Guoquan (Bob) Wang University of Houston

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reference Frames for GPS Applications and Research
Advertisements

1 Sea-Level changes. What causes the sea level to change over time? Questions:
Vertical Crustal Motion in the North Pacific and Implications for Tide Gauge Records and Sea Level Rise Jeff Freymueller and Christopher F. Larsen Geophysical.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
Accuracy Assessment of NEXTMap Elevation Data for the State of Alabama M. Lorraine Tighe PhD Candidate Director, Geospatial Solutions - Intermap November.
The earthquake induced landslide geohazard: development of a ground and space integrated monitoring experiment at Sea of Marmara Supersite Pascal Bigarre.
Assistant Administrator National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service September 18, 2008 John H. Dunnigan Toward National Height.
Geodesy and earthquakes
Title U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Probable Production Induced Subsidence, Fault Reactivation, and Wetland Loss in the Gulf Coast.
2-3 November 2009NASA Sea Level Workshop1 The Terrestrial Reference Frame and its Impact on Sea Level Change Studies GPS VLBI John Ries Center for Space.
2015 Height Modernization Partner Meeting April 14, 2015.
1 GPS and GNSS Activities in Hong Kong Simon C W KWOK Geodetic Survey Section Lands Department Hong Kong 35th Civil GPS Service Interface Committee Fairfax,
Permanent GPS Stations in Israel as Basis for
April Exploring a collaboration between Caltech and the Singaporean government Forecasting giant earthquakes of the Sumatran subduction zone and.
Texas Height Modernization and Texas Spatial Reference Center Gary Jeffress, Ph.D., RPLS Director, Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science Texas.
The governing equation for groundwater flow can be written using total head (h) or pressure (p). Why do we typically use head (h) as the dependent variable?
Texas Spatial Reference Center Gary Jeffress, Ph.D., RPLS Director, Conrad Blucher Institute for Surveying and Science Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.
0/27 Merriam-Webster: a branch of applied mathematics concerned with the determination of the size and shape of the earth and the exact positions of points.
DORIS - DAYS Toulouse May 2-3, 2000 DORIS Doppler Orbitography and Radiopositioning Integrated by Satellite  Basic system concept  Main missions  Schedules.
Tsunamis Presented by: Saira Hashmi Oct. 14 th,2005 EPS 131 Introduction to Physical Oceanography.
National Flood Workshop “Precipitable Water Values Associated with Recent Flood Events in Southeast Texas” Paul Lewis 1.
Induced Seismicity at Lake Aswan Reservoir, Egypt Awad Hassoup Head of the National Seismic Network Laboratory.
1 Urban Growth Simulation A Case Study of Indianapolis Sharaf Alkheder & Jie Shan School of Civil Engineering Purdue University March 10, 2005.
Geodesy and Map Projections Geodesy - the shape of the earth and definition of earth datums Map Projection - the transformation of a curved earth to a.
National Height Modernization Program Overview January 24, 2006 Juliana Blackwell Height Modernization Program Manager.
National Mapping Division EROS Data Center U. S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Operation Systems (EROS) Data Center World Data.
1 First Results of the CMONOC GNSS Network Junping Chen Bin Wu, Shuhua Ye, Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
Environmental and Water Resources Engineering Division Civil Engineering Dr. Soumendra Nath Kuiry Assistant Professor Hurricane Gustav (2008) Simulation.
Background to >10 years of BIFROST activities Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck 1, Rüdiger Haas 1, Sten Bergstrand 1 Martin Lidberg 1,2, Lotti Jivall.
Correlation Between Groundwater Level And Altitude Variations in Land Subsidence Area of The Choshuichi Alluvial Fan, Taiwan Chieh-Hung Chen, Chung-Ho.
Evolution of the Marine Intrusion Using Geophysical Methods after 25 years in the Motril-Salobreña Aquifer (Southern Spain) C. Duque, M.L. Calvache, A.
A More Accurate and Powerful Tool for Managing Groundwater Resources and Predicting Land Subsidence: an application to Las Vegas Valley Zhang, Meijing.
Workshops for Establishing a Stable North American Reference Frame (SNARF) to Enable Geophysical and Geodetic Studies with EarthScope: Annual Report
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Bee Lake Water Quality Monitor Data Summary Period of record: to 2/19/07.
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Monitoring Ground Displacements at a National Highway Project: The case of “Egnatia Odos” in Greece Egnatia Odos S.A. & Laboratory of Geodesy, Department.
LONG TERM GEODETIC MONITORING OF THE DEFORMATION OF A LIQUID STORAGE TANK FOUNDED ON PILES P. Savvaidis Laboratory of Geodesy Dept. of Civil Engineering.
Dam Removal as a Solution to Increase Water Quality Matthew Nechvatal, Tim Granata Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Texas Height Modernization Dr. Gary Jeffress, RPLS Texas Spatial Reference Center National Height Modernization Partner Meeting NOAA Gulf of Mexico Disaster.
Harris-Galveston Coastal Subsidence District Jace A. Houston Groundwater District Survey and Summary of Regulatory Methods Texas Groundwater 2004 November.
Application of a North America reference frame to the Pacific Northwest Geodetic Array (PANGA) M M Miller, V M Santillan, Geodesy Laboratory, Central Washington.
An Overview of the Observations of Sea Level Change R. Steven Nerem University of Colorado Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Colorado Center.
Technical Specifications for Monitoring Ground Displacements at a National Highway Project K. Lakakis, P. Savvaidis and I. Ifadis Laboratory of Geodesy.
Subsidence Mapping in Harris County, Texas Taryn Tigges CE 394K – GIS in Water Resources Fall 2012.
National Geodetic Survey Update Hydrographic Services Review Panel Honolulu, HI May 4, 2011 Juliana Blackwell Director National Geodetic Survey.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Recent Reductions of Subsidence Rates in the Mississippi River Delta Plain Julie C. Bernier 1 and.
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
Arc Hydro groundwater data model: a data model for groundwater systems within ArcGIS AWRA Specialty Conference Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
Timothy (Jak) J. Kearns Flow in the Unsaturated Zone Fall
Recent progress and big ideas on geologic sequestration US/international perspective Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Jackson School of Geosciences.
29 August 2005Geosciences Australia1 Space Geodesy, SLR and Global Sea Level Change John Ries Canberra, Australia August 29,,2005.
South East Strategic Regional Coastal Monitoring Programme – Annual Review Meeting, November 2009 Satellite Data for Coastal Monitoring Trevor Burton Fugro-BKS.
Climate Change 101: A New Jersey Perspective Anthony J. Broccoli Co-Director, Rutgers Climate Institute Department of Environmental Sciences Rutgers University.
An Integrated Approach for Subsidence Monitoring and Sinkhole Formation in the Karst Terrain of Dougherty County, Georgia Matthew Cahalan1 and Adam Milewski1.
module Using DInSAR to assess vertical ground motions at Tide Gauges
United States Coast Guard
Ground-Level Monitoring Committee Meeting
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Freshwater-Saltwater Mixing Zone Biased vs. Reliable Monitoring
VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe
Department of Civil Engineering
Department of Geology and Geological Engineering
Sea-Level changes.
Presentation transcript:

Guoquan (Bob) Wang University of Houston Current Land Subsidence in the Houston Metropolitan Area, Texas, Derived from GPS Observations (1993-2012) Guoquan (Bob) Wang University of Houston With contributions from graduate students: Timothy J. Kearns, Jiangbo Yu, Linqiang Yang, Xueyi Jia, and Jianjun Jiang

Outline GPS Geodesy Infrastructure in the Houston area Public available GPS stations (Hardware) Stable Houston Reference Frame (SHRF) (Firmware) Single-receiver phase ambiguity resolved GIPSY PPP resolution (software) Current subsidence mapping (2005-2012) Scientific Questions: (1) Is there deep seated (or fault-controlled) subsidence in the Houston area? (2) When will the current subsidence stop?

Historic Subsidence in Houston 3 m within 30 years, 10 cm/year (USGS, Coplin and Galloway, 2009) (USGS, Kasmarek et al., 2009) 6 m Historic Subsidence in Houston USGS

Houston Ship Channel Area

Geodesy Infrastructure: Permanent GPS Stations Harris-Galveston Subsidence District (70+) Texas Department of Transportation 15+ 83 GPS +11 Extensometers City of Houston, others

HoustonNet NSF MRI: 40 GPS; UH: 10 GPS Subsidence, faulting, and salt dome uplift Hurricane intensity forecasting Civil engineering community---buildings, bridges, dams, sea walls

Geodesy Infrastructure: The Stable Houston Reference Frame Helmert Transformation 7 years: 2005-2012 Wang et al., 2013

14-Parameter Similarity Transformation   Translation along the respective axis (in meters) Differential Scaling of the respective axis (ppb) Counterclockwise Rotations (in radians)

14-Transformation Parameters Unit IGS08 to SHRF t0 = 2012 IGS08 to NAD83(2011) t0 = 1997* Tx(t0) cm 0.00000 99.34300 Ty(t0) -190.33100 Tz(t0) -52.65500 Rx(t0) mas 25.91467 Ry(t0) 9.42645 Rz(t0) 11.59935 s(t0) ppb 1.71504 dTx cm/year -1.07250 0.07900 dTy -1.05876 -0.06000 dTz -3.54574 -0.13400 dRx mas/year 1.15720 0.06667 dRy -0.93885 -0.75744 dRz -0.33224 -0.05133 ds ppb/year 1.37220 -0.10201   NGS *Pearson and Snay (2013), Table 7

No-linear subsidence rate 18 Years Jersey Village Spatial and temporal variation of subsidence

Ground Deformation at Closely-Spaced (4 km) GPS Sites

Recent Subsidence Mapping (2005-2012) 85 years 6 m 83 GPS +11 Extensometers

Maximum subsidence rate <=2.5 cm/year < 5 mm/year 7 years: 2005-2012

Aquifer Profile: Chicot + Evangeline 3600 ft USGS

Subsidence---pumping (??%)+ faulting (??%) Question 1: Is there deep-seated (fault-controlled) subsidence in the Houston-Galveston area? Gulf Coast Geology and faults Subsidence vs. Faulting Subsidence---pumping (??%)+ faulting (??%) Ortega, 2013

USGS Borehole Extensometers Compaction meter USGS 13 extensometers at 11 sites 40 years: 1974—2013

Addicks Borehole Extensometer (-549 m)

Co-Located GPS and Extensometer Monitoring Site (ADKS) +15 years Wang et al., 2014

Wang et al., 2014 Journal of Surveying Engineering 18 years 40 years Drought of 2011 Drought of 2005 Conclusion: The compaction measurements from the long-term extensometers are reliable and the accuracy is about a few millimeters. Wang et al., 2014 Journal of Surveying Engineering

Co-located GPS and Extensometer Sites ADKS(-549 m) NETP (-591 m) LKHU (-661 m) 22 years Conclusion: Compacted aquifers are limited to above -600 m

Clear Lake—Jonson Space Center Sites Clear lake Deep Borehole (-936 m) Clear lake Shallow Borehole (-530 m) Jonson Space Center(-235 m) 50m 2.5 km 37 years Conclusion: No compaction below -530 m

-530 m USGS, 2009 Conclusion: Only partial of the Evangeline aquifer had been compacted!

Coastal Subsidence: Galveston vs. New Orleans 4 mm/year It appears no considerable tectonic subsidence occurs currently in the Houston-Galveston area.

UH Coastal Center “Vertical” GPS Array -1 ft -10 ft -20 ft -30 ft Borehole GPS

Question 2: When will the subsidence cease? 1978-1998 38 years Conclusion: It took 20 years (1978-1998) to halt the subsidence in the southeast part.

38 years Conclusion: 2005+20=2025

Summary The ground water and aquifer systems respond slowly to human actions. It took almost two decades (1980s and 1990s) to halt the subsidence in the south-east part of the Houston metropolitan area. Therefore, a long-term perspective is needed to manage groundwater resources and control land subsidence. The spatial and temporal variation of subsidence could be very considerable! subsidence=f(x,y,z t) The groundwater regulations implemented by the HGSD are very successful in reducing subsidence rate in the Houston area. Currently, there is no considerable deep-seated or fault-controlled subsidence in the Houston-Galveston area. Current aquifer compaction is limited to about -530m. Thank you!

Stable: v=0