Washington University Danforth Campus Carbon Footprint: Using the Campus as a Living Laboratory E. M. Robinson, R. B. Husar, M. Malten Washington University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 W ashington University, St. Loui, MO Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus Instructors:
Advertisements

Reporting template model Required reporting section ALL sectors Recommended reporting section Sector specific LA NDPB+ FHEI NHS The model selected is to.
Carbon Footprint / Life Cycle Analysis September 29, 2009.
1 Greenhouse Gas Inventory FY 2013 and FY 2014 for the American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCC)
Toward a Sustainable Campus Part II: Improving the Efficiency of the CNS Building Energy Systems Nitin Rajan ‘07 Physics Department Ithaca College.
Low Carbon Action Group results. The nature of our business means a large amount of energy needs to be used, but we are looking to compensate that with.
Staff Induction-Environmental Awareness
Welcome and Introductions- Working Group Chair Where We Are/Where We Are Going- Lindsay Batchelor GHG Inventory and CAP Overview- Lindsay Batchelor/Jeff.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
AMDSB Environmental Leadership and Education Committee Seaforth, ON March 1, 2010 Presented by Stephen Boles, MSc President, Kuzuka Ltd. Exeter, Ontario.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY REPORT 2009 Antioch University Seattle.
Class Project Report, Spring 2014 E 449/549 Sustainable Air Quality Sustainability Transition of Sulfurous Air Quality Emissions and Causality.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
EECE 449/549 Sustainable Air Quality: Sustainable Linking of Energy and the Environment Rudolf B. Husar & Erin Robinson Department of Energy, Environmental.
DRAFT, April 24 –All data are preliminary, need verification Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University,
1 GHG emissions the eThekwini experience. 2 GHG Emission Inventory.
Common Carbon Metric for Measuring Energy Use & Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Building Operations A tool developed by GHG Protocol and UNEP-SBCI.
“Enterprising” Students Lead Campus Sustainability Initiatives at Michigan Tech Presented by: Andrew McKenzie Erin Valdivia Green Campus Enterprise AASHE.
CLASS PROJECT REPORT SUSTAINABLE AIR QUALITY, EECE 449/549, SPRING 2010 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, ST. LOUIS, MO INSTRUCTORS: PROFESSOR RUDOLF B. HUSAR, ERIN.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
MAGEEP. Sustainable Development – Causality Loop Economic Development with Due Care of the Environment Systems approach: linking human activities and.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Energy Consciousness Taking a Systems Approach to Energy Dr. Rachel Leslie Resilience Research Portfolio Manager Defence Science and Technology Laboratory.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Fort Lewis College Greenhouse Gas Inventory Presented by the Fort Lewis College Environmental Center January 31, 2008.
Welcome and Introductions- Working Group Chair Where We Are/Where We Are Going- Lindsay Batchelor GHG Inventory and CAP Overview- Lindsay Batchelor/Jeff.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
World-Class Education. World-Class City. Click to Add Title How Institutional Factors are Related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cynthia Klein-Banai, Ph.D.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO Transportation Carbon Emissions Model - Midterm.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 W ashington University, St. Loui, MO Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus Buildings.
© OECD/IEA INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Worldwide Trends in Energy Use and Efficiency Key Insights from IEA Indicator Analysis ENERGY INDICATORS.
Carbon Footprint of the U.S. Population: Causes and Spatial-Temporal Pattern U.S. Residential Electricity Use Analysis Class Project Me/ENV 449, 2007 Nick.
Welcome and Introductions- Working Group Chair Where We Are/Where We Are Going- Lindsay Batchelor GHG Inventory and CAP Overview- Lindsay Batchelor/Jeff.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO Transportation Carbon Emissions Model - Midterm.
2008Greenhouse Gas Inventory - Duke University Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2008 Update.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
Assessing a Culture of Sustainability at the University of Michigan (U-M) John Callewaert U-M Graham Sustainability Institute Robert W. Marans U-M Institute.
CPUC Green Management Program Ravi Subramanian, Director Information Technology & Management Services Division Presented at CPUC meeting on July 31, 2008.
Moving Toward a Sustainable Purchasing Policy April 21, 2014 Kimberly Kokenakes-Director, University Services 1.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Sustainability and Facilities Management John Sullivan Energy & Sustainability Office Facilities & Services Division.
Welcome and Introductions- Working Group Chair Where We Are/Where We Are Going- Lindsay Batchelor GHG Inventory and CAP Overview- Lindsay Batchelor/Jeff.
DRAFT, April 14 –All data are preliminary, need verification Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University,
Class Project Report, Spring 2014 E 449/549 Sustainable Air Quality Sustainability Transition of Sulfurous Air Quality Emissions and Causality.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Residential/Commercial Carbon Emissions Nationally and on the Danforth Campus.
Washington University Transportation Emission Commuter Travel –Faculty/Staff –Students University Fleet Air Travel –Athletic Meets –Study Abroad –Faculty.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 W ashington University, St. Loui, MO Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus Buildings.
Calculating a CO 2 Inventory for Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Federal Environmental Symposium – East Kim Fowler Senior Research Engineer Pacific.
A Carbon Footprint Calculator for On-campus Students: Development and Education Jeremy Caves Maiella Leano; Jina Lee; Althea Tupper.
THE NELSON INSTITUTE CARBON FOOTPRINT PROJECT AASHE Conference November 11, 2008 Damon Clark Summit Blue Consulting Jeannette LeBoyer Econergy.
University of Toledo Climate Action Report Scope 1 By Rachel Beres, Andrew Kulikowski, Jon Lockie, Chad Pietkowski, Ken Samoei, and Cory Williams.
American University Lindsay Madeira, Manager of Sustainability Programs American University Mayra Portalatin, LEED AP, Project Manager Facility Engineering.
Integrating Frameworks for Energy and Climate Policy Analysis. Professor Rudolf B. Husar, Director, Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis,
Carbon footprints of individuals, organisations and communities Prof Douglas Crawford-Brown Director Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation Research.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 W ashington University, St. Loui, MO Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus Instructors:
Universities must act as leaders in the fight against climate change
Carrying Capacity & Ecological Footprint
Instructors: Professor Rudolf B. Husar, Erin M. Robinson
Cañada College Sustainability Plan Past… Process/Structure…Goals..
Cañada College Sustainability Plan Past… Process/Structure…Goals..
SEEC ClearPath: Data Driven Climate Action Planning
Town Facilities Benchmarking and GHG Emissions Update
TCU and the Presidents Climate Commitment:
Municipal Greenhouse Gas Inventory Lebanon, NH
Presentation transcript:

Washington University Danforth Campus Carbon Footprint: Using the Campus as a Living Laboratory E. M. Robinson, R. B. Husar, M. Malten Washington University, St. Louis Contact:

Abstract Washington University, following the trend of many other academic institutions, performed a University-wide carbon emission footprint during the Spring of 2008 for The carbon footprint was a collaborative effort between university facilities, an outside consultant and Prof. Husar, teaching EECE 449, Sustainable Air Quality. The collaboration was successful because of the excitement the students had about participating in work that was directly applicable to campus and the facilities department’s need for explanations about the cause of GHG emissions. The Sustainable Air Quality class narrowed the scope of the project to the Danforth Campus and focused on three main objectives: (1) develop a carbon footprint causality model; (2) estimate the carbon footprint and (3) compare our estimates to other universities carbon emission estimates. The Danforth campus saw over 50% increase in carbon emission from 1990 with 80% of that due to electricity usage. The class also found that the estimate for carbon emission on the Danforth campus was comparable to other universities that had performed similar footprint analysis. Future work will include using the carbon footprint causality model to explore various methods for carbon emission reduction.

Specific Objectives: 1.Develop and apply carbon emission estimation model 2.Estimate the carbon footprint of Danforth Campus 3.Establish the key causality drivers for the emissions The focus of this poster is on campus carbon emissions. Further work is still needed for transportation carbon estimates.

Campus as a Living Laboratory The Sustainable Air Quality class, EECE 449/549 worked in collaboration with Facilities department and a consultant to establish a carbon footprint. Using data collected by the consultant, the class with the consultants established the carbon emissions for the Danforth Campus. The class contribution was to begin explaining carbon drivers, modeling future through scenarios and comparing our carbon estimate to peer institutions. The class experience overall was positive. Students were engaged throughout the entire semester because the activities directly related to their lives.

Energy Use Overview The impact on carbon arises from on-campus energy use and from transportation On Campus Energy Use Students Heating Cooling Appliances Faculty/Staff Transportation Commuting Air Travel University Fleet

Method: Causality Model Systems approach: linking human activities and their consequences in closed loop Each component depends on its causal upstream driver – and external forcing The causal loop can be used as an organizing principle for sustainability analysis

Student, Faculty Staff Population Building Area Per Student Space –Teaching, research needs –Comfort? Actual and Forecast Building Area Building Area/Student Student Pop x Area/Student Projected Building Area New since 1990

Energy Demand Actual and Forecast Building Area Actual and Forecast Energy Demand Building Energy Efficiency –Building Design –Appliances –Usage Pattern Projected Energy Use/ Area Area x Energy Use/Area Energy Use

Carbon Footprint Actual and Forecast Carbon Footprint Actual and Forecast Energy Demand Carbon Emissions Factor –Fuel Mix –Energy Waste –Sequestration Projected Emission/ Energy Use Energy Use x Emission/Energy Use Emission

Results: Carbon Footprint

Results: Carbon Footprint Causality Projections

Discussion: Carbon emission has increased by 60% from Increased building square footage and decreased energy efficiency has led to increased carbon emissions By manipulating the energy efficiency or carbon efficiency reductions could be made.

Possible Future Activities WU Carbon Footprint (Actual, Observations) –Transportation Carbon –(Electric) Energy Usage –Real-time monitoring Carbon (Causality) Systems Model –Multi-science approach –Tool for testing ideas on Campus Carbon Collaborate with other Universities in MAGEEP Network to improve carbon footprint

Acknowledgments Washington University Facilities Department, particularly Ed Barry Washington University Office of Sustainability, Matt Malten