Technology as a solution to implementing active-learning pedagogies... Ann C. Smith University of Maryland College Park MD PKAL 2003 Boulder Colorado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Maryland Baltimore County Department of Psychology Eileen OBrien, Ph.D. Introductory Psychology University of Maryland System Course Redesign.
Advertisements

GenChem ABOR Learner-Centered Education 2009 General Chemistry Redesign Department of Chemistry University of Arizona.
Redesigning Computer Literacy Arizona State University Tempe,Arizona Toni Farley Redesign Alliance Conference March 23, 2009 Orlando, Florida.
Improving Active Learning and Instant Feedback in an Introductory Engineering Course Caleb H. Farny Sean B. Andersson Dept of Mechanical Engineering BU.
What is it? What is it? Quality Matters (QM) is a nationally recognized, faculty- centered, peer review process designed to certify the quality of online.
Rajlakshmi Ghosh Cadey Korson Being a TA in a Science Lab.
Welcome to the First-Year Engineering Program
Using SAM 2007 & Aplia In Online Courses. Don Danner San Francisco State University
WILU ’07 York U. Courseware and Collaboration: Teaming Up with Instructional Technology Liaisons Anne Fullerton Liaison Librarian Katherine LithgowLT3.
A STEP to Grow in Science-Engineering-Mathematics Undergraduate Degrees Kandethody Ramachandran a (PI), Catherine Bénéteau a, Scott Campbell b, Gordon.
Collaborations that facilitate the scholarship of teaching: Working with education professionals and more! Ann C. Smith Jennifer Hayes-Klosteridis Paulette.
Flexible Info. Literacy Strategies for Engineering Design in EPICS Hitting a Moving Target & Assessing Our Aim Lisa G. Dunn, Colorado School of Mines.
Using Peer Tutors to Support Learning Focus on Teaching and Technology Conference November 1-2, 2007 Co-presenters: Keith Stine, Department of Chemistry.
Transformation from Lecture-based to Case-based course Ann C. Smith, Robert T.Yuan, Richard Stewart, Patricia Shields and Jennifer Hayes-Klosteridis 2003.
On line lab practical: effective option for station based lab exam Ann C. Smith Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics.
A Faculty Team Works to Create Content Linkages among Various Courses to Increase Meaningful Learning of Targeted Concepts of Microbiology Gili Marbach-Ad,
Computer Science ABET Visit Update November 8, 2003.
Using TAs to Teach Case Studies in Large-Enrollment Science Classes Paula Lemons, Duke University Annual Conference on Case Study Teaching in Science October.
UMCP Educational Technology Outreach On-line Course Assessment and Evaluation Model 2005 EDUCAUSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference Baltimore, Maryland.
How to Teach a Science Course Online. Y Generation (1982–2001) Is Our Educational System Designed For Them? ➔ View lectures as boring and uninteresting.
Making Online Resources Cohesive in a Chemistry Course Justin Shorb Mike Hanson John Moore Chemistry Department.
AET/515 Spanish 101 Instructional Plan SofiaDiaz
Math TLC Tutor Lab Overview: All sections of Math 010 and 110 are taught in a single, dedicated, technology-enhanced classroom that is adjacent to a.
Online Teaching Online Teaching Strategies for Success Electronic Pedagogy – The Art of Teaching Online.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Tammy Muhs General Education Program Mathematics Coordinator University of Central Florida NCAT Redesign Scholar Course Redesign: A Way To Improve Student.
University of Maryland Baltimore County Department of Psychology Eileen O’Brien, PhD, Linda Baker, PhD, Laura Stapleton, PhD, Adia Garrett, PhD, Karen.
The Role of Automation in Undergraduate Computer Science Chris Wilcox Colorado State University 3/5/2015.
Flipping the Statistics Classroom: Enhancing Course Redesign with the Flipped Classroom Dr. Melissa M. Sovak California University of Pennsylvania.
Statistics Course Redesigns at NCSU Roger Woodard.
Student Centered Teaching Through Universal Instructional Design Part II.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
University of Maryland Baltimore County Department of Psychology Psyc100: Introductory Psychology Eileen O’Brien, Ph.D.
How to be an online student. How does it work? An online course follows a schedule and syllabus with due dates for assignments (just like an on-campus.
Central Wyoming College Riverton High PHYSICS COURSE SYLLABUS Prerequisites: Students must be 15 years old to receive concurrent enrollment credit. The.
D. Roberts March 05 University of Maryland Undergraduate Education Douglas Roberts Assoc. Chair, Undergraduate Ed.
Course Introduction Software Engineering
Introduction to Computer Applications MIS105 Introductory Session Instructor: Irfan Ilyas.
Understanding Student Expectations & Effective Teaching Presented by: Dr. Laura Marler Associate Professor of Management College of Business Mississippi.
Teaching Thermodynamics with Collaborative Learning Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Department June 9, 2006.
G UIDELINES FOR COURSE SYLLABUS DESIGN B EST PRACTICES AND INTERNATIONAL TRENDS KOMAR UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (KUST) OFFICE OF QUALITY ASSURANCE.
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
10/19/2015 Twin Cities Bush Grant Promoting Student Learning in Large Classes OMS 2550 Business Statistics Dr. Steven C. Huchendorf, Jason Liu.
1 NURS 325: Context of Health Care Delivery I Nina Trocky, MSN, RN Vanessa P. Fahie PhD, RNC University of Maryland, Baltimore School of Nursing.
Redesign of Biology 101 at Salisbury University Maryland Course Redesign Workshop 29 May 2009.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Welcome to the First-Year Engineering Program ENGR 1181 Class 1 – Part 2.
Academy for Teaching and Learning Excellence (ATLE) Diane R. Williams, Ph.D. Department of Math & Statistics Fran Hopf, Ph.D. National Center for Academic.
WorkRoles Responsi- bilities Instructors
The Impact of Distance Teaching on College Faculty Trudy Abramson & George Fornshell School of Computer and Information Sciences, Nova Southeastern University,
CSE 1105 Week 1 CSE 1105 Course Title: Introduction to Computer Science & Engineering Classroom Lecture Times: Section 001 W 4:00 – 4:50, 202 NH Section.
ICS202 Data Structures King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals College of Computer Science & Engineering Information & Computer Science Department.
Physics 1B3-summer Lecture 11 Welcome to Physics 1B03 !
Beyond the Basics Learning Management Systems (LMS) Michael Heumann, Distance Education Coordinator, Imperial Valley College Cindy Vinson, Distance Learning.
ALLA Annual Convention April 25-28, Collaboration with Faculty to Develop Course-integrated Library Orientations Jo Anne Bryant,
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Welcome to the a Department of Engineering Education ! ENGR 1182 – Introduction to Engineering II Graphics 01.
Carol Revels, Senior Administrator.  Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) in the following areas occur: Technology, Accountable Talk, ELA Instructional.
Storyboard UNIV 101 – The online student Carla Oñate Instructional Designer.
1. Students-related activities. 1.1 Remedial classes. 1.2 Broadcasting Algebra and Trigonometry videos. 1.3 Broadcasting revision classes. 1.4 Math.
Instructional Plan | Slide 1 AET/515 Instructional Plan For Associate’s Degree in Library Skills (Donna Roy)
Student Success in Mathematics: Guiding Principles Shahla Peterman University of Missouri-St. Louis Math Technology Learning Center.
Lecture 1. Course Introduction
Going Beyond Course Design: Implementing Online Delivery Standards
It’s called “wifi”! Source: Somewhere on the Internet!
Welcome to the a Department of Engineering Education !
Lecture 1. Course Introduction
EE422C Software Design and Implementation II
Score Improvement Distribution When Using Sketch Recognition Software (Mechanix) as a Tutor: Assessment of a High School Classroom Pilot Texas A&M University.
McNeese State University Professional Development Opportunity
Presentation transcript:

Technology as a solution to implementing active-learning pedagogies... Ann C. Smith University of Maryland College Park MD PKAL 2003 Boulder Colorado

11/22/03 PKAL What is Active learning? In groups – introduce your self and give one example of active learning (5 minutes) Writing Discussion Presentations Inquiry projects Problem Based Learning

11/22/03 PKAL Our Goal- introduce more active learning in our large lecture course General Microbiology (BSCI 223) –Introductory course General Bio Pre-requisite. –250 students per lecture section –1- 2 lecture sections per semester –Lab component –1 Graduate TA/ 2 lab sections of 18 students –1 faculty member/lecture section –1 faculty member to oversee lab instruction

11/22/03 PKAL What is involved in adding active learning? Organization – –Distribution and collection of materials –Opportunities for individual and group participation Communication –Faculty – student –Student - student Time –Instructor time –Class time

11/22/03 PKAL Barriers to Active learning in large classes? 1.Organization factor increases. 2.Communication opportunities decrease. 3.Time factor increases. Can the use of Technology provide solutions?

11/22/03 PKAL Technology as a solution WebCT 1.Organization Distribution of course materials –Syllabus, –Assignments, –Lecture outlines, –Power points, –Lab Manual, –Grades Student Comments:

11/22/03 PKAL Technology as a solution 2. Communication –Announcements –Public Discussion space for open question and answer –Private discussion space for group work or communication with specific groups –On-line quizzing to provide feedback and to assess student knowledge.

11/22/03 PKAL 3.Time A new course learning environment –Lecture –Lab –On-line Technology as a solution

11/22/03 PKAL Technology ~Value added Outlines can be linked to online resources Availability 24 hours. Time release (Guide students) Exposure to technology Easy to update Opportunities to engage students with different learning styles Potential to engage students in new ways

Can Traditionally Designed Courses Be Transformed Using Technology? Traditional lecture/lab course Active Learning Environment Technology

11/22/03 PKAL Our biggest challenge: Discussion Assignment: Work in Groups to create parameters for a discussion supported by technology. The class: 250 students 2 – one hour lectures, 2 two hour labs/week 2 faculty: lecturer and lab coordinator, 1 TA for every 2 sections of 18 students. Online environment - WebCT

11/22/03 PKAL Discussion parameters: enriches learning experience –use of vocabulary –Reinforces content/concepts from lab and lecture and asks students to incorporate prior learning. –Supports a constructivist approach to learning (requires students to research either in lab or in library) in a manner that prepares students to be scientists

11/22/03 PKAL Design Must include methods to –motivate students to participate –measure participation –moderate/facilitate /model a fruitful discussion. –evaluate individual participation –evaluate success of discussion. –Assess learning.

11/22/03 PKAL Evaluate Your Design Rate 1 – 5 Lecture or lab time requirement? Student training? Faculty intensive? Technology support requirement? Monetary cost? Learning benefit?

11/22/03 PKAL UM Design Two methods both employ Case Studies 1.In lecture discussion Case study and Problems posted online Students provide solutions to problems online Lecturer reads answers, prepares discussion Discussion in lecture – open class and think pair share. Students receive participation points Assessment via exam questions.

UM Design 2.On-line Discussion groups of 6 students/ lab Discussion moderated by an Undergraduate TA Over a one month period student are required to post 6 times to the discussion Participation and quality of posts and group discussion are assessed Coupled with writing assignment where students resort into 6 groups of 3.

11/22/03 PKAL Time – 15 min/ lecture discussion students – one hour prep? Faculty – 2 hour prep, 2 hour initial set up WebCT quiz tool Student Training Learning – Challenges misconceptions, supports learning goals, practice writing, use of vocabulary In Lecture Discussion - Evaluation

11/22/03 PKAL Time – references in lecture/lab –On –line – one month –Meet with UTA’s weekly for the semester –8 hours to review UTA assessments –8 hours set up Additional personnel – 1 UTA/section, Tech TA’s WebCT discussion space Student Training Learning – supports constructivist learning Online discussion - Evaluation

Labs linked to lectures/cases LECTURE LAB ON-line LAB 18 students/TA LECTURE 250 students/instructor Presentation of ContentHands on Activities a. b.

Labs linked to lectures/cases LECTURE LAB ON-line LAB 18 students/TA LECTURE 250 students/instructor Presentation of ContentHands on Activities a. b.

Labs linked to lectures/cases LECTURE LAB ON-line LAB 18 students/TA LECTURE 250 students/instructor Presentation of ContentHands on Activities a. b. ACTIVE LEARNING COURSE Lecture, lab and online goals are complementary Traditionally Designed Course

Labs linked to lectures/cases Directed Discussions LECTURE Lectures linked to labs/cases LAB Team work, lab reports, presentations Labs linked to lectures/cases ON-line Discussion Links: resources, lecture outlines Course information Case studies PAK questions Lab quizzes and lab manual Surveys Grades Poster session LAB 18 students/TA LECTURE 250 students/instructor Presentation of ContentHands on Activities a. b.

11/22/03 PKAL Concerns Access to computer Training Technology support on campus Students expectations for immediate feedback Faculty

11/22/03 PKAL Acknowledgements Robert Yuan, Rick Stewart, Patty Shields Paulette Robinson Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics College of Life Sciences Undergraduate Technology Apprentice Program Office of Information Technology

11/22/03 PKAL Course Transformation? Assignment Learning goal: role of microbes in production of a product via biotechnology –Bacterial genetics –Genetic engineering Course time – 2 weeks, 4 lecture periods of 50 min each, 4 lab periods of 2 hours each Student plays the role of a research scientist

Outcome: student learns basic concepts as well as current notions and approaches Resources for students: Lab, lecture, text, prior learning, access to online data bases and digital libraries +… Incorporates Active learning –Discussion –Team work –Individual participation –Writing –Problem solving Includes –Mechanism for feedback to the student –Assessment piece

11/22/03 PKAL 3 On-line Discussion Groups per lab section