Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (CPMS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Child Rights Toolkit Comprehensive Toolkit To Address Children's Rights In Development & Humanitarian Cooperation And Government Programming.
Advertisements

Outcome mapping in child rights-based programming
Session 2.3 Applying the INEE Minimum Standards: Emergency assessment and design to BUILD BACK BETTER.
Child Protection Units
Humanitarian Response Presented by Garry Dunbar Director, Humanitarian and Emergencies Section Australian Agency for International Development.
Applying Conflict Sensitivity in Emergency Response: Current Practice and Ways Forward Conflict Sensitivity Consortium ODI Humanitarian Practice Network.
Phase 1 Do No Harm Basic Phase 2 Partners Beneficiaries Diversion Phase 3 Complaints Flexibility Communication Phase 4 Review Building Capacity Good Enough.
Addressing Gender based Violence (GBV) in Humanitarian Situations in the Asia and the Pacific Region Ms Devanna de la Puente Inter-agency Regional Emergency.
IIEP’s conflict-sensitive approach to education sector planning Suzanne Grant Lewis, Deputy Director UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Protection Monitoring and Assessment in Natural Disasters (Place) – (Date) Session 3.1: Protection Monitoring and Assessment in Natural Disasters.
Human Rights-Based Approach to Programming - UNFPA - SESSION 6: Emergency Response.
UN Roundtable on Older Persons in the 2004 Tsunami February 13-14, 2006 Recommendations.
THE INTERFACE BETWEEN CHILD PROTECTION & GBV R&P Siobhán Foran, GenCap Advisor, Global Clusters, Geneva.
Child protection minimum standards
What are the Minimum Standards and
Core Commitments for Children in Humanitarian Action
Background Based on Global Framework agreed in Kobe. Developed through regional and national consultations over two years. Includes lessons learned since.
Conflict Sensitive Education Pack : Integrating Conflict Sensitivity in Education Programmes, Planning and Policies Seminar: Education and Conflict: the.
1 The Reach Out Project. 2 Who are we ? An inter-agency, training project, on refugee protection, that was initiated in 2001, and will phase out by the.
Humanitarian coordination S3.1 session day 5 3 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011.
UNICEF Turkey Country Programme
CID’S CIVIL MILITARY FORUM 2013 Protection of Civilians – What does this mean? Kirsty Burnett, SCNZ Head of Programmes
Strengthening an effective Child Protection System to improve the Rights and Well- being of Children Without Appropriate Care - the Ethiopian case Ibrahim.
PROTECTION CLUSTER Southern Sudan, 21 October Humanitarian Work Plan.
INTERACTION APPLYING BASIC Child Protection Mainstreaming TRAINING.
What do they do and how do they do it?. Presentation  History, structure and governance  Main areas of work  Achievements  Challenges  Lessons learnt.
Shelter Training 08b – Belgium, 16 th –18 th November, 2008 based on content developed by p This session describes the benefits of developing a strategic.
Identify the institutions which have a stake in the
Key Elements of Legislation For Disaster Risk Reduction Second Meeting of Asian Advisory Group of Parliamentarians for DRR 5-7 February, 2014, Vientiane,
Foundation module 7 Psychosocial support.
Session 271 Comparative Emergency Management Session 27 Slide Deck.
Special Session II Increasing Investment for Disaster Risk Reduction.
CP Sub-Cluster Coordinator Training CP Sub-Cluster Coordinator Training 2010 The Role of the Coordinator in Situational Assessments.
Council of Europe Policy Guidelines on Integrated National Strategies for the Protection of Children from Violence By Lioubov Samokhina.
The IASC Humanitarian Cluster Approach Angelika Planitz UNDP BCPR Developing Surge Capacity for Early Recovery March 2006.
Trafficking in human beings in R. Macedonia Maja Varoslija- Open Gate La Strada Macedonia.
A conflict-sensitive approach involves:  Gaining a sound understanding of the two- way interaction between activities and context;  Acting to minimize.
Sphere India: Genesis and Milestones Sphere India: Present Status Sphere India Management Structure Sphere India: Future Plans Sphere India.
Children without appropriate care: Protecting Children in Emergencies R. Bérenger BEREHOUDOUGOU Regional Disaster Risk Management Manager Plan West Africa.
INEE Regional Tools Launch Washington, DC July 1, 2010.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
Operational Plan for UNAIDS Action Framework: Addressing Women, Girls, Gender Equality and HIV February 3, 2010.
INEE MS Contextualization Juba, South Sudan 6-9 March, 2012.
Ministry for Women, Youth, Children and Persons with Disabilities.
Gender in Humanitarian Aid Different Needs, Adapted Assistance Commission Staff Working Document July 2013.
The Sphere Project. Why is Sphere needed? Post- Rwanda Multi-donor evaluation “Unnecessary deaths” NGO concern with quality and accountability.
Plan © Plan An introduction. © Plan It starts with ambition… Plan’s Vision is of a world in which all children realise their full potential in societies.
Donor Coordination Forum 16 October, key challenges Poverty Social exclusion Functional gaps and system weaknesses in social services.
DETERMINE Working document # 4 'Economic arguments for addressing social determinants of health inequalities' December 2009 Owen Metcalfe & Teresa Lavin.
Who we are Leading independent child rights organisation creating lasting change for children in need in India and around the world Non sectarian organization.
Dr Wilma Doedens Humanitarian Response Unit UNFPA-Geneva 10 October 2005 IASC Guidelines for Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Settings.
Nutrition, AAP and the Core People-Related Issues: A project led by HelpAge International and the Global Nutrition Cluster in collaboration with the global.
“Towards A South Africa Fit for Children” 1 PRESENTATION : NATIONAL PLAN OF ACTION FOR CHILDREN (NPAC)
12/12/2005 IASC IASC Principals Slide 1 IASC in 2005 Work Plan 2006 Ms. Yvette Stevens Chairperson, IASC Working Group and Assistant Emergency Relief Coordinator.
Guidelines for Integrating Gender-based Violence Interventions in Humanitarian Action Basic Introduction and Overview.
Accountability to Affected Populations 8 December 2015.
NATIONAL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT
Understanding Vulnerabilities and Strengthening Response Community-based Integration of Anti-trafficking and Human Rights Protections within Post-Earthquake.
DIPECHO Advocacy Network Initiative (DANI) LESSONS LEARNT & THE WAY FORWARD DMWG Meeting, April 25 th 2008 Presented by Vu Xuan Viet Project Manager CARE.
1 Office of ASG/CITO Crisis Information Management Strategy UNGIWG-11, Geneva 15 March 2011 A written consent by the UN is required to use the information.
People Centred Humanitarian Action Gender Equality in Early Recovery CCfER Training, December 2015.
ADVOCACY MEETING: “Protection of children on the move” November, Laussane “Child protection systems and how children on the move benefit from it,
Office of Global Health and HIV (OGHH) Office of Overseas Programming & Training Support (OPATS) Health The Global Response to Caring for Orphans and Vulnerable.
SAFE toward a WORLD for children Five-Year Strategic Plan
The Humanitarian Community
Peacebuilding Priority Plan Heads of Mission
Cp Case management COACHING AND SUPERVISION TRAINING INITIATIVE
Developing a shelter strategy
The Humanitarian Community
Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (CPMS)
Presentation transcript:

Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (CPMS) Overview of the: Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (CPMS)

Child Protection in Emergencies The prevention of and response to abuse, neglect, exploitation and violence against children Show the video Child Protection in Emergencies is the prevention of and response to abuse, neglect, exploitation and violence against children – both in Preparedness and Response. 3. It is NOT the more general protection of Rights (such as a child’s right to education etc). As we see in the video, emergencies due to natural disasters OR conflict have devastating effects on children’s lives. Children can be killed or injured, separated from their families, recruited into armed forces, sexually abused and trafficked This video is available at cpwg.net or CPWG YouTube page and is currently available in English, Spanish, French, Urdu, Pashto and Sindhi. http://www.youtube.com/user/aliochasalagnac?feature=watch

What are the CPMS about? العربية English Français Español Show the video Child Protection in Emergencies is the prevention of and response to abuse, neglect, exploitation and violence against children – both in Preparedness and Response. 3. It is NOT the more general protection of Rights (such as a child’s right to education etc). As we see in the video, emergencies due to natural disasters OR conflict have devastating effects on children’s lives. Children can be killed or injured, separated from their families, recruited into armed forces, sexually abused and trafficked This video is available at cpwg.net or CPWG YouTube page and is currently available in English, Spanish, French, Urdu, Pashto and Sindhi. http://www.youtube.com/user/aliochasalagnac?feature=watch العربية English Français Español

CPWG Members and Associates Bureau for Population and Refugee Migration; Government of Canada; Child Frontiers; Child Helpline International; Child Soldiers International; ChildFund International; Columbia University, CPC Network; Danish Refugee Council; Department for International Development; Displaced Children and Orphans Fund; European Commission Humanitarian Office; EveryChild; Family for Every Child; Geneva Call; GOAL; Handicap International; Heartland Alliance; International Bureau for Children's Rights; International Committee of the Red Cross; International Labour Organization; International Rescue Committee; Islamic Relief Worldwide; Keeping Children Safe Coalition; Mercy Corps; Norwegian Refugee Council; U.S. Office for Foreign Disaster Assistance; Plan International; Retrak; Refugee Point; Save the Children; SOS Children's Villages International; Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation; Terre des Hommes; The International Institute for Child Rights and Development; United Nations Children's Fund; United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations; United Nations High Commission for Refugees; War Child Canada; War Child Holland; War Child UK; Watchlist on Children and Armed Conflict; and World Vision International. The CPWG is the global level forum for coordination on child protection in humanitarian settings. In the humanitarian system, the CPWG constitutes an “area of responsibility” within the Global Protection Cluster. The group brings together NGOs, UN agencies, academics and others under the shared objective of ensuring more predictable, accountable and effective child protection responses in emergencies. The global Child Protection Working Group (CPWG) led the development of the CPMS and is helping to support its roll-out and implementation. A CPMS Task Force has been created within the global CPWG to support the initiative. As you can see from the list, the development and roll-out are inter-agency processes with broad consensus. The CPWG also includes individual members with expertise in the area, who are not included in the list on the slide.

The need for minimum standards for Child Protection in Emergencies "It would provide benchmarks for what is a good enough child protection programme“ "Indicators would allow organizations to better evaluate their response work in terms of child protection" "To would help organizations prepare for child protection issues during emergency response“ "To enable new cluster members at country level to benefit from evolution of the sector so far, and encourage all actors to obtain a minimum level of quality in responses"

CPMS Development Process November 2010 First Meeting July 2011 Large Consultation April 2012 Country Consultations (4 languages) October 2012 Global Launch

The CPMS became companion to Sphere Standards in May 2013. CPMS and other Humanitarian Standards The Sphere Project, the ICRC Professional Standards for Protection, INEE Standards, HAP and others help humanitarian actors to improve quality and accountability in Humanitarian Response. The CPMS became companion to Sphere Standards in May 2013. Sphere Companion Standards:

CPMS Objectives Establish common principles and strengthen coordination amongst child protection actors. Improve the quality of child protection programming to achieve greater impact for children. Improve accountability within the child protection sector during emergencies. Further define the professional field of child protection. Make available good practice in child protection to date. Enable better advocacy and communication on child protection risks, needs and responses. Read each objective and if possible give 1 or 2 simple examples based on past professional experience

CPMS Structure CPMS follows the Sphere Standards’ format Introduction Standard (one phrase) Key Actions Indicators The CPMS references and builds directly on existing guidelines such as interagency guidelines on child friendly spaces, mental health and psychosocial support, unaccompanied and separated children, working with CAAFAG, etc. The CPMS will be available in French, Spanish, Arabic and English by the end of 2013. The English and French versions are already available (July 2013). Guidance Notes References

CPMS Foundations CRC SPHERE CPMS 10 key Principles Survival and development Non-discrimination Child Participation Best Interest of the Child SPHERE Avoid exposing people to further harm Ensure people’s access to impartial assistance Protect people from physical and psychological harm Assist people to claim their rights, access available remedies and recover from the effects of abuse CPMS Strengthen child protection systems Strengthen children’s resilience in humanitarian action 10 key Principles

What is a minimum standard? Agreed universal benchmarks to be achieved or aspired to without being altered. A common agreement of what needs to be achieved and adequate quality. Some Standards will need to be prioritized or phased, depending on the starting point in the context. Some Standards will not be relevant for a particular context. Depending on the context, child protection may be strong or weak prior to the emergency. In contexts where child protection was weak, the minimum standards served as goals to work towards. It may not be possible to achieve them all at once. Relevance – for example, the Standard on children associated with armed forces and armed groups will not be applicable to a context where recruitment of children does not occur.

If the participants have hard copies of the CPMS, please refer to the back cover. The handbook itself can seem large but each of the 26 Standard is an average of 6 pages. 3. See following slides for all Standards. Recap here: Standards to ensure a quality child protection response Standard 1 Coordination Standard 2 Human resources Standard 3 Communication, advocacy and media Standard 4 Programme cycle management Standard 5 Information management Standard 6 Child protection monitoring Standards to address child protection needs Standard 7 Dangers and injuries Standard 8 Physical violence and other harmful practices Standard 9 Sexual violence Standard 10 Psychosocial distress and mental disorders Standard 11 Children associated with armed forces or armed groups Standard 12 Child labour Standard 13 Unaccompanied and separated children Standard 14 Justice for children Standards to develop adequate child protection strategies Standard 15 Case management Standard 16 Community-based mechanisms Standard 17 Child-friendly spaces Standard 18 Protecting excluded children   Standards to mainstream child protection in other humanitarian sectors Standard 19 Economic recovery and child protection Standard 20 Education and child protection Standard 21 Health and child protection Standard 22 Nutrition and child protection Standard 23 Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) and child protection Standard 24 Shelter and child protection Standard 25 Camp management and child protection Standard 26 Distribution and child protection

Standards to ensure a quality child protection response Coordination Communication, advocacy and media Human Resources Programme cycle management Information management Child Protection Monitoring This group of Standards look at systems that support programming and have major impact on the quality of the responses. These Standards do not aim to replace the existing policies and tools on these issues, but rather to provide a child protection-oriented view of each area of work.

Standards to address child protection needs Dangers and injuries Physical Violence and other harmful practices Sexual Violence Psychosocial distress and mental disorders Children associated with armed forces or armed groups Child labor Unaccompanied and separate children Justice for children This group of standards cover the core critical issues in child protection in emergencies. Some of the areas are more developed within the child protection sector (CAAFAG, UASC) while others where have little existing interagency guidance and tools (justice for children in emergencies, physical violence and other harmful practices). Through promotion of the CPMS, it is hoped that these areas will be able further strengthened.

Standards to develop adequate child protection strategies Case Management Community-based child protection mechanisms Child-friendly spaces Protecting excluded children

Standards to mainstream Child Protection in other Humanitarian Sectors Economic Recovery Education Health Nutrition WASH Shelter Camp Management Distribution and Child Protection Mainstreaming standards focus on how child protection and the eight different sectors can work together to ensure children are protected in all humanitarian interventions. The main actions section is broken into two sections on what the other sector (Economic recovery, education, etc.) can do and what child protection actors can do. These Standards need to be shared with workers in other sectors to be achieved.

Who are the standards intended for? Intended for use by those working on child protection or related areas of humanitarian action Working directly with children, families and communities; Planners and policy makers; Coordinators; Donors; Academics; It may also include those working in the justice system and security personnel; Government personnel and those working in independent or multilateral organizations As well as armed forces and groups;

How can the CPMS be used? To plan and cost humanitarian interventions To induct and train new staff or partners As self-learning tool and reference text To establish common and measurable expectations To enable advocacy on child protection issues, and to brief decision-makers on child protection To establish agreement on common principles between different actors To monitor and evaluate the allocation of funding To enable those working in other sectors of humanitarian action to protect children better

Activities at National/Local Levels Implementation of the CPMS 2013-2015 Activities at National/Local Levels Raise awareness – launch events, discussions Contextualize the Standards in countries Build capacity of all users (CP and other sectors) Integrate CPMS in strategies, work plans and monitoring and evaluation tools Provide feedback on the use and areas for improvement of the Standards Translate the Standards into other languages 1. The list suggests activities that can be organised at national and local levels as well as regional. 2. Launch events can take whatever form the country finds best suited to raising awareness among all users – government, local civil society, national and international NGOs, UN agencies, community leaders and donors. 3. Contextualisation means adapting the Standards to fit the context by making them more specific. Contexualisation should be an interagency undertaking that identifies the priority problems and Standards in the specific context and develops specific goals in relation to the general Standard. 3. Examples of using the CPMS in guidelines and strategies are available on the CPMS webpage – cpwg.net/minimum-standards 4. A feedback form on the Standards will be available on the cpwg.net webpage by August 2013, surveys will be conducted at the end of 2013 and consultations will be held in selected countries in 2014. 5. Translation of the CPMS is essential for all stakeholders to be able to use the Standards and for contextualisation to take place. Guidelines for translating the CPMS are available on the CPMS webpage.

Implementation of the CPMS 2013-2015 Global Level Support Financial and technical support for regions and countries to carry out awareness raising and capacity building activities Technical support for contextualization Development of adaptable capacity building and communication materials Monitor the use and application of the Standards Ensure Standards exist in 4 major languages 1. The global implementation plan for 2013-2015 is available and addresses three main areas – dissemination and awareness raising on the Standards, capacity building to apply the Standards (resource development and provision of technical human resource support) and promotion of institutionalisation of the Standards (integrating the Standards into agency policies and procedures). 2. Capacity building materials will include guidance support on response monitoring, overview training for field staff on how to use the CPMS, guidance on contextualising the CPMS to your context and mainstreaming briefing notes and case studies. 3. The CPMS will be available in French, Spanish and Arabic by end 2013. Support for other language translations is possible.