Group 2 Sunny Wicks, Rebecca Sampson, Nikki Akraboff, Ellis Langford, Garret Crandall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Click to Add Title CDR: Spring, The Team Alex Coso Fred Gay Dan Cunningham Val Lugo.
Advertisements

NASA Lunabotics Mining Competition Interim Design Presentation Team 19: Aleks Fedoriw Duncan Haldane Arthur Pack Michael Pearse Carlos Ruiz.
Giving Bertha! LTA CDR David Dryjanski – Design/Construction, SolidWorks Expert Rachel Ellman - Design/Construction Carl Engel - Team manager, Propulsion.
Drag Queen LTA Completed Design Review Nestor Lara, 2004.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
1 Structures QDR1 Ashley Brawner Neelam Datta Xing Huang Jesse Jones Team 2: Balsa to the Wall Matt Negilski Mike Palumbo Chris Selby Tara Trafton.
Juggernaut Team 3 Completed Design Review Becca Arvanites: Structural Design Mark Egan: Structural Analysis & Stability Karl Kulling: RC Operator/communications.
Completed Design Review Team Airblade Timothy Davenport Brian Guerrero Mark Kastantin Oscar Kataura William Peters Robert Taylor.
PROPULSION PDR#1 Brian Barnett Rob Benner Ryan Srogi John Keune Alex Fleck.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
DR2 Presented by: Mark Blanton Loren Garrison Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian September 26, 2000 Chris Curtis.
BELIEVE. Lighter Than Air Vehicle Completed Design Review Team Two “Believe”
¡¡ Ten Cuidado!! LTA CDR. Team Members Josh Maciejewski – design, construction, Solidworks Josh Maciejewski – design, construction, Solidworks Matt.
Christopher Cottingham
4 Spheres 3 Presents The Development of Gus™. Objectives  Reliability, stability and controllability  Most efficient battery usage possible  Clarify.
Lighter Than Air Critical Design Review Mark Cote Yonas Tesfaye Josh Levinger Bryan Owens The A-Team.
Critical Design Review The Fab Four Jeremy Conrad Jeremy Conrad Electronics Expert Electronics Expert Javier Matamoros Javier Matamoros Thrust Guru Thrust.
Project Review Micro Air Vehicle Project: P Sponsored by Impact Technologies The Boeing Company Mark Baybutt Electrical Engineering David.
Team Weatherman Completed Design Review James Banks, Test Engineer Katonio Butler, Electrical Specialist Alex Cutting, Structural Engineer Lori Huberman,
Barry Barrios Structural Engineer Daniel Chaparro Structural Engineer Laura Garrity Propulsion Chad Lieberman Control Surfaces Adam Vaccaro Electrical.
ENGR-1101 Introduction to Engineering CapstoneProject: The iPad ControlledHovercraft College of Engineering Temple University Fall 2011.
Circuit Diagram Rules. 1.Always use a ruler. 2.Be neat and make your symbols clear and clean.
Justin DeStories Aircraft Design. Objective/Requirements  The UAV team at Arizona State University is designing, optimizing, and building an autonomous.
THE INVENTION OF THE AIRPLANE ORVILLE WILBUR Part 1: Background & Failures.
Wright Flyer Competition Commemorating 100 years of powered flight.
TCSP – Packaging Design & Considerations. Plane is the package - PCB and battery must fit inside fuselage - Selected servo should fit in the pre-cut slot.
Electromechanical Systems “Robotic Sorting System” Brent GuyJonathan Penney.
Virginia Science Olympiad: BUILDING EVENTS Div C.
Replicating the 1903 Wright Flyer
ELEMENTS OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ENME 489L Fall Aerodynamic Analysis 3 Balloons in straight line Maximum Lift Minimum Drag.
ES 100 Micro Aerial Vehicle Group 1 Michelle Helsel, Austin Dickey, Alsia Plybeah, Dylan Carlson, Peter Baldwin, Lucila Calderon.
Order of Presentation David – Intro and Fall Review Matt – Testing and Summary of Changes Josiah – Details on New Design Josh – Electrical Hardware Ona.
Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV” David Neira TJ Worden Matthew Martin Joshua Mellen Ona Okonkwo Josiah Shearon A IR HERCULES 1.
Model No. CK1000MN / CK1000MNAL Automatic Lift is Optional Organic Food Waste Composter 1200 KG Processing Capacity.
Student Unmanned Aerial System FAMU/FSU College of Engineering Mechanical Engineering Department (1) Electrical and Computer Engineering Department (2)
Dane Batema John Tapee Audrey Serra Patricia Roman Kyle RyanCarlos Vergara Benoit BlierDrew Capps Team 1: Lessons Learned and Vehicle Summary Team “Canard”
Engineering Design Workshop Quality Design Projects for Engineering Fairs Sponsored by Santa Clara Valley Science and Engineering Fair Association for.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
P15462 – TETHERED WIND ENERGY PLANE Devin Bunce Matthew Kennedy Matthew Maginn Carl Stahoviak Matthew Zebert.
Power is the rate at which work is done.
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
Motor Air Vehicle Group 1 Jacky, Osama, Eddy, Abdul, Michael, Serge.
Solar Panel Concepts Covered: Energy Transfer, Static/Kinetic Friction, Motor and Solar Panel Efficiency. Equations: F= ma, Solar Efficiency = Power Output/
8 Tips for How to be a Good Manager. Tip 1: Motivate your employees. This will help to improve their performance.
Problem 3 ME 115 Final – Troy Topping. Initial Construction A box with m = 1250 kg is input to simulate the forklift Only half the mass is used since.
By Mikayla McLachlan Maker Day. We started off in the year 5A and 5B classroom and split up into 3 different groups they were Bottle rockets, Solar boats.
Department of Communication Engineering, NCTU 1 Title of Your Project Name.
DR1 PF, E, & FTP PDR Prototype Fabrication, Economic and Flight Test Plan Preliminary Design Review October 26, 2000 Presented By: Mark Blanton & Chris.
Remote control steering Considering a normal configuration of the airship like in the picture below:
Critical Design Review Team Floating Point MIT April 25, 2003.
PRESENTATION OUTLINE Experiment Objective Introduction Data Conclusion Recommendations.
Tod Mackay Channel Sales - RSC Battery Storage Options Tesla Powerwall Single-Phase – SolarEdge StorEdge Three-Phase – Fronius Symo Hybrid SMA Sunny.
Chapter 3 Organization. Introduction- Body- Conclusion.
Abppowers.com is well known leading Online UPS, Stabilizer, Inverter manufacturers and suppliers in India. Website:-
Team 3 Structures and Weights PDR 2
SAE Aero 2017 Midterm Presentation Joe Zongolowicz, Nick Montana, Frank Dixon, Kevin Scheventer, Kathy Hansen, Marquis Ward, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao,
Wall-E Prototype I The design project Wall-E Prototype I is an intelligent automated trash collecting robot with obstacle detection capability. The robot.
Propulsion Preliminary Design Review #1
AEROMODELLING WORKSHOP
A method to evaluate enrichments for Asian elephants in zoos
모니터 리프트 규격서(HML-500) Audio & Video System, Display, Conference System.

© T Madas.
The Team.
The Almost Incredible Machine By: Scott Cramer and Warren Edmunds
Golfing 151.

Sarah Shoemaker 3/20/2008 Structures, Gondola Design, Tanks, CAD Final Slides AAE 450 Spring 2008 Structures.

Presentation transcript:

Group 2 Sunny Wicks, Rebecca Sampson, Nikki Akraboff, Ellis Langford, Garret Crandall

Objective of Presentation To present our finalized design and receive constructive input To make clear our motives for altering our preliminary design To back up our design with aerodynamic analysis

Final Design One main truss 2 balloons One back stabilizer Hanging motor arrangement

Final Design Snapshots

Aerodynamic Analysis Weight Balsa Truss.0387 kg Motor Assembly.2864 kg Its counterweight kg Servo Set.0806 kg Battery Pack.156 kg Balloons.14 kg Servo Battery Assembly =.1282 kg Stabilizer~.02 kg Total Mass*9.8m/s^ N

Aerodynamic Analysis

Hooray! The Lift needed is less than the Lift Max!

Design Evolution and Analysis Total design overhaul… Total design overhaul… Our design changed mainly because we directed our focus from creatively thoughtful to practical Our design changed mainly because we directed our focus from creatively thoughtful to practical We realized that although many other arrangements of balloons and propellers might theoretically work exceedingly well, if we couldn’t build it, it wouldn’t work We realized that although many other arrangements of balloons and propellers might theoretically work exceedingly well, if we couldn’t build it, it wouldn’t work

Conclusion :-D :-D