SPA’s Good Practice for Admissions Policies Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Peter Chetwynd, Admissions Support and Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Advertisements

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
THE ADMISSIONS POLICY. WHY AN ADMISSIONS POLICY ? To ensure that the University is compliant with the QAA Code of practice: Admissions to Higher Education.
SPA, admissions issues and feedback
QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Handbook for Academic Review Karen Czapiewski.
Quality and Standards Framework – Collaborative Provision December 2008 Janet Pearce, University Quality Officer.
Facilitated by: Pobal Training Initiative.  Using the “Managing Better” Toolkit  Principles of Good Governance  Key Responsibilities of the Company.
HE Admissions from the FE Perspective Iain Wolloff Farnborough College of technology.
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
The International Postgraduate Student Experience – QAA perspective Dr Laura Bellingham Research, Development and Partnerships Group UKCGE workshop Thursday.
Head of Learning: Job description
Child Safeguarding Standards
Sharing Good Practice in Quality
Demonstration of sustained effective leadership in academic practice and academic development Evidence of impact on high quality student learning Draw.
B2 RAG analysis comparisons. Participants a three separate events completed RAG analyses of their concerns for evidencing B2 indicators: 1) 22 July 2014.
Mind your Ps and Qs Professionalism and Quality in Admissions SPA Conference, 10 June 2014.
Aim to provide key guidance on assessment practice and translate this into writing assignments.
MOOCs and the Quality Code Ian G. Giles PFHEA Medical Education
Towards Excellence in Restorative Practice: A Quality Assurance Framework for Organisations and Practitioners Restorative Practice Strategic Forum Kieran.
SPA Programme outline 16/04/2017
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
Control environment and control activities. Day II Session III and IV.
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
UK Quality Framework OU and ARCs
1 CHCOHS312A Follow safety procedures for direct care work.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Future Aspirations Dr Maire Shelly Associate Postgraduate Dean North Western Deanery.
THE NATURE AND PURPOSE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING
Introduction to the Applicant Experience The Applicant Experience in Wales, 4 June 2014 Peter Chetwynd, Admissions Support and Development Manager.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
The UK Quality Code and Higher Education Reviews Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Catherine Kerfoot, Development Officer, QAA.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
Presented by Linda Martin
Teaching and Supporting Students with Vision Impairments An Australian Universities Teaching Committee Funded Project WAANU Conference March 2005.
Fair access and widening participation – the view from SPA OCNLR Access to HE Conference Thursday 24 March 2011 Annie Doyle, Senior Project Officer, SPA.
The role of the applicant experience in improving retention SPA Seminar Northern Ireland - 12 April 2011 Annie Doyle, Senior Project Officer, SPA.
Quality Assurance – European Standards and Guidelines.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
NIPEC Organisational Guide to Practice & Quality Improvement Tanya McCance, Director of Nursing Research & Practice Development (UCHT) & Reader (UU) Brendan.
UK Quality Code for Higher Education
FOURTH EUROPEAN QUALITY ASSURANCE FORUM "CREATIVITY AND DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE BEYOND 2010", COPENHAGEN, NOVEMBER IV FORUM-
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
Developing a Sustainable Procurement Policy and Strategy EAUC – EAF Programme.
Contextual data in admissions: is it right to use it; is it wrong not to? FACE Conference 2 July 2009 Dan Shaffer, Senior Project Officer.
Quality Management Systems FIETA Providers Herman Letoka ETQA MANAGER.
AfRE self assessment Birgit Whitman, University of Bristol, July 2015.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
Managing mistakes in admissions decision-making 2a. UCAS Admissions Conference, 21 March 2016 Jeni Clack, Admissions Support and Development Advisor.
The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education ‘Tutoring for the 21 st Century’ 28 January 2015 Harriet Barnes Natalja Sokorevica Standards, Quality.
Managing the risk of unconscious bias in admissions 3b UCAS Admissions Conference, 21 March 2016 Dan Shaffer, Head of Professionalism in Admissions Lizzy.
Partnerships between institutions: competition, collaboration and issues to consider for admissions 4b. UCAS Admissions Conference, 22 March 2016 Janet.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Joining up approaches between your recruitment and admissions 1b
Assessment and Feedback – Module 1
Implementing and reviewing additional admissions assessments
Good practice in entry requirements
B2 RAG analysis comparisons
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Quality and Standards An introduction.
Partnerships between institutions: competition, collaboration and issues to consider for admissions 4b. UCAS Admissions Conference, 22 March 2016 Janet.
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Quality Assurance of Assessment Arrangements
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education in Africa (ASG-QA: PART B: EQA and PART C: QAAs) Presented at: CONSULTATIVE WORKSHOPS.
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Presentation transcript:

SPA’s Good Practice for Admissions Policies Admissions Policy and the QAA Quality Code – Are you ready? Peter Chetwynd, Admissions Support and Development Manager

The Expectation for recruitment, selection and admission Recruitment, selection and admission policies and procedures adhere to the principles of fair admission. They are transparent, reliable, valid, inclusive and underpinned by appropriate organisational structures and processes. They support higher education providers in the selection of students who are able to complete their programme.

Schwartz’s principles of fair admissions A fair admissions system should: 1.Be transparent, and provide consistent and efficient information 2.Select students who are able to complete the course as judged by their achievements and potential 3.Use assessment methods that are reliable and valid 4.Minimise barriers to applicants – inclusive? 5.Be professional in every respect and underpinned by institutional structures and processes.

 The Schwartz principles of fair admissions underpin and inform Chapter B2’s Expectation  The Schwartz principles of fair admissions underpin and inform SPA’s guidance and good practice  We are not in the business of endorsing practice as ‘B2 ready’, but if...  you have already been using our good practice + your admissions processes adhere to the Schwartz principles = there shouldn’t be too much to worry about  We want to support you to not just meet but exceed Expectations B2 and SPA’s good practice on admissions policies

What’s covered by Chapter B2?  Admissions → Recruitment, selection and admission  Recruitment and selection were already covered by B2  Recruitment activities involve ‘individuals... actively weighing up the prospect of entering or continuing in higher education’  Runs up to enrolment – induction activities are covered by B4  Encompasses ‘any programme, at any level and employing any mode of study, with a higher education provider’  B2’s just a part of the bigger picture pre- application post- application applicationtransition

What’s covered by the B2 Indicators? Indicators 1–4 cover all stages of recruitment, selection & admission Policies are informed by strategy and understood by all involved (Ind. 1) Processes are carried out professionally by competent, authorised staff (Ind. 2) There is a high quality appeals and complaints procedure in place (Ind. 3) Policies and procedures are monitored and reviewed regularly (Ind. 4)

What’s covered by the B2 Indicators? Thinking about higher education (Ind. 5) Applying to higher education (Ind. 6) Going through the selection process (Ind. 7) Receiving the decision and feedback (Inds 8–9) Making the transition from prospective student to current student (Ind.10) Indicators 1–4 cover all stages of recruitment, selection & admission

Our admissions policy resources

Why is your admissions policy crucial?  To ensure that your institution’s mission and values are reflected in your admissions practice and your interactions with applicants Recruitment, selection and admission policies are informed by the strategic priorities of the higher education provider. Higher education providers promote a shared understanding of their approach among all those involved in Recruitment, selection and admission. Indicator 1

monitor measure pre- application post- application applicationtransition institution mission and values policiesstrategic aims key interactions linking interactions integrated practitioner groups/communities enablers – staff, systems, funds Applicant experience strategy map

Why is your admissions policy crucial?  To ensure that your institution’s mission and values are reflected in your admissions practice and your interactions with applicants  To support staff professionalism and coherent practice across your institution through a definitive source for policy and procedure

Why is your admissions policy crucial?  To ensure that your institution’s mission and values are reflected in your admissions practice and your interactions with applicants  To support staff professionalism and coherent practice across your institution through a definitive source for policy and procedure Recruitment, selection and admission policies are informed by the strategic priorities of the higher education provider. Higher education providers promote a shared understanding of their approach among all those involved in Recruitment, selection and admission. Indicator 1 Recruitment, selection and admission processes are conducted in a professional manner by authorised and competent representatives of the higher education provider. Indicator 2

monitor measure pre- application post- application applicationtransition institution mission and values policiesstrategic aims key interactions linking interactions integrated practitioner groups/communities enablers – staff, systems, funds Applicant experience strategy map

Why is your admissions policy crucial?  To ensure that your institution’s mission and values are reflected in your admissions practice and your interactions with applicants  To support staff professionalism and coherent practice across your institution through a definitive source for policy and procedure  To facilitate measuring and monitoring

Why is your admissions policy crucial?  To ensure that your institution’s mission and values are reflected in your admissions practice and your interactions with applicants  To support staff professionalism and coherent practice across your institution through a definitive source for policy and procedure  To facilitate measuring and monitoring Higher education providers monitor, review and update their recruitment, selection and admission policies and procedures, in order to enhance them and to ensure that they continue to support the provider's mission and strategic objectives. Higher education providers determine the frequency with which monitoring and review are undertaken. Indicator 4

monitor measure pre- application post- application applicationtransition institution mission and values policiesstrategic aims key interactions linking interactions integrated practitioner groups/communities enablers – staff, systems, funds Applicant experience strategy map

Why is your admissions policy crucial?  To ensure that your institution’s mission and values are reflected in your admissions practice and your interactions with applicants  To support staff professionalism and coherent practice across your institution through a definitive source for policy and procedure  To facilitate measuring and monitoring  To promote transparency in all aspects of recruitment, selection and admissions

Why is your admissions policy crucial?  To ensure that your institution’s mission and values are reflected in your admissions practice and your interactions with applicants  To support staff professionalism and coherent practice across your institution through a definitive source for policy and procedure  To facilitate measuring and monitoring  To promote transparency in all aspects of recruitment, selection and admissions … assist prospective students in making informed decisions… Indicator 5 … make clear to prospective students how … the process will be conducted… Indicator 6 … transparent entry requirements … Indicator 7 … give successful applicants sufficient information … to make the transition from prospective student to current student. Indicator 10

Why is your admissions policy crucial?  To ensure that your institution’s mission and values are reflected in your admissions practice and your interactions with applicants  To support staff professionalism and coherent practice across your institution through a definitive source for policy and procedure  To facilitate measuring and monitoring  To promote transparency in all aspects of recruitment, selection and admissions  To demonstrate and evidence compliance with the Quality Code, legal/statutory obligations, fair admissions, good practice etc. …

high level statement supported by principles enacted through procedures – Reflects your mission and strategic plan – Affirms your commitment to fair admissions – Outlines the qualities looked for in an applicant – Specific principles or policy statements – Policy implementation and review process – Links to other codes/policies adhered to – Procedures for specific aspects of admissions – Supplementary good practice guidance – Information for applicants and advisors The admissions policy hierarchy

high level statement supported by principles enacted through procedures Core admissions policy Step-by-step procedural detail Descriptions of staff roles/ responsibilities Institutional good practice statements Information for applicants and advisors  Who is the audience? Core policy should be accessible to all  All-in-one document or separate admissions policy document and procedure handbook?  Good practice to harmonise devolved procedures  Clear IAG for applicants is vital in addition to policy documents What goes in the admissions policy?

ReviewDisseminateImplementMonitor It’s about more than just writing the document …

Admissions policies checklist

Overarching reflective questions for B2  Is our admissions policy informed by strategy and by our institutional mission and values?  Do we have clear policies and procedures in place for all our recruitment, selection and admission activities?  Does everyone involved in these activities – including external agents – know and understand the policy?  Is our admissions policy translating into admissions practice?  Are we monitoring, evaluating and refining all our policies and procedures?  Are we not just transparent but also clear?

Questions? More information from: or