Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Making a Difference Improving the Quality of Life of Individuals with Developmental Disabilities and their families.
2012 Review Growing Up Great Network February 2013.
PORTFOLIO.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Research has shown that healthy students are better learners. How can you develop a healthy school community using a Comprehensive School Health Approach?
The California Family Strengthening and Support Standards are designed to be used by family support providers for planning, providing, and evaluating quality.
Illinois Educator Code of Ethics Training
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
STRENGTHENING FAMILIES National Briefing, 2012.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Karen L. Mapp, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent, Boston Public Schools
Multidisciplinary Teams
Strengthening Families through Home Visiting. What we’ll cover today Overview of Strengthening Families Overview of the Protective Factors Framework Connections.
The Revised Strengthening Families Self-Assessments: What’s Different?
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Goal 3, Volunteer Development and Systems to Support Youth: Logic Model and Communications Plan Situation Statement During 2005, over 11,218 adult volunteers.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
PARENT, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
 Explored alternative data collection for Family Development efforts in ETO with 3 pilot centers  Conducted focus groups with FRC Family Development.
Helping Families Receive the Best Start in Life.  Check In  AOK History  AOK Communities  Conceptual Framework  Advancing Collaborative Leadership.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
May 20, Purpose of the Self- Assessment Required by the Head Start Performance Standards (i)(1) Head Start Ac 2007 Head Start Act Section.
Collaborating to Sustain a Healthy Community January 28, 2015.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Bringing Protective Factors to Life in the Child Welfare System New Hampshire.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE PARTNERSHIPS, PARENTS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT October 27, 2011 Presented By Ramona Reyes, Vice President, Columbus.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Ingham Healthy Families. History: Why Healthy Families America? Michigan Home Visiting Initiative Exploration & Planning Tool (Fall 2013)  Ingham County.
Joint Infant and Toddler Steering Committee/Early Learning Regional Coalition Statewide Meeting “Using our Data for Continuous Improvement” Organizational.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Ted Price, Ph.D. West Virginia University Workshop Facilitator September 16, 2010.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
The “Recipe” for Systems Change The Vision The Current Status/Self- Assessment & Objective Evaluation The Goal(s) The Objectives The plan of action Who.
Professionalizing Mobility Management: Developing Standards and Competencies Julie Dupree, Easter Seals Association of Travel Instruction Conference August.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
Strong field project [URL]| 1 strong field project model strategies outcomes DV Orgs & Leaders Intermediary Partners Technical Assistance Providers BSCF.
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
Illinois Department of Children & Family Service/Chicago State University STEP Program - NHSTES May THE STEP PROGRAM Supervisory Training to Enhance.
Welcome to the IPFS Webinar The National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Health Care (The National CLAS.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Welcoming, caring, respectful, and safe learning and working environments and student code of conduct A presentation for EIPS leadership, COSC, EIPS staff,
INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS Heather Ouzts, NC DPI Parent Liaison Beverly Roberts, ECAC NC SIP Project Coordinator.
Pediatric Regional Integrated Services Model. Purpose The purpose of the Pediatric Regional Integrated Service Model (PRISM) is to provide streamlined.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
ASCCC Cultural Competency and Advocacy Plan Update Cleavon Smith, Berkeley City College Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
1 This project was supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
MUHC Innovation Model.
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
Furthering the Field GROWING THE MOVEMENT
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Presentation transcript:

Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting

Goal 2 – Strengthen Evidence of Program Impact  Projects 1. Revise and strengthen the Colorado Family Support Assessment (CFSA-2) 2. Reliability Study 3. Pilot test screening / workflow & CFSA-2

CFSA-2  Purpose  Comprehensive assessment  Identification of family assets, areas for improvement, and readiness to change  Objective and reliable family index to track family progress over time

CFSA-2  Development Process  Regional meetings to gather input  Research Literature  Publically available tools  Program & Evaluation Committee

CFSA-2  3-part assessment  Part A: Domain Matrix  Part B: Protective Factors Survey  Part C: Readiness to Change and Goal Setting

Reliability Study  Scientific study of reliability (objectivity)  10 case studies  Development  Each rated by 24 Family Support workers representing 12 centers  Web-based

Reliability Study  Results  Family support workers agreed with each other – ICCs between (>.80 is excellent)  Family support workers agreed with correct ratings (84% accurate)  Workers with an FD credential were more accurate than those without

FD Workflow Pilot  Goals  Test the CFSA-2 in the field  Test a common intake and workflow for family support  Identify key points to assess readiness  Facilitate goal setting and family support work

FD Workflow Pilot  Successes  Consistency is good!  CFSA-2 well-received  Process facilitates goal setting  Challenges  Time to administer  Identifying process for administration (setting appointments vs first visit)

Next Steps  Refine processes  Workflow, common intake, referrals  Fidelity monitoring protocols  Scientific evidence  Submit Reliability Study for publication in Journal of Research on Social Work  CFSA-2 implementation  Develop and provide training on the CFSA-2  Measure family progress on the CFSA-2

Standards of Quality for Family Strengthening & Support Developed by the California Network of Family Strengthening Networks Adopted by the National Network of Family Support and Strengthening Networks

Data from 22 Family Resource Centers by Section Family Centeredness Valuing and recognizing families as integral to the Program Family Strengthening Supporting families to be strong, healthy and safe, thereby promoting their optimal development Embracing Diversity Acknowledging and respecting families’ diversity, supporting their participation in a diverse society, and engaging in ongoing learning about and adaptation to diversit y Community Building Contributing to building a strong and healthy community by facilitating families’ social connections, developing their leadership skills, and collaborating with other Programs Evaluation Looking at areas of Program strength, as well as areas for further development, in order to guide continuous quality improvement and achieve positive results for families

Quality Indicators

Overall Data from 22 Family Resource Centers Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 3%6%24%34%33%

A.1 Program encourages families to participate in program development and implementation. A.2 Program is accessible and welcoming to families. A.3 Program conducts outreach to families and sustains constructive relationships with them. A.4 Program models family centeredness with its staff members and in its administrative practices. Family Centeredness Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 5%27%45%23% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 2%12%52%34% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 23%48%29% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 9%36%55%

B.1 Program recognizes and affirms families’ strengths and resilience and is responsive to their concerns and priorities. B.2 Program enhances families’ capacity to support the healthy cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development of their family members. B.3 Program recognizes families as significant resources for their own family members and each other. Family Strengthening Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 7%23%33%37% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 2%16%34%48% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 2%36%32%30%

C.1 Program acknowledges and respects the diversity of the families, including their cultural traditions, languages, values, socio-economic status, family structures, sexual orientation, religion, individual abilities, and other aspects. C.2 Program enhances the ability of families and staff to participate in a diverse society and to navigate the dynamics of difference. C.3 Program engages in ongoing learning and adaptation of its practices to address diversity. Embracing Diversity Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 32%34% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 7%14%29%25% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 5%45%18%32%

D.1 Program is involved in, and engages families in, the larger community building process. D.2 Program supports the development of community-based leadership. D.3 Program builds collaborative relationships with other organizations to strengthen families and communities. Community Building Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 2%9%27%21%41% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 9%5%23%45%18% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 5% 27%63%

E.1 Program collects and analyzes information related to program participation. E.2 Program collects and analyzes information related to program quality. E.3 Program collects and analyzes information related to program outcomes. E.4 Program demonstrates that it incorporates evaluation as a core component of programming. Evaluation Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 5%45% 5% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 26% 27%14%7% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 22%32%36%5% Minimum Quality Not Yet Addressed Approaching Minimum Quality Meets Minimum Quality Meets Minimum & Approaching High Quality Meets Minimum & Meets High Quality 37%33% 12%9%

Next Steps Prioritizing your top 5 potential action items Completing missing data items

Potential Action Items Please prioritize your TOP 5 goals. 1.To be open (increase hours of operation) full time, 5 days, maybe 1 weekend day, to support those who work during the week (A.2) 2.Implement a formal intake process, utilize a method of assessment to help families ID their resources/strengths to handle a crisis (B.1) 3.Offer programming specific for working males in the community. (B.3) 4.Have parents facilitate our monthly parent engagement meetings instead of staff. (B.3) 5.Educate Marketing Committee on diversity of our community so marketing material reflects the trends in the diversity of the population served. (C.1) 6.Redevelop advisory committee to represent diversity of population served. (C.1) 7.Community news bulletin as a component of a social media campaign. (D.1) 8.Provide opportunities for families to participate in forums that provide information on topics such as educational rights, disability rights, etc. (D.2) 9.Include analysis of data in periodic Manager Retreats and planning meetings (E1) 10.Going forward, staff members will receive training on incorporating evaluation as a core component of training. (E.4)

Missing Data Items B.1.2 Where are we on the continuum? How do we do it? ▫Minimum Quality Indicator: Program engages families to identify their concerns, priorities, and resource needs. It links families with service providers, informal supports, or other families to address them. ▫High Quality Indicator: Program implements a formal process to gather information about families’ concerns, priorities, and resource needs. Program partners with families to set goals. It formally facilitates families’ access to services and activities, and has a system to provide them with the follow-up support. E.2.1 Where are we on the continuum? ▫Minimum Quality Indicator: Program utilizes the Standards of Quality for Family Strengthening & Support Program Self-Assessment Tool and other appropriate program assessment tools. ▫High Quality Indicator: Program conducts an annual self-assessment utilizing the Standards of Quality for Family Strengthening & Support Program Self-Assessment Tool and other appropriate program assessment tools. Program analyzes results to inform program planning efforts and makes appropriate modifications.

Questions?