The distribution of redevelopment in the KC region Is there room for 45,000 households in the redevelopment area, according to local land use plans?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Game Room. The Next Master Designers Create your own fabulous game room using polygons.
Advertisements

GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003.
All parcels in Howard County Vacant parcels and infill parcels (improvement value of $5,000)
1 Site Capacity and Natural Resource Protection Relationships in Subdivision Design.
Modeling Infill and Urban Growth to Evaluate Agricultural Conversion in Lake County, FL By Blake Harvey October 21, 2011 Committee Chair: Dr. Paul Zwick.
Workforce Housing Task Force Proposed Pilot Program Discussion Item February 20, 2007 Workforce Housing Task Force Proposed Pilot Program Discussion Item.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
COLORING WITH NUMBERS. NumbersNumbers NumbersNumbers
A Comparison of Residential and Commercial Real Estate Barry Gross Developers Research May 30, 2013.
Urban Containment Increasing in Popularity  Most common in fast-growth regions  Intent to contain sprawl, minimize costs  Too much land, urban sprawl.
3680 Avalon Park Blvd E Orlando, FL Phone: Fax: Future Land Use Allocation Model (FLUAM)
Scenario Planning with Envision Tomorrow
Metro Growth Distribution Process
CPA-02-14/ZOM Parker 26, LLC Small Scale Comp Plan Amendment and Rezoning.
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
11/16/041 Using Smart Growth and Growth Visioning in Developing a Regional Growth Forecast By Seong-Youn Simon Choi, Ph. D. Southern California Association.
© red ©
Lec 15 LU, Part 1: Basics and simple LU models (ch6.1 & 2 (A), ch (C1) Get a general idea of urban planning theories (from rading p (A)
Tom Williams, AICP, TTI Geena Maskey, CAMPO.  Need a System that Combines: ◦ Sound Technical Process ◦ Engage Local Planners  Technical Process to put.
Candidate Briefing and Update. 45 minutes. Not a lot of time for most, for me IMPOSSIBLE ! ◦ Personal background ◦ Vision ◦ Development of a comprehensive.
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO September 26, 2014.
August 3, Introductions 2. Status Reports 3. Demographics Presentation 4. Community Engagement—Plan Norwalk by MindMixer 5. Project Team—City.
Economic Benefits of DRGR Land Use Change July 2014.
Metro Growth Distribution Process Project Update to MTAC January 4, 2012.
City of Riverbank Planning Commission Meeting March 17, :00 p.m.
Land Market Monitoring: Beyond Land Supply Gerrit-Jan Knaap Professor and Director National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education University of.
Village of Ossining Vision Presentation Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. May 11 th, 2005.
Land Use Scenarios Status. Encompass 2040 Scenarios Scenario 1: Continues similar development patterns of the past with no new zoning initiatives Scenario.
Welcome. Challenges  Overcoming perceptions, some real, that  Gardner is not open for business  We aren’t consistent in the application of our codes.
FLORIDA 2060 A Research Project of 1000 Friends of Florida.
2022 GROWTH TARGETS I. Household Targets II. Job Targets III. Countywide Planning Policy Amendments.
Land Use Single family uses - 30% of land Community Services - 13% Roads - 13% Multi- family use 8% Vacant 6% 2 Family use – 6% Parks – 5% Commercial –
BRAC RTF CGIA Progress Report July 26, BRAC RTF Task #10 CGIA role Mapping and analysisMapping and analysis Geographic Information SystemsGeographic.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
May 25, Atlanta Regional Commission ARC Zapping and Dis-aggregation of Socio-Economic Data using GIS Project Team: Mike Alexander (ARC), Guy Rousseau.
Estimating Residential Infill Capacity: A Bay Area Application John D. Landis Department of City & Regional Planning UC Berkeley for Caltrans Horizons.
Systems of Measuring Urban Growth Stuart Meck, FAICP Senior Research Fellow American Planning Association Module 8: Monitoring and Measuring Urban Development.
1 Statewide Land-Use Allocation Model for Florida Stephen Lawe, John Lobb & Kevin Hathaway Resource Systems Group.
Avalon Park Retail Market Analysis Fishkind and Associates, Inc Corporate Blvd. Orlando, FL December 12, 2008.
Affordable Housing Strategy, Understanding, Solutions.
HELIOS: Household Employment and Land Impact Outcomes Simulator FLORIDA STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Development & Application Stephen Lawe RSG Michael Doherty.
Land Needs Simulator: Overview and Recommended Assumptions Presented to: RPS Policy Committee Presented by: ECONorthwest January 9, 2007.
Overview 2011 Prepared For South Salt Lake Brandon Smith Rick Davidson
Housing Element Update City of Coachella Planning Commission Hearing September 4, 2013.
PolicyLink Regional Equity Project Linking Jobs, Housing and Transportation Kalima Rose, Associate Director February 8, 2005.
A MASTER PLAN FOR THE Town of Belville. Existing Conditions.
Regional Planning Directors’ Meeting July 22, 2011 Growth Allocation Project Metro Planning & Development Department Research Center REGIONAL GROWTH /
Where are We in the World? A Look at Summit and the Continents.
San Francisco Planning Department July 30, 2002 Summit on the Industrial Land in the Eastern Neighborhoods.
Metro Data Resource Center Portland Metro: MetroScope 2002 – 2008 A Tool for Regional Decision Making Presentation to the New York Metropolitan Transportation.
How Closely We Live With Each Other
Island County Comprehensive Plan 2016 Review and Update Buildable Lands Analysis Results 1.
City of Pierce Welcome and Follow Up.
Poverty In Alachua County
Learning our elements of art!
Triad Market Forecast RETAIL Jeffrey T. Nimmer
Real Estate Principles, 11th Edition
Howard County Changing Demographics & New Development
2040 Comprehensive Plan Open House
Transfer of development rights
Housing Cycle: New Owner Demand vs. Renter Demand
Employment in the Twin Cities Region
Disaster Resistant Communities Group -
What Color is it?.
Wednesday, March 20, :30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.
Regional Demographic Review
Michele Norton, Planner City of North Port
King City 1st level 2nd level Block Plan Diagram
FOR SALE Auburn Multi Family Land
Understanding Kansas City’s Public Education Landscape
Presentation transcript:

The distribution of redevelopment in the KC region Is there room for 45,000 households in the redevelopment area, according to local land use plans?

One challenge to allocating redevelopment: Places where future landuse density is less than existing land use Black = Existing Units per Acre (UPA) > Future UPA. Many of these polygons are now Single- Family (SF) Medium or SF High, but the future land use is SF Low.

Black = UPA > Future UPA, excluding where LU = SF Medium or SF High

In these polygons, FLU employment > LU employment. Red outline = Redevelopment Area Most of Olathe and Lee’s Summit is included because of the introduction of blended chips into the FLU.

Black = developed polygons where FLU employment > LU employment, in the redevelopment area. Current calculated emps: 117,701 Future emps (gross) 475,000 Difference: 357,300

These are vacant/ag polygons containing employment. They could hold 200,000 gross emps.

Developed polygons FLU UPA > LU UPA.

Black = developed polygons where FLU UPA > LU UPA, in the redevelopment area. Current calculated units: 104,426 Future units (gross) 422,351 Difference: 317,925

Vacant polygons containing housing units could add another 164,705 gross units.

Redevelopment of non-SF developed polygons within the redevelopment area and within activity centers would result in a change from 253 units to 106,000 units

Vacant within redevelopment area Redevelopment within activity centers 164,705 gross units + 106,000 gross units = 271,000 units

DOWNTOWN KCMO Vacant within redevelopment area Redevelopment within activity centers 9,000 gross units + 42,000 gross units = 51,000 units

Developed polygons (purple, orange, red) are only displayed within activity centers. Redevelopment of non-SF developed polygons within the redevelopment area and within activity centers (black) would result in a change from 253 units to 106,000 units

Redevelopment of non-SF developed polys within the redevelopment area and within activity centers, INCLUDING vacant/ag polys would result in a change from 253 units to 127,800 units

2012 Potential Redevelopment 2010 Forecast Infill

Downtown to 31 st Street Current calculated units: 0 Future units: 30,481

Olathe Current calculated units: 0 Future units: 8,200

Lee’s Summit Current calculated units: 0 Future units: 5,300

Wyandotte Core Current calculated units: 15 Future units: 5,400

Platte County Current calculated units: 0 Future units: 5,800 North Oak Current calculated units: 0 Future units: 7,900

Independence Core Current units: 0 Future units: 3,000 24/40 Current units: 0 Future units: 4,300 Raytown Current units: 0 Future units: 1,370