Goals & Objectives for Freight Mobility in Our Region Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 2012 Ports and Cities Conference Newcastle Dorte Ekelund, Executive Director Major Cities Unit Department of Infrastructure and Transport
Advertisements

Manitoba International Gateway Strategy Manitoba Infrastructure & Transportation.
Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
VTrans2035 Update March 30, Dironna Belton Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment.
MARYLAND’S FREIGHT STAKEHOLDER ADVISORY COMMITTEE Federal Highway Administration, Office of Freight Management and Operations Talking Freight Seminar Series.
Public Workshop Welcome -to the -. What is the ?
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
Freight Mobility Plan – Update Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region Sushil Nepal. Bill Thunberg. Mike.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Presented to: Florida Redevelopment Association Presented by: Bob Romig.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA’s Talking Freight Seminar presented by Michael Williamson Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April.
Freight Transportation Planning and Modeling CE 451/551.
California Freight Advisory Committee May 14, 2014.
Comprehensive Freight Movement Plan Pennsylvania Rail Freight Seminar May 22, 2013 Pennsylvania Long Range Transportation Plan Pennsylvania Long Range.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
Logistics and Regions. Trends The regions are becoming integrated in large-scale network economies (new markets conditions, reliance on global supply.
MTF Rail Development Forum
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
Dubai Government Policies for Enhancing the Competitiveness of Multimodal Transportation and Logistics Cluster June 2014.
Beyond the Border Action Plan Border Infrastructure Investment Plan (BIIP)
Planning for One Transportation System – Marine Highways Kevin Schoeben Deputy Director Office of Planning and Programming Illinois Department of Transportation.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Southern Dallas County Strategic Development Planning Project Capture the Value.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Multimodal Maturity of Virginia’s Transportation Corridors April 19, 2006 presented.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
Quality Region Principles The New Visions Plan addresses the region’s quality of life in a number of important ways and provides a framework for improving.
1 Florida Trade Flow Study presented to Florida Transportation Commission November 5, 2010 presented by Carrie Blanchard, Ph.D., Florida Chamber Foundation.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
Freight Council Webinar February 21, 2006 Anthony T. Furst Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations The Framework for National Freight.
Engaging Freight and Supply Chain Representatives in Public Sector Projects.
ESIP Federation Air Quality Cluster Partner Agencies.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
I-69 Corridor: A Citizens’ Report on Transportation Needs Judy Hawley Chair I-69 Corridor Advisory Committee.
“Connecting People and Places” REGIONAL MOBILITY PLAN Future Scenarios October 19, 2009.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative 2006.
Greening the Trade Corridors in North America: Why Corridors and Why Green? Benjamin Teitelbaum CEC, April 22 nd.
Linking Planning and Operations in Las Vegas Talking Operations Seminar March 23, 2005.
International Logistics Centres for Western NIS and the Caucasus Georgia: Areas in the vicinity of Tbilisi airport Ministry of Economy and Sustainable.
Southern California Association of Governments Freight Transportation: Emerging Issues for Southern California Alan Bowser Goods Movement PlanningWorkshop.
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
Virginia Office of Public-Private Partnerships (VAP3) Adopted Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) enabling legislation in 1995 Public-Private Education.
2060 Florida Transportation Plan Florida Model Task Force Meeting November 10, 2009.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
DRAFT INNER MELBOURNE ACTION PLAN Presented by Elissa McElroy IMAP Executive Officer January 2016.
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
Goals and ObjectivesFeb. 20, 2014 TEXAS FREIGHT MOBILITY PLAN: FACILITATING TEXAS’ ECONOMIC GROWTH AND GLOBAL COMPETIVENESS Regional Freight Advisory Council.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Freight Forum RTC Washoe March 31 st, The reliable, cost effective, and safe movement of goods and products across the State of Nevada and.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Project Overview – Phase 1
Prepared by: Paritosh Kasotia, Iowa Energy Office, IEDA
Ohio Rail Development Commission November 15, 2017 Meeting
North Carolina logistics study
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Goals & Objectives for Freight Mobility in Our Region Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region

Topics What is a freight mobility plan? How did we get here? Scoping process Goals and Objectives Implementation 2 Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region

History of Freight Planning in Region Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 3

What is a Freight Mobility Plan? Develops a regional strategy for freight movement, incorporating trucking, marine cargo, rail freight and air cargo, and intermodal connections between them Examines current and future freight issues as the region looks to preserve and enhance a reliable and efficient transportation system for the future Is developed through public-private sector coordination with input from freight stakeholders, economic development interests, and local, regional, state and federal transportation agencies Develops recommendations, priorities and strategies to address issues of particular importance to freight movers and users such as congestion and travel time reliability, system maintenance and preservation. Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 4

History of Freight Planning in Region North Carolina and South Carolina Departments of Transportation 2004 – NCDOT approves Statewide Strategic Highway Corridor network 2008 – NCDOT approves Statewide Mobility Plan – SCDOT approves the South Carolina Statewide Comprehensive Multimodal Long- Range Transportation Plan – South Carolina Department of Commerce updates State Rail Plan 2009 – North Carolina Governor Perdue establishes the Governor’s Logistics Task Force 2011 – NC Governor’s Logistics Task Force recommends administrative and funding reorganizations to address freight issues across North Carolina 2012 – South Carolina Statewide Comprehensive Multimodal Long-Range Transportation Plan updated to include an expanded freight component Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 5

History of Freight Planning in Region Economic Development Agencies 2005 – CCOG Regional Comprehensive Economic Community Assessment Report identifies growing logistics industry cluster in region as valuable competitive advantage during US Dept of Commerce EDA funded economic development planning process 2007 – Centralina Economic Development Commission (CEDC) issues the EDA approved Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) report that includes a regional priority strategy of promoting and advancing the Logistics Industry cluster Metropolitan Planning Organizations 2010 – MUMPO, GUAMPO, CRMPO, and RFATS develop separate 2035 Long-Range Transportation Plans, each with freight components for their respective study areas. Other Regional Plans 2011– North Carolina’s Seven Portals Study identifies major intermodal facilities for the region and how they link with the region’s transportation network – Charleston Neck Area Study to address freight movements related to South Carolina Ports – Centralina Regional Transportation Study Policy Committee and stakeholders recommend a freight plan be the first product of ongoing coordinated transportation in the region Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 6

Scoping Process Spring Interdisciplinary freight plan identified as regional need Summer Discussions with NCDOT and reviewing regions throughout nation to identify potential plan focus areas and limits Fall Literature review and interview with area leaders December Bi-weekly stakeholder meetings to guide process Jan/Feb Initial round of open houses to solicit feedback on potential goals and objectives for process April Second, and final, round of open houses to review, confirm, and prioritize goals and objectives Summer Raise money to pay for plan Fall Initiate plan development, estimated to take 9-12 months Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 7

Stakeholder Meeting Participants CSX and Norfolk Southern Railroads L&C and Aberdeen, Carolina, and Western Railroads North Carolina and South Carolina Trucking Association Centralina and Catawba Regional Council of Governments Catawba Indian Nation Lancaster, Stanly, and York County economic development agencies All seven area transportation planning organizations Huntersville, Mooresville, and Gaston County North Carolina and South Carolina Departments of Transportation – Transportation planning staff – Rail planning staff – Board of Transportation and Highway Commission members Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 8

Goals and Objectives The following five goals with objectives that would form the basis for the scope for a plan to help improve freight movement throughout the 14-county Greater Charlotte bi-state region. The Goals and Objectives would: Identify Specific Recommendations- Identify recommendations in the areas of coordination, transportation, land use, economic development, environment and energy. Develop No New Organizations- The recommendations do not require the development of any new organizations or mandates. The recommendations instead provide guidance to transportation, land use, economic development, environmental, and private organizations and agencies. Provide Collective Benefit- When implemented, the recommendations can provide a safer and more efficient network for freight movement, improved land use planning, and more integrated economic development strategies. Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 9

Goal 1- Coordination The region has a range of existing plans and programs that each address a portion of the regional issue of freight mobility. Improved regular communication with an emphasis on cross-communication is key to advancing mutual supporting initiatives. Objective 1.1 – Establish a Regional Forum: Establish a regular public/private regional forum for information sharing on freight issues. Benefit: Increased coordination and dialogue. Objective 1.2 – Private Industry Participation: Invite freight providers and private industry representatives to area transportation planning agency meetings. Benefit: Increased awareness of, and comment on, legislative, policy, plan, and project updates. Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 10

Goal 2- Transportation A reliable transportation network is the backbone of freight planning and economic activity, yet funding does not exist to address all congestion, accessibility, and safety concerns in the region. Accommodating freight movement and improving network operations should therefore be fully incorporated in the transportation planning and congestion management processes. Objective 2.1 – Project Prioritization: Increased consideration of freight in project prioritization at the local level. Benefit: Improve status of freight-relevant projects in transportation plans and programs. Objective 2.2 – Intermodal Linkages: Improve linkages and movement time to intermodal facilities. Benefit: Facilitate traffic to and from facilities and increase accessibility for rail traffic. Objective 2.3 – Safety: Decrease impact of accidents and other incidents on arterial road and rail operations. Benefit: Provide more reliable and predictable travel times for freight movers. Objective 2.4 – Short-Range Strategies: Increase emphasis on short-range strategies to improve freight movement. Benefit: Implement high-value, low-cost projects to improve freight traffic. Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 11

Goal 3- Land Use Transportation plans help implement the land use vision for a community, and facilitate travel based on existing uses in a community. Local communities should work to aid reuse of existing commercial and industrial land for similar uses. Objective 3.1 – Redevelopment: Identify best practices for facilitating land redevelopment for freight intensive land uses. Benefit: Encourage reuse of existing industrial and commercial land where infrastructure exists. Objective 3.2 – Zoning: Identify best practices for zoning complementary land uses near freight intensive areas. Benefit: Minimize negative effects of freight intensive land uses. Objective 3.3 – Rest Areas: Identify strategies for accommodating rest area parking for drivers. Benefit: Improve quality of life for drivers and reduce incidence of trucks parking overnight in unsafe or otherwise conflicting locations. Objective 3.4 – Rail Siding Access: Establish best practices for preserving and identifying where to build rail siding access for freight users, particularly in rural areas. Benefit: Increased predictability for land owners and rail lines, and economic opportunity for communities and rail lines. Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 12

Goal 4- Economic Development A successful freight mobility plan will strengthen the economic prosperity of the region and support its position as a major distribution center. Areas of emphasis for economic development agencies will focus on meeting the needs of businesses throughout the supply chain in the transportation system. Objective 4.1 – Freight-Oriented Property Development: Identify and market current and future freight-oriented property located near appropriate transportation infrastructure. Benefit: Reduced demand for transportation improvements in undeveloped areas Objective 4.2 – Intermodal Efficiency: Regularly communicate with vested industries and organizations to improve the efficient transfer of goods between modes at intermodal terminals, ports, and distribution hubs. Benefit: Reduced costs and congestion, and increased capacity, at existing locations Objective 4.3 – Technology & Trends: Incorporate current freight analysis and intermodal coordination and technology trends into transportation planning processes. Benefit: Transportation planning agencies are kept abreast of trends in economic development and private sector data, operations, and technology. Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 13

Goal 5- Environment and Energy Freight movement requires a significant amount of energy. Therefore, greater efficiencies in the system that reduce congestion can in turn reduce emissions and fuel consumption along with the corresponding expense. These outcomes are a priority for the nation and private industries alike. Organizations, firms, and communities should therefore work together to identify strategies to increase freight system efficiencies and improve air quality. Objective 5.1- Idling Reduction: Increase availability of infrastructure to reduce engine idling. Benefit: Reduce energy consumption and air pollution, increase ability to meet air quality standards, as well as improve quality of life for drivers. Objective 5.2 – Emergency Management Coordination: Coordinate with local, state, and federal emergency management agencies to ensure their plans and policies address energy availability and system sustainability in their activities. Benefit: Increased community resilience during emergencies and other crises. Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 14

Next Steps Plan Initiation - The Request for Proposal and Plan initiation process is contingent upon funding. The area transportation planning agencies intend to initiate this plan in the Fall of 2012, contingent upon funding. This schedule is necessary to provide recommendations for the area transportation planning organizations’ long range plans, due in the Spring of Cost - The Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region Freight Mobility Plan is estimated to cost $400,000. Costs are based on data collection, complexity of freight networks, detail of recommendations, amount of coordination between public and private agencies. Costs for comparable plans range from $200,000 to in excess of $2 million. Funding - Currently, agencies expressing an interest in paying part of the cost include NCDOT ($100,000) and MUMPO ($50,000). Other potential funding sources include 1) private partners; and, 2) other local, regional and state commitments. Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 15

How To Get Involved 1.Join the Steering Committee, which will be providing guidance in the development of the Freight Mobility Plan Scope. 2.Sign-up to receive more information as this process moves forward. 3.Participate in future open houses and public engagement for the development of a Freight Mobility Plan. For more information, contact: Bjorn Hansen, Centralina Council of Governments Transportation Program Coordinator, at or Or Wendy Bell, Catawba Regional Council of Governments Senior Planner, at or Planning for Fast, Efficient Freight Transport in the Greater Charlotte Bi-State Region 16