Accountability to Responsibility in a STAAR World! TEPSA Summer Conference 2014 Ty Duncan, ESC 17 on Twitter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Advertisements

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Lessons Learned From STAAR Released Items. “Follow” ESC 17 Instructional Leaders On Twitter
Accountability 2013 and Beyond! Tori Shauna Ty
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
Action Items For Accountability 2015 URGENT and INTENSE.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
LINKING ACCOUNTABILITY AND INSTRUCTION Ty Duncan ESC 17 Coordinator of Accountability and #esc17
Grading the Top End Ty Duncan Senior Specialist Region 17 Education Service Center
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
Accountability Update Professional Service Provider Update and Network Meeting April 1,
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Specialist Things Every Parent Should Know.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Overview Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR): What You Need to Know Feb. 16, 2012 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Accountability Update District Testing Coordinator Advisory Committee Meeting March 20,
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Accountability to Responsibility in a STAAR World! Shauna Lane, ESC Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator
Accountability 2014!! Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Shauna Lane, ESC 17 Ty.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-4:00.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
TETN Session #18319 | November 14, 2013 | 1:00-3:00 p.m. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
Lazbuddie ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
Accountability Update Ty
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
July 11, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Michael Murphy State and Federal Accountability.
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
Improvement 101 – Back to the Basics
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Accountability Update
State and Federal Accountability Overview
2014 State Accountability Ratings
Presentation transcript:

Accountability to Responsibility in a STAAR World! TEPSA Summer Conference 2014 Ty Duncan, ESC 17 on Twitter

Like our Facebook Wall for Live Updates!! Instructional-Leaders/ Follow us @esc17counselors

Learning is not attained by chance, it must be sought for with ardor and attended to with diligence. -Abigail Adams

Take a Look at Our Blog!!

Session Objectives This session will: Detail the implications of the Accountability System as we move forward in Texas. Explore both the procedural and cultural implications of STAAR on our districts and campuses as well as look at practical ways to ensure campus and districts ensure they are meeting student needs while also meeting the goals intended goals of the accountability system in Texas. Challenge us to meet our responsibility to the students we serve while working within the confines of a sophisticated accountability system. Come prepared to look at data and research that will influence your culture in a positive way.

Accountability vs. Responsibility What drives us to the right thing? Is the Accountability System the driver? Would we do the right thing if the Accountability system did not exist?

Index 1: Student Achievement Index 1 Student Achievement provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students.  Subjects: Combined over Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies.  Student Groups: All Students only  Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II (Satisfactory) 7

Pass/Fail Culture

Subject Phase 1Phase 2 FinalLevel III Reading Grade 353%65%75%88% Grade 452%66%77%86% Grade 554%65%76%87% Grade 652%65%75%88% Grade 752%64%74%84% Grade 850%63%75%85% English I53%60%63%85% English II54%59%63%85% Math Grade 359%72%83%91% Grade 460%71%81%90% Grade 554%66%78%88% Grade 642%58%71%87% Grade 744%56%69%85% Grade 839%52%64%88% Algebra 137%50%61%83% Science Grade 559%70%80%91% Grade 856%65%74%78% Biology37%51%61%83% Social Studies Grade 850%62%73%83% US History41%53%65%81% Writing Grade 452%61%68%84% Grade 754%63%71%85% Index Index Index Index Index Index Index Index

Raising the Instructional Bar!

The Structure of Knowledge Concept Topic Principle Generalization FACTSFACTS FACTSFACTS FACTSFACTS FACTSFACTS FACTSFACTS FACTSFACTS FACTSFACTS FACTSFACTS Lynn Erickson -- Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction for the Thinking Classroom, 2007

Connecting Topics ColonizationRevolution New Nation Manifest Destiny Civil War Raising the Instructional Bar!

Colonization Manifest Destiny New Nation Revolution Civil War Expansion--- Democracy --- Conflict --- Culture--- Industrialization Raising the Instructional Bar!

Academic Vocabulary Immersion nalleaders&from=8/1/2013&to=8/31/2013

Index 2: Student Progress 15 Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners.  By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, and Writing for available grades.  Credit based on weighted performance:  One point credit given for each percentage of students at the Met growth expectations level.  Two point credit given for each percentage of students at the Exceeded growth expectations level.

The greatest sin a coach can commit is to allow kids to slide by. This goes for the classroom as well as the court." - Hubie Brown \

Maybe the Coaches Have It Right! They do not wait till the season is over analyze game film because that would not be responsive enough. Formative assessment is the only way to really grow students! Benchmarks are fine, but in the end they are not responsive enough. Be responsive! structionalleaders&from=4/1/2013&to=4/30/ structionalleaders&from=4/1/2013&to=4/30/201 3

Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps 18  Credit based on weighted performance:  Phase-in Level II satisfactory performance One point for each percent of students at the phase-in Level II satisfactory performance standard.  Level III advanced performance (2014 and beyond) Two points for each percent of students at the Level III advanced performance standard. Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups.

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness 19 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the importance for students to receive a high school diploma that provides them with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school.  Graduation Score: Combined performance across the graduation and dropout rates for  Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups OR  Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index.  RHSP/AHSP Graduates for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups  STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level II on Two Test for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups (2014 and beyond)  College Ready Graduates

Measure The Standard Not “The Work” 5) History. The student understands the challenges confronted by the government and its leaders in the early years of the republic and the Age of Jackson. The student is expected to: (E) identify the foreign policies of presidents Washington through Monroe and explain the impact of Washington's Farewell Address and the Monroe Doctrine; Does a student who matches the people found in (E)on a worksheet deserve a hundred in the grade book? How do you define FULL KNOWLEDGE of the student expectation above?

Stop Talking About Differentiation and Do It!! Student Expectation: (E) identify the foreign policies of presidents Washington through Monroe and explain the impact of Washington's Farewell Address and the Monroe Doctrine; Student Expectation: (E) identify the foreign policies of presidents Washington through Monroe and explain the impact of Washington's Farewell Address and the Monroe Doctrine; Identify Presidents foreign policy? Debate the foreign policy that would best suit current political tensions in Syria! Read the Farewell Address and Monroe Doctrine and compare their application? Take a look at Roosevelt’s Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Is it necessary? Why would Washington argue against it?

Level III is Not That Far Away!!

State Assessment and CREATIVITY are not mutually exclusive!!!!

Accountability vs. Responsibility What is Responsible? – Raising the Bar!! – Vocabulary Immersion – Increase Responsiveness – Measure Standard and Not “the Work” – Differentiate to Level III

Take a Look at Our Blog!!

Like our Facebook Wall for Live Updates!! Instructional-Leaders/ Follow us @esc17counselors

Resources  Frequently Asked Questions About Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)  Performance Reporting Home Page  2013 Accountability System Frequently Asked Questions TCDSS Summer Collaborative Lynn Erickson -- Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction for the Thinking Classroom, 2007