Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Monitoring, Evaluation & Technical Assistance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Regional Adviser on Human Rights and the Law, UNDP Regional Center WCA
1 Measuring ICT4D: ITUs Focus on Household and Individual Market, Economics & Finance Unit Telecommunication Development Bureau.
Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April
Key elements to develop a national strategic plan for TB control Malgosia Grzemska Stop TB Department WHO, Geneva, Switzerland EURO/TBTEAM Regional Workshop.
SYSTEM OF EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE Heidi Berner H Head of Management Control Division Budget Office,
Training for Participants Date, Location, Venue 1 Welcome! Welcome to PEM 2 Module!
 Capacity Development; National Systems / Global Fund Summary of the implementation capacities for National Programs and Global Fund Grants For HIV /TB.
IFAD Reform towards a better development effectiveness How can we all do better? Mohamed Béavogui Director, West and Central Africa January 2009.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
YMCA Proposal Writing Successful Strategies for Financial Development.
Performance Monitoring and Financial Reports Performance Monitoring and Financial Reports UNAIDS and Unified Budget and Workplan (UBW)
United Nations Statistics Division
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
FAO NAMA learning tool to support NAMA preparation in agriculture
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Overview of New Funding Model May 17, 2013 Astana, Kazakhstan.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
TEMPUS IV- Quick recommendations on how to make a good proposal Jordanian National Tempus Information Day 15/12/2010 Jordanian University.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
How to use the VSS to design a National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) 1.
Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa Accra, Ghana, 9-11 July 2009 Tracking National Portfolios and Assessing Results.
February 21, JAS Consultation between the Government of Tanzania and Development Partners February 21, 2006 Courtyard Hotel, Dar es Salaam.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Gulana Hajiyeva Environmental Specialist World Bank Moscow Safeguards Training, May 30 – June 1, 2012.
IPA Funds Monitoring and Evaluation December Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Improving Aid Coordination in Tajikistan Aid Coordination in Tajikistan Improving and Challenges Aid Coordination in Tajikistan Improving and Challenges.
Overview of the Global Fund Procurement and Supply Management Issues Workshop for LAC Consultants th July 2009 Pharmaceutical Management Advisory.
M ODULE 5 PART 1: Introduction to Consolidation of Pharmaceutical and Health Product Management (PHPM) in the SSF Context GLOBAL FUND GRANT CONSOLIDATION.
Advancing UNAIDS support to empowering young people to protect themselves from HIV Consultation, New York, October 2009.
M&E requirements for grant signing: M&E Plan Workshop on effective Global Fund Grant negotiation and implementation planning January 2008 Manila,
M&E System Strengthening Tool Workshop on effective Global Fund Grant negotiation and implementation planning January 2008 Manila, Philippines Monitoring.
Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in West and Central Africa June 2008, Douala, Cameroon.
Global Fund Assessments Part II: Understanding Assessment Results Geneva – December 2005.
IFAD Reform towards a better development effectiveness How can we all do better? Mohamed Tounessi Bamba Zoumana Virginia Cameroon Retreat 4-5 November.
WHO EURO In Country Coordination and Strengthening National Interagency Coordinating Committees.
M ODULE 6 PART 1: Planning and Stakeholder Management GLOBAL FUND GRANT CONSOLIDATION WORKSHOP DATE.
Recent Developments of the PEFA Program Video-conference of the PEMPAL BCOP PEFA Working Group February 20, 2009 Frans Ronsholt Head of PEFA Secretariat.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Grant Application Form (Annex A) Grant Application Form (Annex A) 2nd Call for Proposals.
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
Roadmap & Actions Expert Consultation Health in All Policies.
Comprehensive M&E Systems: Identifying Resources to Support M&E Plans for National TB Programs Lisa V. Adams, MD E&E Regional Workshop Kiev, Ukraine May.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
NFM: Modular Template Measurement Framework: Modules, Interventions and Indicators LFA M&E Training February
Capacity Assessment of Implementers LFA PSM expert workshop January 2014.
National workshop Pilot testing of Guidelines for updating of national implementation plans to address the new persistent organic pollutants in Abuja,
Support to National REDD+ Action: Global Programme Framework (SNA) Work Plan and Budget 2015 Information and Knowledge Sharing Sessions Twelfth.
Support National Social Protection Strategy (NSPS) CARD/SPCU 1.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 11. Reporting.
GFDRR Work Plan April 27, 2016 Luis Tineo
Global Coordination Platform
UNEP/Global Mechanism support for UNCCD reporting
Workshop on MDG Monitoring United Nations Statistics Division
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
UN Support to SDG implementation in Seychelles.
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
April 2011.
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Proposed Regional Medium-term Civil Registration and Vital Statistics Plan First Conference of African Ministers Responsible for Civil Registration August.
Field monitoring Project (number and title)
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Presentation transcript:

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Monitoring, Evaluation & Technical Assistance

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Session Goals Identify key entry points for TA Demonstrate linkages between M&E, procurement and finance Reemphasize the importance of M&E in the PBF model.

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Entry Points for TA in M&E Proposal development 1.M&E Plan 2.Attachment A / Performance Framework Grant negotiation Grant implementation

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 The Performance Framework The Performance Framework is a legally-binding document attached to the grant agreement. It mainly focuses on a subset of indicators from the M&E plan which are used to measure the program’s performance and consequently inform disbursement decisions. The M&E Plan An M&E plan is typically a document developed in consultation with all major stakeholders that describes how the national (or Global Fund grant-specific) M&E system works and the costed actions needed to strengthen it over a set period of time. M&E Plan vs the Performance Framework

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Features of a “good” M&E Plan Information requiredInformation desired M&E FrameworkEvaluation and research Data collectionData management Information products (dissemination) Capacity building Data Quality AssuranceCoordination between Agencies and units Action Plan M&E budget (5-10%)

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 What M&E Plan to submit? Normally PR should submit the National M&E plan, unless: Multi-country proposal  Regional M&E Plan National M&E Plan does  National M&E Plan with not include details GF-specific annex required for GF grant No National M&E Plan  Submission of GF-specific M&E plan and subsequent elaboration of National M&E plan

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Most Common Pitfalls with M&E Plans Budget – 5-10% Action plan Data quality assurance mechanisms Description of how system functions Impact / outcome framework

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 M&E Budget Ensure sufficient budget allocation for M&E and for TA Break down M&E costs by cost category Show GF contribution to national M&E agenda and budget (vis a vis the gap)

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 M&E Budget Cost Categories M&E Personnel M&E Technical assistance Training, workshop and meetings Data quality assurance Equipment, infrastructure (including IT) and consumables/running costs Production of M&E Plans, work plans, guidelines, tools and reports Surveys, surveillance, operational research and special studies

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 TA for the Performance Framework 1.Impact / outcome framework 2.Baselines 3.Target setting

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Impact / Outcome Framework Clear description of national I/O agenda Aligned to national priorities, targets and plans Sufficient budget allocation for measurement Show contribution from other partners and demonstrate funding gap

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Quote from Technical Review Panel “The TRP found the overall quality of the performance frameworks presented as poor. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) capacity is still weak and predominantly dependent on process rather than outcome and impact indicators.”

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Baselines Ensure updated baselines used in proposals Provide solid estimates for target populations For baselines and reporting on routine monitoring, provide number and %

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Target Setting Ensure targets are in line with overall goals Based on epidemiological situation, past performance, capacity in country, capacity for scale up etc. Value for money Clear link with finance and procurement

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Key messages  Ensure alignment to national strategy’s objectives, indicators and targets.  Support the submission of the national M&E plan every time a grant specific M&E plan is not needed.

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Entry Points for TA in M&E Proposal development Grant negotiation Grant implementation

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 TA Entry Points during Grant Negotiation M&E systems strengthening workshops Development of M&E strengthening action plans Development of M&E plans Assistance with performance frameworks

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Entry Points for TA in M&E Proposal development Grant negotiation Grant implementation

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 TA during Grant Implementation Address issues identified ad-hoc, through DQA or OSDV Implementation of M&E system strengthening action plan

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 The Most Common M&E Issues where TA Could Help during implementation Systems Training of people Operational definitions (of indicators)

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Final Thoughts Vital role of TA at all stages of Global Fund grants Importance of M&E in the performance based funding model Be honest and realistic with your clients

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Group Exercise

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Exercise Instructions Goal: To understand, through a real world example, the interlinkages for TA between M&E, procurement and finance Groups of 5 or 6 Methodology: Group-based problem solving and development of TA action plan. Expected Outputs: –Diagnosis of problem –Identification of potential solutions –TA action plan from M&E perspective

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009

Extra Slides It would be helpful to prepare an introduction to each session (1 slide) explaining: The methodology of the session (presentation – Q&A – exercise) Set of questions. Number of groups for the exercise. Expected output. The introduction format should be the same for the three presentations, a common methodology, common tool, with different specific results (and questions). The common output could represent a better understanding of the links and interdependence between the different areas that characterize a proposal (or technical assistance).

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 M&E Framework & Data collection methods (required) List of indicators as agreed upon in the national strategy For each indicator:  Indicator name  Baseline values with dates and relevant source of data  Targets set according to frequency of measurement  Data collection method for the indicator – e.g. health information system, programme monitoring, ANC sentinel surveillance, population-based surveys, facility-based surveys, etc.  Frequency of data collection (monthly, quarterly, annual, 3 years, etc.)  Person/agency responsible for data collection and reporting (if agency, please specify relevant unit)

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Information products (required)  The M&E plan should explain how the data collected and analyzed will be made available to stakeholders and the general public.  E.g.: periodic reports, websites, stakeholders’ meetings, etc.

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Data quality assurance (required)  The M&E plan should contain a data verification and quality assurance system  The Global Fund has developed a system of on-site data verification that could be expanded beyond Global Fund grants

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Action Plan (required)  The M&E plan should include an Action Plan which includes activities, time of implementation, responsible unit and budget  Should be developed and agreed upon among different stakeholders (especially those involved in the implementation and support of the activities included)  Can be developed with M&E System Strengthening tool which should be considered a living document, constantly monitored and to be reviewed and updated on a regular basis.

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 M&E Budget (required)  The M&E plan should contain an M&E budget with sources of funding and financial gaps  Global Fund contribution should be indicated  5-10% of grant is recommended to be used to strengthen the M&E system  Examples of budget items are: HMIS strengthening, TA, workshops, surveys, staff, information products, etc.

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Evaluation and OR (desirable)  Operational research (OR)  Evaluation  Other types of studies that complement the information collected through the indicators and will periodically evaluate the programme and M&E system

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Data management (desirable)  how the data is received, stored & analyzed (specify electronic database - if online, provide link) and accessed by relevant actors  data flow from sources to final users

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Capacity building (desirable)  The M&E plan should include a description of the capacity present at the time of developing the plan  capacity gaps  strategy adopted to improve the M&E capacity over the plan’s lifespan

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Coordination (desirable) The M&E plan should include:  the agencies and units responsible to run the M&E system and implement the M&E plan  the relevant M&E units at national and, if they exist, sub- national levels  recommendation to include a multi-sector M&E Technical Working Group

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Herramienta de Fortalecimiento de los Sistemas de Monitoreo y Evaluación

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 Qué es la Herramienta de Fortalecimiento de los Sistemas de Monitoreo y Evaluación? Paso 1: Diagnóstico Paso 2: Plan de Acción

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 La Herramienta de Fortalecimiento de los Sistemas de M&E Una herramienta acordada con nuestros socios técnicos (pronto será reemplazada con una sola herramienta con 12 componentes) Cubre tres listas de comprobación complementarias:  Plan de M&E  Capacidades de gestión de la información de la Unidad de Gestión (unidad de Monitoreo y Evaluación)  Sistemas de Notificación de Datos por Área de Programa (e.g., ARV, DOTS)

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 ■Un plan de acción detallado con el presupuesto para fortalecer los sistemas de M&E ■Una discusión mas amplia durante la negociación de la subvención y/o durante la implementación de la subvención. ■Identificación de las necesidades que requieren apoyo técnico (y el proveedor de este apoyo) ■Un acuerdo con los socios técnicos del país sobre los iniciativas compartidas y su financiamiento (p.e., la organización de encuestas) Los resultados que se esperan son:

Ciudad de Panamá, Julio 2009 El Ciclo de Fortalecimiento de M&E Evaluar el sistema de M&E Desarrollar/revisar el Plan de M&E y Plan de Acción y Fortalecimiento Implementar el Plan de M&E y Plan de Acción y Fortalecimiento Dar Seguimiento