Elementary Science Update Teaching and Learning Science and Science Assessment April 30, 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

Computer-Based Performance Assessments from NAEP and ETS and their relationship to the NGSS Aaron Rogat Educational Testing Service.
The Adventure Continues: Exploring the Next Generation Science Standards.
What Parents Need to Know  TABS (Texas Assessment of Basic Skills)  TEAMS (Texas Educational Assessment of Minimum Skills)  TAAS (Texas Assessment.
Handouts for Session 4 Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
1 Powerful Classroom Assessments: Examining Student Thinking Tom Hathorn Science Education Director, ESD114 SALT & NCOSP.
Development of New Science Standards:
Major Outcomes of Science Instruction
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
1 Welcome back!. Vision for Science Teaching and Learning 2 View free PDF from The National Academies Press at *Will also be posted.
2008 History and Social Science Standards of Learning: Using Student Engagement To Support Active Learning and Assessment January 2013.
Understanding the Science MSP Mark Watrin Science Coordinator ESD112 Planning Investigations Plan different kinds of investigations, including field studies,
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
Welcome to FOSS VARIABLES Workshop
Overview. What will it look like? Item TypeBiology EOC Multiple Choice30-34 Completion1-5 Short Answer5 Total Items40 Total Points45 Pilot Items5  5-6.
Unit 1 Learning Objectives Experience a science lesson that integrates CA CCSS speaking/listening, writing and reading with science content Identify Literacy.
Meridian Middle School A little about me as a student Last year… Now I know… Multiple Intelligence quiz Strengths Challenges Big Mountain Insert.
Common Core Mathematics, Common Core English/Language Arts, and Next Generation Science Standards. What’s the common thread?
Science Gateway Assessment 1 2 Preparing for the Science Gateway.
SMART Goal All teachers should be able to recognize and implement 4 out of the 8 depth icons by the end of the workshop.
Understanding the Science MSP Mark Watrin Science Coordinator ESD112.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Welcome to Third Grade’s Parent Night
Engaging in Next Generation Science Standards. Amber Farthing Professional Learning and Program Assistance Coordinator, LASER Ellen Ebert Science Director,
What is STEM? What is STEM?
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
Easy-to-Understand Tables RIT Standards Key Ideas and Details #1 KindergartenGrade 1Grade 2 With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about.
EarthComm Capsule Presentation. Earth From Space.
Big Idea 1: The Practice of Science Description A: Scientific inquiry is a multifaceted activity; the processes of science include the formulation of scientifically.
Using Picture Books for Professional Development on NGSS Kirk Robbins October 26, 2013.
New Teachers’ Induction January 20, 2011 Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
5 th Grade Science MSP SYSTEMS Analyze a system in terms of subsystems functions as well as inputs and outputs. See how parts of objects, plants, and animals.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Welcome to AP Biology Mr. Levine Ext. # 2317.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
March 16,  Welcome, Introduction & Expectations  Introduction Probe  Graduation Requirements  Test & Item Spec Scavenger Hunt  Sample Biology.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Curriculum Report Card Implementation Presentations
USING SCIENCE JOURNALS TO GUIDE STUDENT LEARNING Part 1: How to create a student science journal Part 2: How to assess student journals for learning.
Chris DeWald Science Instructional Coordinator Montana Office of Public Instruction.
Science Notebooking In the OC Presented by District Coordinators &Lead Teacher.
Understanding the Science MSP Mark Watrin Science Coordinator ESD112.
How People Learn – Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999) Three core principles 1: If their (students) initial understanding.
NGSS-Health Science August Connection to the Common Core.
CER and Annotating Text District Learning Day August 6, 2015.
Understanding the Science MSP Mark Watrin Science Coordinator ESD112 Questioning and Investigating Investigate an answerable question through valid experimental.
National Research Council Of the National Academies
Click to edit Master title style Overview of the NGSS Framework.
The Basics About NGSS
November 16, 2010 Professional Teachers of Science High School Proficiency Exam A graduation requirement for sophomores in 2011.
Must pass EOC to graduate from high school Performance Level Descriptors Basic, Proficient, or Advanced To pass, need a level 3 or 4 Scale scores (below)
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
LEAP TH GRADE. DATES: APRIL 25-29, 2016 Test Administration Schedule:  Day 1 April 25- ELA Session 1: Research Simulation Task (90mins) Mathematics.
High School Biology EOC Systems Thinking and Field Studies March 18, 2013  Welcome- Networking and Coffee  Door Prizes.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
5 E’s Science Instructional Delivery Model. 5 E’s Science Instructional Model for Multiple-day Lessons Engage Explore Extend Evaluate Explain.
Inquiry Primer Version 1.0 Part 4: Scientific Inquiry.
District and school leaders January 22 or March 4, 2016.
Djanna Hill, Ed.D. Professional Development Workshop Burlington County October 2015.
 Continue to develop a common understanding of what STEM education is/could/should be here at Killip.
Welcome to Review session for 2013 Exam is required for all students enrolled in Biology class as well as all 10 th graders enrolled in a biology class.
High School Biology EOC Planning and Updates December 4, 2012  Welcome- Networking and Coffee  Door Prizes  Contest  Entry Task.
Session #1 - 8/18/2016. CANVAS Course Code # 6 th : th : th :
Module 1: Overview of the Framework for K–12 Science Education
Kirk Robbins Next Generation Science Standards 101 Part 2: Digging into the Science & Engineering Practices.
Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics
Presentation transcript:

Elementary Science Update Teaching and Learning Science and Science Assessment April 30,

Welcome Introductions Goals for the webinar Assessment Updates Review 5 th grade assessment data Preview assessment templates and resources Next Generation Science Activities in your region Science Notebooks 2

Big Ideas in Science Standards EALRs 1-3 Crosscutting Concepts and Abilities EALR 4 Domains of Science EALR 1 SystemsPhysical Science …is a way of thinking that makes it possible to analyze and understand complex phenomena. Force and Motion Matter: Properties and Change Energy: Transfer, Transformation and Conservation EALR 2 InquiryEarth and Space Science …is a process of asking and answering questions about the natural world that forms the bedrock of science. Earth and Space Earth Systems, Structures and Processes Earth History EALR 3 ApplicationLife Science …is about the interaction between science and technology, and how both can help solve real-world problems. Structures & Functions of Living Systems Ecosystems Biological Evolution 3

Scenarios and Items Scenarios provide context for a set of items Systems, Inquiry, and Application Physical, Earth & Space, and Life Science Items associated with a scenario cover a range of standards & range of cognitive complexity Items not connected to a scenario are called “stand alone” items, and are clearly marked for students 4

What is a “scenario”?  Text describing a scientific situation  Establishes the context for a set of items that follows  One or two pages long  Includes a diagram and/or a table 5

Types of scenarios SystemsInquiryApplication Describe systematic observations, models, or open- ended explorations of a system. Diagram of a system and some text about a specific system. Describe either controlled experiments or field studies and model age- appropriate investigations. Data table with the variables and results. Describe a technological design process student used to solve a problem. A problem or challenge is presented. Results from testing the solution. 6

Examples of systems PhysicalEarth & SpaceLife Object on a ramp Boiling water on a stove Electrical circuit Earth, Moon, and Sun Water moving through the land Landforms A single plant or animal An ecosystem— garden, field, schoolyard—with plants, animals, and nonliving parts 7

Example with an animal SystemsInquiryApplication Labeled diagram of the animal and some information about the animal’s role in the ecosystem. Controlled experiment about the effect of types of food on the weight of the animal. Data table with results of the experiment. Documentation of man-made changes to an ecosystem to attract the animal to the area. Table with data indicating animal visits to the area. 8

Test and Item Specifications Document 9

Test Specifications grades 5 & 8 The test “map” designates the following proportions of points:  At least 20% Systems (with connected EALR 4 content)  30% Inquiry  20% Application (which will apply EALR 4 content)  At most 30% EALR 4 domain knowledge that is not associated with a cross-cutting concept or ability* *EALR 4 content may be assessed in questions that only assess EALR 4, or in questions that cut across both EALR 4 and a cross-cutting concept or ability (Systems, Inquiry, Application). 10

Number and Types of Items Item TypeGrade 5Grade 8 Multiple Choice Completion1-6 Short Answer45 Total Items3035 Total Points3440 Pilot Items55 11

Grade 5: Students at each performance level Below Basic Basic Proficient Advanced 15,761 18,06624,27218, Percent of Students Who Took Test (number of students) 12

13

Lessons Learned…. 14

Science Assessment Resources 15

Short Answer Item Templates 16

Assessment Updates 17

Short Answer Formats 18

Field Study Questions 19

External Resources for Field Studies 20

Questions/Comments  Assessment Contacts  Cinda Parton – Director of Assessment Development  Linda Cabe Smith – Science Assessment Specialist  Kara Monroe – Science Assessment Specialist  Science Assessment 21

K-5 Systems Handbook /2012/01/08/k-5-systems-standards-a-handbook/ 22

K-5 Application Handbook -5-application-design-handbook/ 23

5th Grade Science MSP Prep Kit th-grade-science-msp-prep-kit-washington-state 24

MSP Practice Kit Thanks to OSPI: Scenarios, Rubrics, Student Samples Our desire: Detailed plans + tools for teachers & students Presented by: Tom Hathorn Science and Mathematics Specialist Bethel School District 25

MSP Practice Kit: Main Elements  Planning & Organizing 1.Calendar 2.Lesson Plans  Do, Talk, Improve work  “Strategy Sessions” 3.Tracking Tools 26

MSP Practice Kit: Main Elements  Planning & Organizing 1.Calendar 2.Lesson Plans  Do, Talk, Improve work  “Strategy Sessions” 3.Tracking Tools 27

MSP Practice Kit: Main Elements  Planning & Organizing 1.Calendar 2.Lesson Plans  Do, Talk, Improve work  “Strategy Sessions” 3.Tracking Tools 28

MSP Practice Kit: Main Elements  Scenario Materials  Selected scenarios  “Main” set (4)  “Extra Practice” set (5)  Student rubrics  Selected student work 29

MSP Practice Kit: Main Elements  Scenario Materials  Selected scenarios  “Main” set (4)  “Extra Practice” set (5)  Student rubrics  Selected student work 30

MSP Practice Kit: Formative Assessment & Metacognition Encourage a “growth” mindset (effort + improvement) 1.In Lesson Plans:  Student sense-making talk  Feedback/improvement with rubric help 2.In Strategy Sessions, think about...  Parts of a scenario  My strengths  What I want-to-improve 3.In Tracking + Extra Practice  Teacher tools  Differentiated extra practice  “Confidence Line”  self-confidence & reasons for it 31

MSP Practice Kit: Typical Lesson Plan Day Focus 1 Simulate testing conditions  talk about conditions, not answers 2 MC  Public notes of students’ reasons for answers How do we know? How can we test our ideas? Praise effort & contribution, but not ability or correct answers. 3 Make sense of SA rubric  student talk to clarify reasons for answers Student Pairs score samples of student work. Public discussion of rubric-based reasons for scores What’s missing in this one? What’s not clear to you? Students improve their SA responses (regardless of initial quality) 4 Repeat Day 3 with next Short Answer item Plans for working with one assessment scenario: 32

MSP Practice Kit: Student Rubric 1pg, adapted from OSPI rubric pages Used Page Keeley’s: C-E-R framework for scientific explanations 33

MSP Practice Kit: “ Packetized” for Students  (white) Four scenarios in main set  1 scenario packet for each student  (yellow) Seven SA student rubrics  (blue) 3-4 student samples for seven SA items  1 rubric & student samples for every 2 students 34

MSP Practice Kit: Packaged for Teachers  MSP Practice Kit binder (plans, tools + masters)  Student packets (class sets)  Kit rotation in 5 th grade ( ):  2 Science Kits  MSP Practice Kit (Feb., late in 2 nd rotation )  Earlier next year? 35

Questions/Comments  Contacts  Tom Hathorn – Science and Mathematics Specialist Bethel School District  Kirk Robbins – Science Director Kent School District 36

Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Update 37

Opportunities in your region  Contact your ESD science coordinator or your district science coordinator  Download a copy of the K12 Framework for Science Education framework.jpg  Watch OSPI Teaching and Learning website for survey link  Complete survey before the end of May 38

Science Notebooks 39

Science Inquiry Standards Literacy Grades 4-5 Inquiry Standard  Scientific explanations emphasize evidence, have logically consistent arguments, and use known scientific principles, models, and theories.  Scientists communicate the results of their investigations verbally and in writing. They review and ask questions about the results of other scientists’ work. Related Performance Expectations  Generate a conclusion from a scientific investigation and show how the conclusion is supported by evidence and other scientific principles.  Display the findings of an investigation using tables, graphs, or other visual means to represent the data accurately and meaningfully.  Communicate to peers the purpose, procedure, results, and conclusions of an investigation.  Respond non-defensively to comments and questions about their investigation.  Discuss differences in findings and conclusions reported by other students. 40

Why discuss literacy? Researchers have found that students learn science better when they write about their thinking and that the act of writing may force integration of new ideas and relationships with prior knowledge. (Thier and Daviss, 2002) Mark Watrin emphasized this idea with us during our February webinar: Elements of Effective Science Instruction. This process of writing and reflectively thinking is key to sense- making. 41

Science and language are interdependent. Their processes are mirrored in each other.  Students at all levels should be able to:  Note details  Compare and contrast  Predict  Sequence events  Link cause and effect  Distinguish fact from opinion  Link words with precise meanings  Make inferences  Draw conclusions From Thier and Daviss,

Strategies to improve literacy in science. Use prompts to uncover ideas.  Predicting: What does the topic title reveal?  Reflective questioning before reading: What does this topic mean to me?  Reflective questioning after reading: What questions do I still have about this topic?  Evaluating: What it is the main idea of this reading?  Paraphrasing: Turn and talk with a classmate about the reading.  Summarizing: How many key ideas can I identify?  Identifying words and meanings: Do I understand the meaning of the reading?  Reflecting on the overall reading: If I reread this topic, what areas would I focus on? 43

Many Resources 44 Writing in Science

Questions/Comments  Contact Ellen Ebert – Director Teaching and Learning Science Thank you for joining in today! 45