Concept of Driver Assistance The ASV Project of Japan Geneva November 2003 Informal Document No. 20 (131 st WP.29, agenda item 2.4.)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Field Operational Tests in 7FP Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector DG INFSO - ICT for transport.
Advertisements

Warning Timing for AEBS AEBS/LDWS Proposal of Warning Timing 1) Warning has two functions; to induce the driver to take an avoiding maneuver.
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2013 Overview of International Activities to Limit Distraction Document No. ITS (21st ITS,
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
Indirect Field of Vision in Large Vehicles 1 Informal document GRSG (103rd GRSG, 2-5 October 2012 Agenda item 12) Submitted by the expert from Japan.
I-295 / I-76 / NJ 42 Incident Management Task Force in New Jersey
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism September 2009 Hideto Hakakenaka Head, ITS Division, National Institute for Land and Infrastructure.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Information on mandatory fitting of advanced safety systems in Japan Engineering Policy Division.
Technical Regulating in the Russian Federation and Adoption into Its National Laws of the Global Technical Regulations Established under 1998 Agreement.
AFS Main Beam (Driving Beam) Improvements Presentation to WP th Session November 2008 Informal document No. WP th WP.29, November.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Definition for Levels of Automation
10 November 2009 Masahiko NAITO MLIT, JAPAN Future direction for harmonization of vehicle regulations ~ Japanese contribution to WP29 ~ Informal Document.
Hans-Martin Gerhard28. April 2010 Seite 1Dr. Ing. h. c. F. Porsche AG Pedestrian Safety - Quiet Cars Hans-Martin Gerhard Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Quiet.
1 Survey on the Effectiveness of Safety Belt Reminder System Japan December 2006 Informal Document No. GRSP th GRSP 12th- 15th December 2006 Agenda.
Bringing intelligent systems to the market: the new European research challenge of Field Operational Tests Fabrizio Minarini Head of Sector ICT for Transport.
The negative impact of certain technical aspects on safety in the right-hand traffic Andrzej Bogdanowicz – Ministry of Infrastructure.
Summary of Activities up to Now March 16, th ITS Informal Group Meeting K. Hiramatsu and M. Sekine NTSEL: National Traffic Safety and Environmental.
1 Consideration of Issues Japan Presentation Informal document No. GRRF-S08-13 Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008 Agenda item 5.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
Transmitted by the representative of JAPAN Toward Realization of the “Mutual Recognition of International Whole Vehicle Type Approval (IWVTA)” under the.
Human Factors Concerns for Design & Performance of Warnings J.L.Harbluk & P.C. Burns Ergonomics & Crash Avoidance, Transport Canada Human Factors Forum.
SAFESPOT Project Kick off Meeting February 16 th and 17 th 2006 Rome 1 Integrated Project Co-operative Systems for Road Safety “Smart Vehicles on Smart.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - February 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT Japan.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Approval System for New Mobility The 52 nd Session for GRSP ( ~14 ) Ministry of Land,
Mutual Recognition Arrangement under UN/ECE 1958 agreement under UN/ECE 1958 agreement 21 st APEC TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP Meeting Takao Onoda Ministry.
Traffic Accidents caused by Lane Departure in Japan  Data of Traffic Accidents around Japan Transmitted by the expert from Japan Informal document GRRF
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
FP6 IST Call 4 SO eSafety – Co-operative Systems for Road Transport European Commission - DG Information Society and Media Unit C.5: ICT for Transport.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Göteborg Incident Management National guidelines from Denmark Iben Louring Mortensen (Danish Road Directorate)
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism New Priorities of Japan -Future Measures for Vehicle Safety for a Society with No Traffic Accidents-
Brief Review up to Now 1 March 11, 2011, Geneva UNECE/WP29/ITS Informal Group 19th Meeting T. Onoda & K. Hiramatsu, Japan Transmitted by expert from JAPANInformal.
Intelligent Traffic Environmental System (ITES-AIR)
December 2015 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Transmitted by the expert from JapanGRSP Rev.1 (58th GRSP, 8-11 December 2015,
Cycle of Vehicle Safety Measures in Japan - Study process before & after rulemaking procedure Issue of safety regulations Enforcement (type approval &
1. Overview of the past and future work of WP29 ITS Round Table 18/2/2004 Geneva Kenji Wani Co-chairman of ITS informal Group, ECE/WP29 Ministry of Land,
V8 Working at height and the prevention of falls from vehicles.
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles Excerpts from the relevant sections of the ToR: II. Working items to be covered (details.
© International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2009 Page 1 Improve Road Safety – Target the Main Cause Effectively UNECE Road Safety Seminar Minsk, 13 May.
Engineering College, Tuwa. Design Engineering 1 - B  Guided by, SUBMITTED BY, PRAGNESH PATEL SHAH HETAXI ( ) RAJPUT VIVEK ( ) SOLANKI.
FIA MOBILITY & TOURISM Gerd Preuss, FIA Representative at UNECE, WP 29 Protection Against Mileage Fraud Current Status in ITS-AD 110 th GRSG Meeting Geneva,
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
© International Road Transport Union (IRU) 2007 Page 1 Improve Road Safety – Target the Right User “ Results of the European Truck Accident Causation study”
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Common Understanding on Major Horizontal Issues and Legal Obstacles
Submitted by the expert form Japan Document No. ITS/AD-09-12
Concept of ACSF TAN (Type Approval Number)
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
Development of the Japan’s RDE (Real Driving Emission) procedure
Activities on Advanced ITS Radiocommunications
Statement of Principles on the Design of High-Priority Warning Signals
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Expansion of consideration target of ITS-AD IWG
Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office
Activities on Advanced ITS Radiocommunications
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
ENabling SafE Multi-Brand Platooning for Europe
Union College Utility Cart Safety Program
Sergio Buonomo Counselor ITU-R Study Group 5
          Driver Safety Meeting.
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Safety concept for automated driving systems
Interpretation of 06 series of amendments to Regulation No. 48
Status report from ITU-R WP 5A on ITS activities
AV Regulation in Florida
GRE/2012/27... DRIVERS OPINION POOL
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Informal document GRVA-04-34
Presentation transcript:

Concept of Driver Assistance The ASV Project of Japan Geneva November 2003 Informal Document No. 20 (131 st WP.29, agenda item 2.4.)

What is ASV ?  ASV = Advanced Safety Vehicle  Vehicles equipped with systems assisting the driver’s safe driving, utilizing the ITS technology Driving assistance : Providing information, warning, and control  Drastically reducing accidents caused by mis-operations of drivers  ASV project = Promotion of research and development of ASV technologies through the concerted cooperation of the government, academics and industries

Phase 1 ASVPhase 2 ASVPhase 3 ASV Period FY1991-FY1995FY1996-FY2000FY2001-FY2005 Task Verification of technical feasibility Environmental preparations for realization of practical application Technology development; Study of promotion of dissemination Vehicle models Passenger vehicles passenger vehicles, trucks, buses and two-wheeled vehicles  SubjectsVehicles only Vehicles only, Coordination with road infrastructure Vehicles only, Coordination with other vehicles, etc, Coordination with road infrastructure Outline of the ASV Project

Design Principles of ASV 1.Driver Assistance ASV technologies should understand driver’s wills and support their safe driving based on the concept of driver responsibility. 2.Driver Acceptance ASV technologies should be easy to use and be trusted by drivers. This means that a human-machine interface design should be appropriately implemented. 3.Social Acceptance ASV technology-equipped vehicle must operate with unequipped vehicles and pedestrians. Therefore, we must consider how to obtain proper understanding of the public.

“Concept of Driver Assistance“ (for driver load reduction control technologies) 1.The system should act after confirming the will and intention of the driver. 2.The system should assist driver in safety. 3.The system should be checked by the driver at any time. 4.The system should inspire a proper amount of confidence in the driver, not causing him to place too much confidence nor distrust in the system. 5.The system should be overridden by the driver. 6.The system’s control should be smoothly passed over to the driver when the situation goes beyond the range of assistance of the system. 7.The system should not make a negative impact to the traffic environment. 8.There should be mature society to accept the system.

1.The system should act according to the will of the driver or what the driver normally expects in terms of safety. 2.The system should assist driver in safety. 3.The system should be checked by the driver at any time. 4.The system should inspire a proper amount of confidence in the driver, not causing him to place too much confidence nor distrust in the system. 5.The system should be overridden by the driver in the case that the driver operates for more safety. 6.The system’s control should be smoothly passed over to the driver when the situation goes beyond the range of assistance of the system and if a room for operation by the driver is left. 7.The system should not make a negative impact to the traffic environment. 8.There should be mature society to accept the system. “Concept of Driver Assistance“ (for accident avoidance or mitigating control technologies)

Checking process using Concept of Driver Assistance as checking list MLIT checks a new technology for driver assistance through a manufacturer’s technical explanation on the consideration of it’s technology in accordance with “Concept of Driver Assistance.” For carrying the confirmation smoothly, technical guideline may be utilized.

Concept of Driver Assistance & Technical Guideline MLIT checks the design concepts of new technologies using “Concept of Driver Assistance.” If a technology has been confirmed to meet the technical guideline, checking is omitted Based on the result of checking, a technical guideline may be modified or newly defined.