Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seeing Dark Energy (or the cosmological constant which is the simplest form of DE) Professor Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth)
Advertisements

Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:
Cosmological CPT Violation, Baryo/leptogenesis and CMB Polarization Mingzhe Li Nanjing University.
P ROBING SIGNATURES OF MODIFIED GRAVITY MODELS OF DARK ENERGY Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dark Energy and Extended Gravity theories Francesca Perrotta (SISSA, Trieste)
Observational Constraints on Sudden Future Singularity Models Hoda Ghodsi – Supervisor: Dr Martin Hendry Glasgow University, UK Grassmannian Conference.
CMB: Sound Waves in the Early Universe Before recombination: Universe is ionized. Photons provide enormous pressure and restoring force. Photon-baryon.
This has led to more general Dark Energy or Quintessence models: Evolving scalar field which ‘tracks’ the matter density Convenient parametrisation: ‘Equation.
Observational Cosmology - a laboratory for fundamental physics MPI-K, Heidelberg Marek Kowalski.
PRE-SUSY Karlsruhe July 2007 Rocky Kolb The University of Chicago Cosmology 101 Rocky I : The Universe Observed Rocky II :Dark Matter Rocky III :Dark Energy.
CMB as a physics laboratory
Lecture 1: Basics of dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science) ``Welcome to the dark side of the world.”
Prof. Eric Gawiser Galaxy Formation Seminar 2: Cosmological Structure Formation as Initial Conditions for Galaxy Formation.
Science of the Dark Energy Survey Josh Frieman Fermilab and the University of Chicago Astronomy Lecture 1, Oct
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
Program 1.The standard cosmological model 2.The observed universe 3.Inflation. Neutrinos in cosmology.
COMING HOME Michael S. Turner Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics The University of Chicago.
Dark Energy Bengt Gustafsson: Current problems in Astrophysics Lecture 3 Ångström Laboratory, Spring 2010.
表紙. 全天マップ1 T=2.725K Cosmic Microwave Background CMB.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Structure formation in dark energy cosmology La Magia, April 2005.
Early times CMB.
Confronting theory with observations workshop, NBIA, Copenhagen, August 18, Analysing the CMB in a model-independent manner Syksy Räsänen University.
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 1 the standard model Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Cosmic Microwave Background  Cosmological Overview/Definitions  Temperature  Polarization  Ramifications  Cosmological Overview/Definitions  Temperature.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
Cosmological structure formation and dark energy Carlo Baccigalupi Heidelberg, May 31, 2005.
Lecture 5: Matter Dominated Universe: CMB Anisotropies and Large Scale Structure Today, matter is assembled into structures: filaments, clusters, galaxies,
University of Durham Institute for Computational Cosmology Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Galaxy clusters.
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
the National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Socorro, NM
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
The Statistical Properties of Large Scale Structure Alexander Szalay Department of Physics and Astronomy The Johns Hopkins University.
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
Local Void vs Dark Energy Local Void vs Dark Energy Tirthabir Biswas IGC, Penn-State University with A Notari and R Mansouri, astro-ph/ with A Notari,
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 10; May
ERE 2008September 15-19, Spanish Relativity Meeting 2008, Salamanca, September (2008) Avoiding the DARK ENERGY coincidence problem with a COSMIC.
Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies Jerry Sellwood.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Three theoretical issues in physical cosmology I. Nonlinear clustering II. Dark matter III. Dark energy J. Hwang (KNU), H. Noh (KASI)
Dark Energy and baryon oscillations Domenico Sapone Université de Genève, Département de Physique théorique In collaboration with: Luca Amendola (INAF,
The Cosmic Microwave Background
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Determining cosmological parameters with the latest observational data Hong Li TPCSF/IHEP
@ 2012 Miniworkshop for String theory and Cosmology Dec. 01st Seokcheon Lee (KIAS)
The Nature of Dark Energy David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology SS Chapter 6 Cosmic Microwave Background.
Inh Jee University of Texas at Austin Eiichiro Komatsu & Karl Gebhardt
Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett With: Matt Auger, Vasily Belokurov, Phil Marshall and Alex Hall ArXiv:
Smoke This! The CMB, the Big Bang, Inflation, and WMAP's latest results Spergel et al, 2006, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year results:
Cosmological constraints from μE cross correlations
Observational Constraints on the Running Vacuum Model
Observational limits on dark energy
Princeton University & APC
Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
STRUCTURE FORMATION MATTEO VIEL INAF and INFN Trieste
Cosmology from Large Scale Structure Surveys
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Precision cosmology, status and perspectives
Large Scale Structure of the Universe
Detection of integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect by cross-correlation of the
Local Void vs Dark Energy
Graduate Course: Cosmology
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
CMB Anisotropy 이준호 류주영 박시헌.
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)

Observational constraints on dark energy The properties of dark energy can be constrained by a number of observations: 1.Supernovae type Ia (SN Ia) 2. Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) 3.Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) 4. Large-scale structure (LSS) 5.Weak lensing The cosmic expansion history is constrained. The evolution of matter perturbations is constrained. Especially important for modified gravity models.

Supernovae Ia constraints The cosmic expansion history is known by measuring the luminosity distance (for the flat Universe)

Parametrization to constrain dark energy Consider Einstein gravity in the presence of non-relativistic matter and dark energy with the continuity equations In the flat Universe the Friedmann equation gives

where

Joint data analysis of SN Ia, WMAP, and SDSS with the parametrization (Zhao et al, 2007) Best fit case

Cost for standard two-parameter compressions The two-parameter compression may not accommodate the case of rapidly changing equation of state. Bassett et al (2004) proposed the ‘Kink’ parametrization allowing rapid evolution of w : DE

Maximizied limits of kink parametrizations Parmetrization (i) Parmetrization (iii) Parmetrization (ii) Kink The best-fit kink solution passes well outside the limits of all the other parametrizations.

Observational constraints from CMB The observations of CMB temperature anisotropies can also place constraints on dark energy. 2013? PLANCK

CMB temperature anisotropies Dark energy affects CMB anisotropies in two ways. 1. Shift of the peak position 2. Integrated Sachs Wolfe (ISW) effect ISW effect Larger Smaller scales (Important for large scales) Shift for

Angular diameter distance The angular diameter distance is (flat Universe) This is related with the luminosity distance via (duality relation)

Causal mechanism for the generation of perturbations Second horizon crossing After the perturbations leave the horizon during inflation, the curvature perturbations remain constant by the second horizon crossing. Scale-invariant CMB spectra on large scales After the perturbations enter the horizon, they start to oscillate as a sound wave.

CMB acoustic peaks where HuSugiyama

(CMB shift parameter) where and

The WMAP 5yr bound:

(Komatsu et al, WMAP 5-yr data) Observational constraints on the dark energy equation of state

Joint data analysis of SN Ia + CMB (for constant w) The constraints from SN Ia and CMB are almost orthogonal.

ISW effect on CMB anisotropies

Evolution of matter density perturbations ( ) The growing mode solution is Responsible for LSS Perturbations do not grow.

Poisson equation The Poisson equation is given by (i) During the matter era (ii) During the dark energy era (no ISW effect)

Usually the constraint coming from the ISW effect is not strong compared to that from the CMB shift parameter. (apart from some modified gravity models) ISW effect

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) Baryons are tightly coupled to photons before the decoupling. The oscillations of sound waves should be imprinted in the baryon perturbations as well as the CMB anisotropies. In 2005 Eisenstein et al found a peak of acoustic oscillations in the large scale correlation function at

BAO distance measure The sound horizon at which baryons were released from the Compton drag of photons determines the location of BAO: We introduce (orthogonal to the line of light) (the oscillations along the line of sight) The spherically averaged spectrum is

We introduce the relative BAO distance where The observational constraint by Eisenstein et al is The case (i) is favored.

Joint data analysis of SN Ia + CMB + BAO (for constant w)