Scholarly Publishing: Why service is poor, prices are high, and what can be done by Aaron.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
Advertisements

The Future of Scholarship in the Digital Age: The Role of Institutional Repositories Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ensuring a Journal’s Economic Sustainability, While Increasing Access to Knowledge.
Trade-Offs by Harold Winter
Open Access – a funder’s perspective Robert Terry Senior Policy Adviser The Wellcome Trust.
Survival in Uncertain Times Library Materials Costs Exploding Lois Schultz April 22, 2003.
Institutional repositories and libraries : being visible Nor Edzan Che Nasir Library University of Malaya.
California Digital Library eScholarship Repository ASIST DASER Summit November 2003 Suzanne Samuel California Digital Library.
Februrary 2005UCSF Library & Center for Knowledge Management Scholarly Communication.
The Impact of Consortial Purchasing on Library Acquisitions: the Turkish Experience Tuba Akbaytürk 24 th Annual IATUL Conference Ankara, Turkey.
Open Access and Scholarly Communications Tyler Walters Julie G. Speer Library Faculty Advisory Board November 20, 2009.
CREATING CHANGE IN EUROPE : SPARC EUROPE AND SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING Frederick J. Friend SPARC Senior Consultant
Publishing through UC’s eScholarship Insert Name/Title date The following slides are based on the work of the UCLA Library Scholarly Communications Steering.
Authors' Rights & WrongsAuthors' Rights & Wrongs Research Showcase Carnegie Mellon University’s Institutional Repository Dan Hood, Research Showcase Outreach.
Building Publishing Services in the Academic Library Brian Rosenblum University of Kansas Colorado Academic Library Summit Denver, Colorado June 1, 2007.
UCSF Library and The Center for Knowledge Management November 2005 THE COST OF SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION Karen Butter University Librarian Presentation to.
River Campus Libraries Building an E-Publishing Model from the Stakeholders on Up Susan Gibbons Asst. Dean, Public Services & Collection Development River.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Challenges & New Opportunities Laurel Haycock, U Libraries February 2007 Author’s Rights:
California Digital Library eScholarship Repository Int’l Conference on Digital Institutional Repositories 9-10 December 2004, Hong Kong Catherine H.Candee.
Publishing Solutions for Contemporary Scholars: The Library as Innovator and Partner Sarah E. Thomas University Librarian Cornell University Ithaca, NY.
Journal Sales Channels With the advent of the internet and online journals, the international library market has increased in complexity and opportunity.
CREATING CHANGE IN EUROPE : SPARC EUROPE AND SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING Frederick J. Friend SPARC Senior Consultant
Open Access: An Introduction Edward Shreeves Director, Collections and Content Development University of Iowa Libraries
October Challenges for Scientific Editors in the Electronic Era Hooman Momen Editor Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
Electronic Journal Deals concerns and issues (or Beware the “Big Deal”) Linda Norbury Aston University USTLG Meeting 12 June 2001, Aston University.
Alternative Models of Scholarly Communication: The "Toddler Years" for Open Access Journals and Institutional Repositories Greg Tananbaum President The.
Ted Bergstrom University of California Santa Barbara.
UCSF Library and Center for Knowledge Management University of California, San Francisco October 2004 Scholarly Communication – Impact on Libraries.
A Skeptic’s View of Open Access Michael Held The Rockefeller University Press UKSG Conference March 30, 2004.
1 SPARC: Partnering for a New Scholarly Communication System ACRL STS Program Chicago, IL July 10, 2000 Julia Blixrud SPARC Assistant.
Open Access: The revolution in academic publishing Henry Hagedorn Editor, Journal of Insect Science Department of Entomology and Office of Scholarly Communication.
Seminar on Scholarly Communication and the UC Community University of California Office of Systemwide Library Planning Fall 2003.

Charleston Pre-Conference Nov. 3, 2004 David Goodman Palmer School of Library and Information Science Long Island University How to survive.
The access to information divide: Breaking down barriers Bas Savenije Director General KB, National Library of the Netherlands Stellenbosch Symposium /
Agenda Travis Brooks SPIRES overview & recent projects Questions from the last meeting Ann Redfield SU Science & Engineering Libraries—Serials Cancellations.
UNT Scholarly Works Laura Waugh Repository Librarian for Scholarly Works
Networked Information Resources SPARC, E-prints & Open Access initiatives.
Digital Commons & Open Access Repositories Johanna Bristow, Strategic Marketing Manager APBSLG Libraries: September 2006.
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 Resource Issues.
Scholarly Communication in a Knowledge-Based Economy John Houghton Centre for Strategic Economic Studies Victoria University, Melbourne
Dartmouth College Library COL 1 Scholarly Communication: Threats, Problems and Opportunities Presentation to the Council on Libraries Dartmouth.
Uganda Scholarly Digital Library (USDL) Makerere University’s Institutional Repository By Margaret Nakiganda URL:
Are academic journals becoming obsolete? Ted Bergstrom University of California, Santa Barbara.
Digital Commons, Institutional Repositories, ResearchNow, The Berkeley Electronic Press, and ICOLC (in a nut shell) Sean O’Doherty Vice-President, Sales.
UC’s Open Access Policies: Scope, comparisons, support for deposit.
California Digital Library eScholarship: a UC Publishing Initiative Catherine H.Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of Scholarly.
Using Open Access Publishing for the Effective Dissemination of African Research PKP PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE PROJECT Ensuring a Journal’s Economic Sustainability,
Hidden information. Access to information, especially research, is often shared only through closed systems –accessible only to subscribers. Open Access.
Electronic Theses and Dissertations: The bepress Approach Ben Hermalin Interim Dean, Haas School of Business, UC Berkeley & Co-Founder, bepress.
Future Directions for Scholarly Publishing at the University of California Catherine H. Candee Director, Publishing and Strategic Initiatives Office of.
Digital Commons digitalcommons.unl.edu. Digital Commons is: an “institutional repository” (IR) a resource for scholarly communication an opportunity for.
+ Scholarly Communication: An Introduction November 7, 2015 Charlotte Roh Slides 3, 4, 9, and 11 of this work were originally created and revised by Stephanie.
Implementing BePress’ Digital Commons Institutional Repository Solution: Two Views from the Trenches Carol Watson, Associate Director for Information Technology,
Open Access (OA) : a summary for 2006 Joanne Yeomans CERN Scientific Information Group (Presentation for the CESSID students 12 th May 2006)
Digital Commons: Starting an Institutional Repository at a Small University Christopher W. Nolan Assistant University Librarian Trinity University
Institutional Repositories: Solutions by the Academy, for the Academy Greg Tananbaum September 20, 2002.
Virginia Baldwin Professor, Engineering Librarian University of Nebraska-Lincoln ASEE Louisville June 2010 Open Access Availability of.
A Scholarly Communication Tool For the 21 st Century.
Carol Watson, Associate Director for Information Technology, University of Georgia Law School James M. Donovan, Faculty and Access Services Librarian,
Building an Outstanding Student Research Journal in the IR Stephanie Davis-Kahl, Scholarly Communications Librarian Michael Seeborg, Professor of Economics.
Are academic journals becoming obsolete?
Using Open Access to Increase Personal Internet Presence
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III
Publishing Solutions for Contemporary Scholars: The Library as Innovator and Partner Sarah E. Thomas University Librarian Cornell University Ithaca, NY.
Networked Information Resources
Electronic site licenses: Big Deals and Raw Deals
Presentation transcript:

Scholarly Publishing: Why service is poor, prices are high, and what can be done by Aaron

I come to this problem wearing three hats Economics Professor studying the matter for a Mellon Foundation project. Antitrust Professor Small Publisher: Berkeley Electronic Press

Economist Painfully slow (Hurwicz, Ellison) Prices high and increasing How possible? –Hint: its not costs –“Greatest profit of the monopoly is the quiet life”--Hicks –Market power or even monopoly power.

Entry Barriers limit competition First copy costs –Processing Manuscripts: editing, reviewing,etc. –Copy editing –Typesetting Coordination problems (Ultimate Catch 22) –Journal is a coordination equilibrium –Leap of faith by Authors Editors/Reviewers Libraries Indexes Readers

Computer Technology First copy costs –processing costs fall with editorial management software like bepress’ Edikit –however, effect on incremental costs more dramatic Coordination problems –problems remain –rise of bundling (“Big Deal”) aggravates coordination problems.

What can be done? Work to lower entry barriers and thereby increase competition. Economists and other Scholars –Take risks as Authors and Editors –Pretend that private rewards equal social rewards Libraries and Universities –Support entrants by subscribing –Insist that cancellations yield proportionate savings

What can be done? Libraries and Universities continued –Provide or license technology for new low-cost publication outlets. For journals. (encourage faculty to start) Subsidize competitors to reap rewards later For monographs, working papers, other publication outlets. Institutional Repositories Subject Matter Repositories –Tenure standards: emphasize quality of work Develop quality indexes not connected to journal

What can be done? Antitrust Authorities –Block Mergers –Block Big Deal bundling as an entry barrier Approaches –Tying sale. –price discrimination.

What the Berkeley Electronic Press (aka “bepress”) has done Founded by UC Berkeley Professors Staff –9 employees Goal –Make scholarly publishing efficient (good service, low cost)

Bepress (continued) Software Developed –Eliminates “one-offs” in web-site and journal creation –Automates repetitive and tedious tasks of running journal Filing submissions, revisions, reviews, decision letters Writing reviewer request s and addressing them Reminding reviewers, etc. –easy uploading of documents/stamping identifying and unifying information on PDF’s automatically –organized/easy searching –personalized notification –varied uses –licensed much cheaper than others

What the Berkeley Electronic Press (aka “bepress”) has done Journals (6 in economics and business) –service 5-10 week turnaround Submission to several journals at once –price $100-$500 per year per university per journal. Discounts for multi-year subscriptions. –Much lower than Elsevier –Somewhat more than Associations (though our site license allows all to use so cheaper in total in many cases) –Stable pricing.

Journal List –The B.E. Journals of Economic Analysis & Policy –The B.E. Journals of Macroeconomics –The B.E. Journals of Theoretical Economics –Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics –Journal of Agriculture and Food Industrial Organization –The Review of Marketing Science –Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology –International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering –The Forum –Global Jurist –Journals of Legal Scholarship

What bepress has done Friendly Policies –Quasi-open access (a compromise) Compromise depends on good faith of librarians –Free subsciptions in developing countries –Editor profit sharing –Author retains copyright –Commitment to stable pricing

What bepress has done Open Access Institutional repositories –E.g., California Digital Library eScholarship repository Working papers Monographs –Compare: D-Space Organization. See to compare Cost 250K-300K per year at MIT. Time to implement: ?

Bepress continued Subject matter repositories (partly open access) –Coming this winter

Conclusion: Basic Problem Entry barriers –costs per unit will be high at outset for startups Competition will bring change –must work to lower entry barriers –invest to pay startup costs, subsidize alternatives

What can actors do to aid dissemination and lower costs Economists –Take risks as Authors and Editors –Pretend that private rewards equal social rewards Libraries –Help new publications get started. Start low cost publication outlets E.g., CDL eScholarship Repository Universities –Start Repositories –Subsidize publications Gov’t grant making organizations Antitrust Authorities