Effect on Grammar Acquisition by Order of Implicit and Explicit Instruction RACHEL A. BRANCH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

The Proficiency Orientation of Existing Methodologies
Language Assessment System (LAS) Links TM Census Test.
The Basics of Language Acquisition
Chapter 3: The Direct Method
The Role of Noticing: An Experimental Study on Chinese Tones in a CFL Classroom Zihan Geng & Chen-Yu Liu Principal Investigators: Andrew Farley & Kimi.
Takehiro Iizuka.  CF has significant and durable effects on target language development (Lyster & Saito, 2010) What type of CF benefits L2 acquisition??
The Direct Method Group 2 Members: Julie Huang
”When CALL is the better choice” Jane Vinther, Ph.D. University of Southern Denmark CALL 2008 conference University.
Curriculum-Based Assessment and Other Informal Measures
The Grammar-Translation Method
Constructivist and Directed Models The Differences Between The Two.
Lesson Planning Objectives:
ACE TESOL Diploma Program – London Language Institute OBJECTIVES You will understand: 1. Various techniques for using music and songs to teach listening.
 New communication technologies are being developed and these changes affect not only literacy instruction but also our definition of literacy itself.
Vocabulary Building Strategies ELCE Summer Institute: July, 2013 Facilitator: Sonja Follett.
The impact of peer- assisted sentence- combining teaching on primary pupils’ writing.
Reading and Writing Through Task-Based Group Work.
The Grammar – Translation Method
Presented by: Rajashree Pande & Moiz Raja Shaikh Centre For Learning Resources 3 rd TEC, Hyderabad 16 th – 18 th March 2013.
DEVELOPING ART LESSONS WITH AT-RISK YOUTH AND ELLS IN MIND Delanie Holton Art Teacher Fletcher Primary and Intermediate Aurora, CO.
High expectations… “To improve teaching and learning throughout the school”
2014 Fall Semester- Lesson Plan 1. Step One  Make a clear introduction of Grammar Translation with a PPT (20 minutes)—You can use any material from internet.
CUTM 4012: Methods of Teaching English Week 9: Grammar – Part 1.
Task Based Learning In your classroom.
Presenter: Chen, Yu-Chu Advisor: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: 2008 Nov.3 Corrective Feedback in the Chatroom: An experimental study Loewen, S. & Erlam, R. (2006).
A Study of Taiwanese High School Students' Production and Perception Performance in English Non-High Front Vowels Graduate Student: Wan-chun Tseng Advisor:
16/11/ INCIDENTAL FOCUS ON FORM DURING DECISION MAKING TASKS AND THE EFFECTS ON ORAL AND WRITTEN PERFORMANCE Eva Alcón Soler Universitat Jaume I.
Do Now (7 minutes) NYSESLAT Overview (10 minutes) NYSESLAT Jigsaw (20 Minutes) Group Presentation/Discussion (20 Minutes) Wrap-Up and Q&A (3 minutes) Do.
OSHA Long Term Care Worker Protection Train the Trainer Program Part 7: Evaluation Tools/Post-Test.
Audio Diaries for improved spoken proficiency Anthony Schmidt University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Testing and Evaluation
Instruction For the Chinese vocabulary: Record your pronunciation of the character or word. Provide the English meaning. Use the mouse write the character.
Jade Huffman Kerry Litwinski
The Direct Method 1. Background It became popular since the Grammar Translation Method was not very effective in preparing students to use the target.
Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA Perspective Rod Ellis.
How to Teach with Go for it! 山西省教育科学研究院 山西省教育厅教研室 平克虹.
Chapter 14 I have to have…. Last Week: Review You used “I need to be able to + verb.” to talk about skills for jobs. ex. A teacher needs to be able to.
SIOP: Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Dr. Kelly Bikle Winter 2007.
Second Language Acquisition Theories (A brief description) Compiled by: Nicole Lefever.
Lecture 3: Finding Balance in the Treatment of Grammar Dr. Douglas Fleming Faculty of Education.
A Pilot Study of a Multimedia Instructional Program for Teaching of ESL Grammar with Embedded Tracking.
Using Skype to Improve the Speaking Ability of Junior High School Students N99C0003 向倍儀 Ellie.
1 Leticia M. Trower Gaston County Schools Used with permission.
Introduction to Language Teaching The Grammar-Translation Method.
Lesson 4 Grammar - Chapter 13.
Third Grade Vocabulary Instruction Using Repetition and Graphic Organizers Action Research Project Kristen Russell Fall 2008.
Willard Public Schools Teacher Professional Development Teaching Strategies for ELL Students.
Taking the Mystery out of the Bilingual Target Language Proficiency Test (BTLPT): Why Candidates Are Failing the Test? Maria Bhattacharjee Ed.D Irene Chen.
College of Education Meeting with the Professor: The Field Assignment Project (Case Study)
CLT with Grammar Instruction People learned languages before institutionalized education existed. Natural learning processes always assert themselves over.
1 Taiwan Teachers’ Professional Development Series: Oral & Written Communication in your FL Classroom.
Lesson 4 Teaching Grammar Chapter 13. Questions re: Teaching Grammar What kind of approach do you take when teaching grammar? What assumptions do you.
Monitoring and Assessment Presented by: Wedad Al –Blwi Supervised by: Prof. Antar Abdellah.
2013 Fall Semester- Week 3. Step One  Make a brief introduction of Grammar Translation with a PPT (10 minutes)  Tell the classmates (5 minutes) 1. your.
LST. Collective Responsibility Concentrated Instruction Convergent Assessment Certain Access RTI and Reading.
THE CALIFORNIA ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT TEST (CELDT) Poway Unified School District.
Lesson planning I’d like to start by looking at two questions : Why ? How ? Those two questions will be answered if we answer the following three questions.
PROJECT PAPER Successful English Language Learning Inventory Prepared by, Noraishah Intan bt Othman P69255 GE6533 Language Learning Strategies Instruction.
T H E D I R E C T M E T H O D DM. Background DM An outcome of a reaction against the Grammar- Translation Method. It was based on the assumption that.
The Teachability Hypothesis. Stages of acquisition of morpho-syntactic structures follow a set developmental order. Stages cannot be skipped as a result.
How Languages Are Learned
EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT SECOND LANGUAGE TRAINING Morgan-Short et al.
SLA PROVIDING INPUT FOR ACQUISITION
Teachers College, Columbia University
Teaching Proficiency Through Reading Stories
Developing Qualitative Research Questions
ELT 213 APPROACHES TO ELT I GRAMMAR-TRANSLATION METHOD WEEK 3
The Efficacy of Using Web- and Print-based Materials in Teaching Grammar to Iranian EFL Learners Ehsan Rezvani, Ph.D. in TEFL IAU, Isfahan (Khorasgan)
Explicit AND Student-centered grammar instruction
Presentation transcript:

Effect on Grammar Acquisition by Order of Implicit and Explicit Instruction RACHEL A. BRANCH

Related Research  Many studies have been done in SLA research on the effectiveness of implicit vs. explicit grammar instruction Explicit Instruction Is Most Effective Implicit Instruction Is Most Effective Both Explicit and Implicit Instruction Are Necessary Akakura (2012)Krashen (2003)R. Ellis (2005) Spada and Tomita (2010)- meta-analysis Macaro and Masterman (2006) Hulstijn (2002) Scheffler and Cincala (2010) Nassaji and Fotos (2011) Long (1996)Swan (2005)

The Problem  A number of researchers (e.g. Loewen, 2015) have concluded that learners benefit most from a combination of both explicit and implicit instruction  But what about the order of instruction?  Does the order of implicit and explicit instruction affect implicit and explicit knowledge?

Research Questions  1. Does the order in which implicit and explicit grammatical instruction is presented in the classroom affect either implicit or explicit knowledge of the grammar?  2. If so, is implicit followed by explicit or explicit followed by implicit instruction more effective for implicit and explicit grammar acquisition?

Participants  12 international graduate students at Texas Tech University studying in various fields  Students in the International Teaching Assistant preparation class at TTU  Average English proficiency level between intermediate and advanced  8 of the participants were male and 4 were female  5 of the participants were Chinese, 2 were Saudi Arabian, 1 was Mexican, 1 was Korean, 1 was Taiwanese, 1 was Brazilian, and 1 was Argentinian.  Their ages ranged from 24 to 42-years-old

Treatment  Target structure: Untrue in the present and future conditional Day 1Day 2 Treatment Group 140 minute session of explicit instruction on target structure 25 minute session of implicit instruction on target structure Treatment Group 225 minute session of implicit instruction on target structure 40 minute session of explicit instruction on target structure Control GroupNo instruction on target structure

Treatment Implicit Instruction SessionExplicit Instruction Session 5 minutes Students listened to song containing target structure while reading lyrics 10 minutes Teacher led class discussion about meaning of song (no mention of target structure) 10 minutes Students wrote sentences about what they would do in certain situations 15 minutes Teacher explained how to form target structure and in what situations it is used 10 minutes Students filled in blanks on board forming sentences with target structure 15 minutes Students wrote their own sentences using target structure correctly

Assessment Implicit Knowledge Assessment  10 oral questions  3 contained target structure/ 7 distractors  Participants could not see questions  Participants given 20 seconds to answer each question  Each session was recorded Explicit Knowledge Assessment  10 written fill-in-the-blank questions  3 contained target structure/ 7 distractors  Participants given 10 minutes to fill in blanks with correct forms of verbs provided in parentheses

Data Analysis Implicit Knowledge Assessment  +1 if participant used target structure correctly  0 if participant used target structure incorrectly  +.5 if participant used the target structure in one clause correctly and in one clause incorrectly  Perfect score= 3 Explicit Knowledge Assessment  +1 if participant used target structure correctly  0 if participant used target structure incorrectly  Perfect score= 3

Results

Discussion  RQ 1- Does the order in which implicit and explicit grammatical instruction is presented in the classroom affect either implicit or explicit knowledge of the grammar?  Maybe  We will get a more clear picture after the delayed post-test results

Discussion  RQ 2- If so, is implicit followed by explicit or explicit followed by implicit instruction more effective for implicit and explicit grammar acquisition?  Explicit knowledge- group 1 (the group that received explicit instruction first) had greater gains than the other two groups  Implicit knowledge- group 2 (the group that received implicit instruction first) had the greatest gains, followed closely by the CONTROL GROUP  Cumulative gains- group 2 had the greatest cumulative gains

Limitations  Study limited to 2 treatment sessions over 1 week  Very small n size  Only looked at acquisition of 1 target structure

Implications/Future Work  Based on the results of this study, implicit followed by explicit instruction is associated with greater gains in implicit grammatical knowledge, and explicit followed by implicit instruction is associated with greater gains in explicit grammatical knowledge, at least with regard to this target structure  Future studies asking the same question about order of instruction should include larger n sizes, longer treatment periods, and use a variety of target structures

Thank You!