Federal Aviation Administration Airport 20 to 1 Approach Surface Oklahoma Airport Operators Association, (OAOA)/ American Association of Airport Engineers,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emergency COA Process Presented to: UAS All Users TELCON
Advertisements

Presenter Todd G. Johnson, Airport Solutions Specialist September 14, 2012.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Approval Process Overview Cranes or Other Objects United Parcel Service Mike Manis, Support Specialist,
Airport Obstruction Issues GAA Workshop March 14 th, 2014 Presented by: Alan Hood, Georgia Department of Transportation Airport Safety Data Program Manager.
Federal Aviation Administration Airport 20 to 1 Approach Surface Georgia Airports Association (GAA) Annual Workshop Cindy M Hintz Eastern Flight Procedures.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION AVECO July 14 – 18, 2014 Centralized Certification.
The Office of Information Technology Information Security Administrator Kenneth Pierce, Vice Provost for IT and Chief Information Officer.
Airport Obstruction Issues And ASM GAA Workshop February 25, 2015 Presented by: Alan Hood, Georgia Department of Transportation Airport Safety Data Program.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration What’s New at the Flight Procedures Office Pennsylvania Airports Conference Jerry Lebar March 2,
Hershey Conference March 2008 Federal Aviation Administration 0 Hershey Conference March 2008 Federal Aviation Administration 0 Conducting Studies For.
WHAT AIRPORT MANAGERS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TERPS Association of California Airports Lake Tahoe, California September 10, 2014 QED Airport & Aviation Consultants.
Recent Lighting and Marking Design Challenges/Trends
Presented to: 2008 FAA Eastern Region Airports Conference By: Donna O’Neill FAA Obstruction Evaluation Specialist Date: March 19, 2008 Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration Airport 20 to 1 Approach Surface & Restoring Night Minimums Georgia Airports Association (GAA) 2015 Annual Workshop Cindy.
1 Federal Aviation Administration Airports GIS Program March 10, 2009 FAA | Office of the Associate Administrator of Airports (ARP)  ARP | Airport Safety.
APAC PBN Seminar F.LECAT (ICAO)
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Presented to: HAI FIRC By: Hooper Harris, Manager, AFS-250 Date:February 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Operational Control Operations Specification.
Henry Felices Hershey PA March 5, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Overview of the Airport Safety Data Program.
Contract Lifecycle Management Improve responsiveness, efficiencies, and oversight & reduce risks and costs INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Apply your company template.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Changes in Reimbursable Agreements 31 st Annual Airports Conference V Thompson & R Farrell, Lead.
Session No. 3 ICAO Safety Management Standards ICAO SMS Framework
Enforcement Action for 2014
Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 150/5370-2F Operational Safety on Airports During Construction Presented to: Eastern Region 35 th Annual.
Focus Points Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Overview ALP Guidance
Federal Aviation Administration FAA Presentation to Prospective Bidders Chicago Midway International Airport July 30, Airports Division Great Lakes.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration 2012 ACA Annual Conference David F. Cushing, Manager, LAX-ADO Wednesday, September 11, 2013 Construction.
1 Economic Directorate’s Quality Audit Program Steven S. Klement Office of Statistical Methods and Research for Economic Programs.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Medical Review Team.
Presented to:FAA field personnel By:AOSC Date:February 17, 2006 Presented to:FAA field personnel By:AOSC Date:February 17, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Part 13 Informal Complaint Process Filing and Investigating Informal Complaints 35 th Annual Airports.
FAA Satellite Navigation – Status Briefing 1 Federal Aviation Administration January 5, 2007.
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs
Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA, AFS-400 Date: August 8, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration FPAW Summer 2012 RVR/Prevailing Visibility Conversion and.
Presented by: Roger Sultan, FAA Aviation Safety Inspector; AFS-400 Date: February 25, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Operational impact of §
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS GAP ANALYSIS SURVEY FOR U.S. AIRPORTS
State Safety Inspections and Sponsor Expectations.
Federal Aviation Administration Clarification to Policy and Procedures Concerning Use of Airport Revenues; Proceeds from Taxes on Aviation Fuel Presented.
By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Focus on the Future 8 th Annual V&V Summit 2012 John Frederick Test Standards Board Chairperson Manager, V&V.
Presented to: Emerald Coast Transportation Symposium By: Terry Washington, P.E. Regional Capacity Manager – FAA Southern Region Airports Division Date:
Federal Aviation Administration What’s New In Instrument Flight Procedures Jerry Lebar, Eastern Flight Procedures Office March 3, 2010 Hershey Airports.
Presented to: 34 th Annual Airports Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, CEP Date: March 3, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration Planning and Environmental Guidance.
2015 GDOT PowerPoint Title Page Sub Titles Body Text Obstruction Evaluation “What are all these surfaces?” GAA Spring Conference February 19, 2016 Presented.
UAS Operations in the Golden Triangle Mike Hainsey Executive Director Golden Triangle Regional Airport.
Presented By: FAA, ATO, Western Service Center Date: March 7, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration FAA Initiative to Address Noise Concerns of Santa Cruz/Santa.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR February 10, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration Approval Guidance for RNP Procedures with AR C-384 Presentation.
Ohio Aviation Association Airport Airspace Zoning Ohio Airports Conference April 12 and
Federal Aviation Administration Navigating the AIP April 18, 2016 By:Glenn A Boles, Manager, AR/OK ADO Kathy Franklin, Program Manager, AR/OK ADO Presented.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Teterboro Runway 19 Quiet Visual Approach Teterboro Users Group (TUG) Gerald Lynch, Eastern Service.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: OSWG Presented by: Chris Hope Date: March 9, 2016 ILS Performance Classification OpSpec C061.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Obstacles in the Visual Segment 20:1 Background, Policies and Action Gerard G Lebar Eastern Flight.
Ohio Aviation Association Airspace Protection Ohio Airports Conference April 12 and
APAC PBN Seminar F.LECAT (ICAO)
Tender Briefing Session COR34/2016
Runway 5-23 Obstruction and Visibility Minimums Update
State Safety Inspections
External Sales & Agreements (Contracts)
2017 Annual Conference, South Lake Tahoe Rayvon Williams,
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Oceanic and International Operations
SMS The following presentation will provide a brief synopsis of the key functions of the FltPlan.com FRAT system and your SMS program. Rev. 2, Updated.
Instrument Approaches to Your Airport
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
NERC Reliability Standards Development Plan
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
May 2018 HSAC.
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Federal Aviation Administration Airport 20 to 1 Approach Surface Oklahoma Airport Operators Association, (OAOA)/ American Association of Airport Engineers, (AAAE) Annual Conference Ron Sanders Southwest Regional Flight Procedures Team March 10, 2015

Federal Aviation Administration 2 20:1 Approach Penetrations Criteria developed by Flight Standards in the late 1990s Requires clear 20:1 Visual Approach surface for night minimums All terminal procedures are currently reviewed every two years, as required by AFS policy. During that periodic review, or other amendments, the TERPS Specialist in AeroNav Products may identify obstacles that penetrate the 20:1 visual surface.

Federal Aviation Administration 3 20:1 Penetrations (continued) Background: During Oct 2012, Flight Standards Division AFS-400 required immediate NOTAM action resulting in “Not Authorized (NA) at night when 20:1 identified. Current Policy: Effective Jan 6, 2014, refined policy considered “Risk” factor of the identified penetrations and allowing a validation period (30 days). Validation: To verify if the obstacle exists or has been removed, and/or if the obstacle is lighted.

Federal Aviation Administration 4 20 to 1 Approach Surface (TERPS)

Federal Aviation Administration 5

Federal Aviation Administration 6 20 to 1 Penetrations Identified by : Geographic Information System (GIS) tool - Mandatory biennial reviews / OKC ANP - During instrument procedure amdts Reported by: ∙ Various offices: Regional FPT, ANP, GDOT, FC Result in loss of night time capability Daytime visibility restricted to 1 SM

Federal Aviation Administration 7 Identification of 20 to 1 Penetrations Typical scenario: During biennial review of airport’s procedure(s) OKC development branch identifies non-validated penetrations. - - Specialist’s findings are forwarded to Flight Procedures Team (FPT), assigning each penetration with risk assessment of high, medium or low. - - FPT adds GoogleEarth overlay to the file (.kml)

Federal Aviation Administration 8 20 to 1 penetrations (cont) - - Within 3-business days, file is forwarded to airport requiring sponsor to validate each penetration ASAP, but no more than 30-days / ADO copied Airport owner/sponsor must provide a written report and copy ADO No response received within prescribed timeframe will result in IAP visibility minima and night capability as required.

Federal Aviation Administration 9 Airport Owner / Sponsor Response If 20 to 1 penetrations determined invalid - - FPT will notify applicable offices to update airport’s data file(s); no action required to restrict or modify subject IAP. If 20 to 1 penetrations determined valid: - - Submit written compliance plan Mitigation - - Remove, light or lower - - VGSI can be used as mitigation when approved by Flight Standards

Federal Aviation Administration 10

Federal Aviation Administration 11

Federal Aviation Administration 12 Possible Mitigation Actions Visual Glideslope Indicator (VGSI) - Apt Mgr submits Form seeking AFS approval Apply ILS / LOC / LPV / LP Full-Scale Deflection - Calculation, conducted by Aero Nav Products when trying to mitigate 20:1 penetration vs restricting night mins Restrict only CAT C/D approach category minimums vs restricting CAT A/B/C/D -If penetrations are outside CAT A/B area

Federal Aviation Administration 13 Thank you Questions?

Federal Aviation Administration 14 Contact Info Ron Sanders Central Flight Procedures Team ,