Pile Testing and Evaluation for the Sand Creek Byway, Sandpoint, Idaho Presented by Dean E. Harris, P.E., CH2M HILL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soil Exploration Part II
Advertisements

Massimo Sacchetto Annalisa Trevisan CPT EXECUTED IN DIFFICULT CONDITIONS USING CPTWD AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS BRASIL September 2012 Porto De Galinhas.
Prepared by J. P. Singh & Associates in association with Mohamed Ashour, Ph.D., PE West Virginia University Tech and Gary Norris Ph.D., PE University of.
1 Analysis of Test Results 2 What we’ll have to do: Load-Deflection curve. Load Vs Strain curve for steel and concrete Find yield load (  s = 0.002)
3-D Dynamic Base Shaking Model 2-D Static BNWF Pushover Model
8. Axial Capacity of Single Piles
DRIVEN PILE SPECIFICATIONS
Wave Equation Applications 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
Failure Case Study of Construction at a Solid Waste Site K. Madhavan, Ph.D., P.E., Dept. of Civil & Env. Engineering Christian Brothers University Memphis,
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
Special Design and Construction Considerations
Negative Skin Friction
Foundation System Design for Al Nimmer Commercial Building
AASHTO LRFD Section and 10
USING THE RAPID LOAD TESTER TO PROVIDE PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL.
Geotechnical Site Characterization by Cone Penetration Testing
Determination of Soil Stiffness Parameters
Micropiles Save Drilled Shafts
Foundations. Feature common to bridge and building structures Deep vs. shallow Safely transfer dead and live loads with acceptable levels of settlement.
1 Asia Managing Geotechnical Risk Learning from the Failures “Issues related to the use of Numerical Modelling in Design of Deep Excavations in Soft Clay”
Textural Identification Properties of Soil Topic D.
Subsurface Conditions Mission Bay San Francisco, California Presented by Hadi J. Yap, PhD, PE, GE DTX Project Meeting San Francisco County Transportation.
What is a proper time for pile testing Jaroslaw Rybak, Wroclaw University of Technology.
Soils Investigation Soil Investigation
Lecture-8 Shear Strength of Soils
Direct Shear Test CEP 701 PG Lab.
 Soil grains come from weathering of bedrock ◦ Physical weathering – granular soils ◦ Chemical weather – creates clay  Soil is either residual or transport.
TOPIC 2: TYPES OF FOUNDATION
Footings.
1 Field Approach A Test pile of required dimensions is constructed in the field and a load test is conducted to assess the capacity of the pile. This approach.
Mata kuliah: S0892 – Ground Improvement Method Tahun: 2010 Case Study Session
Liquefaction Analysis For a Single Piled Foundation By Dr. Lu Chihwei Moh and Associates, Inc. Date: 11/3/2003.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES CFAC Review Thomas F. Joos, P.E. Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering Division May 8, 2007 NSLS-II Conventional.
Reference Manual Chapter 9
CE 317 Geotechnical Engineering Dr. Tae-Hyuk Kwon
LIQUEFACTION FAILURE OF FOUNDATION - STRUCTURE COLLAPSE.
Additional Design Considerations 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
Micropiles – UK Trends Mike Turner Applied Geotechnical Engineering.
Settlement Criteria  f f f for clays, silty clays, plastic silts: Chapter 5 (short term) Chapter 7 (long term, i.e., consolidation)  i i i in this.
Bridge Engineering (3) Foundations – Pile Foundations (1) 1. *Types of foundations 1.1 Shallow foundations (buried less than 5m deep) Spread (isolated)
OMAE 2009 Honolulu, HI - May 31 to June
IWM2003 in Seattle Kinya Miura: GeoMechanics Group,
HEWLETT PACKARD BUILDING 5 SEISMIC UPGRADE CORVALLIS, OREGON, USA TOM A. ARMOUR, P.E. SESSION III STRUCTURAL SUPPORT & SEISMIC APPLICATIONS IWM 2002 MAY.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS – II CFAC Review Conventional Facilities Geotechnical Conditions Tom Joos Civil/Structural Engineer BNL Plant Engineering.
Classical and Finite Difference Method to Estimate pile Capacity Compared With Pile Load Test Results Yogesh Prashar, P.E., GE Force Pulse Conference,
Wave Equation Applications 2009 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
Research at Northwestern University: End-bearing Micropiles in Dolomite.
Session 19 – 20 PILE FOUNDATIONS
Credit Valley Hospital Pre-loaded Micropiles for Vertical Expansion of Parking Garage SMART Contractometer Results Nadir Ansari, Isherwood Associates Jim.
Case History Evaluation of the Axial Behaviour of Bored Pile from SPT Aung Naing Moe August 2014.
PILE FOUNDATIONS UNIT IV.
SITE INVESTIGATION ARUN MUCHHALA ENGINEERING COLLEGE-DHARI
Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Institute Of Technology,Vasad.
Pile Foundation Reason for Piles Types of Piles
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-III (CE 434)
Soil mechanics and foundation engineering-III (CE-434)
Prepared by:- Barham Jalal
Direct Shear Test.
AN OVERVIEW OF SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATION SYSTEMS
Site Investigation and Field Tests
Fall 2016 ASSE 4311: Learning Outcome Assessment III/Civil Engineering 18/1/2017 Final Presentation Structural & Geotechnical Design of a Hotel in the.
Outline Introduction Test section details Axial load test results
DARSHAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
CFAC Review NSLS-II Conventional Facilities Update
Aspek Geoteknik.
Foundations.
Aspek Geoteknik.
Mike Turner Applied Geotechnical Engineering
N.N.Som Consulting Geotechnical Engineer
Group Members: 1. NORAZLINA MD YUSOFF( ) 2.SHARIFAH NAZILA BT SYED MOHAMMAD ( ) 3.SHERVIN MOTAMEDI( ) 4.PEYMAN BEHTASH ( )
Presentation transcript:

Pile Testing and Evaluation for the Sand Creek Byway, Sandpoint, Idaho Presented by Dean E. Harris, P.E., CH2M HILL

Project Description Current alignment is through the City Realignment will provide a non-stop route for through traffic WGI is completing roadway and structural design CH2M HILL is responsible for geotechnical and structural design

Sand Creek Byway

Project Features Project features include two interchanges, a smaller bridge crossing a city street, and numerous MSE walls Community is sensitive to appearance and function Community supports the project

Sand Creek Crossing

Geotechnical Explorations Piezocone (CPTu) was the primary method of subsurface exploration Maximum depth of CPTu soundings of 80 m Soil borings were advanced adjacent to many soundings to collect samples. Other testing included vane shear testing and shear wave velocity tests

Cone rig and barge in Sand Creek

Typical Soil Profile Upper 10 m: Medium stiff sandy silt to clay, N = 9 to 15 blows per 0.3 m 10 to 39 m: Very soft to soft clay with thin layers of loose to medium dense sandy silt, N = 0 to 5 blows per 0.3 m 39 to 67 m: Alternating soft to medium silt and clay, N = 7 to 13 blows per 0.3 m

Pile Loading Test Axial compression loading test on a 0.41 m (16 in) steel pipe pile, driven to a depth of 45 m, with PDA and CAPWAP analysis Pile was instrumented at 8 levels, with vibrating wire gauges on sister bars, and 2 telltales; concrete-filled Osterberg Cell (O-Cell) used at the head of the pile, with steel reaction frame

Pile driving with APE D36-32

Loading System

Loading test

Load-Movement Curves from Loading Test

Findings from Loading Test Plunging failure occurred at movement of 11 mm Analysis considered pile residual load For clay layer,  = 0.1, N t = 6

ConditionCapacity (kN) End of Initial Driving260 Restrike (after 24 hours setup) 980 Static Loading Test (50 days after driving) 1900

Strain Gauge Placement

Neutral Plane Analysis

Interpretation of Gauge Load

Summary and Conclusions Pile Setup is a major factor affecting construction and estimated capacity Instrumentation is necessary to extrapolate the pile testing data to other pile lengths Residual load effects are significant in interpreting capcity