THE PROCESSES THROUGH WHICH AFFECTIVE STATES INFUSE JUDGEMENTS OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING Yvonne MacKay School of Psychology DEAKIN UNIVERSITY * Note: please.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Promotion and Prevention. Approach and avoidance systems We have talked about approach and avoidance These systems may be engaged broadly –Higgins –Promotion.

Advertisements

Task 3 Know about arousal and anxiety, and the effects it has on sports performance.

Exemplification of Standards

Subjective wellbeing across cultures: why do differences exist? Daisung Jang and Do-Yeong Kim Department of Psychology, Macquarie University Sydney, Australia.

Physical Intellectual Emotional  We define who we are through communication with others.  Impressions of who we are, are formed according to the ways.

Regulation of Subjective Well-being in the Elderly

1 User experience User interfaces Jaana Holvikivi Metropolia.

Personality and Well-being What makes some people happier than others? May be partly a question of individual differences. But first, what is happiness.

WHAT MAKES PEOPLE HAPPY?

Reason, Passion, & Social Cognition Week 13, Part 1 Announcements for April Papers due at start of class on Thursday. 2. Class will meet in 223D.

What to do, and what not to do, to be happy and satisfied: Affect regulation strategies and subjective well-being in representative sample of Croatia Zvjezdana.

The Get Ready Mindset: When Anticipated Future Resource Demands Increase Effort Allocation to Unrelated Current Tasks Anick Bosmans, Rik Pieters and Hans.

Personality and Life Satisfaction: A Facet-Level Analysis Ulrich Schimmack Shigehiro Oishi R. Michael Furr David C. Funder.

Affect In a Model of Subjective Wellbeing Melanie Davern Professor Bob Cummins NB. Please view via ‘Notes page’. You can then progress through the document.

Affective Forecasting

Attitudes - Job Satisfaction Organizational Behaviour The Individual.

Hedonia, Eudaimonia, and Well-Being: An Introduction Deci & Ryan 2008.

Beyond the Hedonic Treadmill Revising the Adaptation Theory of Well-Being Diener, E., Lucas, R.E., & Scollon.

Meeting of Minds 2015 “Assessing well-being and quality of life“ "Using the personal well-being index in relation to ASD“ Richard Mills UK.

Changes to the economic and industrial marketplace have resulted in the emergence of virtual teams and flatter structures. Given the changing work structures,

Aesthetic appeal versus usability: Implications for user satisfaction Gitte Lindgaard & Cathy Dudek Carleton HOTLab Ottawa, Canada.

SATISFACTION WITH LIFE AS A WHOLE: What informs this judgment? Yvonne MacKay Doctor of Psychology (Clinical), 2005 – DEAKIN UNIVERSITY Supervisor: Prof.

Dianne Vella-Brodrick. Comparison of sociodemographic, personality and social support variables as predictors of quality of life. Thanks.

Subjective QOL of people with Arthritis RoseAnne Misajon Robert A. Cummins.

Subjective Wellbeing in the Workplace

The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Update 2003 Robert A Cummins (Deakin University) Richard Eckersley (Australian National University) Sing Kai Lo (University.

School of Psychology, Deakin University Perceived Control & Wellbeing Sue Chambers, Jackie Hollway, Emma-Rose Parsons & Clea Wallage.

Motivation Foreign and Second Language Learning

Attitudes and Job Satisfaction

Spirituality: The Key between Life Satisfaction and Body Satisfaction Jennifer L. Faulkner & Sara E. Harding.

NICE versus not-nice: A false dichotomy Dr Joël Vos Ψ Dept. of Psychology.

Introducing small-group workshops as formative assessment in large first year psychology modules Suzanne Guerin School of Psychology, University College.

Motivation, Ability, & Opportunity

Cherie Levy Dianne A Vella-Brodrick School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Monash University.

Exploring The Determinants of Subjective Well-Being : A Study of Children in India Tithi Bhatnagar (Research Scholar) & Prof. Meenakshi Gupta Department.

Arousal, Stress, & Anxiety

Effects of best possible self, strengths and gratitude interventions on SWB 10 th Annual Australian Quality of Life Conference, Melbourne, 20 th November.

What is mental health?. “Mental Health refers to a broad array of activities directly or indirectly related to the mental well-being component included.

© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.

Severely wrong or slightly wrong? Sanctions and Moral Behavior Laetitia Mulder Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

A Positive Attitude Changes Everything. What is a positive attitude? Popular definitions: Wikipedia: "is a concept in psychology. Attitudes are positive.

Measuring Subjective Wellbeing. Two types of wellbeing Eudaimonic Hedonic Definitions of happiness by early philosophers. – Eudamonia : self actualization,

WHY STUDY PSYCHOLOGY? Chapter 1, Section 1. Warm-up When has the study of psychology ever been relevant in your life or when do you believe it ever will.

Interviewers training, ScoPeO evaluation(Country), (date) Module 2: Presenting the main concepts addressed in the ScoPeO questionnaire.

PHSB 612: Interventions Diane M. Dowdy, Ph.D. Spring 2008.

Subjective well-being Ype H. Poortinga Tilburg University, Netherlands & University of Leuven, Belgium.

Copyright 2010 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. PSYCHOLOGY: MAKING CONNECTIONS GREGORY J. FEIST ERIKA L. ROSENBERG.

S.J.Deen MSW, M.Phil Ph.D Scholar Madras School of Social Work Casa Major Road, Egmore, Chennai

Principles of Reinforcement People react differently to the same reinforcement. People are unable to repeat desirable behaviors. People receive different.

Cultural Influences on Subjective Well-Being Why are there differences in mean levels of SWB between nations? Diener, E. (2000). Subjective Well-being.

The immediate and long-term effects of a lab simulation of discrimination on well being Mindi Foster, Wilfrid Laurier University Rationale In trying to.

Background, Philosophical Basis and Principles of Behavior.

Entertainment The main motivation. Study of media entertainment Only in the last 15 years or so has entertainment as a media experience received much.

The Role of Response Efficacy on the Relationship between Cultural Orientation and Decision-Making Preference in the Patient-Physician Communication University.

Social Psychology Study of how thoughts, feelings and behaviors are influenced by others ( Allport, 1968 ). A. Social Cognitions a. Impression formation.

Subjective Well Being and Culture Dr. James H. Liu Centre for Applied Cross Cultural Research Victoria University of Wellington.

The Motive Perspective

User Interface Evaluation Introduction Lecture #15.

Unit X Test - Part II - FRQ Grading Rubric. FRQ Prompt Psychology has a variety of complementary yet incomplete perspectives that help us understand behavior.

MOMENTS THAT MATTER Findings from a unique study into magazines and well-being.

Job Satisfaction and Subjective Well-Being: Test of a Moderated Mediational Model Serdar Karabati, Ph.D., Istanbul Bilgi University & Nurcan Ensari, Ph.D.,

Motivation, Ability, and Opportunity

Chapter 4 Perspectives on Consumer Behavior

Motivation, Ability, and Opportunity

Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)

Goals of Psychology!.

self-determination theory (SDT)

ASSUMPTIONS STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES

Entertainment The main motivation.

Presentation transcript:

THE PROCESSES THROUGH WHICH AFFECTIVE STATES INFUSE JUDGEMENTS OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING Yvonne MacKay School of Psychology DEAKIN UNIVERSITY * Note: please select a view that enables the ‘notes’ to be seen.

Cognition Affect

Satisfaction with specific targets: “How satisfied are you with…your vacuum cleaner?”

Cognition Affect Satisfaction with broad targets: “How satisfied are you with…your life as a whole?”

Affective states SWB Cognition SYSTEMATIC PROCESSING

Affective states SWB Cognition SYSTEMATIC PROCESSING HEURISTIC PROCESSING

Affective states SWB Cognition SYSTEMATIC PROCESSING HEURISTIC PROCESSING Diener et. al. - “t op-down influences on how bottom-up information is used” (2002, p.443) Veenhoven - “ if we feel fine, we gather we must be satisfied” (1996, p.10)

Affect SWB Cognition SYSTEMATIC PROCESSING Affect SWB HEURISTIC PROCESSING Situational Factors: Hi gh in personal relevance. Complex, atypical targets. Situational Factors: Low personal relevance. Uncomplicated, commonly encountered targets.

Affect SWB Cognition SYSTEMATIC PROCESSING Affect SWB HEURISTIC PROCESSING Situational Factors: Hi gh in personal relevance. Complex, atypical targets. Dispositional Factors: High ‘need for cognition’ Situational Factors: Low personal relevance. Uncomplicated, commonly encountered targets. Dispositional Factors: Low ‘need for cognition’

Affect SWB Cognition SYSTEMATIC PROCESSING Affect SWB HEURISTIC PROCESSING Situational Factors: Hi gh in personal relevance. Complex, atypical targets. Dispositional Factors: High ‘need for cognition’ Affective states: Negative Situational Factors: Low personal relevance. Uncomplicated, commonly encountered targets. Dispositional Factors: Low ‘need for cognition’ Affective states: Positive

HYPOTHESES 1 - The question “how satisfied are you with your life as a whole?” will provide a good context for both systematic and heuristic processing to occur. 2 - Individual levels of ‘need for cognition’ will moderate whether the systematic strategy is adopted to process the SWB judgement. High levels of need for cognition will be related to affect infusion via systematic processing. Low levels of need for cognition will be related to affect infusion via heuristic processing. 3 - Affective states will moderate whether the systematic strategy is adopted to process the SWB judgement. Negative affective states will be related to affect infusion via systematic processing. Positive affective states will be related to affect infusion via heuristic processing.

STUDY 2 Negative Positive Systematic Heuristic

STUDY 2 High Arousal Low Arousal Negative Positive Systematic Heuristic Systematic

STUDY 2 High Arousal Low Arousal Negative Positive Systematic Heuristic Systematic

STUDY 2 High Arousal Low Arousal Negative Positive Heuristic Systematic Heuristic HYPOTHESES

STUDY 2 High Arousal Low Arousal Negative Positive Heuristic Systematic Heuristic HYPOTHESES Systematic

STUDY 2 High Arousal Low Arousal Negative Positive Heuristic Systematic Heuristic HYPOTHESES Systematic

STUDY 2 High Arousal Low Arousal Negative Positive Heuristic Systematic Heuristic HYPOTHESES Systematic Low affect infusion? Systematic?

Thank-you