NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress in Reading and Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.
How College Shapes LivesFor detailed data, see: trends.collegeboard.org. SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, 2013, Tables 222, 306, and.
Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.
Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.
*Includes American Indian and Alaska Native alone, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, and Two or More Races **Hispanic origin based on Spanish.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Inside America’s Math Courses The Release of the Algebra I and Geometry Curricula: Results from the 2005 High School Transcript Mathematics Curriculum.
1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.
The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
2013 NACME Data Book Deck 2: Pre-College Educational Challenges.
Examination of Variables Related to NCLEX-RN Janis A. Franich, RN, BSN, CIC.
1 Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2011.
Black-White Gaps in Mathematics Coursetaking Patterns 1 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics 20 th Anniversary.
Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education Board Georgia Goals for Education Challenge to Lead: Georgia 2006 Challenge to Lead Southern Regional Education.
Results of the 2009 NAEP High School Transcript Study America’s High School Graduates Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics.
Wisconsin Department of Health Services HIV/AIDS Surveillance Annual Review New diagnoses, prevalent cases, and deaths through December 31, 2013 April.
Division of Tuberculosis Elimination Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tuberculosis in the United States National Surveillance System Highlights.
Achieve Data Profile: Washington January AMERICAN DIPLOMA PROJECT NETWORK The Big Picture n To be successful in today’s economy, all students.
Implementing Standards in a Complex System Heidi Schweingruber, Director Board on Science Education National Research Council 1.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics January 25, 2011.
Division of Tuberculosis Elimination Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tuberculosis in the United States National Tuberculosis Surveillance System.
1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.
1. What is the National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL)? 2 Assessment of the English literacy of U.S. adults Last conducted in 1992 Nationally representative.
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP June 20, 2012 Science in Action: Understanding what students know and can do in the classroom, in the lab, and.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress: National and State-Level Science Results JANUARY 25, 2011.
The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
Gateway to the Future: Improving the National Vital Statistics System St. Louis, MO June 6 th – June 10 th, 2010 Is There Progress Toward Eliminating Racial/Ethnic.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Uri Treisman Professor of Mathematics Director, Charles A. Dana Center The University of Texas at Austin URBAN MATH LEADERSHIP.
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.
United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.
1. 2 Overview of the 2006 NAEP Assessments Administered in January–March 2006 National results for grades 4, 8, and 12 Results by scale scores and achievement.
The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
NAEP Grade 4 Math by Race/Ethnicity, Nation Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer,
The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 4, 2011.
U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010 March 2011.
Sandi Simpkins, Ph.D. Do Families Matter for Adolescents’ Pursuit of STEM?
Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS Presented To Raising Achievement, Closing Gaps Taskforce September 18, 2009 Wake County Public School System.
California State University, Sacramento Nancy Shulock Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy Presentation to Conference: Policy Challenges.
The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.
The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.
NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2010 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education.
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin
Using NAEP Results to Examine State Trends in Mathematics Achievement
Focus on the Learner: Who are the students states serve?
Tuberculosis in the United States
2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS
Social Security Income Social Security Income Social Security Income
Black-White Gaps in Mathematics Coursetaking Patterns
Underrepresentation of Underrepresented Minorities in Academic Medicine: The Need to Enhance the Pipeline and the Pipe  Juanita L. Merchant, M. Bishr.
Burden of Diabetes in Connecticut: An Overview
Supplementary Data Tables, Community Health Indicators
Share of Medicare beneficiaries Median savings () Mean savings
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Burden of Diabetes in Connecticut: An Overview
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
Share of Medicare beneficiaries Median (50th percentile)
Presentation transcript:

NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress in Reading and Mathematics

National Assessment of Educational Progress 2

Overview of the 2008 Long-Term Trend Assessment 3

Reading Results

Trends in National Average Reading Scores * Significantly different (p <.05) from NOTE: The score-point change is based on the difference between unrounded scores. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1971–2008 Long-Term Trend Reading Assessments. 5

White – Black Reading Score Gap: Age 9 * Significantly different (p <.05) from NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scores. Black includes African American. The White and Black race categories exclude Hispanic origin. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1971–2008 Long-Term Trend Reading Assessments. 6

White – Hispanic Reading Score Gap: Age 9 * Significantly different (p <.05) from Hispanic was not reported as a separate race/ethnicity category in 1971, but data for Hispanic students were included in the overall national results. NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scores. Hispanic includes Latino. The White race category excludes Hispanic origin. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1971–2008 Long-Term Trend Reading Assessments. 7

Reading Results by Race/Ethnicity 1 Results for Hispanic students were first available in Therefore, the result shown in the 1971 column for Hispanic students is from the 1975 assessment. NOTE: The score-point change is based on the difference between unrounded scores. Black includes African American, and Hispanic includes Latino. Race categories exclude Hispanic origin. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1971–2008 Long-Term Trend Reading Assessments. 8

Reading Results by Gender 9 NOTE: The score-point change is based on the difference between unrounded scores. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1971, 2004, and 2008 Long-Term Trend Reading Assessments.

Mathematics Results

Trends in National Average Mathematics Scores * Significantly different (p <.05) from NOTE: The score-point change is based on the difference between unrounded scores. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1973–2008 Long-Term Trend Mathematics Assessments. 11

White – Black Mathematics Score Gap: Age 9 * Significantly different (p <.05) from NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scores. Black includes African American. The White and Black race categories exclude Hispanic origin. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1973–2008 Long-Term Trend Mathematics Assessments. 12

White – Hispanic Mathematics Score Gap: Age 9 * Significantly different (p <.05) from NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scores. Hispanic includes Latino. The White race category excludes Hispanic origin. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 1973–2008 Long-Term Trend Mathematics Assessments. 13

Mathematics Results by Race/Ethnicity NOTE: The score-point change is based on the difference between unrounded scores. Black includes African American. The White and Black race categories exclude Hispanic origin. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1973, 2004, and 2008 Long-Term Trend Mathematics Assessments. 14

Mathematics Results by Gender NOTE: The score-point change is based on the difference between unrounded scores. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1973, 2004, and 2008 Long-Term Trend Mathematics Assessments. 15

Mathematics Coursetaking: Age 13 # Rounds to zero. * Significantly different (p <.05) from NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. An average score is not shown for students who selected the “not taking mathematics” response because the sample size was insufficient to permit a reliable estimate. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1986 and 2008 Long-Term Trend Mathematics Assessments. 16

Mathematics Coursetaking: Age 17 * Significantly different (p <.05) from NOTE: The “pre-algebra or general mathematics” response category includes “pre-algebra or introduction to algebra” and “general, business, or consumer mathematics” and students who did not take any of the listed courses. The “other” response category includes students for whom the highest-level mathematics course could not be determined due to missing or inconsistent responses. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1978 and 2008 Long-Term Trend Mathematics Assessments. 17

Summary by Subject 18

For More Information