Targeting Dispositions by Risk, Need, Responsivity Modeling If / Then Decisions Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reducing Recidivism Reducing the Rate and Use of Incarceration Reducing Recidivism Reducing the Rate and Use of Incarceration What Works and Best Practices.
Advertisements

Integrating Risk/Needs Assessment Into Drug Court
Treatment of Substance Involved Offenders in Criminal Justice Settings – Challenges & Outcomes Igor Koutsenok, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Psychiatry,
Best Practices Standards Vol. I: An Overview. OBJECTIVES  Define Best Practices Standards  Identify the need for Best Practices Standards  Briefly.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
Keir Boettcher Deputy District Attorney
Alternatives to Incarceration and Care Coordination May 12, 2015.
TREATMENT OF THE JUVENILE OFFENDER II ISSUES IN ASSESSMENT AND CASE PLANNING DR. ROBERT D. HOGE DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY CARLETON UNIVERSITY OTTAWA, ONTARIO.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention April 2 & 3, Square miles 1,000,000 + people 10 th largest U.S. city 4 th Safest U.S. city.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.
ASSESSMENTS OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS THROUGH EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICES
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
Risk and Needs Assessments
Assessment of Risk and Need
Specialized Populations: When is ORAS not enough? The Corrections Institute Center for Criminal Justice Research University of Cincinnati.
Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;
Table 1 Introduction  Overview  While predictors of recidivism and technical violations are often examined in probation and parole outcome research,
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Offender Supervision Control and Public Safety Issues.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
Offender Rehabilitation
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
Presented by: Cary Heck, Ph.D. University of Wyoming
Risk/Needs Assessment Within the Criminal Justice System.
Integrating Offender Screening Process into Specialty Court Eligibility Determination Presenter: Steven Fritz, LPC, LADC Clinical Director, Human Skills.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Treatment is the Key: Addressing Drug Abuse in Criminal Justice Settings Redonna K. Chandler, Ph.D. Branch Chief Services Research Branch Division of Epidemiology,
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
North Carolina TASC NC TASC Bridging Systems for Effective Offender Care Management.
RISK AND NEED TRACKS SAMHSA 2013 Orleans Parish Drug Court Expansion Grant.
Assessment of Alcohol-Involved Offenders Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals Treatment Research Institute.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
VOCABULARY. ADJUDICATE  TO HEAR AND SETTLE A CASE BY JUDICIAL PROCEDURE.
Targeting Participants for Adult Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
Targeting Participants for Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Programs for Drug Offenders.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania Evidence-Based Dispositions for Drug Offenders.
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Targeting Dispositions by Risks &
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Targeting Dispositions by Risks &
INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND THE ROLE OF GPS Thomas H. Williams, Associate Director Community Supervision Services July 14-15, 2008 United States Sentencing.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
SENTENCING Overview/Review The “PSI” and “Risk Assessment” Sentencing Disparity Sentencing Guidelines Who Dictates Time Served?
Targeting Participants for Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals.
Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.
Reducing Recidivism and Promoting Recovery: Implications of National and State Trends for Improving Treatment Programs Alexa Eggleston, J.D. Program Director,
Offender Assessment Utilizing the Risk-Need- Responsivity Model A web presentation for RSAT - T&TA by Roberta C. Churchill -ACJS.
Unit 8 Prof. Hulvat CJ240. Housekeeping…. We are winding down…. We are winding down…. Late work…. Late work…. Coming up in our final unit 9 Coming up.
Community-Based Corrections, 10th Edition Leanne Fiftal Alarid Cengage Learning Chapter 14 Bringing it All Together: Solutions for Community-Based Corrections.
Principles of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations Janelle Prueter Illinois TASC Presented to RSAT West VA Conference July 21, 2011.
Performance Evaluation of Drug Courts Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Use Of Risk Assessments in Utah Sentencing
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
A MULTI-TRACK DUI COURT SYSTEM FOR REPEAT OFFENDERS
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D., FCPP
Evidence-Based Criminal Justice Reform
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Annals of Research and Knowledge (ARK)
Key Moments in NADCP History
Presentation transcript:

Targeting Dispositions by Risk, Need, Responsivity Modeling If / Then Decisions Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. National Association of Drug Court Professionals

Short-term cost to taxpayers Short-term risk of recidivism Dispositional Continuum Long-term functioning of the individual Pre-plea diversion Post-plea diversion Sentence to incarceration Sentence to restrictive intermediate punishment (IP / RIP) Sentence to probation or community supervision Decriminalization De-felonization TreatmentCourts

Post-plea diversion Short-term cost to taxpayers Short-term risk of recidivism Improved functioning of the individual Pre--plea diversion Short-term cost to taxpayers Short-term risk of recidivism Long-term functioning of the individual Sentence to Incarceration Restrictive intermediate Punishment (IP/ RIP) Probation or community supervision Dispositional Continuum Conditional release (parole, probation or community corrections) Unconditional release FRONT-END DIVERSION < FRONT-END DIVERSION BACK-END REENTRY > DecriminalizationDe-felonization TreatmentCourts

Offense vs. Offender Decisions Determinate vs. indeterminate sentencing (vs. guided discretion)Determinate vs. indeterminate sentencing (vs. guided discretion) Evidence-based practices (EBPs)Evidence-based practices (EBPs) Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR)Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) Graduated sanctionsGraduated sanctions Positive reinforcementPositive reinforcement Collateral consequences (negative reinforcement)Collateral consequences (negative reinforcement)

Risk Principle Not necessarily a risk for violence or dangerousnessNot necessarily a risk for violence or dangerousness Serious prognosis or lesser amenability to treatmentSerious prognosis or lesser amenability to treatment The higher the risk level, the more intensive the supervision and accountability should be; and vice versaThe higher the risk level, the more intensive the supervision and accountability should be; and vice versa Mixing risk levels is contraindicated!Mixing risk levels is contraindicated!

Prognostic Risk Factors Current age < 25 yearsCurrent age < 25 years Delinquent onset < 16 yearsDelinquent onset < 16 years Substance abuse onset < 14 yearsSubstance abuse onset < 14 years Prior convictions or incarcerationPrior convictions or incarceration Prior rehabilitation failurePrior rehabilitation failure History of violenceHistory of violence Antisocial Personality Disorder / PsychopathyAntisocial Personality Disorder / Psychopathy Familial history of crime or addictionFamilial history of crime or addiction Criminal or substance abuse associationsCriminal or substance abuse associations

Need Principle Clinical syndromes or impairments (diagnosis)Clinical syndromes or impairments (diagnosis) The higher the need level, the more intensive the treatment or rehabilitation services should be; and vice versaThe higher the need level, the more intensive the treatment or rehabilitation services should be; and vice versa Mixing need levels is contraindicated!Mixing need levels is contraindicated!

Specific Responsivity Order and timing of intervention is critical: 1.Responsivity needs: interfere with rehabilitation (e.g., deficient housing, mental illness, withdrawal, anhedonia) 2.Criminogenic needs: cause or exacerbate crime (e.g., addiction, criminal thinking) 3.Maintenance needs: degrade rehabilitation gains (e.g., poor education or employment skills) 4.Humanitarian needs: cause distress (e.g., medical or dental illness)

Risk & Needs Matrix High Risk Low Risk HighNeeds LowNeeds Supervision Supervision Treatment Treatment Pro-social habilitation Pro-social habilitation Adaptive habilitation Adaptive habilitation Treatment Treatment (Pro-social habilitation) (Pro-social habilitation) Adaptive habilitation Adaptive habilitation Supervision Supervision Pro-social habilitation Pro-social habilitation (Adaptive habilitation) (Adaptive habilitation) Secondary prevention Secondary prevention Diversion Diversion

Stage in System Legal standards differLegal standards differ Defense or prosecution agreementDefense or prosecution agreement Available time for treatment and supervisionAvailable time for treatment and supervision Differences in base rates for risk and needDifferences in base rates for risk and need Impacts risk or need level (e.g., reentry)Impacts risk or need level (e.g., reentry) **** Need to get 3-dimensional ****

Court-monitored probation; e.g., HOPE Court Treatment court; e.g., Drug Court, MH Court RIP

Pre-Disposition Assessment Use immunity, especially at pre-adjudication stageUse immunity, especially at pre-adjudication stage Require assessment of risk and need after adjudication but prior to disposition (e.g., as part of a PSI)Require assessment of risk and need after adjudication but prior to disposition (e.g., as part of a PSI) Valid, reliable & culturally unbiased instrumentsValid, reliable & culturally unbiased instruments Substance abuse vs. dependence diagnosis guides treatment conditions and response to technical violations involving new drug useSubstance abuse vs. dependence diagnosis guides treatment conditions and response to technical violations involving new drug use

Guided Discretion Require professionals to consider risk and need (excluding certain offenses)Require professionals to consider risk and need (excluding certain offenses) Require professionals to consider effectiveness and cost-effectiveness (excluding certain offenses)Require professionals to consider effectiveness and cost-effectiveness (excluding certain offenses) Publish data on recidivism and costs of alternative dispositionsPublish data on recidivism and costs of alternative dispositions Include dispositional rationale on the recordInclude dispositional rationale on the record Restrictive basis for appeal (abuse of discretion)Restrictive basis for appeal (abuse of discretion) Publish data on dispositional decisionsPublish data on dispositional decisions

Validated Risk Tools Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) Wisconsin Risk and Need Assessment Scale (WRN) Risk and Needs Triage (RANT) Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) Ohio Risk Assessment System (ORAS) Federal Post Conviction Risk Assessment (PCRA) Risk Prediction Index (RPI)

Validated Needs Tools Addiction Severity Index (ASI) Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) Offender Profile Index (OPI) Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI) Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) Offender Screening Tool (OST) ST%29.aspx Inventory of Offender Risk, Needs, and Strengths (IORNS)

Validated Diagnostic Tools Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV (SCID) Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM) Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) Texas Christian University (TCU) Drug Dependence Screen-II