ORFEUS OBSERVATORY COORDINATION WORKSHOP Seismic Networks and Acceleration Networks İstanbul, 12-14 November 2012 The Strong-Motion Data in the Western.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE PROJECT AND THEIR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN EUROPEAN STANDARD -Major findings -Major findings suitable for inclusion in European Standard.
Advertisements

INSTITUTE OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING SEISMOLOGY (IZIIS) University SS. Cyril and Methodius Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Zagreb, Oct 2013 Radmila Salic; Zoran Milutinovic 3 rd Project Workshop Improvements in the Harmonized Seismic Hazard Maps for the Western Balkan.
Development of an In-Situ Test for Direct Evaluation of the Liquefaction Resistance of Soils K. H. Stokoe, II, E. M. Rathje and B.R. Cox University of.
Seismic Stratigraphy EPS 444
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
NERIES JRA4 Meeting Rome 4 and 5 December 2006 TASK A: SITE SELECTION Monography of the station CROTONE Station code CRT__ Servizio Sismico Nazionale.
Time-dependent increase in CPT tip resistance following explosive compaction. Time-dependent increase in V s following explosive compaction, as measured.
Soil ConditionsRecordsStations Alluvium125 Rock2915 Stiff soil4615 Soft soil2213 Very soft soil147 Unknown3412 TOTAL15767 Period:
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps - Inputs and Status Choi Yoon Seok Jennifer S. Haase Robert L. Nowack Purdue University.
MARSITE - ISTANBUL. MARSITE started on November 1 st, It is a three-year project. MARsite has been funded for about 6M€. The first months are dedicated,
University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Seismic Refraction. Some uses of seismic refraction Mapping bedrock topography Determining the depth of gravel, sand or clay deposits Delineating perched.
Characterization of Glacial Materials Using Seismic Refraction and Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves Glenn Larsen Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
SURFACE WAVE SURVEYS LIMITED
Three Worlds to Explore Look Up? (Astronomy) Look Down? (Geophysics) Look at Surface? (Geology)
Data centres and observablesModern Seismology – Data processing and inversion 1 Data in seismology: networks, instruments, current problems  Seismic networks,
Modeling Seismic Response for Highway Bridges in the St. Louis Area for Magnitude 6.0 to 6.8 Earthquakes J. David Rogers and Deniz Karadeniz Department.
Skopje, Oct 2012 Radmila Salic, MSc. 1 st Project Workshop and Kick-Off Meeting Improvements in the Harmonized Seismic Hazard Maps for the Western.
Petrotech 2007 AOA Geophysics Inc Integrity Oil Services Specialists in Applied Geophysics.
GEOL 414 Applied Geophysics Fall Semester 2006 Principles of various geophysical methods and their application to geologic problems. Prerequisites: Geology.
Average properties of Southern California earthquake ground motions envelopes… G. Cua, T. Heaton Caltech.
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
Ground Motion Parameters Measured by triaxial accelerographs 2 orthogonal horizontal components 1 vertical component Digitized to time step of
What is compaction? A simple ground improvement technique, where the soil is densified through external compactive effort. + water = Compactive effort.
Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Techniques  The specification sates that you should be able to:  Describe the geophysical exploration techniques.
SEMBODAI RUKMANI VARATHARAJAN ENGINEERING COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING FOUNDATION ENGINEERING BY KARTHIVELU.
Belgrade, Apr 2013 Radmila Salic, MSc. 2 nd Project Workshop Improvements in the Harmonized Seismic Hazard Maps for the Western Balkan Countries|
ABEM Distributor Seminar 2009 Terraloc Mk 8. ABEM Terraloc Mk 8.
Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.
DEPARTMENT FOR GEOTECHNICS AND SPECIAL STRUCTURES Laboratory for dynamics of soils and foundations University Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Skopje Institute.
University of Missouri - Columbia
Mr.Santosh Kumar Scientist Web:
Web-based Class Project on Rock Mechanics
COMPILATION OF STRONG MOTION DATA FROM EASTERN CANADA FOR NGA-EAST PROJECT Lan Lin Postdoctoral Fellow, Geological Survey of Canada.
Earthquake Load Some Basic Definitions:
INDUCED SEISMICITY IN PETROLEUM FIELDS: RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION, SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT M. Nafi Toksöz Earth Resources Laboratory, Massachusetts.
Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Techniques  The specification sates that you should be able to:  Describe the geophysical exploration techniques.
Earthquake Engineering GE / CEE - 479/679 Topic 13. Wave Propagation 2
ANALYSIS ON SLIDING MECHANISM OF TSAOLING ROCKSLIDE IN CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE EVENT Tien Chien Chen National Pingtung University of Science & Technology Meei.
Belgrade, Apr 2013 Radmila Salic, MSc. 2 nd Project Workshop Improvements in the Harmonized Seismic Hazard Maps for the Western Balkan Countries|
Predicting Site Response. Based on theoretical calculations –1-D equivalent linear, non-linear –2-D and 3-D non-linear Needs geotechnical site properties.
SASW – an in situ method for determining shear modulus
Marine Resistivity: a Tool for Characterizing Sediment Zones.
 The site is located in Tulkarem city.  The building consists of seven stories, and the area of each stories is about 700 m 2, the aim of this research.
Geotechnical Engineering
NEEDS FOR PERFORMANCE-BASED GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING
The main instrument used is called the sonde. A basic sonde consists of a source and two receivers one-foot apart. The sonde is lowered down the borehole.
NERIES JRA4 Meeting Rome 4 and 5 December 2006 TASK A: SITE SELECTION Monography of the station CATANIA Station code CAT__ Servizio Sismico Nazionale.
NS/V noise NS/H noise NS/H earthquakes The use of a very dense seismic array to characterize the Cavola, Northern Italy, active landslide body. By P. Bordoni.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II CFAC Review Conventional Facilities Geotechnical Conditions Tom Joos Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering.
Site Specific Response Analyses and Design Spectra for Soft Soil Sites Steven F. Bartlett, Ph.D., P.E. I-15 NATIONAL TEST BED TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER SYMPOSIUM.
Building and Housing Research Center
SITE INVESTIGATION.
BASICS OF DYNAMICS AND ASEISMIC DESIGN
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
1 Introduction to Applied Geophysics & Geophysical Exploration Prof Jeannot Trampert (coordinator) Dr Fred Beekman
Recent CSMIP/Caltrans Downhole Array Data and their Application in Site Specific Analysis H. Haddadi 1, V. Graizer 1, A. Shakal 1, P. Hipley 2 1 – California.
Microtremor method Saibi. Dec, 18, 2014.
1 SITE RESPONSE ANALYSIS USING MICROTREMORS Boğaziçi University Kandilli observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Department of Geophysics Korhan.
Earthquake Site Characterization in Metropolitan Vancouver Frederick Jackson Supervisor – Dr. Sheri Molnar.
Servizio Sismico Nazionale
Servizio Sismico Nazionale
Strong Motion Network in Taiwan
The Hungtsaiping landslides- from a rock slide to a colluvial slide
Creating a Conference Poster
108th OGC Technical Committee
Assessments of Conditions at 70 Rock Sites Having Vs30 near the NEHRP B-C Boundary with Measures of Heterogeneity J.B. Scott1, J.N. Louie1, D. Pei1, K.
Presentation transcript:

ORFEUS OBSERVATORY COORDINATION WORKSHOP Seismic Networks and Acceleration Networks İstanbul, November 2012 The Strong-Motion Data in the Western Balkans Zoran Milutinovic Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology University “Ss. Cyril and Methodius” in Skopje Skopje, Macedonia

Contents  The Strong-Motion Data in the Western Balkans  Seismic Monitoring, Macedonia  The 3D Strong Motion Array, Ohrid Lake Macedonia

M RangeNo. of Eq. M ≤ ≤ M ≤ ≤ M ≤ ≤ M ≤ ≤ M ≤ 6.89 Total330 Period:

Soil TypeNo. of St.Color Rock33Dark brown Soil33Light brown Undefined34Yellow Total100 Free Field Strong Motion Stations

Instrumented Buildings # StoriesBHCRMKRS GF+012 GF+0411 GF+122 GF+131 GF+141 GF+152 GF+1811 GF+201 Total13

Instrumented Dams Dam TypeBHMKMNRSSI Gravity Dams15 Arch Dams11 Earth Dams51 Total14

MRATINJE DAM (HE PIVA) Pluzine, Montenegro Dam and spillways Type of damArch, double-curvature Height220 m Length268 m Crest width4.5 m Base width45 m Volume732,940 m 3 ImpoundsPiva River Reservoir CreatesPiva Lake Capacity880,000,000 m 3 Catchment area1,757.7 km 2 Surface area12 km 2 Power station Turbines3 x 120 MW Installed capacity360 MW

SALAKOVAC DAM (HE SALAKOVAC) Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina Dam and spillways Type of damGravity Height70 m Length Crest width Base width Volume ImpoundsNeretva River Reservoir Creates Capacity Power station Turbines3 x 70 MW Installed capacity210 MW

Period: Station Type# Sites/Instruments Free field100/100 Dam Body14 / 55 Buildings13 / 34 Total127 / 189

Description Acceleration (cm/s2) Velocity (cm/s) Displacement (cm) H. Component – – – H. Component – – – Vertical 1.47 – – – 8.94 Total length (s) 2.02 – Total No. of Records 495 Period:

Soil ConditionsRecordsStations Alluvium125 Rock2915 Stiff soil4615 Soft soil2213 Very soft soil147 Unknown3412 TOTAL15767 Period:

MK, Debar SO Station (Very Soft Soil) Litolo{ko-stratigrafski parametri [Litho-Stratigraphic Parameters] Fizi~ko-mehani~ki parametri [Velocity Profile] Kota [Depth] Debelina [Thickness] Geolo{ki stolb [Geologic Column] litplo{ki dominanten [Lithological Description] sostav dodatoci Vp (m/s) Vs (m/s) g (kN/m 2 ) T (sec.) +/- 0, Pesok (Sand) pesok so glina [Sand with Clay] ~akal i konglomerat [Gravel and Conglomerate] {krilci [Shale] At 30 meters Depth ( Vs 30, T 30 ) MN, Bar SO Station (Stiff Soil) Litolo{ko-stratigrafski parametri [Litho-Stratigraphic Parameters] Fizi~ko-mehani~ki parametri [Velocity Profile] Kota [Depth] Debelina [Thickness] Geolo{ki stolb [Geologic Column] litplo{ki dominanten [Lithological Description] sostav dodatoci Vp (m/s) Vs (m/s) g (kN/m 2 ) T (sec.) +/ Glina [Clay] Glina [Clay] glina i ~akal [Clay and Gravel] fli{ [Flysch] Varovnici [Limestones] At 30 meters Depth ( Vs 30, T 30 ) EU-SMDBEU-SMDB 35 (57)

Summary on Performed Site Specific Field Measurements and Laboratory Tests #RequirementDescription Qty [ToR v2.0] Qty [total] 1 Site Characterization Borehole (B30) Depth 30m, un-cased, sampling for dynamic laboratory and liquefaction susceptibility testing, three (3) samples per horizon; standard geotechnical report 70 2 Instrument placing Borehole (BI30) Depth 30m, cased, standard geotechnical report.77 3 Vs shear wave velocity measurements in B30 borehole Method: P.S. suspension logging, detail report.70 4 In citu rock properties in B30 borehole Pressuremeter (Elastmeter) test, for 3 selected boreholes, only -3 5 Shallow seismic refraction measurements Two (Nos. 2) orthogonal m, in total max 250m, geophysical profiles, data processing, report on litho- stratigraphic and geotechnical characteristics, and Vp and Vs velocity profile Ground noise measurements One (1) month continuous ground noise recording, data processing Soil Testing Laboratory Engineering properties of soils and soil index properties Soil Testing Laboratory Unconfined compressive strength test of rocks with (and without) deformation measurements (3) 9 Dynamic Soil Testing Laboratory Material curves [(G-  ), (  -  )] for characteristic soil materials Liquefaction susceptibility testing Sands from surface or near surface layers, only.3642

Schema of Geophysical Site Characterization Database Segment Including Internal/External Links with Other Seismic Database Tables

Criteria on Quality of Surface Geophysical Survey and Data Interpretation Quality Quality grade Surface Geophysical Survey combined with Excellent1 Borehole coupled with borehole geophysical (velocity profile) measurements (downhole, crosshole, PS suspension measurements) and laboratory testing of soil samples (moisture content, dry density, LL/PL, void ratio /porosity/). High2 Borehole coupled with in-citu measurement of soil/rock mechanical properties (SPT, CPT, elastmeter /Pressuremeter/) or corresponding laboratory testing of soil samples (UCST, other) Good3 Borehole coupled with in-citu SPT or CPT measurements of soil/soft rock mechanical properties and laboratory testing of soil samples (moisture content, dry density, LL/PL, void ratio /porosity/). Acceptable 4 Borehole coupled with lithology logging in accordance with ASTM D “Standard Guide for Field Logging of Subsurface Explorations of Soil and Rock” ( 5 Geophysical survey coupled with other non-invasive surface seismic techniques (point/array ground noise measurements) Nominal6 Standalone geophysical survey.

DATABASE

Seismic Monitoring, Macedonia

Seismotectonic and Maximum Observed Seismic Intensity Map

Strong Motion Network of Macedonia SMA-1 Accelerographs

NATO SfP | Improvements in the Harmonized Seismic Hazard Maps for the Western Balkan Countries NATO SfP | BSHAP

NATO SfP | Improvements in the Harmonized Seismic Hazard Maps for the Western Balkan Countries NATO SfP | BSHAP

The 3D Strong Motion Array, Ohrid Lake Macedonia

Commencement 1976 Realization in three phases: Phase I (1980 – 1985): oInvestigations: (Geotechnical, Geophysical, Hydrotechnical) oInstallation of the entire array Phase II (1986 – 1988): oTesting (excitations, field forced vibration, frequency range 2 – 40 cpc) Phase III (1989 – …….): oExploatation of the network oSeveral earthquakes (M = 5.0 – 5.5; Albania, Greece, Macedonia)

Plan of Sites of the Ohrid Lake Strong Motion Three Dimensional Array L1 - Building site; L2 and L3 ­characteristic soil; L4 - Outcroping rock

DENSE 3D STRONG MOTION ARRAY OHRID LAKE VALLEY Outcropping rock (3 Ch) Free field (9 Ch) Instrumented Building including the soil profile up to the bedrock (36 Ch) Foundation

Location-1: Building. 9th story Building. 6th story Foundation, Fl Fouodation, F2 Foundation, F3 Foundation, F4 Surface, S 1 Downhole, B1 (101 m) Downhole, B2 (22.9 m) Downhole, B3 (13 m) Location-2: Surface, S 1 Downhole, B1 (125 m) Downhole, B2 (22. m) Downhole, B3 (9,5 m) Location-3: Surface, S 1 Downhole, B1 (99.6 m) Downhole, B2 (21.5 m) Downhole, B3 (9 m) Location-4: Outcropping rock R1