Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457. Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Advertisements

Depth of Knowledge It’s NOT the VERB, It’s the ACTION! Portions of this presentation were taken from.
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
Standards Scaling– Teacher Leaders LMS Team
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
COABE 2014 Forging the Future Implementing Webb’s DOK in the Active Learning Classroom Sara Z. Gutting Education Consultant (317)
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Task Analysis Connecting Math and Science through class discussions.
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Teachers Helping Teachers with Rigor/Depth of Knowledge / Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy Presented by NHCS Gifted Education Specialists.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Summer 2012 DataCamp June/August, Everyone is using standards…
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
Selected Responses How deep does the question dig?????
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Tuesday 08/12 Grab DOK handouts and put them in your “Units” tab. Warm-up: Look over the Academic Integrity Policy that you researched for homework. Respond.
Today’s Learning Target I can explain how Webb’s Depth of Knowledge compliments Bloom’s Taxonomy to build rigor in the classroom.
From Infusing Rigor & Research into Instruction and Assessment presentation USOE, Salt Lake City, UT February 25-26, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D. Center for.
With great power comes great responsibility.
SBAC Overview. SBAC Data SBAC Data Using ATLAS Protocol Step 1- GETTING STARTED 0 The educator providing the student work gives a very brief statement.
1. 10:00 – 10:05AmWelcome 10:05 -10: 10Starter 10: :30DOK and Blooms 10: :30DOK activity 11 :30AM Prayer Break 12: :15Pm Broad.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
Questioning as Formative Assessment: GRECC Math Alliance February 4 th - 7 th, 2008.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
Depth of Knowledge Civic Literacy Teacher Network Social Studies.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
Analyzing Terminology Adapted from Coos Bay SD.  Form groups of three or four  Receive verb cards  Using the cards, sort the verbs any way you like.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Definitions & Examples
Depth of knowledge (dok)
Agenda 10:00 – 10:05Am Welcome 10:05 -10: 10 Starter 10: :30
Presented by: Brian Jeffrey and Ashley Maxwell
Assessment Information
What is it with these two?
Why DOK? The DOK level focuses on how deeply a student needs to understand the content.   Understanding the DOK level of the standard will help teachers.
Preplanning Presentation
Ice-breaker In triads, answer the following questions (4-5 min):
Norman L Webb.
Assessment and Higher-Order Thinking
Presentation transcript:

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge USD 457

Objectives CO – Analyze and apply the four levels of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge. LO – Read for the purpose of understanding the four levels of DoK. LO – Discuss comparisons between DoK, Bloom’s and Rigor and Relevance.

Review of DoK/Rigor and Relevance and Bloom’s Taxonomy

Bloom’s and Webb’s Bloom's Taxonomy focuses on the tasks that students complete to deepen student understanding. However, Webb's DoK centers on the thinking process, not just the product. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge is about the cognitive demands (thinking process) of instruction, tasks, and/or assessments. While Bloom's Taxonomy relies on the verb, Webb's DoK extends beyond the verb to what follows--- beyond the 'what' to the 'how'.

DoK 1/Quad A: Recall and Reproduction Read pg. 7 of Webb’s DoK guide – Highlight what you think is most important about this level. Compare to the Rigor and Relevance Framework and discuss how the two fit together.

DoK 1/Quad A: Recall and Reproduction Focus is on specific facts, definitions, details, or using routine procedures (draw, list, label, retell, follow recipe, who, what, when, where, etc) Explaining processes in your own words Deep content knowledge is essential Combination of level ones does NOT equal level 2. One right answer

DoK 2/Quad B: Skills and Concepts Read pg. 9 of Webb’s DoK guide – Highlight what you think is most important about this level. Compare to the Rigor and Relevance Framework and discuss how the two fit together.

DoK 2/Quad B: Skills and Concepts Focus is on applying skills and concepts (in a familiar/typical situation), relationships (compare, cause/effect), main ideas Requires deeper knowledge than definition Explaining HOW and WHY Making Decisions Processing target knowledge to be able to summarize or classify information before responding Requires two or more steps

DoK 3/Quad C: Strategic Thinking Read pg. 11 of Webb’s DoK guide – Highlight what you think is most important about this level. Compare to the Rigor and Relevance Framework and discuss how the two fit together.

DoK 3/Quad C: Strategic Thinking Focus is on reasoning and planning in order to respond (e.g. write an essay, apply in new/novel situation) Complex and abstract thinking is required Often need to provide support for reasoning or conclusions drawn More than one “correct” response or approach is often possible

Read pg. 13 of Webb’s DoK guide – Highlight what you think is most important about this level. Compare to the Rigor and Relevance Framework and discuss how the two fit together. DoK 4/Quad D: Extended Thinking

Requires complex reasoning, planning and thinking (generally over extended periods of time) for the investigation Assessment activities have multiple steps with extended time provided Students may be asked to relate concepts within the content area and among other content areas Students make real-world applications in new situations.

DoK Sorting Activity Take stacks of cards and place them into levels 1-4 on the sorting template.

Design DoK Activities Design an activity for each of the four levels. Upon completion share with your co-workers and explain your reasoning for the placement of the activity in that level.

References Webb's Depth of Knowledge Guide; Career and Technical Education Definitions. (2009). Retrieved from Sibley, B., Marconi, E., & Southern Nevada Regional Professional Development Program (2008, January). The Depth of Knowledge Levels. Retrieved from