Shared Learning Services : Key Learnings Session 102 November 9, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Business Improvement Review Knowledge Understanding Action.
Advertisements

Life Science Services and Solutions
Program Management Office (PMO) Design
BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL IT MODERNIZATION
Output Costing 11 th November 2010 Toby Spanier
AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM ACF Roundtable IT Governance – what does it mean to you as an audit committee member July 2010 The AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM is.
Do You Know ???.
Federal Student Aid Technical Architecture Initiatives Sandy England
A framework for describing IT Project Management Processes and Tool Set Features Enterprise Project Management Framework.
1 Corporate Capabilities. Adayana was founded in 2001 to improve human capital performance Our clients come to Adayana to help improve their people’s.
Program Management Overview (An Introduction)
IT Project Management Office
Centralized vs. Decentralized: Pros, Cons & Best Practices
Learning 101 Session 430 November 7, Learning 101.
Selecting and Implementing an LMS for your Company Session Code #2411.
The Acquisition Gateway
B&O Committee May 2015 iTRAK - Change Management An Agency Adapting to Change.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
1 expect the best Commonwealth IT Investment Portfolio Tool ProSight Overview.
Proprietary and Confidential THINQ LMS/TMS Overview for LearnShare July 18, 2000 Andrew Rodriguez Jim Adelson, Adrian Booth, Anna Rotman.
E-Learning, Human Capital Management and the Banking Sector Dimitris Baltas, ATC ROM.
Charting a course PROCESS.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Corporate Governance: Beyond Compliance at a time of Recession Prof. Ashley G. Frank BA(Econ)[Magna Cum Laude], MDPA (Cum Laude], MBA, MCom [Cum Laude],
Getting Smarter with Information An Information Agenda Approach
Learning with a Purpose: Learning Management Systems Patti Holub, Director District Initiatives and Special Projects Miguel Guhlin, Director Instructional.
Thomas Hacker Barb Fossum Matthew Lawrence Open Science Grid May 19, 2011.
© 2009 GVM Solutions Enterprise Learning Diagnostic (ELD) High Level Overview 1.0 Alignment and Governance 1.1 Learning Governance 1.2 Curriculum Alignment.
Learning and Development Capgemini North America June 2009.
Enterprise NASA Will Peters August, 2010.
New Procurement & Delivery Arrangements for the Schools’ Estate Presentation to Strategic Advisory Group 18 April 2005.
Day Post-Merger Integration Plan Agenda  Where Are We Today ?  Where Do We Want To Go ?  How & When Will We Get There ? The purpose.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
South Carolina Association for Healthcare Quality Using Data to Drive Organizational Improvement July 11, 2008 Bryan Bowles, Client Executive Premier Healthcare.
Operational Excellence and Sustainable Performance Improvement Date: 9 June, 2009.
1 Metro NY NYS Forum Commissioner Carole Post Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications May 4, 2010.
CSI - Introduction General Understanding. What is ITSM and what is its Value? ITSM is a set of specialized organizational capabilities for providing value.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
An Integrated Control Framework & Control Objectives for Information Technology – An IT Governance Framework COSO and COBIT 4.0.
Building Capability.  In order to successfully operate an architecture function within an enterprise, it is necessary to put in place appropriate organization.
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
© 2008 IBM Corporation Challenges for Infrastructure Outsourcing July 29, 2011 Atul Gupta Vice President, Strategic Outsourcing, IBM.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
81 8. Managing Human Resources Managing the IS function Centralized control of IS function Distributed control of IS function Federated control of IS function.
SHAPING THE ROLE OF HR: Tactics for Strategic Change.
Microsoft Office Project 2003: Selling EPM in your Organization Matt Wilson Business Solutions Specialist LMR Solutions.
100 Day Post-Merger Integration Plan
Project Management – a facilitated discussion Craig Johnson IS Business Systems Analyst Connexus Energy / Information Systems.
4th Annual Ubiquitous Computing Conference Developing an eLearning Strategy January 4, 2001 Philip DiSalvio, Ed.D., Director SetonWorldWide Seton Hall.
Marv Adams Chief Information Officer November 29, 2001.
Information Technology Services Strategic Directions Approach and Proposal “Charting Our Course”
Changing the way the New Zealand Aid Programme monitors and evaluates its Aid Ingrid van Aalst Principal Evaluation Manager Development Strategy & Effectiveness.
12-CRS-0106 REVISED 8 FEB 2013 APO (Align, Plan and Organise)
CYSSC - Cluster 2.0 Partner Management Final Deliverable High Sensitivity Sep 2, 2011 Cluster 2.0 Project Team.
11 May 2005 The Benefits & Challenges of Enterprise Portfolio Management Michael S. Belk, MEM, CEI, CEM, MCP Manager IT Projects International Paper Company.
Driving Value from IT Services using ITIL and COBIT 5 July 24, 2013 Gary Hardy ITWinners.
IMPLEMENTING THE APPROPRIATE PMO FOR MY ORGANIZATION Karen Walkup, PMP September 26, 2007.
Unifying Talent Management. Harnessing the Power of Workforce Intelligence in Talent Planning to Drive Business Performance.
Talent Acquisition, Staffing, Recruitment, Executive Search.
Mgt Project Portfolio Management and the PMO Module 8 - Fundamentals of the Program Management Office Dr. Alan C. Maltz Howe School of Technology.
IT Governance and Management Structure
Inflectra User Summit May 18, 2017.
All IT Staff Meeting September 18, 2013
Microsoft SAM Managed Service Program
By Jeff Burklo, Director
Microsoft SAM Managed Service Program
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
KEY INITIATIVE Shared Services Function Management
Presentation transcript:

Shared Learning Services : Key Learnings Session 102 November 9, 2009

2 Shared Learning Services: Key Learnings

3 Agenda What is Shared Learning Services? What are the key business drivers “fueling” Shared Learning Services? What are the challenges? What are the change management issues? Shared Learning Services = Outsourcing Implementation Model

4 Distribution eLearning Account and Program Management Content Hosting Learning Applications Certification Content Design & Development Learning Content Management Custom Content Development Content Acquisition Supplier Contracts Management Curriculum Strategy & Design Capacity Planning Training Admin. Plateau Admin. Instructors Classrooms Learning Needs Analysis Logistics & Scheduling - Students, Materials, Facilities and Instructors Reporting Communications Enrollment Financial Transactions Learning Services

5 Shared Learning Services: What is it? Shared Learning Services –A structure and governance model for coordinating, managing, delivering and measuring an organization’s core learning services –Shifts common activities from individual business units to a centralized operation to reduce costs and improve service quality –Improves overall efficiency and control while giving every business unit access to functionally deep and talented resources

6 Learning Governance Models De Centralized Business units (BU) own and operate independent learning teams Each learning team manages their own budgets, metrics, resources, learning systems and 3rd party vendors Increases organizational redundancy / Decreases bureaucracy Centralized Control over all aspects of Learning through a single centralized learning organization reporting to CLO Accountability for enterprise-wide budget, metrics, resources, systems and 3rd party vendors Reduces redundancy / Increases bureaucracy Federated Centralized learning organization develops enterprise programs, sets standards, and manages enterprise learning systems Business Units responsible for local learning strategy alignment / development as well as learning delivery for BU specific functional learning

7 Federated Structure

8 Shared Learning Services Learning Technologies LMS LCMS Virtual Classroom Pod/Video Casts Social Learning Tools Vendor Management Learning Technologies LMS LCMS Virtual Classroom Pod/Video Casts Social Learning Tools Vendor Management Learning Content Design and Development ISD / Story Board Creation Authoring / Assessment Enterprise Content Library Management / Integration Vendor Management Learning Content Design and Development ISD / Story Board Creation Authoring / Assessment Enterprise Content Library Management / Integration Vendor Management Learning Administration / Operations Registration Services Class Optimization, & Reporting Classroom Management Financial Management Vendor Management Learning Administration / Operations Registration Services Class Optimization, & Reporting Classroom Management Financial Management Vendor Management Learning Strategy Business Goal Alignment Performance Consultation Needs Analysis Job/Competency Models Curriculum Planning Learning Project Mgmt. Learning Strategy Business Goal Alignment Performance Consultation Needs Analysis Job/Competency Models Curriculum Planning Learning Project Mgmt. Learning Delivery Facilitation Program Evaluation Surveys Learning Delivery Facilitation Program Evaluation Surveys Shared Learning Services –Shifts common activities from individual business units to a centralized operation to reduce costs and improve service quality –Improves overall efficiency and control while giving every business unit access to functionally deep and talented resources

9 Key Business Drivers Cost Efficiency Consistency Governance Common User Experience

Learning Governance Survey – Key Findings 86% of organizations do not have an enterprise-wide plan for learning that spans the organization More than two-thirds (69%) say that learning roles and responsibilities are not optimally aligned across the organization (suggesting improvements needed) 89% report low to moderate consensus on how to evaluate the learning function 70% of respondents indicated having established a ‘shared services’ role for learning in their organization (underscoring this capability as an emerging ‘best practice’)

11 Key Components of Shared Learning Services Formalized work intake processes and project, resource, and cost tracking mechanisms 1. Portfolio Tracking and Management Continuous improvement mindset towards optimal efficiency 2. Operational Excellence Defined measures on the agreed commitments (quantities, service levels and budget) 3. Service Quality Ability to quantify and measure the cost of learning services/products delivered 4. Financial Stewardship Ability to scale workforce based upon work volume 5. Variable Workforce

12 Shared Learning Services: Challenges Alignment Operating Model Metrics / ROI Bureaucracy GLOs – Guerilla Learning Organizations Change Management –Loss of Control / Oversight –Perception of Quality –Uniqueness

13 Is Shared Learning Services a sly first step to Outsourcing? 3 rd party comparisons (costs, operating model, capabilities, etc) are easier to evaluate Organizational change management issues regarding migration to Shared Learning Services model / outsourcing partner are similar

14 Shared Learning Services Implementation Model Assess Design Develop Change / Implement Evaluate Assess DesignDevelop Change/ Implement Evaluate

15 Assess Identify the key stakeholders who represent learning, business lines, etc. Assess current training needs, practices and business drivers Assess overall learning infrastructure and services (programs, systems, headcount, vendors, etc.) Assess effectiveness of current Learning Governance Model Identify organizational redundancies, efficiency and cost savings opportunities Create Business Case

16 Design Learning Services Organization Determine future state Governance Model –Align “centralized” Learning Services against Governance model; account for localization requirements –Design Learning Services Organization Portfolio Tracking and Management Operational Excellence Financial Stewardship Service Quality Variable Workforce –Identify opportunities to partner with 3 rd party providers for selected services

17 Develop Facilitate the process of getting key stakeholders to buy-in to a strategic vision for learning services –Develop a Learning Services organization that is aligned with strategic vision Develop processes to optimize investment and re-use of training assets and resources across the enterprise Establish guidelines and standards for the tracking and measurement of training activity, spend, resource and vendor utilization, content re-use, and effectiveness Develop processes and tools that generate transparency of training offerings, participation, roles, costs, and results Create vendor strategy, processes, rationalization Establish management and maintenance processes Create evaluation, feedback and effectiveness measures –Create an change management / implementation strategy for the Learning Services organization

18 Implement Create broad stakeholder buy-in Train and implement Highlight successes and mitigate challenges Communicate

19 Evaluate Dashboards

20 Questions

21 Contact Information