Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Advertisements

Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
System Accreditation. An international institution that brings together three of the largest U.S.-based accreditation agencies: Southern Association of.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director (October 23, 2013)
University of Peshawar 13 th QEC Meeting August 18-19,2009, Karachi.
University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore 12 th Meeting of QECs Heads By Dawar Hameed Mughal Deputy Director QEC
17 th Meeting of QECs Heads Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director QEC.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Professor Dolina Dowling
QEC initiates SA through the dean one semester prior to the assessment Department forms the PT that will be responsible for preparing SAR QEC reviews.
SEQUENCE OF MEETING  Welcome Note by the Rector  Confirmation of Minutes of 1st Meeting  Progress on Agenda Items of 1st Meeting  Discussion on Fresh.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
DIMENSIONS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION AND CHALLENGES OF FUTURE.
University of Warsaw The Office for Quality of Education 11th of December th of December 2008.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
TIME LINE FOR PROGRAM REVIEWS. BASIC MAP OF PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESSES.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Quality Enhancement Cell University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Lahore 10 th Meeting of QECs Heads By Dr. Muhammad Aleem Director QEC
AMU DoQuP FINAL REPORT MD, PhD, Associate Professor G.Ahmadov Azerbaijan Medical University Bishkek, April 22, 2015.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL, THE MOST BENEFICENT.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
SELF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA 1.Program Mission Objectives and Outcomes 2.Curriculum Design and Organization 3.Laboratories and Computing Facilities 4.Student.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Community College Conducts a Workshop on … Community College conducted a workshop on "Together towards Pioneering in Education and Excellence in Learning"
University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Lahore 11 th Meeting of QECs Heads by Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Deputy Director QEC Deputy Director QEC.
THE QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ACCREDITATION Project Outcomes and Activities.
2 LATEST STATUS OF FACULTY OF ISLAMIC STUDIES DepartmentProgram TeamsSAR Received Sent Back For Changes SAR Received After Improvement Audit Completed.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Yes, It’s Time!  10 years after the most recent visit ( )  (probably spring semester)  SMSU proposes dates; HLC replies  Much to be.
Pharmacy School Self Study Prof. Abdalla Elkhawad UMST.
Planning for Academic Program Review Site Visits
Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Institutions(HEIs) Professor Dr Mesbahuddin Ahmed Head of Quality Assurance Unit UGC, Bangladesh.
1 Michigan State University Preparation for EC 2000 Thomas F. Wolff, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Michigan.
University of Warsaw. The quality of education assurance and enhancement system at the University of Warsaw.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Presenter Prof. Dr. Aamir Ijaz Prof. Dr. Aamir Ijaz Director, Quality Enhancement Cell, Director, Quality Enhancement Cell, University of the Punjab, Lahore,
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Quality Assurance in Higher Education
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
2. Quality Assurance Unit (QAU)
19th Meeting of Heads of QECs (Phase I &II) HEC Regional Office, Lahore Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director (Feb 14, 2014)
Institutional Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)
Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level
Time Line for Program Reviews
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
To achieve improvement through: Self assessment Benchmarking
Time Line for Program Reviews
Fort Valley State University
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Presentation transcript:

Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director

Establishment of QEC The QEC at UVAS was established in Dec, 2006 First Director assumed the charged in Feb, 2007 Staff hiring was done in June 2007

Vision and Mission (QEC) Vision To achieve excellence in academic standards in attaining the status of world class renowned institution Mission To ensure and improve quality of academic programs through implementing internationally acclaimed academic quality assurance processes to develop our students for meeting the current challenges of the market. Globally competitive quality education is what we strive for. Honoring the team, valuing the students, and following the golden principles of education is our philosophy.

Objectives Of QEC To instill scientific, objective based education and play a creative role in response to emerging professional challenges towards Veterinary, its ancillary professions and the community To ensure quality education at the University under the umbrella of Quality Assurance Agency of H EC To identify and rectify the gaps hampering imparting quality education

Objectives Of QEC To build the capacity of the faculty according to the modern lines To establish the standard parameters for quality education, training, assessment and evaluation To identify the modern tools in teaching and research and incorporate it in education system as and when needed

Self Assessment (SA) Assessment conducted by the Institution/ Department itself to assess whether programs meet the educational objectives and outcomes with the purpose to improve program's quality and enhancing students learning

Objectives of SA Improve and maintain academic standards Enhance students' learning Verify that the existing programs meet their objectives and institutional goals Provide feedback for quality assurance of academic programs

Mechanism of SA The QEC initiates the SA Program team (PT) collects data for preparing self- assessment report (SAR) about the program The department submit the SAR to the QEC through the concerned Dean/HOD The QEC reviews the SAR within one month to ensure its preparation as per required format The Vice Chancellor forms a assessment team (AT) in consultation with the QEC recommendations

The AT comprises of 2-3 members from within or outside the university The QEC plans and schedules the AT visit The AT conducts the assessment, submits a report and presents its findings in an exit meeting, attended by the QEC, Dean and PT and faculty members The QEC submit an executive summary on the AT findings to the Vice Chancellor

The Department prepare and submit an implementation plan (IP) to QEC based on the AT findings The QEC follow up on the IP to ensure departments are adhering to the IP The academic department must inform the QEC each time a corrective action is implemented QEC review the implementation plan once a semester to assess the progress of IP

QEC initiates SA through the dean one semester prior to the assessment Department forms the PT that will be responsible for preparing SAR QEC reviews the Documentation within one month SAR Complete The Vice Chancellor / Rector forms the AT in consultation with the concerned dean based on the recommendation of the QEC YES NO

QEC plans and visit The AT conducts assessment and presents its findings to QEC, Dean, PT and dept. faculty The QEC submits an executive summary to the Vice Chancellor / Rector Department prepares implementation plan as in table A.2 Follow up of the implementation plan by QEC Legend · QEC: Quality Assurance Committee · PT: Program Team · SA: Self Assessment · SAR: Self Assessment Report

Program Team (PT)and TORs Group of officers of the Institute/ Department Nominated by the Head of the Institute/ Department Responsible for conducting different surveys (Teachers’ evaluation, Course evaluation, Course review report, Graduating students survey, Research review form, Alumni Survey, Employer survey etc) Responsible for data analysis and report preparation of these surveys PT is a contact group during the assessment period Maintain the record of all the supporting documents addressing various standards of the SAR

Responsible for preparing SAR within dead line and send it to QEC for timely feedback To provide justification for each standard if it is not applicable in SAR To attend the SAR meetings as and when required To ensure that Self Assessment Mechanism is being implemented as per given guidelines To coordinate with other departments/faculty members as and when required for the completion of the SAR

Assessment Team (AT) A group of three to four officers/officials with one chairman of the Team. One of the members must be a Subject Specialist from within or outside university. Nominations are proposed by the Director QEC to the Vice Chancellor to finalize the team selection AT is Responsible for the evaluation of SAR

TORs of Assessment Team To review SAR report as per guidelines provided by QEC To visit the Department/Institute with other members and verify the contents of SAR To attend meetings on the findings of visits and sharing of experiences To draft a report on the prescribed format based on the findings of visits

THANK YOU