1. 1 Survey on the Effectiveness of Safety Belt Reminder System Japan December 2006 Informal Document No. GRSP-40-16 40 th GRSP 12th- 15th December 2006 Agenda Item B.1.3.

2. 2  In Japan, it has been mandatory since March 2005 to equip the driver’s seat of passenger cars with the safety belt reminder system (SBR) (mandatory for new-model vehicles since September 2005). 1. Objectives  To confirm the effect, following survey has been conducted.  The rate of safety belt use with / without SBR  How and when SBR is activated  Positive and negative evaluations of its functions  Passenger seat SBR effect for future reference

3. 3 The 6448 vehicles driver’s use/non-use of safety belt was visually checked at parking lot entrances of “road station of arterial roads (speed limit 60 km/h)” and “shopping mall”. Shopping Mall 2. Method of Survey Passenger cars were selected with / without SBR equipped. 268 SBR-equipped vehicles users were interviewed. Road station of arterial road

4. 4 97.3 90.1 70 80 90 100 With SBRWithout SBR Rate of use (%) ** *: p<0.05 **: p<0.01 Rate of Safety Belt Use with / without SBR 3. The rate of safety belt use with / without SBR 474 (7.4 %) vehicles were equipped with Driver SBR. The Safety belt use with SBR vehicles were +7.2% (97.3% ← 90.1%) higher than without vehicles. +7.2%

5. 5 1.8 2.7 4.9 5.4 8.5 24.7 50.2 0102030405060708090100 Other Always kept unused Unbuckled too early Forgotten Short-distance Being parked or reversing In parking lot/ property Delay of buckling-up Rate (%) Conditions of SBR Activation 4. How and when SBR is activated Most of activate condition was in short term such as “delay of buckling-up” and “ Short distance”. 65.3% trip time was with in 30 min. 30.6 34.7 22.0 6.7 4.5 1.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 15 or less 16-3031-6061-90.91-120 121 or more Rate (%) Trip Time Distribution Trip Time (min.)

6. 6 83.8 16.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 UsefulNot useful Rate (%) Effectiveness of SBR Audible Warning 5. Positive and negative evaluations of its functions Approx. 84% of the users answered that the SBR audible warning was useful. 74.6% users answered “No request” for SBR function. 74.6 2.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 2.0 3.9 5.1 9.0 0102030405060708090100 No request Other Elongate the duration Change to melodic alarm, etc. Activate the alarm earlier Turn up the volume Change the sound quality Change to voice Shorten the alarm duration Turn down the volume Rate (%) Request for SBR function

7. 7 95.7 84.7 70 80 90 100 With SBRWithout SBR Rate of use (%) ** *: p<0.05 **: p<0.01 Rate of Safety Belt Use by with / Without passenger’s seat SBR 6. Passenger seat SBR effect for future reference 2443 (38%) vehicles had passenger occupants. 116 (4.7%) vehicles were equipped with passenger seat SBR. The Safety belt use with SBR vehicle was +11.0% (95.7% ← 84.7%) higher than without vehicles. 11.2 % was activated by “Luggage on the seat”. 1.3 11.2 3.3 2.6 15.1 0.7 3.3 62.5 0102030405060708090100 Action in a moving vehicle Luggage on the seat Always kept unused Unbuckled too early Forgotten Short-distance/ unused In parking lot /property Delay of buckling-up Rate (%) Conditions of Passenger's Seat SBR Activation

8. 8  The rate of the driver’s safety belt use with SBR vehicles were +7.2 % higher than without vehicles. Therefore, SBR is very effective to increase the driver’s safety belt use.  SBR was activated mostly in short term such as delay of buckling-up or short distance driving. Therefore, Short term deactivation could considerably reduce the effective.  With regard to the reference investigation of passenger seat SBR, it was also effective, however, there was still a issue of caused by putting luggage and seating frequency. Therefore, further discussions for technical requirement and effectiveness study are necessary. 7. Summary