Team Development Agenda Questions from previous session BlackBoard comments & questions Team building Developmental model for teams Rationale for TB Culture & norm considerations Stages of teams TB example & contrast Reflective learning Next week: teams present TB design & rationale for feedback Team time on handbook

Team Building: Design & Processes Team development Rationale for teambuilding Assessing the context Microlab structure Tuckman’s stages of team development Sample teambuilding sequence Reflective learning

What are the assumptions of a developmental model? (think human development) What’s the difference between team building & team development? When (under what conditions or events) do you think team building should be done?

If you don’t know your team members, you don’t have a team, and it doesn’t matter how high you can jump!

Risk-Taking The Jo-Hari Window– a rationale for acquaintance & team building

Team building usually doesn’t just happen

Considerations for Team Building Background History, norms, culture Context of current request Why now (not 6 months earlier/later?) What happens if TB is not done? What do you want to be different? What’s prevented this from happening until now? Evaluation What are the immediate, short and long term indications that TB was successful? (e.g., Kirkpatrick Model) Design Sufficient time (2-3 hours); protected time (retreat) Homework, preparation Legitimacy, authorization, support Materials (handouts, surveys, facilities, A-V, etc.) Structured exercises & processing

Positive experiences Key incidents 16 weeks X X X X X X X X X 3 hours Microlab ######### Negative experiences Sequence of structured exercises Laboratory Education or T-group (Training Group)

Tuckman Stages of Team Development 1. Forming 2. Storming3. Norming 4. Performing Reforming JoiningAdjourning Differences, influence, power, conflict, complementing Acquaintance, goals, roles, procedures, constraints, resources, schedule, etc. Team cohesion, norms, conformity, groupthink risk, team espirit High performing team: Task focus, quality, productive, reflective, espirit, etc. Low  Task Emphasis  High Low  Social Emphasis  High

1.What is our understanding of the goals and objectives which this team was organized to achieve? How can we ensure we are all going in the same direction? 2.What special skills, information, backgrounds, and expertise do each of us bring to this team? 3.What structure, format, style and schedule do we prefer for our meetings? 4.What roles do each of us prefer on a team? What are our strong and weak roles? Which do we over/underuse? 5.What are our preferred styles of working and relating? How can these differences be used to complement each other, and be sequenced for more effective problem solving? 6.What stresses each of us? How might our styles change under pressure? What can we look for as signs of stress? How can we give useful and acceptable feedback and support at these times? 7.About what are we most likely to disagree? What are our preferred modes of conflict and conflict resolution? How can we disagree constructively? 8.What can we do to enhance the identity and cohesiveness of this team? How can we create our own team culture? 9.What norms do we bring from other team experiences? What norms would we like to explicitly include or avoid? 10.How can we ensure a team culture in which we can freely question and update restrictive norms? 11.How can we best monitor and discuss our team processes so we can continue to develop and improve? Stage 1: Forming Assessing resources & setting direction Stage 2: Storming Positioning, influence, conflict, complemen- tarity Stage 3: Norming Identity, cohesion, monitor norms Stage 4: Performing Maintain high performance

Using the MBTI in teambuilding

For Week 3: Your team task is to— In 30” present the design for a 2 hour team-building experience for a group and setting Prepare a brief (20”) class presentation of your design (include outline of objectives, activities & rationale) Plan for 10” of discussion, comments and audience constructive feedback Reflect on and discuss your own team processes in constructing this design: What did we observe about our own team processes? What should we stop, start, or continue?

Task Completion Task Origin ? Reflection Interpretation Application Implementation Reflective Learning Cycle Nose to the grindstone Vs Continuous Learning Dewey Kolb Deming Pfeiffer & Jones NTL

Task Completion Task Origin Reflection: What do you notice? awareness vocabulary risk taking opportunity Interpretation: What does it reflect/mean? theory/schema dialogue systems thinking Application: how can we use it? test hypotheses action planning Implementation Reflective Learning Cycle

The “Real” Learning Organization— All levels, all the time Organizational Learning Team Learning Personal Learning

3S Team Reflection STAY: What did we do that worked well for us and we should continue? STOP: What did we do that got in our way and we should discontinue? START: What didn’t we do that would make us more effective and we should start?