1 Reviewing the nomenclature for high- technology trade – the sectoral approach by Alexander Loschky.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spring Update of December 2013 Forecast for 2014 Manufacturing and Non-Manufacturing Sectors Compare 2014 Forecasts with 2013 Reported Results Broad Sector.
Advertisements

The Israeli Economy Stanley Fischer Bank of Israel November 2007.
Unido.org/statistic s Statistical Indicators of Industrial performance Shyam Upadhyaya International workshop on industrial statistics 8 – 10 July, Beijing.
© National Bank of Belgium. Linking external trade data to business Statistics registers (year: 2003) OECD - Paris, September 2006 Peter BOBYR Head.
MYTHS AND REALITIES; SOUTH AFRICA’S IP TIPS – WORLD BANK WORKSHOP 27 OCTOBER 2011.
Open Classroom Policy Advice to the Governor Week 1 What’s UP (and Down) in the Massachusetts Economy Barry Bluestone September 8, 2010.
Structural Transformation and Manufacturing Opportunities Nobuya Haraguchi 20 February
Russia on the high-tech markets Prospects and challenges.
China: The Challenges and Opportunities for the British Economy Chris Milner (GEP, School of Economics, University of Nottingham)
The Changing Shape of UK Manufacturing Joe Grice, Director and Chief Economist.
Industrial policy, Structural Change, and Pattern of Industrial Productivity Growth in Taiwan 1 Tsu-tan Fu Department of Economics & Center for Efficiency.
South Africa System of data collection and dissemination of manufacturing statistics May 2009 The preferred supplier of quality statistics.
ANALYSIS OF THE LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN TURKISH MERCHANDISE TRADE Nihan ODABAŞI Assistant Foreign Trade Expert 7 November 2011 Working Party on International.
JRC: Eurostat: 2 nd WPTGS Meeting, OECD,
Sectoring, classifications and breakdowns ECO - UIS Regional Workshop on Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Indicators Tehran,
“Narva support measures for entrepreneurs creating new jobs” Georgi Ignatov Narva City Dep-t for Development and Economy April 2010.
State of Affairs Nordregio presentation at East West Window WG1 meeting Riga, 6-7 December 2007 The East West Window project is part-financed by the European.
Class 8. Concentration: Measurements and Trends Analysis of a firm’s competitive environment requires identifying the key elements of industry structure.
Jukka Pekkarinen Technology frontier: A comment ”Quality of tertiary education and the economic policy agenda”, Ljubljana, April 2, 2008.
Trade Dynamics in the Euro Area: A Disaggregated Approach DNB/IMF Workshop Preventing and Correcting Macroeconomic Imbalances in the Euro Area 14 October.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Industry statistics General overview 1 Business statistics and registers.
Overview of the NEMESIS Model ERASME. I.1 Introduction The Nemesis model runs under the IODE software Estimation are made mainly using TSP A set of Visual.
Economic Impacts of the KORUS-FTA Progressive Caucus Briefing Robert E. Scott, Ph.D. Economic Policy Institute February 23, 2011.
1 PRESENTATIONFOR USERS PRODUCERS WORKSHOP USERS PRODUCERS WORKSHOP Industrial Statistics AT SBP KARACHI MAY 8-9, 2006.
Patterns of Industrialization and effects of country-specific conditions IPD/JICA Task Force on Industrial Policy and Transformation Jordan, June 5-6,
Energy Management: 2014/2015 Energy Analysis: Input-Output Class # 5 Prof. Tânia Sousa
Industrial Energy Consumption.Anna Martin. 24 th February 2005.
1 Bilateral trade flows and input-output analysis Colin Webb OECD STI/EAS.
2002 Numerical List of Manufactured and Mineral Products Publication Parts: Introduction, Conversion Table Mining Sectors 211, Oil and Gas Extraction 212,
Decomposition Analysis for Energy Use of SMEs In U.S. Manufacturing Industries Yadan Zeng Advisor: Dr. Chris Y. Yuan Department of Mechanical Engineering,
MONTANA STATE FUND 855 STATE STREET SEPTEMBER 26 TH, 2014 THE ECONOMY IN THE BIG SKY PRESENTATION BY: JOE RAMLER SENIOR ECONOMIST MT DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE.
Experimental Industry Estimates in BEA’s R&D Satellite Account Carol A. Robbins Industry Accounts Data Users Meeting October 26, 2007.
“ECONOMIC REVIEW AND TURKEY’S TRADE WITH FINLAND” Embassy of Turkey, Office of the Commercial Counsellor
NAFCOC-Input Industrial Policy Action Plan. Industry Size: The current industry is worth an estimated R1.161tn made of the following major groups: (Stats.
THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL OUTSOURCING ON EMPLOYMENT: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM EU COUNTRIES Martin Falk and Yvonne Wolfmayr Austrian Institute of Economic.
Measuring the Benefits of Improved Market Access Irina Orlova CASE Ukraine January 2008.
1 Tackling systemic questions BELS, London Simon Roberts Associate Director, Foresight Group.
Welcome to the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Learning Module Series ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: CESTiCCWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FULBRIGHT Liv HaselbachQuinn Langfitt.
Outsourcing and U.S. Economic Growth: The Role of Imported Intermediate Inputs Christopher Kurz, Paul Lengermann Federal Reserve Board of Governors* World.
1 Innovation & knowledge indicators  R&D EXPENDITURES  INTERNATIONAL PATENTS  OTHER INDICATORS OF INNOVATION, KNOWLEDGE AND HUMAN CAPITAL.
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS AND INDUSTRIAL POLICY A COMPARISON OF RESULTS BETWEEN SLOVENIA AND HUNGARY Albert Puig GATE (Analysis Group in Economic Transition)
AGNA Meeting April 2016, Addis Ababa Expanding the coverage of the Trade in Value Added database for Africa
Hyunbae Chun (Sogang University) Hak K. Pyo (Seoul National University) Keun Hee Rhee (Korea Productivity Center) Structural Changes and Productivity Growth.
MALAYSIA KLEMS: PRODUCTIVITY PERFORMANCE THE 2 ND ASIA KLEMS DATABASE MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP 17 OCTOBER 2014 Mazlina Shafi’i Wan Fazlin Nadia Wan Osman Malaysia.
China KLEMS Database —— The 2 nd Asia KLEMS Database Management workshop Ren Ruoen Sun Linlin Fan Maoqing Zheng Haitao Li xiaoqin.
International Energy Workshop Venice, June Energy and CO 2 Efficiency in the European Manufacturing Sector: A Decomposition Analysis Dirk.
Jinkeun Yu Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade (KIET) An Analysis of Global Value Chain (GVC) Income and Jobs and Its Implication for the.
Figure 1 – U.S. Non-Farm Labor Productivity Growth, Four-Year Moving Average Source(s): U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Hyunbae Chun (Sogang University) Hak K. Pyo (Seoul National University) Keun Hee Rhee (Korea Productivity Center) The 2 nd Asia KLEMS Database Management.
on CO2 Emission Across Industries
Impacts of Oil Price Changes Korea Development Institute
AUTOMATION.
European Industrial Outlook December 2015 EO-160
Gestão de Sistemas Energéticos 2015/2016
Gestão de Sistemas Energéticos 2016/2017
Productivity Growth and Resource Reallocation Effects in Taiwan: Tsu-tan Fu, Soochow University Yih-ming Lin, National Chiayi University.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Hosein Joshaghani PhD in economics at the University of Chicago
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
ESTP – Course Structural Business Statistics
ESTP – Course Structural Business Statistics
Marta Solaz, Francisco Pérez and Eva Benages
Manufacturing Activity January 2016
ESTP – Course Structural Business Statistics
Cultural Employment.
LUCAS Advisory Group Meeting LU/LC Classification & INSPIRE compliance
Sports' Contribution to Economics and Employment Introduction to Research Results of October 2018.
Prodcom Working Group - 21st October 2013
Prodcom Working Group Item 08.1 – 2014 – Data Quality
Prodcom Working Group JMO M November 2012
Presentation transcript:

1 Reviewing the nomenclature for high- technology trade – the sectoral approach by Alexander Loschky

2 Current high-tech nomenclature Two different approaches: –Sectoral approach (by economic sectors, ISIC / NACE) –Product approach (by product groups, SITC) This presentation concentrates on the sectoral approach.

3 R&D intensity is used as the sole indicator Calculating direct and indirect R&D intensities –Direct R&D intensities: –Indirect R&D intensities (R&D expenditure embodied in the intermediate goods used in the production of another sector) Calculation: via Input-Output tables How are high-tech sectors identified?

4 Why reviewing the sectoral high-tech classification? Current nomenclature is relatively old: 1997: OECD working paper by Thomas Hatzichronoglou (using direct and indirect R&D intensities, but figures date from 1990) 2005: OECD Handbook on Economic Globalisation Indicators (minor and partial update using only direct R&D intensities)

5 Calculation of indirect R&D intensities (1) Brief description in nine steps: 1.Conversion of input-output tables (nearest to the year 2000) from national currencies into US-$ (using PPP) 2.Estimation of missing output data for certain sectors and countries (where possible) with production data 3.Summing-up of the input-output tables of all countries into a single table

6 Calculation of indirect R&D intensities (2) 4.Calculation of the direct R&D intensities: = total R&D expenditure of sector Y for all countries / total output in sector Y of all countries 5.Conversion of the unified input-output table of step 3 into a table of input coefficients (A) 6.Formation of the Leontief inverse: (I-A) -1 (The Leontief inverse shows the impact of one unit of final demand on the intermediate products.)

7 Calculation of indirect R&D intensities (3) 7.Transformation of the table into a table of output necessities (showing the amounts of intermediate products needed for one unit of output) 8.Calculation of the total R&D intensities: Calculation of indirect R&D intensities (of sector Y from each sector X) : The output necessities of sector Y from each sector X were multiplied with the respective direct R&D intensities of sectors X. Total R&D intensity of sector Y = direct R&D intensity of sector Y + indirect R&D intensities of Y

8 Calculation of indirect R&D intensities (4) 9.The total R&D intensities were used to classify the sectors for its technology intensiveness. The threshold used were: R&D intensity… … below 1.0%: low-tech … between 1.0% and 2.5%: medium-low-tech … between 2.5% and 7%: medium high-tech … higher than 7%: high-tech

9 Results of the calculation – (1) high-tech sectors Classification of industries based on technology intensity Nomenclature *1980* IO sector / Sector description ISIC Rev. 3 Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&Ddir. R&D Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D 20 Medical, precision & optical instruments %10.53%56.55%5.10%54.69%3.61% 10 Pharmaceuticals %10.04%311.35%10.47%48.37%7.62% 19 Radio, television & communication equipment %8.32%49.40%8.03%39.33%8.35% 17 Office, accounting & computing machinery %7.91%214.37%11.46%211.19%9.00% 23 Aircraft & spacecraft %8.21%117.30%14.98%116.06%14.13% * Data from the year 1990 and 1980 are taken from Hatzichronoglou (1997).

10 Results of the calculation – (2) medium-high-tech sectors Classification of industries based on technology intensity Nomenclature *1980* IO sector / Sector description ISIC Rev. 3 Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D 24 Railroad equipment & transport equip nec %3.68%93.03%1.58%111.69%0.98% 21 Motor vehicles, trailers & semi- trailers %3.30%64.44%3.41%73.68%2.81% 18 Electrical machinery & apparatus, nec %2.65%73.96%2.81%64.25%3.48% 16 Machinery & equipment, nec %2.13%102.58%1.74%102.00%1.32% 09 Chemicals excluding pharmaceuticals 24 excl %2.38%83.84%3.20%82.67%2.15% 11 Rubber & plastics products %1.03%112.47%1.07%92.20%1.08%

11 Results of the calculation – (3) medium-low-tech sectors Classification of industries based on technology intensity Nomenclature *1980* IO sector / Sector description ISIC Rev. 3 Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D 11 Rubber & plastics products %1.03%112.47%1.07%92.20%1.08% 22 Building & repairing of ships & boats %0.73%122.21%0.74%131.42%0.39% 14 Non-ferrous metals %0.80%141.57%0.93%161.04%0.54% 12 Other non-metallic mineral products %0.80%151.44%0.93%141.10%0.66% 25 Manufacturing nec; recycling (include Furniture) %0.46%131.76%0.63%121.45%0.79% 15 Fabricated metal products, except machinery & equipment %0.54%161.35%0.63%151.06%0.45% 13 Iron & steel %0.53%181.10%0.64%180.78%0.45% 08 Coke, refined petroleum products and nuclear fuel %0.39%171.33%0.96%170.80%0.58%

12 Results of the calculation – (4) low-tech sectors Classification of industries based on technology intensity Nomenclature *1980* IO sector / Sector description ISIC Rev. 3 Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D Ra nk dir.+ indir. R&D dir. R&D 07 Pulp, paper, paper products, printing and publishing %0.40%190.88%0.31%190.68%0.23% 05 Textiles, textile products, leather and footwear %0.29%200.78%0.23%200.56%0.13% 04 Food products, beverages and tobacco %0.34%210.73%0.34%200.56%0.14% 06 Wood and products of wood and cork %0.21%220.65%0.18%220.55%0.14%

13 Results – Impact on the high-tech classification: Almost no changes for the technology classification compared to the last one, based on 1990 data. The only major change: precision instruments are now high-tech and became the sector with the highest R&D intensity. But note: The ranking within the high-tech and medium-high-tech groups changed considerably.

14 Outlook (1) This exercise should be repeated each time when new OECD Input-Output tables become available. Hopefully country coverage (currently 18 countries) can be extended to even more OECD and non-OECD countries. Also the classification based on the product approach needs an update (see paper by Florian Eberth, OECD).

15 Outlook (2) – The combined approach Currently trade by high-tech sectors is calculated using correspondence tables (ISIC  SITC). In the future, this could be replaced by using (detailed) sectoral foreign trade data allowing to identify the goods actually traded by high-tech sectors. Thank you!

16 Contact: Phone:

17 Additional slide: Country coverage data from 18 countries were used for which R&D intensities could be calculated and for which OECD Input-Output tables were available (compared to 10 countries in 1997) The countries were: AU, BE, CA, CZ, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, UK, IE, IT, JP, KR, NL, NO, PL, SE, US (all 18 countries are OECD members)