Semantic Annotation Options for Release2 Group Name: MAS WG Source: Catalina Mladin, Lijun Dong, InterDigital Meeting Date: 2015-03-16 Agenda Item: TBD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Leo Obrst MITRE Information Semantics Information Discovery & Understanding Command & Control Center February 6, 2014February 6, 2014February 6, 2014.
Advertisements

The Semantic Web – WEEK 4: RDF
GridVine: Building Internet-Scale Semantic Overlay Networks By Lan Tian.
ESDSWG2011 – Semantic Web session Semantic Web Sub-group Session ESDSWG 2011 Meeting – Semantic Web sub-group session Wednesday, November 2, 2011 Norfolk,
Call for test suites Group Name: REQ Source: Jiaxin Yin, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
Access Control Mechanism for User Group Name: SEC WG Source: Seongyoon Kim, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
The WSMO / L / X Approach Michael Stollberg DERI – Digital Enterprise Research Institute Alternative Frameworks for Semantics in Web Services: Possibilities.
Module 2b: Modeling Information Objects and Relationships IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter, 2007 Michael Crandall.
Device Management using mgmtCmd resource
Device Management using mgmtCmd resource Group Name: WG2/WG5 Source: InterDigital Communications Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
Resource Announcement Procedures Group Name: WG2 Source: Rajesh Bhalla, Hao Wu - ZTE Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
On Management, Abstraction & Semantics
Progressing the Work on the MAS TR-0006, TR-0007 Group Name: Management Abstraction and Semantics Source: Tim Carey, ALU,
Discussions for oneM2M Semantics Standardization Group Name: WG5 Source: InterDigital Communications Meeting Date: Agenda Item: WI-0005 ASN/MN-CSE.
Source: Yuan Tao, Huawei Technologies WG: MAS Meeting: MAS17.
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Announcement Resources ARC Announcement_Issues Group Name: WG2 Source: Barbara Pareglio, NEC Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Input Contribution.
Introduction of PRO WG activities Group Name: TP Source: Shingo Fujimoto, FUJITSU, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
OneM2M-REQ R03 Proposed simple guidelines for writing use cases and requirements Group Name: oneM2M WG1 / WG2 Source: Joerg Swetina (NEC), Ataru.
M2M Abstraction & Semantics Group Name: WG5 Source: France Telecom, NEC Europe Ltd., Meeting Date: xx.
WG-2 - ARC TP #16 Status Report Group Name: oneM2M TP #16 Source: WG2 Chair (Nicolas Damour – Meeting Date: Agenda.
In-Band Access Control Framework Group Name: WG4 SEC Source: Qualcomm Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Usage Scenarios for CSE Group Name: WG2(ARC-WG) Source: Shingo Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Message.
What and Why? Next steps for oneM2M Semantics Group Name: WG5 Source: Joerg Swetina, Martin Bauer (NEC) Meeting Date: Agenda Item: WI-0005 oneM2M-MAS
App-ID Discussion Group Name: ARC WG Source: Seongyoon Kim, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: 31 July 2014 Agenda Item: TBD.
Using Several Ontologies for Describing Audio-Visual Documents: A Case Study in the Medical Domain Sunday 29 th of May, 2005 Antoine Isaac 1 & Raphaël.
WG5 - MAS Progress Report at TP #9 Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang, Chair, Meeting.
Ontology Architectural Support Options Group Name: MAS WG Source: Catalina Mladin, Lijun Dong, InterDigital Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
AllJoyn-Interworking Discussion Group Name: TP WG2 ARC Source: Josef Blanz, Phil Hawkes, Qualcomm Inc., Meeting Date:
Work for the next release Group Name: TP Source: JaeSeung Song, KETI, Jaeho Kim, KETI,
Ontology Resource Discussion
Introducing concept of M2M-application data modeling Group Name: MAS Source: FUJITSU Meeting Date: Agenda Item: Semantics and Device Configuration.
Ontology Architectural Support Options Group Name: MAS WG Source: Catalina Mladin, Lijun Dong, InterDigital Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
Introducing WI Proposal about Authorization Architecture and Policy Group Name: WG4 Source: Wei Zhou, Datang, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Introducing WI Proposal about Authorization Architecture and Policy Group Name: WG4 Source: Wei Zhou, Datang, Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Doc.: IEEE /0169r0 Submission Joe Kwak (InterDigital) Slide 1 November 2010 Slide 1 Overview of Resource Description Framework (RFD/XML) Date:
Management of Semantic Instances in resources using SPARQL update operation with HTTP verbs Group Name: MAS 19 Source: Minwoo Ryu, jaeho Kim, Sungchan.
Device Management using mgmtCmd resource Group Name: WG2/WG5 Source: InterDigital Communications Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD.
1 Open Ontology Repository initiative - Planning Meeting - Thu Co-conveners: PeterYim, LeoObrst & MikeDean ref.:
Different planes for the resource structure Group Name: WG5 – MAS and WG2 – ARC Source: Nicolas Damour, Sierra Wireless
Release Timeline Discussion R2 and beyond Group Name: TP_WPM Source: Roland Hechwartner, WPM Convenor, Meeting Date:
Architectural Considerations for Semantic Support Group Name: WG5 Source: Martin Bauer (NEC), Joerg Swetina (NEC) Meeting Date: Agenda Item:
Device & Device Type Modelling Group Name: WG5 Source: NEC Meeting Date: Agenda Item: WI-0005 MAS Device_&_Device_Type_Modelling.
WG5 – MAS#19 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang (Huawei, WG5 Chair) Meeting Date:
WG5 – MAS#21 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Yongjing Zhang (Huawei, WG5 Chair) Meeting Date:
Semantic Web 06 T 0006 YOSHIYUKI Osawa. Problem of current web  limits of search engines Most web pages are only groups of character strings. Most web.
Status of Active Work Items Level of Completeness Group Name: WPM Source: Roland Hechwartner, WPM Convenor Updated:
LWM2M Interworking Proxy Procedures ARC Considerations
Issues of Current Access Control Rule and New Proposal Introduction Group Name: ARC 21 Source: Wei Zhou, Datang, Meeting Date:
Authorization Architecture Discussion Group Name: SEC WG Source: Seongyoon Kim, LG Electronics, Meeting Date: 28 MAY, 2014 Agenda.
TP WG1 - REQ Progress Report at TP #14 Group Name: WG1 REQ (Requirements) Source: WG1 Vice Chair (Joerg Swetina, NEC), Secretary Changho RYOO,
WG5 – MAS#22 Status Report Group Name: WG5 MAS (Management, Abstraction & Semantics) Source: Tim Carey(Alcatel-Lucent, WG5 Vice Chair) Meeting Date:
Reasons for CSF Clean-up (Issues & Next Steps) Group Name: WG2 Source: Syed Husain – NTT DOCOMO Meeting Date: (ARC_9.3) Agenda Item: 6 DOC#:
Management CSF(s) Architectural choices Group Name: WG2 (ARC), WG5(MAS) Source: Catalina Mladin, InterDigital Comm., Meeting.
Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR,
Service Framework Proposal
CSE Retargeting to AE, IPE, and NoDN Hosted Resources
Enabling the Vision of Bench-to-Bedside with Semantic Web Technologies
Semantic testing in oneM2M
NIDD Discussion Points
Proposed design principles for modelling interworked devices
Release Timeline Discussion R2 and beyond
WPM ad-hoc group report TP#25
TS-0034 scope against TS-0001, and managing stage 2 Semantics
Xiaogang Ma, John Erickson, Patrick West, Stephan Zednik, Peter Fox,
Considering issues regarding handling token
SysML 2.0 Model Lifecycle Management (MLM) Working Group
CMDH Refinement Contribution: oneM2M-ARC-0397R01
Applications of IFLA Namespaces
LOD reference architecture
Presentation transcript:

Semantic Annotation Options for Release2 Group Name: MAS WG Source: Catalina Mladin, Lijun Dong, InterDigital Meeting Date: Agenda Item: TBD

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Semantic annotation in TR-0007 Semantic annotation of M2M resources is a method for adding semantic information to M2M resources so that it provides consistent data translation and data interoperability to heterogeneous M2M applications. Semantically annotated M2M resources can be contacted by an M2M application that understands what data are provided by the resources and what these data means. These annotations provide more meaningful descriptions and expose M2M data than traditional M2M system alone. Semantic information is annotated using Resource Description Framework (RDF) or Web Ontology Language (OWL). 2

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Annotation Requirements (1 of 2) The M2M System shall provide capabilities to manage semantic information about the oneM2M resources, e.g., create, retrieve, update, delete, associate/link (1) The M2M System shall support a common language for semantic description, e.g. RDF (3). The M2M System shall support semantic annotation of oneM2M resources for example application related data contained in containers (14) The M2M System shall support semantic annotation based on related ontologies (15). The M2M System shall be able to support simultaneous usage of multiple ontologies for the same M2M resource (20) 3

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Annotation Requirements (2 of 2) The M2M System shall provide the capability for making semantic descriptions available in the M2M System, e.g. announcement (30) The M2M system shall enable applications to retrieve an ontology representation related to semantic information used in the M2M system (31) 4

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Architectural issues/choices What needs to be annotated? – All Resources (req. 1) includes containers, AEs, etc. What should the annotation provide? – Links to multiple related ontologies (req. 20) – Announceable (req. 30) How can the annotation be done? – Attributes – Linked/child resources Both provide CRUD capabilities, associate/link (req 1) RDF calls for resource-relationship-value triples. Missing: relationship-value doubles (tuples). 5

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Example TR-0007 A.3 Use Case 6 Use case assumptions: User enters gym Smart watch registration performed

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Assumptions 7 Classes and properties are defined in an ontology or ontologies that can be used for annotation (ns denotes a name space in which the ontology locates). – ns: DeviceApp – ns: identifier – ns: producedData Multiple ontologies may be used by and identified by the respective namespaces – Assume that we can mix in the same annotation: – ns1: DeviceApp – ns1: identifier – ns1: producedData – ns2: fitnessApp – ns2: user

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Opt A: Attribute-based Annotation 8 rdf:type ns: DeviceApp ns: identifier “JohnDoeWatch” ns: producedData “bloodPressure”

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Opt B. Resource-based Annotation 9 Two alternative options are proposed on the next slides

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Opt B1. “Basic” Resource-based Annotation 10 Description attribute: List of Relationship-Value tuples that describes the parent resource’s semantics. rdf:type ns: DeviceApp ns: identifier “JohnDoeWatch” ns: producedData “bloodPressure”

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Opt B2. “relationTuple” Sub-resource 11 Example on the next slide description <relationTuple> <subscription> relationTuple <semantics> <subscription>

oneM2M-MAS-2015-XXXX Example Opt. B2 12 rdf:type ns: DeviceApp ns: identifier “JohnDoeWatch” ns: producedData “bloodPressure”