Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
No Child Left Behind. ALL students will attain proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by ALL limited English students will become.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Module 4 TED 356 Curriculum in Sec. Ed.. Module 4 Explain the current official federal and state standards, including professional and accrediting groups.
No Child Left Behind and Students with Disabilities Presentation for OSEP Staff March 20, 2003 Stephanie Lee Director, Office of Special Education Programs.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Data for Student Success Using Classroom Data to Monitor Student Progress “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Presentation on The Elementary and Secondary Education Act “No Child Left Behind” Nicholas C. Donohue, Commissioner of Education New Hampshire Department.
Daniel H. Holloway Senior at Old Dominion University Coordinator of Database Services Gloucester County Public Schools.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 2
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Michigan School Data (MI School Data). What is MI School Data? MI School Data is the web presence for district users, the public, researchers, etc. to.
11/5/2015 Michigan’s School Accreditation System : From Education YES to MI-SAS.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
CREP Center for Research in Educational Policy SES Student Achievement Methods/Results: Multiple Years and States Steven M. Ross Allison Potter The University.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Using Assessments to Plan for Learning MEAP and MME Data Collection.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Sandpiper Elementary School Mrs. Camille LaChance.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Data for Student Success May, 2010 Ann Arbor, MI “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development and web based.
EDU 4245 Class 5: Achievement Gap (cont) and Diagnostic Assessments.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Michigan School Data (MI School Data). Agenda  Overview of MI School Data Portal  Navigation 101  Sample Reports  Training and TA  Q & A 2.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Michigan School Report Card Update
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Annual Parent Meeting October 10, 2018 Lamar Elementary
ESSA accountability & Report Card Proposed regulations
What Every Family Needs to Know! Date
Presentation transcript:

Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development and web based dynamic inquiries for school improvement.”

Comprehensive Needs Assessment What is it? 5 Components of the CNA –School Data Profile –School Data Analysis –School Process Profile –School Process Analysis –Summary Report

CNA Document from MDE School Data Profile Pages 1-26 School Data Analysis Pages 27–32 School Process Profile Pages School Process Analysis Pages 47, 56, 65, 66, 81, 91, 100, 101, 110, 119, 120, 127, 134, 135, 146, 150, 151 School Summary Pages

CNA Document from MDE cont. School Improvement Planning Process Pages Required Elements of SIP Checklist Pages School Improvement Plan Pages 166 Title 1 Targeted Assistance Required Strategies Pages Title 1 Schoolwide Required Strategies Pages

The Comprehensive Needs Assessment School Process Profile is due to the State of Michigan February 15, 2010 Schools should complete the School Data Profile and School Data Analysis Before completing the School Process Profile which is due in February

School Data Profile Contains numerous data tables that represent a wide range of school data The Data 4SS CNA Report was developed to help schools gather state aggregate data to support completion of the School Data Profile begin the data collection process

What tables are available in the Data 4SS CNA Report? Figure 1Student Enrollment Trends Figure 2Subgroup Enrollment Trends Figure 7Grade Level Achievement Figure 9Subgroup Achievement Figure 10Subgroup Achievement

Figure 1 Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Navigation to Data 4SS CNA Report Click on Dynamic Inquiries Click on blue Data Inquiry Tool link at the top of the page Login Left hand side tool bar click on CNA Report Click on Student Enrollment

continued Select ISD Select District Select School 5 years of enrollment data will be available for the school you selected

Figure 2 Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Navigation Top Navigation Bar Click on Enrollment by Subgroup –Subgroups currently available in Data 4SS CNA Ethnic groups State District –Subgroup that will be available in Data 4SS CNA SWD (Students with Disabilities) EDD (Economically Disadvantaged) Male Female

Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 Not available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 6 Not available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Areas of Concern Summary Not available in the Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 7 Available in Data 4SS Report * Average Class Size will need to be determined by school

Navigation Top Navigation Bar Click on Grade Level –08-09 grade level achievement data will display –Use the top Navigation bar to move to and data

Grade Level Achievement Data

Grade Level Achievement Data

Grade Level Achievement

Assessment Information Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 8 Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Challenges Summary Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 9 Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 10 Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Navigation Top Navigation Bar Click on Subgroup Analysis –Three year trend Subgroup proficiency data for the lowest grade level in the building will display automatically –Use the top Navigation bar to move to other grade levels

Subgroup Proficiency Analysis Reading, Writing, ELA

Subgroup Proficiency Analysis Math, Science, Social Studies

Figure 11 Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 12 and Figure 13 Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 14 Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 15 Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 16 Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 17 Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 18 Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Figure 19 Not Available in Data 4SS CNA Report

Questions?

PA 25 The requirement for every school district in Michigan to issue an annual report has existed since 1990 in Public Act 25 (MCL ). Federal law also required schools to publish an annual report in the No Child Left Behind Act of School districts must prepare and publicly disseminate the report no later than the beginning of school year to all schools and parents of all students. (If separate reports are published for PA 25 and for NCLB, the PA 25 report must be published no later than October 15, 2007.)

Required Information for Every School Assessment Data Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Data Teacher Quality Data School Programs Parents

Assessment Data Details Aggregate and disaggregated student achievement at each proficiency level on state assessments. Student achievement must be disaggregated by race, ethnicity, gender, disability status, migrant status, English proficiency, and status as economically disadvantaged. Most recent trend in achievement in each subject area and for each grade level. Report of each individual school results of locally administered student competency tests and/or nationally normed achievement tests – PA 25 does not require disaggregated data.

Assessment Data Details (Cont.) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Data –Disaggregated information on graduation rate and student attendance used to determine AYP compared to state graduation rate and attendance rate. –Comparison between actual achievement of each group (excluding gender and migrant) and state’s annual measurable objectives. –Comparison of building, district and state achievement data on state assessments and other indicators of AYP. Other indicators are attendance rates at the elementary and middle school level, and graduation rates for high school.

Teacher Quality Data The professional qualifications of all teachers in the district and in each school. The percentage of teachers teaching with emergency credentials. The percentage of core academic classes NOT taught by highly qualified teachers, disaggregated by high- poverty compared to low-poverty schools in the district.

School Programs Accreditation Status –PA 25 requires that schools report on state accreditation status. (Education YES!) –A school may also report on accreditation by the North Central Association Commission on Accreditation and School Improvement or another specialized accreditation authority approved by the US Department of Education. District pupil retention data –Number and percentage of pupils enrolled in post-secondary programs and/or college level equivalent courses, if the school is a high school (dual enrollment). –The status of the core curriculum and the school improvement plan.

Parents Information on parent-teacher conference attendance rates.

Additional Information A school may include additional data, if it chooses. These guidelines are simply the pieces of data that must be included in the report. School districts are encouraged to publish the annual report(s) online and to ensure that parents know that the information is available both online and in paper format.

Questions?

Activity Data Collection Plan Determine the data sources for components of the CNA School Profile that are not included in the Data 4SS CNA Report –Procedure Determine data set to be used (current or prior year) Determine the data source Determine person responsible Determine when the data will be collected

Activity