National Environmental Research Institute MARE: Management perspective HELCOM MONAS - member of the MARE board Marine Convention focusing on the state.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
20th November 2007 / Berlin PlanCoast Handbook/ Guidelines and Key Messages Angela Schultz-Zehden.
Advertisements

The HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan, its implementation and some potential PPPs Jesper H. Andersen Head of unit (EU Water Policy) DHI Water Environment Health.
Maria do Rosário Partidário, SEA for strategic assessment SEA for strategic assessment - the critical factors approach Maria do Rosário Partidário IST-
Water Quality H. Behrendt, M. Grossmann, H. Gömann, U. Mischke, A. Schöll, J. Steidl GLOWA-Elbe GLOWA Status conference 19 May 2005 Cologne Linkages of.
Gunnar Norén CCB Executive secretary Seminar ”Reducing nutrient run-off from large-scale animal production in the Baltic Sea Region” Presentation ”Agriculture.
The need for better integration between science and management MARE workshop 1-3 December 2004 Kaj Forsius HELCOM.
Scientific Advice for the Management of Transboundary Marine Eutrophication.
HELCOM proposal on project aiming at BSAP development and implementation Baltic Sea Region Programme Conference May 2007, Hamburg HELCOM.
Eutrophication 6 Socio-Economics of Eutrophication Alice Newton University of Algarve.
Strengths opportunities weaknesses threats SWOT - ANALYSIS RESULTS OF ECOLOGICAL TARGETS GROUP.
Spatial planning in the marine environment Gillian Glegg and Jonathan Richards.
Review of approach 24 March 2015
Overview of existing marine assessments in Europe (North East Atlantic, Baltic Sea, Mediterranean and Black Seas) Frédéric Brochier UNESCO/IOC Consultant.
The new HELCOM Key results from the streamlining process
European Commission: DG Environment Overview of projections data use in the European policy-making process TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections, 30 October.
Reducing nutrient loadings from agricultural soils to the Baltic Sea via groundwater and streams Soils2Sea team Partner Logo.
Implementation of the Water Framework Directive - Uncertainty issues - Michiel Blind, RWS-RIZA.
Regional conference on Nutrient pollution control in the Danube- Black sea basin Chisinau, October BSRP Kaspars Zurins, Niclas Bergman, Johanness.
Danube-Black Sea Regional Projects – Catalysts for Nutrient Reduction Experiences with Setting Targets, Measuring Compliance and Results, and Scaling up.
HELCOM as an International Tool of Environmental Protection of the Baltic Sea Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Chairman, Helsinki.
HELCOM – the focal point for environmental information in the Baltic Sea Area Nikolay Vlasov Information Secretary Helsinki Commission (HELCOM)
Main challenges in implementation of Priority Area 1: To reduce nutrient inputs to the sea to acceptable levels State of play of PA1: -5 flagships running.
APPLICATION OF EU SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT RULES Axel Luttenberger.
CoastalZone.com The Use of Ecological Risk Assessments in a Watershed Level Context Thorne E. Abbott CoastalZone.com.
Connecting rivers and seas – the Danube/Black Sea experiment Laurence Mee.
SWOT analysis: Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities Threats.
Information and transboundary cooperation – challenges and responses Francesca Bernardini United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan – progress on the eve of the 2013 Ministerial Meeting Monika Stankiewicz HELCOM Executive Secretary Baltic Marine Environment.
ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES ICES cooperative research report.
Annual Forum of the EUSBSR and the revision of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR) DG REGIO – D1 Competence Centre Macro-Regions and European.
COHIBA preliminary results for implementation HELCOM BSAP Ms. Eva Brorström-Lundén, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute 32rd Meeting of the Helsinki.
Priorities for further development of (component accounts for) EU ecosystem accounting system Food for thought in three steps: a)Reflection on the overall.
HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan Northern Dimension and the oceans and the seas Mieczysław Ostojski, Prof. WSS Chairman Helsinki Commission 15th Baltic Sea.
Anne Laine North Ostrobothnia Regional Environment Centre FINLAND BOTHNIAN BAY LIFE.
MSFD monitoring guidance MSCG proposed amendments Nikolaos ZAMPOUKAS.
Workshop on Agricultural Nutrient Reduction,Vilnius September 2004 HELCOM- on the way to nutrient load reduction Kaj Forsius HELCOM.
Environmental Progress in the EU Indicators: a communication tool.
Paris 24/04/2010, Connectivity between research, public and policy makers Gulf of Riga Kristina Veidemane Baltic Environmental Forum.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) The key and only legislation completely focused on the marine environment Clear ecosystem based thinking.
- Proposed actions, targets and indicators to reach the objectives
Norwegian Meteorological Institute
Legal aspects of public participation in the ecosystem-based water management in the Baltic Sea Region Maciej Nyka Economic Law and Environmental Protection.
Baltic Sea Festival 2007 Åsa Andersson and Pauli Merriman
Theme 3 – Physical loss and damage to the seafloor
The agricultural sector from NEFCO’s perspective
Baltic Sea cooperation for reducing ship and port emissions through knowledge- & innovation-based competitiveness BSR InnoShip Baltic Sea cooperation for.
The French National Agency on Water and Aquatic Environments
Fredrik Wulff Systems Ecology Stockholm University, Sweden
Questions Can the meeting decide of the structure of the paper?
MSFD PoMs workshop on CEA/CBA WRAP-UP
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG MARE study to support Impact Assessment on the Marine Knowledge 2020 Results of assessment of the data costs related to the MSFD implementation up.
WG ESA meeting 9th of March 2015
EC GUIDANCE ON IWT AND NATURA 2000 CHAPTER 3
Britta Hedlund, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
Update on work of EMMA “European marine monitoring and assessment”
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT)
HELCOM and operational oceanography
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
Work on Agriculture and Water Linkages EEA in cooperation with JRC
Towards a Work Programme for the Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Water Directors Meeting 28 November.
HELCOM WORK Submitted by the Contracting Parties in HELCOM that are also EU member states Name Surname.
HELCOM and the Baltic Sea
A healthy and prosperous Baltic Sea Region the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Photo: HELCOM.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Assessment scales and aggregation
Item 4 b) Marine Strategy Framework Directive and CIS WFD
Presentation transcript:

National Environmental Research Institute MARE: Management perspective HELCOM MONAS - member of the MARE board Marine Convention focusing on the state and development in both the open sea and coastal water Can MARE give advice on measures to be taken (catchment and the sea) to: –fulfil the 50% reduction target on nutrient loading –fulfil the future ecological quality objectives (EcoQO’s) Can MARE be used presenting and assessing the results of HELCOM monitoring programmes?

National Environmental Research Institute Decisions taken in HELCOM are based on common agreement - no “Directives” or “laws” Focus on measures within the HELCOM catchment, but measures on ship traffic, emissions outside HELCOM catchment, dredging etc. are also important MARE seems unique by combining measures, economy, catchment and state/development in the sea, with a ecosystem, holistic and a large scale approach There are strong requirements to a system that set up priorities on measures and costs between countries

National Environmental Research Institute Important to give clear messages as: –NEST is a decision support system - not a decision system –NEST provides overall “average” solutions both on measures and for the state in the Baltic Sea - not details on how and where! –state in coastal areas are mainly dependent on local inputs - other information required! Threat: results from NEST could be used as an excuse for doing nothing!

National Environmental Research Institute Requirements to MARE: –general acceptance by scientists and decision makers in the countries - recommended/used in many countries: not a “Swedish” model –open system: possible to link with/include national detailed models, open for developing NEST in countries –overall acceptance of the applied methodology: important to develop the catchment and economical parts of NEST –general acceptance of applied assumptions –input data accepted/possible to change –agreement on economical functions and results –included more ecological target variables (EcoQO’s) –provide time lags, uncertainties, probability

National Environmental Research Institute –easy available and good documentation –easy and fast to use for both scientists and managers –easy to make alternative scenarios –results from NEST: realistic, simple, easy to explain –don’t allow unrealistic scenario and solutions –usable in relation to the WFD and EU Marine Strategy –free of charge –involve local scientists and decision makers in further development and institutionalisation of NEST –institutionalisation should ensure that the system is updated and developed in future