Environment Western North Carolina Air Quality Don Cooke April 29, 2003.
Production of Syngas and Ethanol Group II. Definition of Syngas Syngas is the abbreviated name for synthesis gas. It is a gas mixture that comprises of.
IPM Overview Elliot Lieberman U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C
Analysis of Existing and Potential Regulatory Requirements and Emission Control Options for the Silver Lake Power Plant APPA Engineering & Operations Technical.
IGCC: Technology to Make Coal Green(er)
Economic Impacts of Implementing a Regional SO 2 Emissions Program in the Grand Canyon Visibility Transport Region Volume I Prepared for: Western Regional.
The Future of Coal Matt Jahnke February 13, 2006.
Clean Error Act (Titles 2 and 3) Mobile Sources and Air Toxics ©2006 Dr. B. C. Paul.
A Brave New World Cathy Woollums, SVP, Environmental and Chief Environmental Counsel NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting – June 2, 2014.
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 4 Improving Air Quality.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
1 BARRIERS & OPPORTUNITIES FOR CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES IN INDIANA F.T. Sparrow CCTR Director INDIEC, Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. Indianapolis.
Preparation of Control Strategies EGU Sector Clean Air Markets Division U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation 17 October 2007.
Cogeneration Facility
Coal-Fired Power Plants Presented By: F Servello.
Driving Forces Behind the Adoption of Pollution Control Technologies in the Electricity Sector : A U.S. Perspective Meredith Fowlie University of Michigan.
THERMAL POWER PLANT.
The Effect of Environmental Regulation upon the Electric Power Industry: A Rating Agency Perspective 23rd February 2005 At the California Public Utility.
1 Where Does Electricity Come From?. 2 Overview of Electricity.
Clear Skies Act of 2003 Western regional Air Partnership April 2-3, 2003.
On the Grid Soung Sik-Kim Chapter 29. Summary A chemical engineer Soung- Sik-Kim Describes optimizing the efficiency of coal-fired power plants Discusses.
2.14.  In 1970 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was established  Required to set and enforce air quality standards  Air quality standard –
Oxy Coal Combustion at the US EPA Myrrha Andersen, Bill Roberts, MAE NCSU Bill Linak, C.W. Lee, NRMRL US EPA Chris Winterowd, Daniel Janek, ARCADIS Jost.
1 Clean Air Act Regulation, Technologies, and Costs NARUC/BPC/NESCAUM Power Sector Environmental Regulations Workshop David C. Foerter Executive Director.
Jeopardy Final Jeopardy
Tampa Electric Company’s Emission Reduction Program
Ryan Anderson April 22, 2008 Climate Change: Science and Society
Overview of Coal-Fueled Power Plants
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Coal-Fired Power Plants
Coal-Fired Power Plants
CAIR Update WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Title 4 Compliance Options ©2002 Dr. B. C. Paul

Band aide Approach  Buy Credits –Have been abundant because of aggressive compliance – could be running out Likelihood may hinge of CO2 control  Fuel Switch –Illinois Mid Sulfur - get about 2.4 lb/MMBTU coal for perhaps slight premium –Can buy Eastern Low Sulfur Coal at about 1.5 to 1.8 lb/MMBTU but shipping premium will be about $7/ton –Can buy low sulfur PRB coal at 0.75 to 1.2 lb/MMBTU with a transportation premium but coal is cheap –Deep Clean Coal but only about 2.5 lb/MMBTU

PRB Coal Issues  Coal Slacks and Spontaneous combusts –Will cost about $40/KW to adapt to handle  PRB Coal is low BTU, high moisture - plant bottlenecks all over and has to be derated up to 20% on capacity –light coaled ash reflect heat from boiler tubes –fans can’t handle higher air volumes –pulverizers can’t grind enough tonnage –feed systems can’t feed enough

PRB Coal Costs  Equipment can minimize derate to about 2% but cost for total retrofit is about $87/kw  PRB coal will have long rail lines and only 2 carriers are available –possible risk of future price gouging  PRB reserves are low cost because of low stripping ratio but after 2010 almost certain to rise

Motivation and Risk of Band Aide  1990s Regulatory Uncertainty –Deregulation paralyzing to industry that was built as a regulated monopoly  Ultimately Clean Plants likely required –Title 4 may become moot point

A Return to Regional Regulation  Clean Air Act built on Market Mechanism Approach  Mentioned Blame Other People for Title I Problems –North East non-competitive, blamed on Midwest –EPA issued a SIP call based on models Created a framework of regional regulation for others –Supreme Court Upheld in 2001 –Most implementation likely to be in NOX

Particulate and Regional Haze Issues  Plants fine particle emissions being regulated –Opacity issue at Great Smokey NP –Fine Particulate Health Issues  Nox and Sox may condense into aerosol particles after emission into air –ESPs can’t get particles that don’t exist –May need very tight NOX and SOX limits far beyond the framework of Title 4 original intent  Mercury regs likely to force scrubbers and SCRs

SO2 Compliance Options  Install Scrubbers to reduce emissions –Dry scrubbers cost about $80/KW to install and about $120/ton SO2 removed with about 70 to 80% removal possible –Wet scrubbers cost about $110/KW to install and about $90/ton SO2 removed and can remove 95 to 98% of SO2

Other Compliance Alternatives  Repower the unit - Common Alternatives –Repower to Fluidized Bed Combustor Can run about $850/KW –Repower to IGCC Can run about $1500/KW –Repower to Natural Gas Can run about $300 to $600/KW depending on Turbine or Combined Cycle –Allowed early compliance credits

Other Alternatives  Retire dirtier power plants and transfer credits to cleaner units - could also involve shifting generation  Buy Electricity –Coal by wire from a plant located closer to source to avoid transportation for fuel switch –Go outside the Cap - Buy from Independent Power Producers that have BACT obligations but are not in the emissions trade program

Radical Choices  Coal processing –Chemical Cleaning needed for Organic Sulfur Processes never set commercially and appear to run about $325/ton of sulfur dioxide avoided –Physical Cleaning requires fine grinding - but already done at Power Plant - Clean at Power Plant - may be able to get 1.5 to 2.4 lb/MBTU from high sulfur - may be only about $20/KW and about $5/ton of avoided SO2 won’t meet phase II limits