USES guia del USES 4.0. EUSES (European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances) Multimedia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIP Industry testing of the draft cTGD Modifying exposure scenarios at DU level Break out session Arona meeting August, 2007 FDLF.
Advertisements

In this presentation you will:
HERA at XXXI CED Kay Fox Human & Environmental Risk Assessment Environmental Risk Assessment under HERA: Challenges and Solutions Kay Fox Chair of the.
The Role of Background Soil Levels in Risk Assessment Teresa S. Bowers Presented at USGS/NRCS Soil Geochemistry Workshop March 4, 2003.
HERA European Stakeholders Workshop: Brussels, Oct Environmental Risk Assessment Progress and Lessons Learned Kay Fox Chair of the HERA Environmental.
© 2004 Prof Roland Clift NANOTECHNOLOGY Professor Roland Clift, Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, GUILDFORD, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK.
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
Draft Essential Principles with Fundamental Concepts By Marlene Kaplan & David Herring NOAA & NASA.
Risk Assessment.
Environmental Indexes by Amit Joshi. Purpose Assess the potential risks posed by releases from industrial sources Conduct preliminary impact assessment.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
Environmental risk assessment of chemicals Paul Howe Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, UK.
6.2.Estimating phase distribution of contaminants in model worlds EP Environmental Processes.
Exposure Assessment Thanks to Marc Rigas, PhD for an earlier version of this lecture Much of the materials is drawn from Paustenbach, DJ. (2000) The practice.
Introduction to GW contamination and
“Carbon Isotope Systematics in Soil” -or- “Plant Poo and Microbe Farts” Justin Yeakel, UCSC.
Risk Assessment.
Aerosols and climate Rob Wood, Atmospheric Sciences.
The Anthropogenic Ocean Carbon Sink Alan Cohn March 29, 2006
ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology
Carbon Isotope Systematics in Soil. Soil Pathway Summary Organic matter finds it’s way into soils and decomposes SOM (Soil Organic Matter) is further.
“to provide and apply an integrated approach of addressing scientific, managerial and societal issues surrounding environmental effects of ionising.
Mrs. Wharton’s Science Class. What is Air Quality? Air Quality- Affects the quality of life of all organisms on earth. Natural and Human activities greatly.
DANTES Akzo Nobel examples Johan Widheden
RISK ASSESSMENT AS TOOL FOR POLICY MAKERS Roncak P., Adamkova J., Metelkova M. Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute, Jeseniova 17, Bratislava The.
Radionuclide dispersion modelling
ECB INFODAYS Zagreb, Croatia, December 2006 Tools for risk assessment: TGDs, EUSES Sharon Munn European Commission DG JRC, Institute for Health and.
Environmental Processes Partitioning of pollutants 3.i Sorption involving organic matter (between air/soil and water/soil)
Scheme of the equilibrium Environmental Compartments Model.
1 The Turtle by Ogden Nash Ogden Nash The turtle lives 'twixt plated decks Which practically conceal its sex. I think it clever of the turtle In such a.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
Surveillance monitoring Operational and investigative monitoring Chemical fate fugacity model QSAR Select substance Are physical data and toxicity information.
HERA at CED XXXI C.Lally 1 Human & Environmental Risk Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment under HERA: Challenges and Solutions Christeine Lally Co-Chair.
Chapter 17.1 Atmospheric Characteristics
120 januari 2011 Tamiflu in the environment Caroline Moermond Charles Bodar Lonneke van Leeuwen Mark Montforts Bianca van de Ven Suzanne Wuijts Monique.
Chapter 11 Environmental Performance of a Flowsheet.
By: Karl Philippoff Major: Earth Sciences
ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY PART 2 ASSOC. PROF. JAN TŘÍSKA ISBE AS CR, ČESKÉ BUDĚJOVICE.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
University of Texas at AustinMichigan Technological University 1 Module 2: Evaluating Environmental Partitioning and Fate: Approaches based on chemical.
ComET™ Farfield Modelling Dr. Don Mackay Mr. Jon Arnot Canadian Environmental Modelling Centre Trent University Peterborough, ON Slides.
Fugacity-based environmental modelsmodels Level 1--the equilibrium distribution of a fixed quantity of conserved chemical, in a closed environment at equilibrium,
University of Texas at Austin Evaluating Environmental Partitioning and Fate: Approaches based on chemical structure David Allen Department of Chemical.
WP4. Assessment of environmental impacts and resulting externalities from multi-media (air/water/soil) impact pathways A. Rabl, T. Bachmann, R. Torfs -
Air Pollution Checked by Petrova N. N. Done by George Mosunov 8 «A» school 73 Lira.
Risk Assessment.
JEG DM: common work items Targets & ex post analysis Robustness Links with biodiversity Trends in selected modeled/measured parameters.
Evapotranspiration Eric Peterson GEO Hydrology.
Air Pollution. Take a Deep Breath Air quality affects the quality of life for all organisms on Earth Natural and human activities greatly influence the.
EHS 507 Food Exposures: Fruits and Vegetables  Fruits and vegetables may become contaminated by multiple pathways –Purposeful spraying or soil treatment.
Organization of Course INTRODUCTION 1.Course overview 2.Air Toxics overview 3.HYSPLIT overview HYSPLIT Theory and Practice 4.Meteorology 5.Back Trajectories.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
INTRODUCTION TO ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING. EIA Scientific Tools and Techniques2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to: 
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Food environment Relations between and. FOOD CHAIN.
Volker J. Soballa Evonik Degussa GmbH Essen, Germany
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Exposure Modelling Day 1.
Clean Technology (PB382) Click to edit Master title style Numfon Eaktasang, Ph.D.
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
Modeling Iodine Released During a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Biology Chapter Sixteen: Human Impact on Ecosystems
Exam review: study guide
ECETOC TRA tool Proposed application to estimate PEC/PNEC ratio for substances with risk score = 1 ECETOC has developed a tiered approach for calculating.
Factors that Affect Rate of Reaction
Nickel Risk Assessment
Apes Ch 11 Risk, Toxicology, and Human Healthy
GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE AN OVERVIEW.
INPUT DATA REQUIREMENTS
Presentation transcript:

USES guia del USES EUSES (European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances) Multimedia Transport and Transformation Model According to the supporting Technical Guidance Documents (TGD) for European risk assessment Euses:

EUSES Aim: To harmonise risk assessment in a systematic and transparent approach Include : Emission, exposure, bio-effects and risk estimation for the environment and humans

Compartments in Euses

–EUSES –Stand-alone application – Multimedia models for: - emissions - transport & transformation - exposure of man and environment – Effects assessment for man and environment – Risk characterisation for man and environment – Conservative results as ‘reasonable worst-cases’ – 3 spatial scales (personal, local, regional) – 2 time scales: - long-term, sub-/chronic - short-term, acute – Uses equations of the Technical Guidance Documents (TGD) of the EU

RELEASE ESTIMATION Production Formulation Processing Private Use Recovery

The local scale of EUSES generic world. The local point source emitting directly ore indirectly into the different compartments [EUSES 1.00]

Structure of the regional distribution model Simple Box of EUSES

Complexity of EUSES [Berding et al. (1999)]

O verview over the EUSES software structure

PEC:The Predicted Environmental Concentration Is the concentration in the environment or food which is predicted by a model. PNEC: The Predicted No Effect Concentration Is a concentration level in the environment or food below which adverse effects are most likely not to occur.

Predicted environmental concentration and Predicted no effect concentration [Boeije (1999)]

RCR (EUSES): Risk Characterisation Ratio RCR is the ratio of the Predicted Environmental Concentration and the Predicted No-Effect Concentration (RCR = PEC/PNEC) and expresses the likelihood of adverse effects to occur. Margin of Safety (MOS) (EUSES): Is the ratio ‘effect level’/’exposure level’=MOS and describes the degree of risk.

A significant influence on all PECs have :  the melting point,  emissions to regional air,  the wind speed,  the atmospheric mixing height..

The soil-PECs are strongly affected by:  the degradation rate in soil,  the vapour pressure,  the aerosol collection efficiency,  the specific mixing depth,  the constant of Junge equation,  the volume fraction of solids in soil,  the density of solid phase,  the surface area of aerosol particles,  partially by the average daily precipitation  the octanol-water partition coefficient

The water/sediment-PECs depend on:  the volume fraction of water in sediment,  the fraction connected to STP,  partially on the octanol-water partition coefficient,  partially on the average daily precipitation,  partially on the weight fraction of organic carbon in suspended matter,  partially on the density of water phase.

Comparison -Outputs – on site / off site concentrations in air, water, sediment, plants and soil – concentrations in breast milk, fish, milk, meat, eggs, tap/swimming water – daily human doses by inhalation, ingestion (breast milk, water, milk, meat, fish, soil) and dermal uptake – individual human lifetime risk attributable to exposures over a certain period – soil clean-up goals (depending on a target risk) EUSESCalTOX – estimates for releases to air, water and soil, life cycle step-wise and spatial scale – predicted environmental concentrations (PEC) in surface water, air, soils and sediment – concentrations in fish, plants, drinking water, milk, meat – exposure of consumers via products – workplace exposure of humans – daily human doses by inhalation, ingestion (water, milk, meat, fish, crops), dermal contact – Predicted No-Effect Concentrations (PNEC) in the environment – Risk Characterisation Ratio for the environment (RCR=PEC/PNEC) = likelihood of adverse effects occurring – Margin Of Safety for humans (MOS= ‘effect’/’exposure’) = degree of risk

Comparison - Applicability – non-ionic organic chemicals, radionuclides, fully dissociating in-/ organic chemicals, solid-phase metal species, partially dissociated in-/ organic species – site specific – very low concentrations (not exceeding the solubility limit in any phase) – long time scales (preferably one year to decades) – areas greater than 1000 m 2 with a water fraction of max. 10 % of the surface area EUSESCalTOX – unacceptable errors may occur assessing: poorly soluble, inorganic or ionisable substances – petroleum can only be assessed using the Hydrocarbon Block Method (HBM) – not site specific without proper data adjustments – several hazards are not considered: global warming, ozone depletion, acidification, eutrophication, etc. – short and long time scales – all spatial scales smaller than continental areas

Comparison - Benefits – easy export/import of data/results for visualisation – possibility of Dynamic Data Exchange (DDE) to other applications from within Excel – applicability of sensibility/uncertainty analysis – relatively well structured input/output sections – easy to understand and use EUSESCalTOX – assessment for the environment and humans – implemented step by step input of the necessary data – control of the range of the data introduced by the user – possibility of introducing the data in different units – great amount of different output data – estimation routines for a lot of the necessary data (emissions, effects, etc.) – great amount of European default data – wide range of time and spatial scales – implemented life cycle steps

ComparisonDisadvantages – only risk assessments for humans – the implemented macros do not run very well – no control of the range of the values introduced by the user – fixed units – default data are valid for California (and therefore not applicable for European risk assessment) – limited applicability for short term exposure and small areas/sites – limited output of risk values (only non/cancer risk for humans) EUSESCalTOX – very complex and difficult to understand – data exchange/export is very difficult if not impossible and does not work automatically – sensitivity/uncertainty analysis are not applicable – graphical visualisation of the results is not implemented