What’s New in the FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate and Risk Based Systems Inspection Rick Perlman Chair Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Division ASQ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.
Advertisements

As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
MFRPS Lesson Learned North Carolina
CBAP and BABOK Presented to the Albany Capital District Chapter of the IIBA February 3, 2009.
SAFA- IFAC Regional SMP Forum
FIELD COMPLIANCE UPDATE CDR Thomas R. Berry, RPh FDA, Investigator RAL-RP / ATL-DO.
FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate Robert Coleman National Expert Drug Investigator Food and Drug Administration.
Field Investigators: ADE Detectives. Section One Introduction to the Team and Their Roles.
Interagency Oncology Task Force (IOTF) Research and Regulatory Review Fellowships
Manufacturing Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science July 20-21, 2004 Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
CDRH Software Regulation
External Defibrillators: Recalls, Inspections, and the Quality System Regulation Melissa Torres Office of Compliance December 15, 2010.
Session 6: Data Integrity and Inspection of e-Clinical Computerized Systems May 15, 2011 | Beijing, China Kim Nitahara Principal Consultant and CEO META.
Top Tactics for Maximizing GMP Compliance in Blue Mountain RAM Jake Jacanin, Regional Sales Manager September 18, 2013.
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
FDA’s Perspective Continued - Where We Are ?. GMP Task Groups.
Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT.
ISSUES SAUDI ARAMCO PROCEDURES SAUDI ARAMCO OPERATOR CERTIFICATION
Quality By Design - A Generic Industry Perspective
QSIT Management Controls QSIT Workshops. Management Controls u Importance u Assessment u Demonstration of Compliance.
“Fit For Use” Jim Melvin Assistant Director of Regulatory Programs North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 3/12/14 8:00 A.M.
Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) RECALLS.  21 CFR 7.40 provides guidance on the policy, procedures, and industry responsibilities for recalls. 
FDA Regulatory review in Minutes: What Product Development Executives Need-to-Know. Specifically, frequent causes of recalls and related areas that investigators.
Top 10 Medical Device Citations
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Fourth Annual Medical Research Summit Concurrent Session 4.05 – Managing CROs and SMOs from a Compliance Perspective Michael SwiatochaAprill 23, 2004.
FDA Science BoardNov 5, CDER Risk-based Site Selection Model: An FDA Risk Management Tool Presentation to FDA Science Board November 5, 2004 by Kara.
Kimberly A. Trautman FDA’s Medical Device Quality System Expert
1 PAT and Biological Products Tom Layloff FDA-SGE Management Sciences for Health The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily.
FDA’s Perspective on the “Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century” Initiative David J. Horowitz, Esq. Director, CDER/FDA, Office of Compliance Advisory.
Important informations
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: By: Date: Oversight Throughout the Supply Chain: Is It Adequate? DOT OIG Audit: Assessment of FAA's Risk-Based.
1 Regulatory Aspects of Pharmaceutical Excipients PQRI Workshop Nick Buhay Acting Director Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality Office of Compliance.
The FDA Regulatory and Compliance Symposium Preparing for the FDA’s Risk-Based Inspections Presented By: Martin Browning, EduQuest, Inc.
PhRMA Perspective on FDA Final Report FDA Advisory Committee on Pharmaceutical Sciences October 20, 2004 G.P. Migliaccio, Pfizer Inc.
BY: EMERALD MOORE CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATOR (CSI).
New England District Update MassMEDIC Conference December 1, 2010 Waltham, MA.
Progress in FDA’s Drug Product Quality Initiative Janet Woodcock, M.D. November 13, 2003.
Career Development Professional Recognition with the Society of Biology HEaTED – Regional Network Event 23rd April 2013 Debbie Brunt Society of Biology.
CBER Common Problems on Source Plasma Inspections Judy Ellen Ciaraldi BS, MT(ASCP)SBB, CQA(ASQ) CBER, OBRR, DBA September 16, 2009.
The Second Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress Presented by J. Glenn George Thursday, March 29, 2007 Day II – Track.
Module 2Slide 1 of 26 WHO - EDM Quality Management Basic Principles of GMP Part One.
HunterDouglas VPP TRAINING.
CDER / Office of Compliance ACPS October 5, 2006 Joseph C. Famulare Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA.
Title Page Quality Mo Samimi, Ph.D. CMQ/OE Presented at the ASQ Biomedical Division Northern California Discussion Group. May 2011.
Second Meeting of the FDA/ACPS Process Analytical Technology: Closing Remarks Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Drug Quality Regulations for the 21 st Century PhRMA Perspective Manufacturing Subcommittee Meeting – May 21, 2003 Gerry Migliaccio Pfizer Inc.
FDA Facility Evaluation Douglas Stearn Deputy Director for Policy and Analysis Office of Compliance Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Current MFRPS State Implementation Status February 3, :15 – 9:45 am Timothy Weigner Staff Director U.S. FDA Office of Regulatory Affairs, Office.
Slide 1 POA Seminar 02 March 2016 Personnel Competence Including Certifying Staff and Release to Service Andy Swift / Michael Greer.
Good Laboratory Practice - general information Pirkko Puranen Senior Inspector, Ph.D. Inspectorate.
Import Safety Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
November 6, 2013 Purchasing Controls & Supplier Quality Best Practices Beyond Compliance for the Medical Device Industry AdvaMed 2013 Bernie Liebler Technology.
Annex II: Potential Applications prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9.
2002 ANSI Annual Conference The Value of Accreditation Robert H. King Jr. President and CEO, RAB.
Interagency Oncology Task Force (IOTF)
Are You Ready? SSH Accreditation and Certification
The Association for Challenge Course Technology
Module 3 Information about the audit
Pharmaceutical Quality in the 21st Century
American Society for Quality Region 5 Quality Conference
Quality System.
Careers in IT.
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
What Is VQIP? FDA required to establish a program to provide for the expedited review of food imported by voluntary participants. Eligibility is limited.
Clinical engineering certification in the United States
Presentation transcript:

What’s New in the FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate and Risk Based Systems Inspection Rick Perlman Chair Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Division ASQ

“Everything that can be invented has been invented” Charles H Duell Commissioner, US Office of Patents urging President McKinley to abolish his office in 1899

What is the Pharmaceutical Inspectorate  FDA developed certification program  High level Pharmaceutical Investigators  Primarily used for complex processes or high risk drug products

History of the PI  Certification started in 1994  Resulted from Industry asking for a more consistent inspection activity  Will continue as long as needed/funded

Purpose  Training and development to maintain qualified staff  Structured approach to obtain, maintain and apply competencies

Objective  Assurance that investigators have the skills and knowledge to perform their jobs

Certification Areas  Drugs  Blood  Seafood  Medical Devices

Types of Drug Certification  Level I  Level II  Level III

Certification - Level I  Mandatory  New hire Investigators  Training completed in first 12 months  Demonstrate competency via audit of results

Level I Training  Web Based  Classroom –Basic Food and Drug Law –Evidence Development –Investigative Interviewing –Quality Auditing

Level I Audit Criteria  Supervisor looks for –General Investigative practices –Evidence Ability to recognize, identify, and collect evidence to support findings –Communication Verbal Written –Professionalism

Certification - Level II  Not mandatory  Requirements –Minimum of 25% in Drugs –Submit documentation to Level II Drug Certification Board –Pass performance audit –Recertify every 3 years (18 CEUs)

Prerequisites - Level II  Level I Certified  Training –Drug manufacturing and quality control –Pre-Approval Inspections –Industrial Sterilization (Drugs and Devices) –Computer Systems Validation –API manufacturing

Certification Board - Level II  National Expert  Experienced Field Investigator  Experts –CDER –CVM  Field Manager  DHRD Specialist

Level II Audit Criteria  Compliance Assessment  Evidence  Verbal Communication  Professionalism

Certification - Level III  The Pharmaceutical Inspectorate  Not Mandatory  Planning for ~ 50 members by FY 07

Level III Eligibility  Minimum 3 years inspecting Drug Firms  Certified as Level II –Must pass six system Audit  Endorsed by District/Office Management  Selected or nominated by Level III Certification Board

Level III - How?  Submit request to Supervisor  Submit Certification Packet to Certification Board  Concurrence from District Management  Screened by Certification Board

Level III Certification Board  2 Field Investigators (National Experts) operating at Level III  2 Experts –CDER –CVM  DFI program Expert  ORA Field Management  DHRD

Level III Candidates  Mainly Investigators with experience and training in pharmaceutical manufacturing  Report directly to ORA District Office  Spend ~80% of time in drug inspection, both Foreign and Domestic

Level III - Expected Competencies  Regulating Pharmaceutical Quality in relation to the FDA’s mission  Risk Management  Advanced Quality Systems  Pharmaceutical Science

Level III - Expected Competencies  Current Regulatory Programs/Procedures  Technology  Investigations

Level III - Admission  Packet successfully reviewed  Pass: –Screening –Training  Participate in Center details  Pass final evaluation

Level III - When  First course completed in 2005  Second course 2006

Level III - Courses  Quality Systems  Risk Assessment and Management  Critical Thinking  Quality by Design  PAT  Design of Experiments  ICH Guidances  Process Capability  Technology Transfer  CAPA

Level III Expectations  Continual learning to enhance their expertise  Develop and implement formal training for –FDA –Industry –State/Local Officials

Level III Expectations  Develop/Evaluate in their area of expertise –Programs –Policies –Procedures in their area of expertise  Auditors for Level II or Level III Drug Certification

Risk Management  ICH Q9 –Quality Risk Management –Adopted November 9, 2005

Risk  Evaluated on –Product, Process, Facility –Controls –Robustness of Quality System

Risk  Regulatory Oversight based on –Applications –Post Approval Changes –GMP Inspections

Risk - Desired State  Barriers to continuous improvement are removed –manufacturing –product quality  Meaningful Specifications  Common understanding of risk  Industry and Regulators on same page –focused on highest risks –understanding of residual risks

Risk - ICH Q9  Provides a guidance document for understanding  Defines common terms  Facilitates –movement toward ‘desired state’ –communication –movement from ‘fire fighting’ to risk management

Why ICH Q9  To ensure a common understanding of Quality Risk Management by both industry and regulators

What ICH Q9 Provides  A common language and process  Potential methodologies for Quality Risk Management  Where Quality Risk Management can add value

What ICH Q9 Provides  Broad risk concepts and principles  Principles for implementation  Elements of the process  Not a single tool but the right tool for the job  Tools

What ICH Q9 Is Not  A ‘cookbook’ for risk management  Specifics for your situation  Exhaustive treatment of theory  A list of all potential methods

FDA’s Risk Based Inspections  Matrixed Approach  Based on –product type –potential harm –population size

Systems Based Inspection  Six Systems –Quality –Materials –Laboratory Controls –Production –Packaging and Labeling –Facilities and Equipment

Risk Based Inspection  Depends on potential risk of your product/process  Compliance History  Inspection History  Number of systems –minimum of 2 (always Quality System)

Thank You!

Questions?